Articles | Volume 38, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
21 Apr 2020
Regular paper |
| 21 Apr 2020
| 21 Apr 2020
Cosmic noise absorption signature of particle precipitation during interplanetary coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta
Emilia Kilpua
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Liisa Juusola
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Maxime Grandin
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Antti Kero
Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, Finland
Stepan Dubyagin
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Noora Partamies
Department of Arctic Geophysics, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
Birkeland Centre for Space Science, Bergen, Norway
Adnane Osmane
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Harriet George
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Milla Kalliokoski
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Tero Raita
Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, Finland
Timo Asikainen
ReSoLVE Center of Excellence, Space Climate Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Minna Palmroth
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
Venla Koikkalainen, Emilia Kilpua, Simon Good, and Adnane Osmane
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-106, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-106, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (NPG).
Short summary
Short summary
We study time series of solar wind large-scale structures (magnetic clouds, sheaths, slow and fast streams). These have profound importance for causing disturbances in the heliospheric conditions and driving space weather on Earth. The used techniques include methods deriving from information theory to determine entropy and complexity. We find that all of these techniques show stochastic fluctuations, but magnetic clouds stand out due to their coherent magnetic field
Emilia Kilpua, Simon Good, Juska Soljento, Domenico Trotta, Tia Bäcker, Julia Ruohotie, Jens Pomoell, Chaitanya Sishtla, and Rami Vainio
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3564, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
Interplanetary shock waves are one of the major forms of heliospheric transient that can have a profound impact on solar wind plasma and magnetic field conditions and accelerate charged particles to high energies. This work performs an extensive statistical analysis to detail how some of the key solar wind turbulence parameters, critical for understanding particle acceleration, are modified at the interplanetary shocks waves.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Simon Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, and Venla Koikkalainen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind is organised into slow and fast streams, interaction regions, and transient structures originating from solar eruptions. Their internal characteristics are not well understood. A more comprehensive understanding of such features can give insight itno physical processes governing their formation and evolution. Using tools from information theory, we find that the solar wind shows universal turbulent properties on smaller scales, while on larger scales, clear differences arise.
Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Lucile Turc, Mikko Savola, Veera Lipsanen, Harriet George, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Structures originating from the Sun, such as coronal mass ejections and high-speed streams, may impact the Earth's magnetosphere differently. The occurrence rate of these structures depends on the phase solar cycle. We use mutual information to study the change in the statistical dependence between solar wind and inner magnetosphere. We find that the non-linearity between solar wind and inner magnetosphere varies over the solar cycle and during different solar wind drivers.
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Ioannis A. Daglis, Loren C. Chang, Sergio Dasso, Nat Gopalswamy, Olga V. Khabarova, Emilia Kilpua, Ramon Lopez, Daniel Marsh, Katja Matthes, Dibyendu Nandy, Annika Seppälä, Kazuo Shiokawa, Rémi Thiéblemont, and Qiugang Zong
Ann. Geophys., 39, 1013–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a detailed account of the science programme PRESTO (PREdictability of the variable Solar–Terrestrial cOupling), covering the period 2020 to 2024. PRESTO was defined by a dedicated committee established by SCOSTEP (Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics). We review the current state of the art and discuss future studies required for the most effective development of solar–terrestrial physics.
Andrei Runov, Maxime Grandin, Minna Palmroth, Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Heli Hietala, Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Sergio Toledo-Redondo, Lucile Turc, and Drew Turner
Ann. Geophys., 39, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In collisionless systems like space plasma, particle velocity distributions contain fingerprints of ongoing physical processes. However, it is challenging to decode this information from observations. We used hybrid-Vlasov simulations to obtain ion velocity distribution functions at different locations and at different stages of the Earth's magnetosphere dynamics. The obtained distributions provide valuable examples that may be directly compared with observations by satellites in space.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Dominique Fontaine, Simon W. Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, Erika Palmerio, Emiliya Yordanova, Clement Moissard, Lina Z. Hadid, and Miho Janvier
Ann. Geophys., 38, 999–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies magnetic field fluctuations in three turbulent sheath regions ahead of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) in the near-Earth solar wind. Our results show that fluctuation properties vary significantly in different parts of the sheath when compared to solar wind ahead. Turbulence in sheaths resembles that of the slow solar wind in the terrestrial magnetosheath, e.g. regarding compressibility and intermittency, and it often lacks Kolmogorov's spectral indices.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Drew L. Turner, Allison N. Jaynes, Lucile Turc, Harriet George, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 683–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical study of the response of the Earth's space environment in sheath regions prior to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. The inner magnetospheric wave activity is enhanced in sheath regions, and the sheaths cause significant changes to the outer radiation belt electron fluxes over short timescales. We also show that non-geoeffective sheaths can result in a significant response.
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia Kilpua, Matti Ala-Lahti, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Osku Raukunen
Ann. Geophys., 37, 561–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the Earth's space environment responds to two different amplitude interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) events that occurred in 2012 and 2014 by using the GUMICS-4 global MHD model. We examine local and large-scale dynamics of the Earth's space environment and compare simulation results to in situ data. It is shown that during moderate driving simulation agrees well with the measurements; however, GMHD results should be interpreted cautiously during strong driving.
Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Riku Jarvinen, Markus Battarbee, Emilia Kilpua, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1183–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, forming a magnetosphere. On the night side solar wind stretches the magnetosphere into a long tail. A process called magnetic reconnection opens the magnetic field lines and reconnects them, accelerating particles to high energies. We study this in the magnetotail using a numerical simulation model of the Earth’s magnetosphere. We study the motion of the points where field lines reconnect and the fast flows driven by this process.
Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Markus Battarbee, Lucile Turc, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, David G. Sibeck, Paul A. Cassak, Robert C. Fear, Riku Jarvinen, Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Rami Vainio, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1081–1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We use the Vlasiator code to study the characteristics of transient structures that exist in the Earth's foreshock, i.e. upstream of the bow shock. The structures are cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies (SHFAs). These transients can interact with the bow shock. We study the changes the shock suffers via this interaction. We also investigate ion distributions associated with the cavitons and SHFAs. A very important result is that the arrival of multiple SHFAs results in shock erosion.
Matti M. Ala-Lahti, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Tuija Pulkkinen, and Jan Souček
Ann. Geophys., 36, 793–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of mirror mode waves and the properties of their plasma surroundings in sheath regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) to deepen our understanding of these geo-effective plasma environments. The results imply that mirror modes are common structures in ICME sheaths and occur almost exclusively as dip-like structures and in mirror stable stable plasma.
Erika Palmerio, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, and Neel P. Savani
Ann. Geophys., 34, 313–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are giant clouds of plasma and magnetic field that erupt from the Sun and travel though the solar wind. They can cause interplanetary shocks in the vicinity of Earth. We show in our paper that the region that follows CME-driven shocks, known as sheath region, can obtain a planar configuration of the magnetic field lines (planar magnetic structure, PMS) due to the compression resulting from the shock itself or from the draping of the magnetic field ahead of the CME.
M. Myllys, E. Kilpua, and T. Pulkkinen
Ann. Geophys., 33, 845–855, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, 2015
K. Andréeová, L. Juusola, E. K. J. Kilpua, and H. E. J. Koskinen
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1247–1261, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 157–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, 2014
E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, D. Fontaine, and L. Turc
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1559–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, 2013
E. K. J. Kilpua, A. Isavnin, A. Vourlidas, H. E. J. Koskinen, and L. Rodriguez
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1251–1265, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, 2013
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, H. Hietala, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1011–1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, 2013
K. Andreeova, E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, A. Isavnin, and R. Vainio
Ann. Geophys., 31, 555–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, 2013
Venla Koikkalainen, Emilia Kilpua, Simon Good, and Adnane Osmane
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-106, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-106, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (NPG).
Short summary
Short summary
We study time series of solar wind large-scale structures (magnetic clouds, sheaths, slow and fast streams). These have profound importance for causing disturbances in the heliospheric conditions and driving space weather on Earth. The used techniques include methods deriving from information theory to determine entropy and complexity. We find that all of these techniques show stochastic fluctuations, but magnetic clouds stand out due to their coherent magnetic field
Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Hongyang Zhou, Liisa Juusola, Abiyot Workayehu, Fasil Kebede, Konstantinos Papadakis, Maxime Grandin, Markku Alho, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Dubart, Leo Kotipalo, Arnaud Lalagüe, Jonas Suni, Konstantinos Horaites, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 511–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-511-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-511-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Vlasiator is a kinetic space plasma model that simulates the behavior of plasma, solar wind and magnetic fields in near-Earth space. So far, these simulations have been run without any interaction with the ionosphere, the uppermost layer of Earth's atmosphere. In this paper, we present the new methods that add an ionospheric electrodynamics model to Vlasiator, coupling it with the existing methods and presenting new simulation results of how space plasma and Earth's ionosphere interact.
Marc Hansen, Daniela Banyś, Mark Clilverd, David Wenzel, Tero Raita, and Mohammed Mainul Hoque
Ann. Geophys., 43, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-55-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-55-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The amplitude of subionospheric very low-frequency (VLF) radio signals does not show a symmetrical behavior over the year, which would be expected from its dependency on the solar position. The VLF amplitude rather shows a distinctive sharp decrease around October, which is hence called the "October effect". This study is the first to systematically investigate this October effect, which shows a clear latitudinal dependency.
Emilia Kilpua, Simon Good, Juska Soljento, Domenico Trotta, Tia Bäcker, Julia Ruohotie, Jens Pomoell, Chaitanya Sishtla, and Rami Vainio
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3564, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
Interplanetary shock waves are one of the major forms of heliospheric transient that can have a profound impact on solar wind plasma and magnetic field conditions and accelerate charged particles to high energies. This work performs an extensive statistical analysis to detail how some of the key solar wind turbulence parameters, critical for understanding particle acceleration, are modified at the interplanetary shocks waves.
Maxime Grandin, Emma Bruus, Vincent E. Ledvina, Noora Partamies, Mathieu Barthelemy, Carlos Martinis, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Katie Herlingshaw, Neethal Thomas, Eero Karvinen, Donna Lach, Marjan Spijkers, and Calle Bergstrand
Geosci. Commun., 7, 297–316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We carried out a citizen science study of aurora sightings and technological disruptions experienced during the extreme geomagnetic storm of 10 May 2024. We collected reports from 696 observers from over 30 countries via an online survey, supplemented with observations logged in the Skywarden database. We found that the aurora was seen from exceptionally low latitudes and had very bright red and pink hues, suggesting that high fluxes of low-energy electrons from space entered the atmosphere.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Konstantinos Papadakis, Markku Alho, Markus Battarbee, Giulia Cozzani, Lauri Pänkäläinen, Urs Ganse, Fasil Kebede, Jonas Suni, Konstantinos Horaites, Maxime Grandin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-26, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-26, 2024
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Flux ropes are peculiar structures of twisted magnetic field occurring in many regions of space, near Earth and other planets, at the Sun, and in astrophysical objects. We developed a new way of detecting flux ropes in large supercomputer simulations of near-Earth space and we use it to follow the evolution of flux ropes for long distances past the Earth in the flow direction. This will be useful in future studies as these flux ropes are involved in the transport of matter and energy in space.
Noora Partamies, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Katie Herlingshaw, Ilkka Virtanen, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Mikko Syrjäsuo, Fred Sigernes, Takanori Nishiyama, Toshi Nishimura, Mathieu Barthelemy, Anasuya Aruliah, Daniel Whiter, Lena Mielke, Maxime Grandin, Eero Karvinen, Marjan Spijkers, and Vincent Ledvina
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3669, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3669, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the first broad band emissions, called continuum, in the dayside aurora. They are similar to STEVE with white, pale pink or mauve coloured light. But unlike STEVE, they follow the dayside aurora forming rays and other dynamic shapes. We used ground optical and radar observations and found evidence of heating and upwelling of both plasma and neutral air. This study provides new information on conditions for continuum emission, but its understanding will require further work.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Elena Marshalko, Mikhail Kruglyakov, and Ari Viljanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2831, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2831, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Interaction between the magnetic field of the rapidly varying electric currents in space and the conducting ground produces an electric field at the Earth's surface. This geoelectric field drives geomagnetically induced currents in technological conductor networks, which can affect the performance of critical ground infrastructure such as electric power transmission grids. We have developed a new method suitable for monitoring the geoelectric field based on ground magnetic field observations.
Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies, and Ilkka I. Virtanen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 355–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral displays typically take place at high latitudes, but the exact latitude where the auroral breakup occurs can vary. In this study, we compare the characteristics of the fluxes of precipitating electrons from space during auroral breakups occurring above Tromsø (central part of the auroral zone) and above Svalbard (poleward boundary of the auroral zone). We find that electrons responsible for the aurora above Tromsø carry more energy than those precipitating above Svalbard.
Leo Kotipalo, Markus Battarbee, Yann Pfau-Kempf, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6401–6413, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6401-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper examines a method called adaptive mesh refinement in optimization of the space plasma simulation model Vlasiator. The method locally adjusts resolution in regions which are most relevant to modelling, based on the properties of the plasma. The runs testing this method show that adaptive refinement manages to highlight the desired regions with manageable performance overhead. Performance in larger-scale production runs and mitigation of overhead are avenues of further research.
Tuomas Häkkilä, Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Monika E. Szeląg, Markku Alho, Leo Kotipalo, Niilo Kalakoski, Pekka T. Verronen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-7, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
We study the atmospheric impact of auroral electron precipitation, by the novel combination of both magnetospheric and atmospheric modelling. We first simulate fluxes of auroral electrons, and then use these fluxes to model their atmospheric impact. We find an increase of up to 200 % in thermospheric odd nitrogen, and a corresponding decrease in stratospheric ozone of around 0.7 %. The produced auroral electron precipitation is realistic, and shows the potential for future studies.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Simon Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, and Venla Koikkalainen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind is organised into slow and fast streams, interaction regions, and transient structures originating from solar eruptions. Their internal characteristics are not well understood. A more comprehensive understanding of such features can give insight itno physical processes governing their formation and evolution. Using tools from information theory, we find that the solar wind shows universal turbulent properties on smaller scales, while on larger scales, clear differences arise.
Markku Alho, Giulia Cozzani, Ivan Zaitsev, Fasil Tesema Kebede, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Maarja Bussov, Maxime Dubart, Sanni Hoilijoki, Leo Kotipalo, Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Jonas Suni, Vertti Tarvus, Abiyot Workayehu, Hongyang Zhou, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 42, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-145-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-145-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetic reconnection is one of the main processes for energy conversion and plasma transport in space plasma physics, associated with plasma entry into the magnetosphere of Earth and Earth’s substorm cycle. Global modelling of these plasma processes enables us to understand the magnetospheric system in detail. However, finding sites of active reconnection from large simulation datasets can be challenging, and this paper develops tools to find magnetic topologies related to reconnection.
Noora Partamies, Bas Dol, Vincent Teissier, Liisa Juusola, Mikko Syrjäsuo, and Hjalmar Mulders
Ann. Geophys., 42, 103–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral imaging produces large amounts of image data that can no longer be analyzed by visual inspection. Thus, every step towards automatic analysis tools is crucial. Previously supervised learning methods have been used in auroral physics, with a human expert providing ground truth. However, this ground truth is debatable. We present an unsupervised learning method, which shows promising results in detecting auroral breakups in the all-sky image data.
Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Lucile Turc, Mikko Savola, Veera Lipsanen, Harriet George, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Structures originating from the Sun, such as coronal mass ejections and high-speed streams, may impact the Earth's magnetosphere differently. The occurrence rate of these structures depends on the phase solar cycle. We use mutual information to study the change in the statistical dependence between solar wind and inner magnetosphere. We find that the non-linearity between solar wind and inner magnetosphere varies over the solar cycle and during different solar wind drivers.
Jonas Suni, Minna Palmroth, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Giulia Cozzani, Maxime Dubart, Urs Ganse, Harriet George, Evgeny Gordeev, Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Vertti Tarvus, Fasil Tesema, and Hongyang Zhou
Ann. Geophys., 41, 551–568, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are structures of enhanced plasma density and/or velocity in a region of near-Earth space known as the magnetosheath. When they propagate towards the Earth, these jets can disturb the Earth's magnetic field and cause hazards for satellites. In this study, we use a simulation called Vlasiator to model near-Earth space and investigate jets using case studies and statistical analysis. We find that jets that propagate towards the Earth are different from jets that do not.
Mizuki Fukizawa, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Keisuke Hosokawa, Tero Raita, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 41, 511–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-511-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-511-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use computed tomography to reconstruct the three-dimensional distributions of the Hall and Pedersen conductivities of pulsating auroras, a key research target for understanding the magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling process. It is suggested that the high-energy electron precipitation associated with pulsating auroras may have a greater impact on the closure of field-aligned currents in the ionosphere than has been previously reported.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Noora Partamies, Heikki Vanhamäki, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, and Simon Walker
Ann. Geophys., 41, 483–510, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
At times when auroras erupt on the sky, the magnetic field surrounding the Earth undergoes rapid changes. On the ground, these changes can induce harmful electric currents in technological conductor networks, such as powerlines. We have used magnetic field observations from northern Europe during 28 such events and found consistent behavior that can help to understand, and thus predict, the processes that drive auroras and geomagnetically induced currents.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Audrey Schillings, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have examined events during which the measured magnetic field on the ground changes very rapidly, causing a risk to technological conductor networks. According to our results, such events occur when strong electric currents in the ionosphere at 100 km altitude are abruptly modified by sudden compression or expansion of the magnetospheric magnetic field farther in space.
Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Markku Alho, Maxime Grandin, Maxime Dubart, Lucile Turc, Hongyang Zhou, Konstantinos Horaites, Ivan Zaitsev, Giulia Cozzani, Maarja Bussov, Evgeny Gordeev, Fasil Tesema, Harriet George, Jonas Suni, Vertti Tarvus, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7903–7912, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7903-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7903-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Vlasiator is a plasma simulation code that simulates the entire near-Earth space at a global scale. As 6D simulations require enormous amounts of computational resources, Vlasiator uses adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) to lighten the computational burden. However, due to Vlasiator’s grid topology, AMR simulations suffer from grid aliasing artifacts that affect the global results. In this work, we present and evaluate the performance of a mechanism for alleviating those artifacts.
Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Sebastian Käki
Ann. Geophys., 40, 545–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eruptions from the Sun can pose a hazard to Earth's power grids via, e.g., geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). We study magnetic measurements from Fennoscandia to find ways to understand and forecast GIC. We find that the direction of the time derivative of the magnetic field has a short
reset time, about 2 min. We conclude that this result gives insight on the current systems high in Earth’s atmosphere, which are the main driver behind the time derivative’s behavior and GIC formation.
Mizuki Fukizawa, Takeshi Sakanoi, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Keisuke Hosokawa, Björn Gustavsson, Kirsti Kauristie, Alexander Kozlovsky, Tero Raita, Urban Brändström, and Tima Sergienko
Ann. Geophys., 40, 475–484, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-475-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-475-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The pulsating auroral generation mechanism has been investigated by observing precipitating electrons using rockets or satellites. However, it is difficult for such observations to distinguish temporal changes from spatial ones. In this study, we reconstructed the horizontal 2-D distribution of precipitating electrons using only auroral images. The 3-D aurora structure was also reconstructed. We found that there were both spatial and temporal changes in the precipitating electron energy.
Sebastian Käki, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
During auroral substorms, the ionospheric electric currents change rapidly, and a large amount of energy is dissipated. We combine ionospheric current data derived from the Swarm satellite mission with the substorm database from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network. We obtain statistics of the strength and location of the currents relative to the substorm onset. Our results show that low-earth orbit satellites give a coherent picture of the main features in the substorm current system.
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Ioannis A. Daglis, Loren C. Chang, Sergio Dasso, Nat Gopalswamy, Olga V. Khabarova, Emilia Kilpua, Ramon Lopez, Daniel Marsh, Katja Matthes, Dibyendu Nandy, Annika Seppälä, Kazuo Shiokawa, Rémi Thiéblemont, and Qiugang Zong
Ann. Geophys., 39, 1013–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a detailed account of the science programme PRESTO (PREdictability of the variable Solar–Terrestrial cOupling), covering the period 2020 to 2024. PRESTO was defined by a dedicated committee established by SCOSTEP (Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics). We review the current state of the art and discuss future studies required for the most effective development of solar–terrestrial physics.
Vertti Tarvus, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Jonas Suni, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Markku Alho, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Andreas Johlander, Konstantinos Papadakis, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 39, 911–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use simulations of Earth's magnetosphere and study the formation of transient wave structures in the region where the solar wind first interacts with the magnetosphere. These transients move earthward and play a part in the solar wind–magnetosphere interaction. We show that the transients are a common feature and their properties are altered as they move earthward, including an increase in temperature, decrease in solar wind speed and an alteration in their propagation properties.
Andrei Runov, Maxime Grandin, Minna Palmroth, Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Heli Hietala, Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Sergio Toledo-Redondo, Lucile Turc, and Drew Turner
Ann. Geophys., 39, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In collisionless systems like space plasma, particle velocity distributions contain fingerprints of ongoing physical processes. However, it is challenging to decode this information from observations. We used hybrid-Vlasov simulations to obtain ion velocity distribution functions at different locations and at different stages of the Earth's magnetosphere dynamics. The obtained distributions provide valuable examples that may be directly compared with observations by satellites in space.
Minna Palmroth, Savvas Raptis, Jonas Suni, Tomas Karlsson, Lucile Turc, Andreas Johlander, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Mojtaba Akhavan-Tafti, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Vertti Tarvus, and Adnane Osmane
Ann. Geophys., 39, 289–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-289-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are high-velocity features within the Earth's turbulent magnetosheath, separating the Earth's magnetic domain from the solar wind. The characteristics of the jets are difficult to assess statistically as a function of their lifetime because normally spacecraft observe them only at one position within the magnetosheath. This study first confirms the accuracy of the model used, Vlasiator, by comparing it to MMS spacecraft, and then carries out the first jet lifetime statistics.
Minna Palmroth, Maxime Grandin, Theodoros Sarris, Eelco Doornbos, Stelios Tourgaidis, Anita Aikio, Stephan Buchert, Mark A. Clilverd, Iannis Dandouras, Roderick Heelis, Alex Hoffmann, Nickolay Ivchenko, Guram Kervalishvili, David J. Knudsen, Anna Kotova, Han-Li Liu, David M. Malaspina, Günther March, Aurélie Marchaudon, Octav Marghitu, Tomoko Matsuo, Wojciech J. Miloch, Therese Moretto-Jørgensen, Dimitris Mpaloukidis, Nils Olsen, Konstantinos Papadakis, Robert Pfaff, Panagiotis Pirnaris, Christian Siemes, Claudia Stolle, Jonas Suni, Jose van den IJssel, Pekka T. Verronen, Pieter Visser, and Masatoshi Yamauchi
Ann. Geophys., 39, 189–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This is a review paper that summarises the current understanding of the lower thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI) in terms of measurements and modelling. The LTI is the transition region between space and the atmosphere and as such of tremendous importance to both the domains of space and atmosphere. The paper also serves as the background for European Space Agency Earth Explorer 10 candidate mission Daedalus.
Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Markku Alho, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Maxime Grandin, Urs Ganse, Konstantinos Papadakis, Andreas Johlander, Lucile Turc, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 39, 85–103, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-85-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-85-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate local acceleration dynamics of electrons with a new numerical simulation method, which is an extension of a world-leading kinetic plasma simulation. We describe how large supercomputer simulations can be used to initialize the electron simulations and show numerical stability for the electron method. We show that features of our simulated electrons match observations from Earth's magnetic tail region.
Maxime Dubart, Urs Ganse, Adnane Osmane, Andreas Johlander, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Grandin, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1283–1298, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1283-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1283-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Plasma waves are ubiquitous in the Earth's magnetosphere. They are responsible for many energetic processes happening in Earth's atmosphere, such as auroras. In order to understand these processes, thorough investigations of these waves are needed. We use a state-of-the-art numerical model to do so. Here we investigate the impact of different spatial resolutions in the model on these waves in order to improve in the future the model without wasting computational resources.
Markus Battarbee, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Lucile Turc, Primož Kajdič, Andreas Johlander, Vertti Tarvus, Stephen Fuselier, Karlheinz Trattner, Markku Alho, Thiago Brito, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Mojtaba Akhavan-Tafti, Tomas Karlsson, Savvas Raptis, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Jonas Suni, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1081–1099, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the dynamics of helium in the foreshock, a part of near-Earth space found upstream of the Earth's bow shock. We show how the second most common ion in interplanetary space reacts strongly to plasma waves found in the foreshock. Spacecraft observations and supercomputer simulations both give us a new understanding of the foreshock edge and how to interpret future observations.
Lucile Turc, Vertti Tarvus, Andrew P. Dimmock, Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Andreas Johlander, Maxime Grandin, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1045–1062, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1045-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1045-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Using global computer simulations, we study properties of the magnetosheath, the region of near-Earth space where the stream of particles originating from the Sun, the solar wind, is slowed down and deflected around the Earth's magnetic field. One of our main findings is that even for idealised solar wind conditions as used in our model, the magnetosheath density shows large-scale spatial and temporal variation in the so-called quasi-parallel magnetosheath, causing varying levels of asymmetry.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Dominique Fontaine, Simon W. Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, Erika Palmerio, Emiliya Yordanova, Clement Moissard, Lina Z. Hadid, and Miho Janvier
Ann. Geophys., 38, 999–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies magnetic field fluctuations in three turbulent sheath regions ahead of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) in the near-Earth solar wind. Our results show that fluctuation properties vary significantly in different parts of the sheath when compared to solar wind ahead. Turbulence in sheaths resembles that of the slow solar wind in the terrestrial magnetosheath, e.g. regarding compressibility and intermittency, and it often lacks Kolmogorov's spectral indices.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Ari Viljanen, and Maxim Smirnov
Ann. Geophys., 38, 983–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Rapid variations of the magnetic field measured on the ground can be used to estimate space weather risks to power grids, but forecasting the variations remains a challenge. We show that part of this problem stems from the fact that, in addition to electric currents in space, the magnetic field variations are strongly affected by underground electric currents. We suggest that separating the measured field into its space and underground parts could improve our understanding of space weather.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Xiaochen Gou, Lei Li, Yiteng Zhang, Bin Zhou, Yongyong Feng, Bingjun Cheng, Tero Raita, Ji Liu, Zeren Zhima, and Xuhui Shen
Ann. Geophys., 38, 775–787, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-775-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-775-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The CSES observed ionospheric Pc1 waves near the wave injection regions in conjugate hemispheres during the recovery phase of the geomagnetic storm on 27 August 2018. The Pc1s were found to be Alfvén waves with mixed polarisation propagating along background magnetic lines in the ionosphere. We suggest that the possible sources of Pc1 are EMIC waves generated near the plasmapause by the outward expansion of the plasmasphere into the ring current during the recovery phase of geomagnetic storms.
Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Drew L. Turner, Allison N. Jaynes, Lucile Turc, Harriet George, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 683–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical study of the response of the Earth's space environment in sheath regions prior to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. The inner magnetospheric wave activity is enhanced in sheath regions, and the sheaths cause significant changes to the outer radiation belt electron fluxes over short timescales. We also show that non-geoeffective sheaths can result in a significant response.
Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Tuomas Koskela, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 625–643, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-625-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-625-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The structure and medium-scale dynamics of Earth's bow shock and how charged solar wind particles are reflected by it are studied in order to better understand space weather effects. We use advanced supercomputer simulations to model the shock and reflected ions. We find that the thickness of the shock depends on solar wind conditions but also has small-scale variations. Charged particle reflection is shown to be non-localized. Magnetic fields are important for ion reflection.
Theodoros E. Sarris, Elsayed R. Talaat, Minna Palmroth, Iannis Dandouras, Errico Armandillo, Guram Kervalishvili, Stephan Buchert, Stylianos Tourgaidis, David M. Malaspina, Allison N. Jaynes, Nikolaos Paschalidis, John Sample, Jasper Halekas, Eelco Doornbos, Vaios Lappas, Therese Moretto Jørgensen, Claudia Stolle, Mark Clilverd, Qian Wu, Ingmar Sandberg, Panagiotis Pirnaris, and Anita Aikio
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 153–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Daedalus aims to measure the largely unexplored area between Eart's atmosphere and space, the Earth's
ignorosphere. Here, intriguing and complex processes govern the deposition and transport of energy. The aim is to quantify this energy by measuring effects caused by electrodynamic processes in this region. The concept is based on a mother satellite that carries a suite of instruments, along with smaller satellites carrying a subset of instruments that are released into the atmosphere.
Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Adnane Osmane, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, Thiago Brito, Tuomas Koskela, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 37, 791–806, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
When the terrestrial magnetic field is disturbed, particles from the near-Earth space can precipitate into the upper atmosphere. This work presents, for the first time, numerical simulations of proton precipitation in the energy range associated with the production of aurora (∼1–30 keV) using a global kinetic model of the near-Earth space: Vlasiator. We find that nightside proton precipitation can be regulated by the transition region between stretched and dipolar geomagnetic field lines.
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia Kilpua, Matti Ala-Lahti, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Osku Raukunen
Ann. Geophys., 37, 561–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the Earth's space environment responds to two different amplitude interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) events that occurred in 2012 and 2014 by using the GUMICS-4 global MHD model. We examine local and large-scale dynamics of the Earth's space environment and compare simulation results to in situ data. It is shown that during moderate driving simulation agrees well with the measurements; however, GMHD results should be interpreted cautiously during strong driving.
Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Riku Jarvinen, Markus Battarbee, Emilia Kilpua, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1183–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, forming a magnetosphere. On the night side solar wind stretches the magnetosphere into a long tail. A process called magnetic reconnection opens the magnetic field lines and reconnects them, accelerating particles to high energies. We study this in the magnetotail using a numerical simulation model of the Earth’s magnetosphere. We study the motion of the points where field lines reconnect and the fast flows driven by this process.
Minna Palmroth, Heli Hietala, Ferdinand Plaschke, Martin Archer, Tomas Karlsson, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, David Sibeck, Primož Kajdič, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Markus Battarbee, and Lucile Turc
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1171–1182, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1171-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1171-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are high-velocity plasma structures that are commonly observed within the Earth's magnetosheath. Previously, they have mainly been investigated with spacecraft observations, which do not allow us to infer their spatial sizes, temporal evolution, or origin. This paper shows for the first time their dimensions, evolution, and origins within a simulation whose dimensions are directly comparable to the Earth's magnetosphere. The results are compared to previous observations.
Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Markus Battarbee, Lucile Turc, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, David G. Sibeck, Paul A. Cassak, Robert C. Fear, Riku Jarvinen, Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Rami Vainio, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1081–1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We use the Vlasiator code to study the characteristics of transient structures that exist in the Earth's foreshock, i.e. upstream of the bow shock. The structures are cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies (SHFAs). These transients can interact with the bow shock. We study the changes the shock suffers via this interaction. We also investigate ion distributions associated with the cavitons and SHFAs. A very important result is that the arrival of multiple SHFAs results in shock erosion.
Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1027–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's magnetic field is shaped by the solar wind. On the dayside the field is compressed and on the nightside it is stretched as a long tail. The tail has been observed to occasionally undergo flapping motions, but the origin of these motions is not understood. We study the flapping using a numerical simulation of the near-Earth space. We present a possible explanation for how the flapping could be initiated by a passing disturbance and then maintained as a standing wave.
Matti M. Ala-Lahti, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Tuija Pulkkinen, and Jan Souček
Ann. Geophys., 36, 793–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of mirror mode waves and the properties of their plasma surroundings in sheath regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) to deepen our understanding of these geo-effective plasma environments. The results imply that mirror modes are common structures in ICME sheaths and occur almost exclusively as dip-like structures and in mirror stable stable plasma.
Derek McKay, Noora Partamies, and Juha Vierinen
Ann. Geophys., 36, 59–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-59-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-59-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study used the Kilpisjärvi Atmospheric Imaging Receiver Array (KAIRA) and Finnish Meteorological Institute's all-sky camera. It looked at radio absorption and optical emission of the long east–west band of aurora (known as the growth phase arc), which forms at the start of substorms. The study found that radio absorption was consistently south of the bright auroral arc and that optical pulsating aurora occurs in the boundary region between the radio absorption zone and the bright arc.
Minna Palmroth, Sanni Hoilijoki, Liisa Juusola, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Heli Hietala, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, Rami Vainio, and Michael Hesse
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1269–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Much like solar flares, substorms occurring within the Earth's magnetic domain are explosive events that cause vivid auroral displays. A decades-long debate exists to explain the substorm onset. We devise a simulation encompassing the entire near-Earth space and demonstrate that detailed modelling of magnetic reconnection explains the central substorm observations. Our results help to understand the unpredictable substorm process, which will significantly improve space weather forecasts.
Noora Partamies, James M. Weygand, and Liisa Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1069–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale undulations of the diffuse aurora boundary, auroral omega bands, have been studied based on 438 omega-like structures identified over Fennoscandian Lapland from 1996 to 2007. The omegas mainly occurred in the post-magnetic midnight sector, in the region between oppositely directed ionospheric field-aligned currents, and during substorm recovery phases. The omega bands were observed during substorms, which were more intense than the average substorm in the same region.
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Pekka Janhunen
Ann. Geophys., 35, 907–922, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the impact on global MHD simulations from different simulation initialisation methods. While the global MHD code used is GUMICS-4 we conclude that the results might be generalisable to other codes as well. It is found that different initialisation methods affect the dynamics of the Earth's space environment by creating differences in momentum transport several hours afterwards. These differences may even grow as a response to rapid solar wind condition changes.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Heli Hietala, Steve E. Milan, Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 34, 943–959, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We have simulated the interaction of the solar wind – the charged particles and magnetic fields emitted by the Sun into space – with the magnetic field of the Earth. The solar wind flows supersonically and creates a shock when it encounters the obstacle formed by the geomagnetic field. We have identified a new chain of events which causes phenomena in the downstream region to eventually cause perturbations at the shock and even upstream. This is confirmed by ground and satellite observations.
Johannes Norberg, Lassi Roininen, Antti Kero, Tero Raita, Thomas Ulich, Markku Markkanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory has been producing ionospheric tomography data since 2003. Based on these data, one solar cycle of ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) estimates is constructed. The measurements are compared against the IRI-2012 model, F10.7 solar flux index and sunspot number data. Qualitatively the tomographic VTEC estimate corresponds to reference data very well, but the IRI-2012 model are on average 40 % higher of that of the tomographic results.
Kirsti Kauristie, Minna Myllys, Noora Partamies, Ari Viljanen, Pyry Peitso, Liisa Juusola, Shabana Ahmadzai, Vikramjit Singh, Ralf Keil, Unai Martinez, Alexej Luginin, Alexi Glover, Vicente Navarro, and Tero Raita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 253–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We use the connection between auroras and geomagnetic field variations in a concept for a Regional Auroral Forecast (RAF) service. RAF is based on statistical relationships between alerts by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and magnetic time derivatives measured by five MIRACLE magnetometer stations located in the surroundings of the Sodankylä research station. As an improvement to previous similar services RAF yields knowledge on typical auroral storm durations at different latitudes.
Carsten Baumann, Markus Rapp, and Antti Kero
Ann. Geophys., 34, 573–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-573-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-573-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Meteor smoke particles (MSPs), originating from evaporated meteoric matter at 60–110 km altitude, are present in the whole atmosphere including polar regions. As electron precipitation is present at high latitudes, these MSPs are bombarded by energetic electrons. The energetic electrons can enter the MSPs and excite secondary electrons. That can lead to a change of the charge state of these MSPs. The study finds that other charging processes, e.g., electron attachment, are more important.
K. Kauristie, M. V. Uspensky, N. G. Kleimenova, O. V. Kozyreva, M. M. J. L. Van De Kamp, S. V. Dubyagin, and S. Massetti
Ann. Geophys., 34, 379–392, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-379-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-379-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents some example events in which sudden changes in the auroral activity at midnight sector seem to have an impact on the intensity of morning-sector magnetic pulsations. Mechanisms which could link these two separate regions are discussed in the paper. Sudden changes in the solar wind properties and fast westward-propagating electrons are suggested to explain the coupling between midnight-sector and morning-sector phenomena.
Erika Palmerio, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, and Neel P. Savani
Ann. Geophys., 34, 313–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are giant clouds of plasma and magnetic field that erupt from the Sun and travel though the solar wind. They can cause interplanetary shocks in the vicinity of Earth. We show in our paper that the region that follows CME-driven shocks, known as sheath region, can obtain a planar configuration of the magnetic field lines (planar magnetic structure, PMS) due to the compression resulting from the shock itself or from the draping of the magnetic field ahead of the CME.
N. Y. Ganushkina, M. W. Liemohn, S. Dubyagin, I. A. Daglis, I. Dandouras, D. L. De Zeeuw, Y. Ebihara, R. Ilie, R. Katus, M. Kubyshkina, S. E. Milan, S. Ohtani, N. Ostgaard, J. P. Reistad, P. Tenfjord, F. Toffoletto, S. Zaharia, and O. Amariutei
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1369–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A number of current systems exist in the Earth's magnetosphere. It is very difficult to identify local measurements as belonging to a specific current system. Therefore, there are different definitions of supposedly the same current, leading to unnecessary controversy. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques.
V. A. Sergeev, S. A. Chernyaeva, S. V. Apatenkov, N. Y. Ganushkina, and S. V. Dubyagin
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1059–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the precipitated-to-trapped flux ratio patterns near the proton isotropy boundary (IB) using NOAA-POES observations. For 30 and 80keV proton energies, we found only 31% of events showing the dispersion pattern predicted by the non-adiabatic scattering in the tail current sheet. Most frequent pattern had no measureable IB energy dispersion (63%); structured IBs with a few Jprec/Jtrap dropouts were also usual (60%). Roles of current sheet and wave-induced scattering are discussed.
M. Myllys, E. Kilpua, and T. Pulkkinen
Ann. Geophys., 33, 845–855, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, 2015
M. Myllys, N. Partamies, and L. Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 33, 573–581, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, 2015
P. T. Verronen, M. E. Andersson, A. Kero, C.-F. Enell, J. M. Wissing, E. R. Talaat, K. Kauristie, M. Palmroth, T. E. Sarris, and E. Armandillo
Ann. Geophys., 33, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-381-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-381-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Electron concentrations observed by EISCAT radars can be reasonable well represented using AIMOS v1.2 satellite-data-based ionization model and SIC D-region ion chemistry model. SIC-EISCAT difference varies from event to event, probably because the statistical nature of AIMOS ionization is not capturing all the spatio-temporal fine structure of electron precipitation. Below 90km, AIMOS overestimates electron ionization because of proton contamination of the satellite electron detectors.
K. Andréeová, L. Juusola, E. K. J. Kilpua, and H. E. J. Koskinen
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1247–1261, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 157–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, 2014
D. Pokhotelov, S. von Alfthan, Y. Kempf, R. Vainio, H. E. J. Koskinen, and M. Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 31, 2207–2212, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2207-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2207-2013, 2013
C. Baumann, M. Rapp, A. Kero, and C.-F. Enell
Ann. Geophys., 31, 2049–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2049-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2049-2013, 2013
E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, D. Fontaine, and L. Turc
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1559–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, 2013
E. K. J. Kilpua, A. Isavnin, A. Vourlidas, H. E. J. Koskinen, and L. Rodriguez
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1251–1265, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, 2013
A. T. Aikio, T. Pitkänen, I. Honkonen, M. Palmroth, and O. Amm
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1021–1034, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1021-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1021-2013, 2013
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, H. Hietala, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1011–1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, 2013
K. Andreeova, E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, A. Isavnin, and R. Vainio
Ann. Geophys., 31, 555–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, 2013
N. Partamies, L. Juusola, E. Tanskanen, and K. Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 31, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Aminaei, A., Honary, F., Kavanagh, A. J., Spanswick, E., and
Viljanen, A.: Characteristics of night-time absorption spike events,
Ann. Geophys., 24, 1887–1904, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1887-2006, 2006. a
Amm, O.: Ionospheric elementary current systems in spherical coordinates and
their application, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 49, 947–955, 1997. a
Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation
from the ground to ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems,
Earth Planet. Space, 51, 431–440, 1999. a
Andersson, M. E., Verronen, P. T., Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., and
Seppälä, A.: Missing driver in the Sun-Earth connection from
energetic electron precipitation impacts mesospheric ozone, Na.
Commun., 5, 5197, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6197, 2014. a
Aryan, H., Yearby, K., Balikhin, M., Agapitov, O., Krasnoselskikh,
V., and Boynton, R.: Statistical study of chorus wave distributions in the
inner magnetosphere using Ae and solar wind parameters, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 6131–6144,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019939, 2014. a
Asikainen, T. and Ruopsa, M.: Solar wind drivers of energetic electron
precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121,
2209–2225, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022215, 2016. a, b
Beharrell, M. J., Honary, F., Rodger, C. J., and Clilverd, M. A.:
Substorm-induced energetic electron precipitation: Morphology and
prediction, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120,
2993–3008, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020632, 2015. a
Belakhovsky, V. B., Pilipenko, V. A., Sakharov, Y. A., Lorentzen,
D. L., and Samsonov, S. N.: Geomagnetic and ionospheric response to the
interplanetary shock on January 24, 2012, Earth Planet. Space, 69,
105, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0696-1, 2017. a
Benacquista, R., Boscher, D., Rochel, S., and Maget, V.: Variations of
the Electron Fluxes in the Terrestrial Radiation Belts Due To the Impact of
Corotating Interaction Regions and Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 1191–1199,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024796, 2018. a
Bingham, S. T., Mouikis, C. G., Kistler, L. M., Paulson, K. W.,
Farrugia, C. J., Huang, C. L., Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., and
Kletzing, C.: The Storm Time Development of Source Electrons and Chorus
Wave Activity During CME- and CIR-Driven Storms, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 124, 6438–6452, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026689, 2019. a
Blum, L. W., Artemyev, A., Agapitov, O., Mourenas, D., Boardsen, S.,
and Schiller, Q.: EMIC Wave-Driven Bounce Resonance Scattering of
Energetic Electrons in the Inner Magnetosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 124, 2484–2496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026427, 2019. a
Borovsky, J. E. and Denton, M. H.: Differences between CME-driven storms
and CIR-driven storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A07S08,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011447, 2006. a, b
Bortnik, J. and Thorne, R. M.: The dual role of ELF/VLF chorus waves in
the acceleration and precipitation of radiation belt electrons, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 69, 378–386,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.05.030, 2007. a
Bortnik, J., Thorne, R. M., and Meredith, N. P.: The unexpected origin
of plasmaspheric hiss from discrete chorus emissions, Nature, 452, 62–66,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06741, 2008. a
Bothmer, V. and Schwenn, R.: The structure and origin of magnetic clouds
in the solar wind, Ann. Geophys., 16, 1–24,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-0001-x, 1998. a
Brown, R. R.: On the poleward expansion of ionospheric absorption regions
triggered by sudden commercements of geomagnetic storms, J.
Geophys. Res., 83, 1169–1171, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA03p01169, 1978. a
Brown, R. R., Hartz, T. R., Landmark, B., Leinbach, H., and Ortner,
J.: Large-Scale Electron Bombardment of the Atmosphere at the Sudden
Commencement of a Geomagnetic Storm, J. Geophys. Res., 66,
1035–1041, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i004p01035, 1961. a
Claudepierre, S. G., Elkington, S. R., and Wiltberger, M.: Solar wind
driving of magnetospheric ULF waves: Pulsations driven by velocity shear at
the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113,
A05218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012890, 2008. a
Clilverd, M. A., Rodger, C. J., Brundell, J., BäHr, J., Cobbett,
N., Moffat-Griffin, T., Kavanagh, A. J., SeppäLä, A.,
Thomson, N. R., Friedel, R. H. W., and Menk, F. W.: Energetic electron
precipitation during substorm injection events: High-latitude fluxes and an
unexpected midlatitude signature, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A10311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013220, 2008. a
Coroniti, F. V. and Kennel, C. F.: Electron precipitation pulsations, J.
Geophys. Res., 75, 1279–1289, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i007p01279, 1970. a, b
Davis, T. N. and Sugiura, M.: Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its
universal time variations, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 785–801,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i003p00785, 1966. a
Douma, E., Rodger, C. J., Blum, L. W., O'Brien, T. P., Clilverd,
M. A., and Blake, J. B.: Characteristics of Relativistic Microburst
Intensity From SAMPEX Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124,
5627–5640, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026757, 2019. a
Grandin, M.: Multi-instrument and modelling studies of the ionospheres at
Earth and Mars, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oulu, available at:
http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:9789526216157 (last access: 4 April 2020), 2017. a
Grandin, M., Kero, A., Partamies, N., McKay, D., Whiter, D.,
Kozlovsky, A., and Miyoshi, Y.: Observation of pulsating aurora
signatures in cosmic noise absorption data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
5292–5300, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073901, 2017b. a, b
Grandin, M., Aikio, A. T., and Kozlovsky, A.: Properties and
Geoeffectiveness of Solar Wind High-Speed Streams and Stream Interaction
Regions During Solar Cycles 23 and 24, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124,
3871–3892, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026396, 2019. a
Hargreaves, J. K.: On the variation of auroral radio absorption with
geomagnetic activity, Planet. Space Sci., 14, 991–1006,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(66)90136-X, 1966. a
Hargreaves, J. K.: Auroral absorption of HF radio waves in the ionosphere: A
review of results from the first decade of riometry, IEEE Proceed., 57,
1348–1373, 1969. a
Hargreaves, J. K., Chivers, H. J. A., and Axford, W. I.: The development
of the substorm in auroral radio absorption, Planet. Space Sci., 23,
905–911, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(75)90177-4, 1975. a
Hargreaves, J. K., Ranta, A., Annan, J. D., and Hargreaves, J. C.:
Temporal fine structure of nighttime spike events in auroral radio
absorption, studied by a wavelet method, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 24621–24636, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900008, 2001. a
Hartley, D. P., Kletzing, C. A., Santolík, O., Chen, L., and
Horne, R. B.: Statistical Properties of Plasmaspheric Hiss From Van Allen
Probes Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123,
2605–2619, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024593, 2018. a
Hendry, A. T., Santolik, O., Kletzing, C. A., Rodger, C. J.,
Shiokawa, K., and Baishev, D.: Multi-instrument Observation of Nonlinear
EMIC-Driven Electron Precipitation at sub-MeV Energies, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 46, 7248–7257, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082401, 2019. a
Holappa, L., Mursula, K., Asikainen, T., and Richardson, I. G.: Annual
fractions of high-speed streams from principal component analysis of local
geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119,
4544–4555, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019958, 2014. a
Huttunen, K. E. J., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Schwenn, R.: Variability of
magnetospheric storms driven by different solar wind perturbations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 107, 1121,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900171, 2002. a, b
Huttunen, K. E. J., Schwenn, R., Bothmer, V., and Koskinen, H. E. J.:
Properties and geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds in the rising, maximum
and early declining phases of solar cycle 23, Ann. Geophys., 23,
625–641, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-625-2005, 2005. a
Jaynes, A. N., Baker, D. N., Singer, H. J., Rodriguez, J. V.,
Loto'aniu, T. M., Ali, A. F., Elkington, S. R., Li, X., Kanekal,
S. G., Fennell, J. F., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Kletzing, C. A.,
Spence, H. E., and Reeves, G. D.: Source and seed populations for
relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 7240–7254,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021234, 2015. a
Juusola, L., Kauristie, K., Vanhamäki, H., and Aikio, A.: Comparison of
auroral ionospheric and field-aligned currents derived from Swarm and
ground magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 9256–9283,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022961, 2016. a
Kalliokoski, M. M. H., Kilpua, E. K. J., Osmane, A., Turner, D. L., Jaynes, A. N., Turc, L., George, H., and Palmroth, M.: Outer radiation belt and inner magnetospheric response to sheath regions of coronal mass ejections: A statistical analysis, Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-150, in review, 2019. a, b, c
Kavanagh, A., Kosch, M., Honary, F., Senior, A., Marple, S.,
Woodfield, E., and McCrea, I.: The statistical dependence of auroral
absorption on geomagnetic and solar wind parameters, Ann. Geophys.,
22, 877–887, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-877-2004, 2004. a
Kavanagh, A. J., Lu, G., Donovan, E. F., Reeves, G. D., Honary, F.,
Manninen, J., and Immel, T. J.: Energetic electron precipitation during
sawtooth injections, Ann. Geophys., 25, 1199–1214,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-1199-2007, 2007. a, b
Kavanagh, A. J., Honary, F., Donovan, E. F., Ulich, T., and Denton,
M. H.: Key features of >30 keV electron precipitation during high speed
solar wind streams: A superposed epoch analysis, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 117, A00L09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017320, 2012. a, b, c
Kavanagh, A. J., Cobbett, N., and Kirsch, P.: Radiation Belt Slot Region
Filling Events: Sustained Energetic Precipitation Into the Mesosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 7999–8020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025890, 2018. a
Kellerman, A. C., Shprits, Y. Y., Makarevich, R. A., Spanswick, E.,
Donovan, E., and Reeves, G.: Characterization of the energy-dependent
response of riometer absorption, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 615–631, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020027, 2015. a
Kepko, L. and Spence, H. E.: Observations of discrete, global
magnetospheric oscillations directly driven by solar wind density
variations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1257,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009676, 2003. a
Kilpua, E., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Coronal mass
ejections and their sheath regions in interplanetary space, Living Rev.
Sol. Phys., 14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0009-6, 2017a. a, b, c
Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Koskinen, H. E. J., Fontaine, D., and
Turc, L.: Magnetic field and dynamic pressure ULF fluctuations in
coronal-mass-ejection-driven sheath regions, Ann. Geophys., 31,
1559–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, 2013. a
Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Turner, D. L., Koskinen, H. E. J.,
Pulkkinen, T. I., Rodriguez, J. V., Reeves, G. D., Claudepierre,
S. G., and Spence, H. E.: Unraveling the drivers of the storm time
radiation belt response, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3076–3084,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063542, 2015. a, b, c, d
Kilpua, E. K. J., Fontaine, D., Moissard, C., Ala-Lahti, M.,
Palmerio, E., Yordanova, E., Good, S. W., Kalliokoski, M. M. H.,
Lumme, E., Osmane, A., Palmroth, M., and Turc, L.: Solar Wind
Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath
Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence, Space Weather, 17, 1257–1280,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002217, 2019a. a, b
Kilpua, E. K. J., Turner, D. L., Jaynes, A. N., Hietala, H.,
Koskinen, H. E. J., Osmane, A., Palmroth, M., Pulkkinen, T. I.,
Vainio, R., Baker, D., and Claudepierre, S. G.: Outer Van Allen
Radiation Belt Response to Interacting Interplanetary Coronal Mass
Ejections, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1927–1947,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026238, 2019b. a, b, c
Kim, K.-C. and Shprits, Y.: Statistical Analysis of Hiss Waves in
Plasmaspheric Plumes Using Van Allen Probe Observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1904–1915,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026458, 2019. a
King, J. H. and Papitashvili, N. E.: Solar wind spatial scales in and
comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A02104,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010649, 2005. a
Klein, L. W. and Burlaga, L. F.: Interplanetary magnetic clouds at 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 613–624, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA02p00613, 1982. a
Krauss, S., Temmer, M., Veronig, A., Baur, O., and Lammer, H.:
Thermospheric and geomagnetic responses to interplanetary coronal mass
ejections observed by ACE and GRACE: Statistical results, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 8848–8860,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021702, 2015. a
Lam, M. M., Horne, R. B., Meredith, N. P., Glauert, S. A.,
Moffat-Griffin, T., and Green, J. C.: Origin of energetic electron
precipitation >30 keV into the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
115, A00F08, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014619, 2010. a
Li, H., Yuan, Z., Yu, X., Huang, S., Wang, D., Wang, Z., Qiao,
Z., and Wygant, J. R.: The enhancement of cosmic radio noise absorption
due to hiss-driven energetic electron precipitation during substorms,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 5393–5407,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021113, 2015. a
Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Angelopoulos, V., Bortnik, J., Cully, C. M.,
Ni, B., Le Contel, O., Roux, A., Auster, U., and Magnes, W.:
Global distribution of whistler-mode chorus waves observed on the THEMIS
spacecraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L09104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037595,
2009. a
Little, C. G. and Leinbach, H.: The Riometer – A Device for the Continuous
Measurement of Ionospheric Absorption, Proc. IRE, 47, 315–320,
https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1959.287299, 1959. a
Longden, N., Honary, F., Kavanagh, A. J., and Manninen, J.: The
driving mechanisms of particle precipitation during the moderate geomagnetic
storm of 7 January 2005, Ann. Geophys., 25, 2053–2068,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2053-2007, 2007. a
Longden, N., Denton, M. H., and Honary, F.: Particle precipitation
during ICME-driven and CIR-driven geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 113, A06205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012752, 2008. a, b, c
Lugaz, N., Farrugia, C. J., Huang, C.-L., and Spence, H. E.: Extreme
geomagnetic disturbances due to shocks within CMEs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
4694–4701, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064530, 2015. a
Malaspina, D. M., Jaynes, A. N., Boulé, C., Bortnik, J., Thaller,
S. A., Ergun, R. E., Kletzing, C. A., and Wygant, J. R.: The
distribution of plasmaspheric hiss wave power with respect to plasmapause
location, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7878–7886,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069982, 2016. a
Masías-Meza, J. J., Dasso, S., Démoulin, P., Rodriguez, L.,
and Janvier, M.: Superposed epoch study of ICME sub-structures near Earth
and their effects on Galactic cosmic rays, Astron. Astrophys., 592, A118,
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628571, 2016. a
Matthes, K., Funke, B., Andersson, M. E., Barnard, L., Beer, J.,
Charbonneau, P., Clilverd, M. A., Dudok de Wit, T., Haberreiter, M.,
Hendry, A., Jackman, C. H., Kretzschmar, M., Kruschke, T., Kunze,
M., Langematz, U., Marsh, D. R., Maycock, A. C., Misios, S.,
Rodger, C. J., Scaife, A. A., Seppälä, A., Shangguan, M.,
Sinnhuber, M., Tourpali, K., Usoskin, I., van de Kamp, M.,
Verronen, P. T., and Versick, S.: Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2),
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2247–2302,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2247-2017, 2017. a
Miyoshi, Y., Kataoka, R., Kasahara, Y., Kumamoto, A., Nagai, T., and
Thomsen, M. F.: High-speed solar wind with southward interplanetary
magnetic field causes relativistic electron flux enhancement of the outer
radiation belt via enhanced condition of whistler waves, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 4520–4525, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50916, 2013. a
Motoba, T., Takahashi, K., Gjerloev, J., Ohtani, S., and Milling,
D. K.: The role of compressional Pc5 pulsations in modulating precipitation
of energetic electrons, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 7728–7739,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA018912, 2013. a
Newnham, D. A., Clilverd, M. A., Rodger, C. J., Hendrickx, K.,
Megner, L., Kavanagh, A. J., Seppälä, A., Verronen, P. T.,
Andersson, M. E., Marsh, D. R., Kovács, T., Feng, W., and
Plane, J. M. C.: Observations and Modeling of Increased Nitric Oxide in
the Antarctic Polar Middle Atmosphere Associated With Geomagnetic
Storm-Driven Energetic Electron Precipitation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 123, 6009–6025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025507, 2018. a
Nikolaeva, N. S., Yermolaev, Y. I., and Lodkina, I. G.: Dependence of
geomagnetic activity during magnetic storms on the solar wind parameters for
different types of streams, Geomagn. Aeronomy, 51, 49–65,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793211010099, 2011. a
O'Brien, T. P. and Moldwin, M. B.: Empirical plasmapause models from
magnetic indices, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1152, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016007,
2003. a
Osmane, A., Wilson, III, L. B., Blum, L., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: On the
Connection between Microbursts and Nonlinear Electronic Structures in
Planetary Radiation Belts, Astrophys. J., 816,
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/51, 2016. a
Østgaard, N., Stadsnes, J., Bjordal, J., Vondrak, R. R., Cummer,
S. A., Chenette, D. L., Parks, G. K., Brittnacher, M. J., and
McKenzie, D. L.: Global-scale electron precipitation features seen in UV
and X rays during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 10191–10204,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900004, 1999. a
Perona, G. E.: Theory on the precipitation of magnetospheric electrons at
the time of a sudden commencement, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 101–111,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA077i001p00101, 1972. a
Potapov, A. S.: ULF wave activity in high-speed streams of the solar wind:
Impact on the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 6465–6477, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019119, 2013. a
Pulkkinen, A., Amm, O., Viljanen, A., and BEAR Working Group: Separation of
the geomagnetic variation field on the ground into external and internal
parts using the spherical elementary current system method, Earth Planet.
Space, 55, 117–129, 2003. a
Pulkkinen, T. I., Partamies, N., Huttunen, K. E. J., Reeves, G. D., and
Koskinen, H. E. J.: Differences in geomagnetic storms driven by magnetic
clouds and ICME sheath regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L02105,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027775, 2007. a
Pytte, T., McPherron, R. L., and Kokubun, S.: The ground signatures of
the expansion phase during multiple onset substorms, Planet. Space Sci., 24,
1115–1132, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(76)90149-5, 1976. a
Ranta, H., Ranta, A., Collis, P. N., and Hargreaves, J. K.:
Development of the auroral absorption substorm: Studies of pre-onset phase
and sharp onset using an extensive riometer network, Planet. Space Sci., 29,
1287–1313, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(81)90095-7, 1981. a
Richardson, I. G.: Solar wind stream interaction regions throughout the
heliosphere, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 15,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0011-z, 2018. a
Richmond, A. D.: Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using Magnetic Apex
Coordinates, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 47, 191–212,
https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.47.191, 1995. a
Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., Thomson, N. R., Gamble, R. J.,
SeppäLä, A., Turunen, E., Meredith, N. P., Parrot, M.,
Sauvaud, J.-A., and Berthelier, J.-J.: Radiation belt electron
precipitation into the atmosphere: Recovery from a geomagnetic storm,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 112, A11307,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012383, 2007. a
Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., SeppäLä, A., Thomson, N. R.,
Gamble, R. J., Parrot, M., Sauvaud, J.-A., and Ulich, T.: Radiation
belt electron precipitation due to geomagnetic storms: Significance to middle
atmosphere ozone chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
115, A11320, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015599, 2010. a
Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., Kavanagh, A. J., Watt, C. E. J.,
Verronen, P. T., and Raita, T.: Contrasting the responses of three
different ground-based instruments to energetic electron precipitation,
Radio Sci., 47, RS2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004971, 2012. a
Saikin, A. A., Zhang, J.-C., Smith, C. W., Spence, H. E., Torbert,
R. B., and Kletzing, C. A.: The dependence on geomagnetic conditions and
solar wind dynamic pressure of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves
observed by the Van Allen Probes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 4362–4377, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022523, 2016. a
Selesnick, R. S., Blake, J. B., and Mewaldt, R. A.: Atmospheric losses
of radiation belt electrons, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1468, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010160, 2003. a
Seppälä, A., Clilverd, M. A., Beharrell, M. J., Rodger, C. J.,
Verronen, P. T., Andersson, M. E., and Newnham, D. A.:
Substorm-induced energetic electron precipitation: Impact on atmospheric
chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8172–8176, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065523,
2015. a
Shain, C. A.: Galactic Radiation at 18.3 Mc/s, Austr. J.
Sci. Res. A, 4, 258,
https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9510258, 1951. a
Shen, X.-C., Hudson, M. K., Jaynes, A. N., Shi, Q., Tian, A.,
Claudepierre, S. G., Qin, M.-R., Zong, Q.-G., and Sun, W.-J.:
Statistical study of the storm time radiation belt evolution during Van
Allen Probes era: CME- versus CIR-driven storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 8327–8339, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024100, 2017. a, b
Shue, J.-H., Song, P., Russell, C. T., Steinberg, J. T., Chao, J. K.,
Zastenker, G., Vaisberg, O. L., Kokubun, S., Singer, H. J., Detman,
T. R., and Kawano, H.: Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind
conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17691–17700,
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01103, 1998. a, b
Smith, A. J., Freeman, M. P., and Reeves, G. D.: Postmidnight VLF chorus
events, a substorm signature observed at the ground near L=4, J. Geophys.
Res., 101, 24641–24654, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02236, 1996. a
Spanswick, E., Reeves, G. D., Donovan, E., and Friedel, R. H. W.:
Injection region propagation outside of geosynchronous orbit, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, A11214,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015066, 2010. a
Summers, D., Ni, B., Meredith, N. P., Horne, R. B., Thorne, R. M.,
Moldwin, M. B., and Anderson, R. R.: Electron scattering by
whistler-mode ELF hiss in plasmaspheric plumes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A04219, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012678, 2008. a
Thorne, R. M., O'Brien, T. P., Shprits, Y. Y., Summers, D., and
Horne, R. B.: Timescale for MeV electron microburst loss during
geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110,
A09202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010882, 2005. a
Turner, D. L., Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Claudepierre, S. G.,
O'Brien, T. P., Fennell, J. F., Blake, J. B., Jaynes, A. N.,
Kanekal, S., Baker, D. N., Spence, H. E., Ripoll, J.-F., and
Reeves, G. D.: The Response of Earth's Electron Radiation Belts to
Geomagnetic Storms: Statistics From the Van Allen Probes Era Including
Effects From Different Storm Drivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1013–1034, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026066, 2019. a
Turunen, E., Kero, A., Verronen, P. T., Miyoshi, Y., Oyama, S.-I.,
and Saito, S.: Mesospheric ozone destruction by high-energy electron
precipitation associated with pulsating aurora, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 11852–11861, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025015, 2016. a
Usanova, M. E., Drozdov, A., Orlova, K., Mann, I. R., Shprits, Y.,
Robertson, M. T., Turner, D. L., Milling, D. K., Kale, A., Baker,
D. N., Thaller, S. A., Reeves, G. D., Spence, H. E., Kletzing, C.,
and Wygant, J.: Effect of EMIC waves on relativistic and ultrarelativistic
electron populations: Ground-based and Van Allen Probes observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1375–1381, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059024, 2014. a
van de Kamp, M.: Harmonic quiet‐day curves as magnetometer baselines for
ionospheric current analyses, Geosci. Instrum. Method Data Syst., 2,
289–304, 2013. a
Wang, C.-P., Thorne, R., Liu, T. Z., Hartinger, M. D., Nagai, T.,
Angelopoulos, V., Wygant, J. R., Breneman, A., Kletzing, C.,
Reeves, G. D., Claudepierre, S. G., and Spence, H. E.: A
multispacecraft event study of Pc5 ultralow-frequency waves in the
magnetosphere and their external drivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 5132–5147, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023610, 2017. a
Wanliss, J. A. and Showalter, K. M.: High-resolution global storm index:
Dst versus SYM-H, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A02202,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011034, 2006. a
Weygand, J. M. and Wing, S.: Comparison of DMSP and SECS region‐1 and
region‐2 ionospheric current boundary, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.,
143/144, 8–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.03.002, 2016. a
Yermolaev, Y. I., Lodkina, I. G., and Yermolaev, M. Y.: Dynamics of
Large-Scale Solar-Wind Streams Obtained by the Double Superposed Epoch
Analysis: 3. Deflection of the Velocity Vector, Sol. Phys., 293,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1310-9, 2018. a
Zhang, X.-J., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Angelopoulos, V., Bortnik, J.,
Kletzing, C. A., Kurth, W. S., and Hospodarsky, G. B.: Statistical
distribution of EMIC wave spectra: Observations from Van Allen Probes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071158, 2016.
a
Zheng, Y., Lui, A. T. Y., Fok, M.-C., Anderson, B. J., Brandt, P. C.,
Immel, T. J., and Mitchell, D. G.: Relationship between Region 2
field-aligned current and the ring current: Model results, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A11S06,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011603, 2006. a
Zurbuchen, T. H. and Richardson, I. G.: In-Situ Solar Wind and Magnetic
Field Signatures of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections, Space Sci. Rev.,
123, 31–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9010-4, 2006. a
Short summary
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms, and they cause dramatic changes in radiation belt electron fluxes. Differences in precipitation of high-energy electrons from the belts to the upper atmosphere are thus expected. We investigate here differences in sheath- and ejecta-induced precipitation using the Finnish riometer (relative ionospheric opacity meter) chain.
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms,...
