Articles | Volume 41, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
17 Apr 2023
Regular paper |
| 17 Apr 2023
| 17 Apr 2023
Effects of the super-powerful tropospheric western Pacific phenomenon of September–October 2018 on the ionosphere over China: results from oblique sounding
Leonid F. Chernogor
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China
Kostiantyn P. Garmash
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
Qiang Guo
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
Victor T. Rozumenko
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China
Related authors
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
The Tonga volcano explosion launched a rich assortment of disturbances in the solid Earth, ocean, entire atmosphere, and the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Statistical and spectral analysis of the measurements made at 19 INTERMAGNET recording stations closest to the volcano shows that the quasi-periodic disturbances were transported by fast and slow magnetohydrodynamic waves, blast wave, atmospheric gravity wave, and Lamb wave; the parameters of geomagnetic bay disturbances have also estimated.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
The Tonga volcano explosion launched a rich assortment of disturbances in the solid Earth, ocean, entire atmosphere, and the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Statistical and spectral analysis of the measurements made at 19 INTERMAGNET recording stations closest to the volcano shows that the quasi-periodic disturbances were transported by fast and slow magnetohydrodynamic waves, blast wave, atmospheric gravity wave, and Lamb wave; the parameters of geomagnetic bay disturbances have also estimated.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Related subject area
Subject: Earth's ionosphere & aeronomy | Keywords: Ionospheric disturbances
Ionospheric effects of the 5–6 January 2019 eclipse over the People's Republic of China: results from oblique sounding
Study of the equatorial and low-latitude total electron content response to plasma bubbles during solar cycle 24–25 over the Brazilian region using a Disturbance Ionosphere indeX
Diagnostic study of geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric changes over very low-frequency signal propagation paths in the mid-latitude D region
Complex analysis of the ionosphere variations during the geomagnetic storm at 20 January 2010 performed by Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) software and DEMETER satellite data
Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm: influence on high frequency radio wave characteristics
Tomographic imaging of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance during the Halloween storm of 2003
Ionospheric anomalies associated with the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq border earthquake and a moderate magnetic storm
Model of the propagation of very low-frequency beams in the Earth–ionosphere waveguide: principles of the tensor impedance method in multi-layered gyrotropic waveguides
Strong influence of solar X-ray flares on low-frequency electromagnetic signals in middle latitudes
A case study of the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the eastern Asian sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic conjugate observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to a North Korean underground nuclear explosion on 3 September 2017
Emergence of a localized total electron content enhancement during the severe geomagnetic storm of 8 September 2017
Mitigation of ionospheric signatures in Swarm GPS gravity field estimation using weighting strategies
PPP-based Swarm kinematic orbit determination
Impact of magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Giorgio Arlan Silva Picanço, Clezio Marcos Denardini, Paulo Alexandre Bronzato Nogueira, Laysa Cristina Araujo Resende, Carolina Sousa Carmo, Sony Su Chen, Paulo França Barbosa-Neto, and Esmeralda Romero-Hernandez
Ann. Geophys., 40, 503–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we use the Disturbance Ionosphere indeX (DIX) to study equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) events over the Brazilian equatorial and low latitudes. Our results showed that the DIX detected EPB disturbances in terms of their intensity and occurrence times. Therefore, these responses agreed with the ionosphere behavior before, during, and after the studied EPBs. Finally, these disturbances tended to be higher (lower) in high (low) solar activity.
Victor U. J. Nwankwo, William Denig, Sandip K. Chakrabarti, Olugbenga Ogunmodimu, Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye, Johnson O. Fatokun, Paul I. Anekwe, Omodara E. Obisesan, Olufemi E. Oyanameh, and Oluwaseun V. Fatoye
Ann. Geophys., 40, 433–461, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We combined the observed diurnal VLF amplitude variation in the D region with standard measurements of the E and F regions to perform a diagnostic investigation of coupled geomagnetic storm effects in order to understand the observed storm-induced variations in VLF narrowband based on state and responses of the ionosphere. The dayside VLF amplitude showed a tendency for attenuation following geomagnetic storms, and the h’E and h’F variations confirmed strong storm response over the signal paths.
Anatoliy Lozbin, Viktor Fedun, and Olga Kryakunova
Ann. Geophys., 40, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) for detection, identification, and analysis of ionosphere anomalies from satellite spectrograms and time series row data from instruments onboard the DEMETER satellite was designed. Using this software, the analyses of ionosphere parameter variations caused by various factors are provided. The scientific data processing and visualization technologies used in the development of DIA can be used in the creation of software for other scientific space missions.
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Karl Bolmgren, Cathryn Mitchell, Talini Pinto Jayawardena, Gary Bust, Jon Bruno, and Elizabeth Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1149–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Travelling ionospheric disturbances behave like waves in the ionosphere, the ionised upper part of the atmosphere. In this study, we use an ionospheric tomography technique to map the electron content as affected by the passage of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance launched during the largest geomagnetic storm observed by modern instruments. This is the first such imaging using this software and to the authors' knowledge the first study of this travelling ionospheric disturbance.
Erman Şentürk, Samed Inyurt, and İbrahim Sertçelik
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1031–1043, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The analysis of unexpected ionospheric phases before large earthquakes is one of the cutting-edge issues in earthquake prediction studies. Ionospheric TEC data were analyzed by short-time Fourier transform and a classic running median to detect abnormalities before the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq earthquake on November 12, 2017. The results showed clear positive anomalies 8–9 d before the earthquake as an earthquake precursor due to quiet space weather, local dispersion, and proximity to the epicenter.
Yuriy Rapoport, Vladimir Grimalsky, Viktor Fedun, Oleksiy Agapitov, John Bonnell, Asen Grytsai, Gennadi Milinevsky, Alex Liashchuk, Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, and Andrey Gulin
Ann. Geophys., 38, 207–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper analytically and numerically treats the new theoretical basis for ground-based and satellite monitoring of the most powerful processes in the lower atmosphere and Earth (hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.), solar-wind magnetosphere (magnetic storms) and ionosphere (lightning discharges, thunderstorms, etc.). This can be provided by the determination of phases and amplitudes of radio waves in the Earth and ionosphere. In perspective, damage from the natural disasters can be decreased.
Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, Viktor Fedun, Peter Gallagher, Joseph McCauley, Mohammed Y. Boudjada, Sergiy Shelyag, and Hans U. Eichelberger
Ann. Geophys., 37, 843–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, 2019
Jing Liu, Dong-He Zhang, Anthea J. Coster, Shun-Rong Zhang, Guan-Yi Ma, Yong-Qiang Hao, and Zuo Xiao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 673–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, 2019
Yi Liu, Chen Zhou, Qiong Tang, Guanyi Chen, and Zhengyu Zhao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Underground nuclear explosion (UNE) can produce ionospheric disturbances through a lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling mechanism, which is very similar with earthquakes. By using the total electron content observations and Swarm ionospheric current data, we have investigated the geomagnetic conjugate ionospheric disturbances. We proposed that the electric field generated during the UNE test can be an important mechanism for ionospheric disturbance.
Carlos Sotomayor-Beltran and Laberiano Andrade-Arenas
Ann. Geophys., 37, 153–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A localized total electron content enhancement (LTE) was observed as a product of the geomagnetic storm that happened on 8 September 2017. This result was unexpected because it was located south of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA). The origin of the enhancement of the TEC in the EIA is very likely due to the super-fountain effect. On the other hand, the LTE is suggested to be produced by the contribution of the super-fountain effect along with traveling ionospheric disturbances.
Lucas Schreiter, Daniel Arnold, Veerle Sterken, and Adrian Jäggi
Ann. Geophys., 37, 111–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing Swarm GPS-only gravity fields to the ultra-precise GRACE K-Band gravity field schematic errors occurs around the geomagnetic equator. Due to the end of the GRACE mission, and the gap to the GRACE-FO mission, only Swarm can provide a continuous time series of gravity fields. We present different and assess different approaches to remove the schematic errors and thus improve the quality of the Swarm gravity fields.
Le Ren and Steffen Schön
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1227–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we analyse the performance of the Swarm onboard GPS receiver and present the approach for determination of the IfE Swarm kinematic orbit with PPP. The differences between our kinematic orbits and ESA reduced-dynamic orbits are at 1.5 cm, 1.5 cm and 2.5 cm level in along-track, cross-track and radial directions, respectively. A comparison with SLR underlines an accuracy of the kinematic orbits of 3–4 cm.
Donat V. Blagoveshchensky, Olga A. Maltseva, and Maria A. Sergeeva
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Afraimovich, E. L., Voeykov, S. V., Ishin, A.B., Perevalova, N. P., and
Ruzhin, Y. Y.: Variations in the total electron content during the
powerful typhoon of August 5–11, 2006, near the southeastern coast of
China, Geomag. Aeron., 48, 674–679,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050113, 2008.
Bortnik, J., Inan, U. S., and Bell, T. F.: Temporal signatures of radiation
belt electron precipitation induced by lightning-generated MR whistler
waves: 1. Methodology, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A02204,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011182, 2006.
Boška, J. and Šauli, P.: Observations of gravity waves of
meteorological origin in the F-region ionosphere, Phys. Chem. Earth,
26, 425–428, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00024-1, 2001.
Chen, J., Zhang, X., Ren, X., Zhang, J., Freeshah, M., and Zhao, Z.:
Ionospheric disturbances detected during a typhoon based on GNSS phase
observations: a case study for typhoon Mangkhut over Hong Kong, Adv. Space
Res., 66, 1743–1753, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.06.006, 2020.
Chernigovskaya, M. A., Shpynev, B. G., and Ratovsky, K. G.: Meteorological
effects of ionospheric disturbances from vertical radio sounding data,
J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 136, 235–243,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.07.006, 2015.
Chernogor, L. F.: The tropical cyclone as an element of the Earth –
atmosphere – ionosphere – magnetosphere system
(in Russian), Space Sci. Tech., 12, 16–26,
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2006.02.016, 2006.
Chernogor, L. F.: Advanced Methods of Spectral Analysis of Quasiperiodic
Wave-Like Processes in the Ionosphere: Specific Features and Experimental
Results, Geomag. Aeron., 48, 652–673,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050101, 2008.
Chernogor, L. F.: Physics and Ecology of Disasters (in Russian),
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publ., Kharkiv, Ukraine, ISBN 978-966-623-807-1, 2012.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Luo, Y., Rozumenko, V. T., and
Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric storm effects over the People's Republic of China on
14 May 2019: Results from multipath multi-frequency oblique radio sounding,
Adv. Space Res., 66, 226–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.037,
2020.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Zheng, Y., and Luo, Y.:
Supertyphoon Hagibis action in the ionosphere on 6–13 October 2019: Results
from multi-frequency multiple path sounding at oblique incidence, Adv. Space
Res., 67, 2439–2469, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.038, 2021.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Zheng, Y., and
Luo, Y.: Disturbances in the ionosphere that accompanied typhoon activity in
the vicinity of China in September 2019, Radio Sci., 57, e2022RS007431,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RS007431, 2022.
Chou, M. Y., Lin, C. C. H., Yue, J., Tsai, H. F., Sun, Y. Y., Liu, J. Y.,
and Chen, C. H.: Concentric traveling ionosphere disturbances triggered by
Super Typhoon Meranti (2016), Geophys. Res. Let., 44, 1219–1226,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072205, 2017.
Chum, J., Liu, J.-Y., Šindelářová, K., and Podolská, T.:
Infrasound in the ionosphere from earthquakes and typhoons,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 171, 72–82,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.022, 2018.
Das, B., Sarkar, S., Haldar, P. K., Midya, S. K., and Pal, S.: D-region
ionospheric disturbances associated with the Extremely Severe Cyclone Fani
over North Indian Ocean as observed from two tropical VLF stations,
Adv. Space Res., 67, 75–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.018,
2021.
Drobyazko, I. N. and Krasil'nikov, V. N.: Generation of acoustic-gravity
waves by atmospheric turbulence, Radiophys. Quant. El+, 28,
946–952, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01040717, 1985.
Edemsky, I. K. and Yasyukevich, A. S.: Observing wave packets generated by
solar terminator in TEC during typhoons, Solar-Terr. Phys., 4, 33–40,
https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-42201806, 2018.
Fišer, J., Chum, J., and Liu, J.-Y.: Medium-scale traveling ionospheric
disturbances over Taiwan observed with HF Doppler sounding, Earth, Planet.
Space., 69, 131, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0719-y, 2017.
Freeshah, M., Zhang, X., Şentürk, E., Adil, M. A., Mousa, B. G.,
Tariq, A., Ren, X., and Refaat, M.: Analysis of Atmospheric and Ionospheric
Variations Due to Impacts of Super Typhoon Mangkhut (1822) in the Northwest
Pacific Ocean, Remote Sens., 13, 661, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040661,
2021.
Frissell, N. A., Baker, J. B. H., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Gerrard, A. J., Miller,
E. S., Marini, J. P., West, M. L., and Bristow, W. A.: Climatology of
medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances observed by the midlatitude
Blackstone SuperDARN radar, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7679–7697, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019870, 2014.
Fukushima, D., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., and Ogawa, T.: Observation of
equatorial nighttime medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in
630-nm airglow images over 7 years, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A10324,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017758, 2012.
Garmash, K.: Software for Passive 14-Channel Doppler Radar,
Harvard Dataverse, V1,
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MTGAVH,
2021.
Garmash, K.: RAW Data on Parameters of Ionospheric HF Radio Waves Propagated
Over China During the September 29–6 October 2018 Typhoon Activity in the
Vicinity of China, Harvard Dataverse,
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VHY0L2,
2022.
Gavrilov, N. M. and Kshevetskii, S. P.: Dynamical and thermal effects of
nonsteady nonlinear acoustic-gravity waves propagating from tropospheric
sources to the upper atmosphere, Adv. Space Res., 56, 1833–1843,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.033, 2015.
Gossard, E. E. and Hooke, W. H.: Waves in the Atmosphere: Atmospheric
Infrasound and Gravity Waves, Their Generation and Propagation, Elsevier
Scientific Publ. Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands, ISBN-10 0444411968, 1975.
Guo, Q., Zheng, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., and Rozumenko, V. T.:
Ionospheric processes observed with the passive oblique-incidence HF Doppler
radar, Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series “Radio
Physics and Electronics”, 30, 3–15,
https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2019-30-01, 2019a.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Dynamical processes in the ionosphere following the moderate earthquake in
Japan on 7 July 2018, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 186, 88–103,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.02.003, 2019b.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Radio Monitoring of Dynamic Processes in the Ionosphere Over China During
the Partial Solar Eclipse of 11 August 2018, Radio Sci., 55, e2019RS006866,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006866, 2020.
Hickey, M. P., Schubert, G., and Walterscheid, R. L.: Acoustic wave heating
of the thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 21543–21548,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000036, 2001.
Hickey, M. P., Walterscheid, R. L., and Schubert, G.: Gravity wave heating
and cooling of the thermosphere: Roles of the sensible heat flux and viscous
flux of kinetic energy, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A12326,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016792, 2011.
Hung, R. J. and Kuo, J. P.: Ionospheric observation of gravity-waves
associated with Hurricane Eloise, J. Geophys., 45, 67–80,
https://journal.geophysicsjournal.com/JofG/article/view/173, 1978.
Hocke, K. and Schlegel, K.: A review of atmospheric gravity waves and travelling ionospheric disturbances: 1982–1995, Ann. Geophys., 14, 917–940, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0917-6, 1996.
Inan, U., Piddyachiy, D., Peter, W., Sauvaud, J., and Parrot, M.: DEMETER
satellite observations of lightning-induced electron precipitation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L07103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029238, 2007.
Isaev, N. V., Sorokin, V. M., Chmyrev, V. M., and Serebryakova, O. N.:
Ionospheric electric fields related to sea storms and typhoons, Geomag.
Aeron., 42, 638–643, 2002.
Isaev, N. V., Kostin, V. M., Belyaev, G. G., Ovcharenko, O. Y., and
Trushkina, E. P.: Disturbances of the topside ionosphere caused by typhoons,
Geomag. Aeron., 50, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321002012X,
2010.
Karpov, I. V. and Kshevetskii, S. P.: Numerical study of heating the upper
atmosphere by acoustic-gravity waves from local source on the Earth's
surface and influence of this heating on the wave propagation conditions,
J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 164, 89–96,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.019, 2017.
Ke, F. Y., Qi, X. M., Wang, Y., and Liu, X. W.: Statistics of ionospheric
responses to Southeast Asia's typhoons during 2006–2018 using the rate of
change in the TEC index, Adv. Space Res., 66, 1724–1742,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.06.003, 2020.
Kong, J., Yao, Y., Xu, Y., Kuo, C., Zhang, L., Liu, L., and Zhai, C.: A
clear link connecting the troposphere and ionosphere: ionospheric reponses
to the 2015 Typhoon Dujuan, J. Geod., 91, 1087–1097,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1011-4, 2017.
Krishnam Raju, D. G., Rao, M. S., Rao, B. M., Jogulu, C., Rao, C. P., and
Ramanadham, R.: Infrasonic oscillations in the F2 region associated with
severe thunderstorms, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 5873–5880,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA07p05873, 1981.
Kubota, M., Shiokawa, K., Ejiri, M. K., Otsuka, Y., Ogawa, T., Sakanoi, T.,
Fukunishi, H., Yamamoto, M., Fukao, S., Saito, A.: Traveling ionospheric
disturbances observed in the OI 630-nm nightglow images over Japan by using
a Multipoint Imager Network during the FRONT Campaign, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
27, 4037–4040, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011858, 2000.
Kuester, M. A., Alexander, M. J., and Ray, E. A.: A model study of gravity
waves over Hurricane Humberto (2001), J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3231–3246,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2372.1, 2008.
Li, W., Yue, J., Yang, Y., Li, Z., Guo, J., Pan, Y., and Zhang, K.: Analysis
of ionospheric disturbances associated with powerful cyclones in East Asia
and North America, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 161, 43–54,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.06.012, 2017.
Li, W., Yue, J., Wu, S., Yang, Y., Li, Z., Bi, J., and Zhang, K.:
Ionospheric responses to typhoons in Australia during 2005–2014 using GNSS
and FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC measurements, GPS Solut., 22, 61,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0722-1, 2018.
Luo, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T.,
Shulga, S. N., and Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric effects of the Kamchatka
meteoroid: Results from multipath oblique sounding,
J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 207, 105336,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105336, 2020.
Marple Jr., S. L.: Digital spectral analysis: with applications, Inc,
Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, N. J., 492 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398548, 1987.
Mikhailova, G. A., Mikhailov, Yu. M., and Kapustina, O. V.: Variations of
ULF-VLF electric fields in the external ionosphere over powerful typhoons in
Pacific Ocean, Adv. Space Res., 30, 2613–2618,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)80358-1, 2002.
Nickolaenko, A. P. and Hayakawa, M.: Heating of the lower ionosphere
electrons by electromagnetic radiation of lightning discharges, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 22, 3015–3018, https://doi.org/10.1029/95gl01982, 1995.
Okuzawa, T., Shibata, T., Ichinose, T., Takagi, K., Nagasawa, C., Nagano,
I., Mambo, M., Tsutsui, M., and Ogawa, T.: Short-period disturbances in the
ionosphere observed at the time of typhoons in September 1982 by a network
of HF Doppler receivers, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 239–266,
https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.38.239, 1986.
Otsuka, Y., Tani, T., Tsugawa, T., Ogawa, T., and Saito, A.: Statistical study
of relationship between medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbance and
sporadic E layer activities in summer night over Japan, J. Atmos.
Solar-Terr. Phys., 70, 2196–2202,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.07.008, 2008.
Paulino, I., Medeiros, A. F., Vadas, S. L., Wrasse, C. M., Takahashi, H., Buriti, R. A., Leite, D., Filgueira, S., Bageston, J. V., Sobral, J. H. A., and Gobbi, D.: Periodic waves in the lower thermosphere observed by OI630 nm airglow images, Ann. Geophys., 34, 293–301, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-293-2016, 2016.
Paulino, I., Moraes, J. F., Maranhão, G. L., Wrasse, C. M., Buriti, R. A., Medeiros, A. F., Paulino, A. R., Takahashi, H., Makela, J. J., Meriwether, J. W., and Campos, J. A. V.: Intrinsic parameters of periodic waves observed in the OI6300 airglow layer over the Brazilian equatorial region, Ann. Geophys., 36, 265–273, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-265-2018, 2018.
Perkins, F. W.: Spread F and ionospheric currents, J. Geophys. Res. 78,
218–226, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i001p00218, 1973
Polyakova, A. S. and Perevalova, N. P.: Investigation into impact of
tropical cyclones on the ionosphere using GPS sounding and NCEP/NCAR
reanalysis data, Adv. Space Res., 48, 1196–1210,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.06.014, 2011.
Polyakova, A. S. and Perevalova, N. P.: Comparative analysis of TEC
disturbances over tropical cyclone zones in the north-west Pacific Ocean,
Adv. Space Res., 52, 1416–1426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.029,
2013.
Prasad, S. S., Schneck, L. J., and Davies, K.: Ionospheric disturbances by
severe tropospheric weather storms, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 37, 1357–1363,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(75)90128-2, 1975.
Pulinets, S. and Davidenko, D.: Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes and
global electric circuit, Adv. Space Res., 53, 709–723,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.035, 2014.
Shiokawa, K., Ihara, C., Otsuka, Y., and Ogawa, T.: Statistical study of
nighttime medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances using midlatitude
airglow images, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1052, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009491, 2003.
Šindelářova, T., Burešová, D., Chum, J., and Hruška,
F.: Doppler observations of infrasonic waves of meteorological origin at
ionospheric heights, Adv. Space Res., 43, 1644–1651,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.08.022, 2009.
Song, Q., Ding, F., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Mao, T., Zhao, X., and Wang, Y.:
Medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances induced by Typhoon Chan-hom
over China, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 2223–2237,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026152, 2019.
Sorokin, V. M., Isaev, N. V., Yaschenko, A. K., Chmyrev, V. M., and
Hayakawa, M.: Strong DC electric field formation in the low latitude
ionosphere over typhoons, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 67, 1269–1279,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.06.014, 2005.
Suzuki, S., Vadas, S. L., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Karwamura, S., and
Murayama, Y.: Typoon-induced concentric airglow structures in the mesopause
region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5983–5987,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058087, 2013.
Vadas, S. L. and Crowley, G.: Sources of the traveling ionospheric
disturbances observed by the ionospheric TIDDBIT sounder near Wallops Island
on 30 October 2007, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A07324, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015053,
2010.
Vadas, S. L., Fritts, D. C., and Alexander, M. J.: Mechanism for the
Generation of Secondary Waves in Wave Breaking Regions, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 194–214, 2003.
Vanina–Dart, L. B., Pokrovskaya, I. V., and Sharkov, E. A.: Studying the
interaction between the lower equatorial ionosphere and tropical cyclones
according to data of remote and rocket sounding, Izvestiya, Atmos. Ocean.
Phys., 2, 19–27, 2007.
Voss, H. D., Imhof, W. L., Walt, M., Mobilia, J., Gaines, E. E., Reagan, J.
B., Inan, U. S., Helliwell, R. A., Carpenter, D. L., Katsufrakis, J. P., and
Chang, H. C.: Lightning-induced electron precipitation, Nature, 312,
740–742, https://doi.org/10.1038/312740a0, 1984.
Voss, H. D., Walt, M., Imhof, W. L., Mobilia, J., and Inan, U. S.: Satellite
observations of lightning-induced electron precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.,
103, 11725–11744, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA02878, 1998.
Wen, Y. and Jin, S.: Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Characteristics
during the 2018 Typhoon Maria from GPS Observations, Remote Sens., 12,
746, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040746, 2020.
Xiao, Z., Xiao, S.-G., Hao, Y.-Q., and Zhang, D.-H.: Morphological features
of ionospheric response to typhoon, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A04304,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011671, 2007.
Yiğit, E., Knížová, P. K., Georgieva, K., and Ward, W.: A
review of vertical coupling in the Atmosphere–Ionosphere system: Effects of
waves, sudden stratospheric warmings, space weather, and of solar activity,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 141, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.02.011, 2016.
Zakharov, V. I. and Kunitsyn, V. E.: Regional features of atmospheric
manifestations of tropical cyclones according to ground-based GPS network
data, Geomagn. Aeron., 52, 533–545,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212040160, 2012.
Zakharov, V. I., Pilipenko, V. A., Grushin, V. A., and Khamidullin, A. F.:
Impact of typhoon Vongfong 2014 on the Ionosphere and Geomagnetic Field
According to Swarm Satellite Data: 1. Wave Disturbances of Ionospheric
Plasma, Solar-Terr. Phys., 5, 101–108,
https://doi.org10.12737/stp-52201914, 2019.
Zakharov, V. I. and Sigachev, P. K.: Ionospheric disturbances from tropical
cyclones, Adv. Space Res., 69, 132–141,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.025, 2022.
Zhao, Y., Deng, Y., Wang, J.-S., Zhang, S.-R., and Lin, C. Y.: Tropical
cyclone-induced gravity wave perturbations in the upper atmosphere: GITM-R
simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JA027675,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027675, 2020.
Zhao, Y. X., Mao, T., Wang, J. S., and Chen, Z.: The 2D features of tropical
cyclone Usagi's effects on the ionospheric total electron content,
Adv. Space Res., 62, 760–764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.022,
2018.
Zheng, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Luo,
Y.: Disturbances in the ionosphere and distortion of radio wave
characteristics that accompanied the super typhoon Lekima event of 4–12
August 2019, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JA030553,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030553, 2022.
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations...
