Articles | Volume 39, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-563-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-563-2021
Regular paper
 | 
24 Jun 2021
Regular paper |  | 24 Jun 2021

Magnetosheath plasma flow model around Mercury

Daniel Schmid, Yasuhito Narita, Ferdinand Plaschke, Martin Volwerk, Rumi Nakamura, and Wolfgang Baumjohann

Related authors

Scalar-potential mapping of the steady-state magnetosheath model
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Simon Toepfer
Ann. Geophys., 42, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024, 2024
Short summary
Magnetopause as conformal mapping
Yasuhito Narita, Simon Toepfer, and Daniel Schmid
Ann. Geophys., 41, 87–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023, 2023
Short summary
Bow shock characteristics from magnetic field observations
Daniel Schmid and Yasuhito Narita
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Venus's induced magnetosphere during active solar wind conditions at BepiColombo's Venus 1 flyby
Martin Volwerk, Beatriz Sánchez-Cano, Daniel Heyner, Sae Aizawa, Nicolas André, Ali Varsani, Johannes Mieth, Stefano Orsini, Wolfgang Baumjohann, David Fischer, Yoshifumi Futaana, Richard Harrison, Harald Jeszenszky, Iwai Kazumasa, Gunter Laky, Herbert Lichtenegger, Anna Milillo, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Rumi Nakamura, Ferdinand Plaschke, Ingo Richter, Sebastián Rojas Mata, Yoshifumi Saito, Daniel Schmid, Daikou Shiota, and Cyril Simon Wedlund
Ann. Geophys., 39, 811–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-811-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-811-2021, 2021
Short summary
Statistical study of linear magnetic hole structures near Earth
Martin Volwerk, David Mautner, Cyril Simon Wedlund, Charlotte Goetz, Ferdinand Plaschke, Tomas Karlsson, Daniel Schmid, Diana Rojas-Castillo, Owen W. Roberts, and Ali Varsani
Ann. Geophys., 39, 239–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Magnetosheath
Proton plasma asymmetries between the convective-electric-field hemispheres of Venus' dayside magnetosheath
Sebastián Rojas Mata, Gabriella Stenberg Wieser, Tielong Zhang, and Yoshifumi Futaana
Ann. Geophys., 42, 419–429, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-419-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-419-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scale size estimation and flow pattern recognition around a magnetosheath jet
Adrian Pöppelwerth, Georg Glebe, Johannes Z. D. Mieth, Florian Koller, Tomas Karlsson, Zoltán Vörös, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Ann. Geophys., 42, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scalar-potential mapping of the steady-state magnetosheath model
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Simon Toepfer
Ann. Geophys., 42, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024, 2024
Short summary
Local bow shock environment during magnetosheath jet formation: results from a hybrid-Vlasov simulation
Jonas Suni, Minna Palmroth, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Giulia Cozzani, Maxime Dubart, Urs Ganse, Harriet George, Evgeny Gordeev, Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Vertti Tarvus, Fasil Tesema, and Hongyang Zhou
Ann. Geophys., 41, 551–568, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Statistical distribution of mirror-mode-like structures in the magnetosheaths of unmagnetized planets – Part 2: Venus as observed by the Venus Express spacecraft
Martin Volwerk, Cyril Simon Wedlund, David Mautner, Sebastián Rojas Mata, Gabriella Stenberg Wieser, Yoshifumi Futaana, Christian Mazelle, Diana Rojas-Castillo, César Bertucci, and Magda Delva
Ann. Geophys., 41, 389–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-389-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-389-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Acton, C. H.: Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility, Planet. Space Sci., 44, 65–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7, 1996. a, b, c
Anderson, J. E.: Magnetohydrodynamic shock waves, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1963. a, b
Aizawa, S., Griton, L. S., Fatemi, S., Exner, W., Deca, J., Pantellini, F., Yagi, M., Heyner, D., Génot, V., André, N., Amaya, J., Murakami, G., Beigbeder, L., Gangloff, M., Bouchemit, M., Budnik, E., and Usui, H.: Cross-comparison of global simulation models applied to Mercury's dayside magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 198, 105176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105176, 2021. a
Dimmock, A. P. and Nykyri,K.: The Statistical Mapping of Magnetosheath Plasma Properties Based on THEMIS Measurements in the Magnetosheath Interplanetary Medium Reference Frame, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 4963–4976, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50465, 2013. a
Dimmock, A. P., Nykyri, K., Osmane, A., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Statistical mapping of ULF Pc3 velocity fluctuations in the Earth's dayside magnetosheath as a function of solar wind conditions, Adv. Spac. Res., 58, 196–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.09.039, 2016. a
Download
Short summary
In this work we present the first analytical magnetosheath plasma flow model for the space environment around Mercury. The proposed model is relatively simple to implement and provides the possibility to trace the flow lines inside the Hermean magnetosheath. It can help to determine the the local plasma conditions of a spacecraft in the magnetosheath exclusively on the basis of the upstream solar wind parameters.