Articles | Volume 38, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
10 Feb 2020
Regular paper |
| 10 Feb 2020
| 10 Feb 2020
Model of the propagation of very low-frequency beams in the Earth–ionosphere waveguide: principles of the tensor impedance method in multi-layered gyrotropic waveguides
Faculty of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
National Space Facilities Control and Test Center, State Space Agency of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Vladimir Grimalsky
IICBA, CIICAp, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos (UAEM), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
Viktor Fedun
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Oleksiy Agapitov
Faculty of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
John Bonnell
Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
Asen Grytsai
Faculty of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
Gennadi Milinevsky
Faculty of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
International Center of Future Science, College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, China
Alex Liashchuk
National Space Facilities Control and Test Center, State Space Agency of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Alexander Rozhnoi
Shmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Maria Solovieva
Shmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Andrey Gulin
Faculty of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
Related authors
Yuriy G. Rapoport, Oleg K. Cheremnykh, Volodymyr V. Koshovy, Mykola O. Melnik, Oleh L. Ivantyshyn, Roman T. Nogach, Yuriy A. Selivanov, Vladimir V. Grimalsky, Valentyn P. Mezentsev, Larysa M. Karataeva, Vasyl. M. Ivchenko, Gennadi P. Milinevsky, Viktor N. Fedun, and Eugen N. Tkachenko
Ann. Geophys., 35, 53–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-53-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-53-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Before many catastrophic phenomena such as earthquakes, sound is generated at a very low frequency. It is already established that it can disturb the upper layer of the atmosphere – the ionosphere. Control of disasters' precursors is important. Using the unique, powerful sound generator, whose loudness is comparable to an ascending jet, we have constructed the theory and conducted a series of experiments trying to model acoustic action of disasters on the ionosphere.
Yu. Rapoport, Yu. Selivanov, V. Ivchenko, V. Grimalsky, E. Tkachenko, A. Rozhnoi, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 32, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-449-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-449-2014, 2014
Anatoliy Lozbin, Viktor Fedun, and Olga Kryakunova
Ann. Geophys., 40, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) for detection, identification, and analysis of ionosphere anomalies from satellite spectrograms and time series row data from instruments onboard the DEMETER satellite was designed. Using this software, the analyses of ionosphere parameter variations caused by various factors are provided. The scientific data processing and visualization technologies used in the development of DIA can be used in the creation of software for other scientific space missions.
Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, Viktor Fedun, Peter Gallagher, Joseph McCauley, Mohammed Y. Boudjada, Sergiy Shelyag, and Hans U. Eichelberger
Ann. Geophys., 37, 843–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, 2019
Yuke Wang, Valerii Shulga, Gennadi Milinevsky, Aleksey Patoka, Oleksandr Evtushevsky, Andrew Klekociuk, Wei Han, Asen Grytsai, Dmitry Shulga, Valery Myshenko, and Oleksandr Antyufeyev
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10303–10317, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10303-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10303-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The major sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) dramatically changed atmospheric conditions. This event is accompanied by a sharp increase in the polar stratosphere temperature, zonal wind reverse, and strong changes in the polar mesosphere. These changes affect even the midlatitude mesosphere, which is not widely covered by observations. Our newly installed microwave radiometer allowed for studying mesospheric zonal wind and CO variations to understand the SSW 2018 effects at midlatitudes.
Asen Grytsai, Andrew Klekociuk, Gennadi Milinevsky, Oleksandr Evtushevsky, and Kane Stone
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1741–1758, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1741-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1741-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Twenty years ago we discovered that the ozone hole shape is asymmetric. This asymmetry is minimum over the Weddell Sea region and maximum over the Ross Sea area. Later we detected that the position of the ozone minimum is shifting east. We have continued to follow this event, and a couple years ago we revealed that the shift is slowing down and starting to move back. We connect all this movement with ozone hole increase; since 2000 the ozone layer has been stabilizing and recently recovering.
Yuriy G. Rapoport, Oleg K. Cheremnykh, Volodymyr V. Koshovy, Mykola O. Melnik, Oleh L. Ivantyshyn, Roman T. Nogach, Yuriy A. Selivanov, Vladimir V. Grimalsky, Valentyn P. Mezentsev, Larysa M. Karataeva, Vasyl. M. Ivchenko, Gennadi P. Milinevsky, Viktor N. Fedun, and Eugen N. Tkachenko
Ann. Geophys., 35, 53–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-53-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-53-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Before many catastrophic phenomena such as earthquakes, sound is generated at a very low frequency. It is already established that it can disturb the upper layer of the atmosphere – the ionosphere. Control of disasters' precursors is important. Using the unique, powerful sound generator, whose loudness is comparable to an ascending jet, we have constructed the theory and conducted a series of experiments trying to model acoustic action of disasters on the ionosphere.
O. Onishchenko, O. Pokhotelov, W. Horton, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1343–1347, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1343-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1343-2015, 2015
H. Breuillard, O. Agapitov, A. Artemyev, E. A. Kronberg, S. E. Haaland, P. W. Daly, V. V. Krasnoselskikh, D. Boscher, S. Bourdarie, Y. Zaliznyak, and G. Rolland
Ann. Geophys., 33, 583–597, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-583-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-583-2015, 2015
H. Breuillard, O. Agapitov, A. Artemyev, V. Krasnoselskikh, O. Le Contel, C. M. Cully, V. Angelopoulos, Y. Zaliznyak, and G. Rolland
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1477–1485, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1477-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1477-2014, 2014
A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, V. Fedun, M. Hayakawa, K. Schwingenschuh, and B. Levin
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1455–1462, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1455-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1455-2014, 2014
A. Rozhnoi, M. Solovieva, B. Levin, M. Hayakawa, and V. Fedun
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2671–2679, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2671-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2671-2014, 2014
G. Milinevsky, V. Danylevsky, V. Bovchaliuk, A. Bovchaliuk, Ph. Goloub, O. Dubovik, V. Kabashnikov, A. Chaikovsky, N. Miatselskaya, M. Mishchenko, and M. Sosonkin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1459–1474, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1459-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1459-2014, 2014
Yu. Rapoport, Yu. Selivanov, V. Ivchenko, V. Grimalsky, E. Tkachenko, A. Rozhnoi, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 32, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-449-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-449-2014, 2014
O. Onishchenko, O. Pokhotelov, W. Horton, A. Smolyakov, T. Kaladze, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 32, 181–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-181-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-181-2014, 2014
A. Kryshtal, S. Gerasimenko, A. Voitsekhovska, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 31, 2193–2200, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2193-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2193-2013, 2013
A. V. Artemyev, K. G. Orlova, D. Mourenas, O. V. Agapitov, and V. V. Krasnoselskikh
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1485–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1485-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1485-2013, 2013
H. Breuillard, Y. Zaliznyak, O. Agapitov, A. Artemyev, V. Krasnoselskikh, and G. Rolland
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1429–1435, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1429-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1429-2013, 2013
S. Zharkov, S. Shelyag, V. Fedun, R. Erdélyi, and M. J. Thompson
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1357–1364, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1357-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1357-2013, 2013
A. Bovchaliuk, G. Milinevsky, V. Danylevsky, P. Goloub, O. Dubovik, A. Holdak, F. Ducos, and M. Sosonkin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6587–6602, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6587-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6587-2013, 2013
A. V. Artemyev, D. Mourenas, O. V. Agapitov, and V. V. Krasnoselskikh
Ann. Geophys., 31, 599–624, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-599-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-599-2013, 2013
O. Onishchenko, O. Pokhotelov, and V. Fedun
Ann. Geophys., 31, 459–462, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-459-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-459-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Earth's ionosphere & aeronomy | Keywords: Ionospheric disturbances
Effects of the super-powerful tropospheric western Pacific phenomenon of September–October 2018 on the ionosphere over China: results from oblique sounding
Ionospheric effects of the 5–6 January 2019 eclipse over the People's Republic of China: results from oblique sounding
Study of the equatorial and low-latitude total electron content response to plasma bubbles during solar cycle 24–25 over the Brazilian region using a Disturbance Ionosphere indeX
Diagnostic study of geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric changes over very low-frequency signal propagation paths in the mid-latitude D region
Complex analysis of the ionosphere variations during the geomagnetic storm at 20 January 2010 performed by Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) software and DEMETER satellite data
Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm: influence on high frequency radio wave characteristics
Tomographic imaging of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance during the Halloween storm of 2003
Ionospheric anomalies associated with the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq border earthquake and a moderate magnetic storm
Strong influence of solar X-ray flares on low-frequency electromagnetic signals in middle latitudes
A case study of the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the eastern Asian sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic conjugate observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to a North Korean underground nuclear explosion on 3 September 2017
Emergence of a localized total electron content enhancement during the severe geomagnetic storm of 8 September 2017
Mitigation of ionospheric signatures in Swarm GPS gravity field estimation using weighting strategies
PPP-based Swarm kinematic orbit determination
Impact of magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Giorgio Arlan Silva Picanço, Clezio Marcos Denardini, Paulo Alexandre Bronzato Nogueira, Laysa Cristina Araujo Resende, Carolina Sousa Carmo, Sony Su Chen, Paulo França Barbosa-Neto, and Esmeralda Romero-Hernandez
Ann. Geophys., 40, 503–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we use the Disturbance Ionosphere indeX (DIX) to study equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) events over the Brazilian equatorial and low latitudes. Our results showed that the DIX detected EPB disturbances in terms of their intensity and occurrence times. Therefore, these responses agreed with the ionosphere behavior before, during, and after the studied EPBs. Finally, these disturbances tended to be higher (lower) in high (low) solar activity.
Victor U. J. Nwankwo, William Denig, Sandip K. Chakrabarti, Olugbenga Ogunmodimu, Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye, Johnson O. Fatokun, Paul I. Anekwe, Omodara E. Obisesan, Olufemi E. Oyanameh, and Oluwaseun V. Fatoye
Ann. Geophys., 40, 433–461, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We combined the observed diurnal VLF amplitude variation in the D region with standard measurements of the E and F regions to perform a diagnostic investigation of coupled geomagnetic storm effects in order to understand the observed storm-induced variations in VLF narrowband based on state and responses of the ionosphere. The dayside VLF amplitude showed a tendency for attenuation following geomagnetic storms, and the h’E and h’F variations confirmed strong storm response over the signal paths.
Anatoliy Lozbin, Viktor Fedun, and Olga Kryakunova
Ann. Geophys., 40, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) for detection, identification, and analysis of ionosphere anomalies from satellite spectrograms and time series row data from instruments onboard the DEMETER satellite was designed. Using this software, the analyses of ionosphere parameter variations caused by various factors are provided. The scientific data processing and visualization technologies used in the development of DIA can be used in the creation of software for other scientific space missions.
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Karl Bolmgren, Cathryn Mitchell, Talini Pinto Jayawardena, Gary Bust, Jon Bruno, and Elizabeth Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1149–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Travelling ionospheric disturbances behave like waves in the ionosphere, the ionised upper part of the atmosphere. In this study, we use an ionospheric tomography technique to map the electron content as affected by the passage of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance launched during the largest geomagnetic storm observed by modern instruments. This is the first such imaging using this software and to the authors' knowledge the first study of this travelling ionospheric disturbance.
Erman Şentürk, Samed Inyurt, and İbrahim Sertçelik
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1031–1043, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The analysis of unexpected ionospheric phases before large earthquakes is one of the cutting-edge issues in earthquake prediction studies. Ionospheric TEC data were analyzed by short-time Fourier transform and a classic running median to detect abnormalities before the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq earthquake on November 12, 2017. The results showed clear positive anomalies 8–9 d before the earthquake as an earthquake precursor due to quiet space weather, local dispersion, and proximity to the epicenter.
Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, Viktor Fedun, Peter Gallagher, Joseph McCauley, Mohammed Y. Boudjada, Sergiy Shelyag, and Hans U. Eichelberger
Ann. Geophys., 37, 843–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, 2019
Jing Liu, Dong-He Zhang, Anthea J. Coster, Shun-Rong Zhang, Guan-Yi Ma, Yong-Qiang Hao, and Zuo Xiao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 673–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, 2019
Yi Liu, Chen Zhou, Qiong Tang, Guanyi Chen, and Zhengyu Zhao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Underground nuclear explosion (UNE) can produce ionospheric disturbances through a lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling mechanism, which is very similar with earthquakes. By using the total electron content observations and Swarm ionospheric current data, we have investigated the geomagnetic conjugate ionospheric disturbances. We proposed that the electric field generated during the UNE test can be an important mechanism for ionospheric disturbance.
Carlos Sotomayor-Beltran and Laberiano Andrade-Arenas
Ann. Geophys., 37, 153–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A localized total electron content enhancement (LTE) was observed as a product of the geomagnetic storm that happened on 8 September 2017. This result was unexpected because it was located south of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA). The origin of the enhancement of the TEC in the EIA is very likely due to the super-fountain effect. On the other hand, the LTE is suggested to be produced by the contribution of the super-fountain effect along with traveling ionospheric disturbances.
Lucas Schreiter, Daniel Arnold, Veerle Sterken, and Adrian Jäggi
Ann. Geophys., 37, 111–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing Swarm GPS-only gravity fields to the ultra-precise GRACE K-Band gravity field schematic errors occurs around the geomagnetic equator. Due to the end of the GRACE mission, and the gap to the GRACE-FO mission, only Swarm can provide a continuous time series of gravity fields. We present different and assess different approaches to remove the schematic errors and thus improve the quality of the Swarm gravity fields.
Le Ren and Steffen Schön
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1227–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we analyse the performance of the Swarm onboard GPS receiver and present the approach for determination of the IfE Swarm kinematic orbit with PPP. The differences between our kinematic orbits and ESA reduced-dynamic orbits are at 1.5 cm, 1.5 cm and 2.5 cm level in along-track, cross-track and radial directions, respectively. A comparison with SLR underlines an accuracy of the kinematic orbits of 3–4 cm.
Donat V. Blagoveshchensky, Olga A. Maltseva, and Maria A. Sergeeva
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Agapitov, O. V., Artemyev, A. V., Mourenas, D., Kasahara, Y., and Krasnoselskikh, V.: Inner belt and slot region electron lifetimes and energization rates based on AKEBONO statistics of whistler waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 2876–2893, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019886, 2014. a
Agapitov, O. V., Mourenas, D., Artemyev, A. V., Mozer, F. S., Hospodarsky, G., Bonnell, J., and Krasnoselskikh, V: Synthetic Empirical Chorus Wave Model From Combined Van Allen Probes and Cluster Statistics, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 2017JA024843, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024843, 2018. a
Arnoldy, R. L. and Kintner, P. M.: Rocket observations of the precipitation of electrons by ground VLF transmitters, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 94, 6825–6832, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA094iA06p06825, 1989. a, b
Artemyev, A. V., Agapitov, O. V., Mourenas, D., Krasnoselskikh, V., and Zelenyi, L. M.: Storm-induced energization of radiation belt electrons: Effect of wave obliquity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4138–4143, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50837, 2013. a
Artemyev, A., Agapitov, O., Mourenas, D., Krasnoselskikh, V., and Mozer, F.: Wave energy budget analysis in the Earth's radiation belts uncovers a missing energy, Nat. Commun., 6, 7143, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8143, 2015. a
Artsimovich, L. A. and Sagdeev, R. Z: Physics of plasma for physicists, ATOMIZDAT Publ. House, Moscow, 320 pp., 1979 (in Russian). a
Azadifar, M., Li, D., Rachidi, F., Rubinstein, M., Diendorfer, G., Schulz, W., Pichler, H., Rakov, V. A., Paolone, M., and Pavanello, D.: Analysis of lightning-ionosphere interaction using simultaneous records of source current and 380-km distant electric field, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 159, 48–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.05.010, 2017. a
Biagi, P. F., Maggipinto, T., Righetti, F., Loiacono, D., Schiavulli, L., Ligonzo, T., Ermini, A., Moldovan, I. A., Moldovan, A. S., Buyuksarac, A., Silva, H. G., Bezzeghoud, M., and Contadakis, M. E.: The European VLF/LF radio network to search for earthquake precursors: setting up and natural/man-made disturbances, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 333–341, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-333-2011, 2011. a
Biagi, P. F., Maggipinto, T., and Ermini, A.: The European VLF/LF radio network: current status, Acta Geod. Geophys., 50, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-014-0089-x, 2015. a, b
Boudjada, M. Y., Schwingenschuh, K., Al-Haddad, E., Parrot, M., Galopeau, P. H. M., Besser, B., Stangl, G., and Voller, W.: Effects of solar and geomagnetic activities on the sub-ionospheric very low frequency transmitter signals received by the DEMETER micro-satellite, Ann. Geophys., 55, 1, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5463, 2012. a
Bragin, Yu. A., Tyutin Alexander, A., Kocheev, A. A., and Tyutin, A. A.: Direct measurements of the vertical electric field of the atmosphere up to 80 km, Space Res., 12, 279–281, 1974. a
Brittain, R., Kintner, P. M., Kelley, M. C., Siren, J. C., and Carpenter, D. L.: Standing wave patterns in VLF Hiss, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 88, 7059–7064, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA088iA09p07059, 1983. a
Buitink, S., Corstanje, A., Enriquez, J. E., Falcke, H., Hörandel ,J. R., Huege, T., Nelles, A., Rachen, J. P., Schellart, P., Scholten, O., ter Veen, S., Thoudam, S., and Trinh, T. N. G.: A method for high precision reconstruction of air shower Xmax using two-dimensional radio intensity profiles, arXiv:1408.7001v2 [astro-ph.IM], 1 September 2014. a
Chevalier, M. W. and Inan, U. S.: A Technique for Efficiently Modeling Long-Path Propagation for Use in Both FDFD and FDTD, IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett., 5, 525–528, https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2006.887551, 2006. a
Chou, M.-Y., Lin, C. C. H., Yue, J., Chang, L. C., Tsai, H.-F., and Chen, C.-H.: Medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances triggered by Super Typhoon Nepartak, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 7569–7577, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl073961, 2017. a
Cummer, S. A., Inan, U. S., Bell, T. F., and Barrington-Leigh, C. P.: ELF radiation produced by electrical currents in sprites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1281–1284, https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL50937, 1998. a
Cummer, S. A., Briggs, M. S., Dwyer, J. R., Xiong, S., Connaughton, V., Fishman, G. J., Lu, G., Lyu, F., and Solanki, R.: The source altitude, electric current, and intrinsic brightness of terrestrial gamma ray flashes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8586–8593, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062196, 2014. a
Dwyer, J. R.: The relativistic feedback discharge model of terrestrial gamma ray flashes, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A02308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017160, 2012. a
Dwyer, J. R. and Uman, M. A.: The physics of lightning, Phys. Rep., 534, 147–241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.004, 2014. a
Glukhov, V. S., Pasko, V. P., and Inan, U. S.: Relaxation of transient lower ionospheric disturbances caused by lightning-whistler-induced electron precipitation bursts, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 16971, https://doi.org/10.1029/92ja01596, 1992. a
Grimalsky, V. V., Kremenetsky, I. A., and Rapoport, Y. G.: Excitation of electromagnetic waves in the lithosphere and their penetration into ionosphere and magnetosphere, J. Atmos. Electr., 19, 101–117, 1999a. a
Grimalsky, V. V., Kremenetsky, I. A., and Rapoport, Y. G.: Excitation of EMW in the lithosphere and propagation into magnetosphere, in: Atmospheric and Ionospheric Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes, edited by: Hayakawa, M., TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 777–787, 1999b. a
Guglielmi A. V. and Pokhotelov, O. A.: Geoelectromagnetic waves, IOP Publ., Bristol, 402 pp., 1996. a
Gurevich, A. V. and Zybin, K. P.: Runaway breakdown and electric discharges in thunderstorms, Physics-Uspekhi, 44, 1119–1140, https://doi.org/10.1070/PU2001v044n11ABEH000939, 2001. a, b, c
Gurevich, A. V., Karashtin, A. N., Ryabov, V. A., and Chubenko, A. L. S.: Nonlinear phenomena in the ionospheric plasma.Effects of cosmic rays and runaway breakdown on thunderstorm discharges, Physics-Uspekhi, 52, 735–745, https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.0179.200907h.0779, 2009. a
Hare, B. M., Scholten, O., Bonardi, A., Buitink, S., Corstanje, A., Ebert, U., Falcke, H., Hörandel, J. R., Leijnse, H., Mitra, P., Mulrey, K., Nelles, A., Rachen, J. P., Rossetto, L., Rutjes, C., Schellart, P., Thoudam, S., Trinh, T. N. G., ter Veen, S., and Winchen, T.: LOFAR Lightning Imaging: Mapping Lightning With Nanosecond Precision, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2861–2876, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028132, 2018. a
Hayakawa, M.: Earthquake prediction with radio techniques, Wiley, Singapore, 294 pp., 2015. a
Kintner, P. M., Brittain, R., Kelley, M. C., Carpenter, D. L., and Rycroft, M. J.: In situ measurements of transionospheric VLF wave injection, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 88, 7065–7073, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA088iA09p07065, 1983. a
Koskinen, H. E. J.: Physics of Space Storms. From the Solar Surface to the Earth, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 419 pp., 2011. a
Kuzichev, I. V. and Shklyar, D. R.: On full-wave solution for VLF waves in the near-Earth space, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 72 , 1044–1056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.07.002, 2010. a
Kuzichev, I.V., Vasko, I. Yu., Malykhin, A. Yu., and Soto-Chavez, A. R.: On the ionospheric propagation of VLF waves generated by currents in the lower ionosphere, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 179, 138–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.07.002, 2018. a
Lehtinen, N. G. and Inan, U. S.: Radiation of ELF/VLF waves by harmonically varying currents into a stratified ionosphere with
application to radiation by a modulated electrojet, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A06301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012911, 2008. a
Lehtinen, N. G. and Inan, U. S.: Full-wave modeling of transionospheric propagation of VLF waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L03104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036535, 2009. a
Levy, M.: Parabolic equation methods for electromagnetic wave propagation, The Inst. of Electrical Eng., Padstow, Cornwall, 336 pp., 2000. a
Lu, G., Zhang, H., Cummer, S. A., Wang, Y., Lyu, F., Briggs, M., Xiong, S., and Chen, A.: A comparative study on the lightning sferics associated with terrestrial gamma-ray flashes observed in Americas and Asia, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy. 183, 67–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.01.001, 2019. a
Maier, S. A.: Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, NY, 234 pp., 2007. a
Marshall, R. A. and Wallace, T.: Finite-Difference Modeling of Very-Low-Frequency Propagation in the Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag., 65, 7185–7197, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2017.2758392, 2017. a
Martynenko, S. I., Rozumenko, V. T., and Tyrnov, O. F.: New possibilities for mesospheric electricity diagnostics, Adv. Space Res., 27, 1127–1132, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00208-3, 2001. a
Meek, C. E., Manson, A. H., Martynenko, S. I., Rozumenko, V. T., and Tyrnov, O. F.: Remote sensing of mesospheric electric fields using MF radars, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 66, 881–890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.02.002, 2004. a
Mezentsev, A., Lehtinen, N., Ostgaard, N., Perez-Invernon, F. J., and Cummer, S. A.: Spectral characteristics of VLF sferics associated with RHESSI TGFs, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 139–159, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027624, 2018. a
Nina, A., Radovanović, M., Milovanović, B., Kovačević, A., Bajčetić, J., and Popović, L. C.: Low ionospheric reactions on tropical depressions prior hurricanes, Adv. Space Res., 60, 1866–1877, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.024, 2017. a
Patra, S., Spencer, E. Horton, W., and Sojka, J.: Study of Dst/ring current recovery times using the WINDMI model, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A02212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015824, 2011. a
Pulinets, S. and Boyarchuk, K.: Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes, Springer, Berlin, 315 pp., 2005. a
Qin, J., Celestin, S., and Pasko, V. P.: Low frequency electromagnetic radiation from sprite streamers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L22803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053991, 2012. a
Rapoport, Y. G., Gotynyan, O. E., Ivchenko, V. N., Hayakawa, M., Grimalsky, V. V., Koshevaya, S. V., and Juarez, D.: Modeling electrostatic – photochemistry seismoionospheric coupling in the presence of external currents, Phys. Chem. Earth, 31, 437–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.010, 2006. a, b, c, d
Rapoport, Y. G., Boardman, A. D., Grimalsky, V. V., Ivchenko, V. M., and Kalinich, N: Strong nonlinear focusing of light in nonlinearly controlled electromagnetic active metamaterial field concentrators, J. Opt.-UK, 16, 0552029–0552038, https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/16/5/055202, 2014. a, b
Rozhnoi, A., Solovieva, M., Levin, B., Hayakawa, M., and Fedun, V.: Meteorological effects in the lower ionosphere as based on VLF/LF signal observations, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2671–2679, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2671-2014, 2014. a
Rozhnoi, A., Solovieva, M., Parrot, M., Hayakawa, M., Biagi, P.-F., Schwingenschuh, K., and Fedun, V.: VLF/LF signal studies of the ionospheric response to strong seismic activity in the Far Eastern region combining the DEMETER and ground-based observations, Phys. Chem. Earth, 85–86, 141–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.005, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f
Ruibys, G. and Tolutis, R: Nonreciprocal HF signal transmission by surface helicon, Electron. Lett., 19, 273, https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19830191, 1983. a, b, c
Sanchez-Dulcet, F., Rodriguez-Bouza M., Silva, H. G., Herraiz, M., Bezzeghoud, M., and Biagi, P. F.: Analysis of observations backing up the existence of VLF and ionospheric TEC anomalies before the Mw6.1 earthquake in Greece, January 26, 2014, Phys. Chem. Earth, 85–86, 150–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.07.002, 2015. a
Scholten, O., Bonardi, A., Buitink, S., Corstanje, A., Ebert, U., Falcke, H., Hörandel, J., Mitra, P., Mulrey, K., Nelles, A., Rachen, J., Rossetto, L., Rutjes, C., Schellart, P., Thoudam, S., Trinh, G., ter Veen, S., and Winchen, T.: Precision study of radio emission from air showers at LOFAR, EPJ Web of Conferences, 136, 02012, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201713602012, 2017. a
Shinagawa, H., Tsugawa, T., Matsumura, M., Iyemori, T., Saito, A., Maruyama, T., and Otsuka, Y.: Two-dimensional simulation of ionospheric variations in the vicinity of the epicenter of the Tohoku-oki earthquake on 11 March 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5009–5013, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl057627, 2013. a
Siefring, C. L. and Kelley, M. C.: Analysis of standing wave patterns in VLF transmitter signals: Effects of sporadic E layers and in situ measurements of low electron densities, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 96, 17813–17826, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA00615, 1991. a
Spiegel, M. R.: Theory and problems of vector analysis and an introduction to tensor analysis, Shnaum Publ., NY, 223 pp., 1959. a
Surkov, V. and Hayakawa, M.: Ultra and Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Springer, Tokyo, 2014. a
Tolstoy, A., Rosenberg, T. J., Inan, U. S., and Carpenter, D. L.: Model predictions of subionospheric VLF signal perturbations resulting from localized, electron precipitation-induced ionization enhancement regions, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 13473, https://doi.org/10.1029/ja091ia12p13473, 1986. a
Walker, A. D. M.: The Theory of Whistler Propagation, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 14, 629–638, 1976. a
Weiland, J. and Wilhelmsson, H.: Coherent Non-Linear Interaction of Waves in Plasmas, Pergamon, London, 1977. a
Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Lepping, R. P., Hutting, L., Plunkett, S., Howard, R. A., and Socker, D.: The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: “The St. Patrick's day event (17 March 2015)”, Earth Planets Space, 68, 151, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y, 2016. a
Yiğit, E., Koucká Knížová, P., Georgieva, K., and Ward, W.: A review of vertical coupling in the Atmosphere–Ionosphere system: Effects of waves, sudden stratospheric warmings, space weather, and of solar activity, Solar-Terr. Phy., 141, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.02.011, 2016. a
Yu, Y., Niu, J., and Simpson, J. J.: A 3-D Global Earth-Ionosphere FDTD Model Including an Anisotropic Magnetized
Plasma Ionosphere, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag., 60, 3246–3256, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2196937, 2012. a
Short summary
The paper analytically and numerically treats the new theoretical basis for ground-based and satellite monitoring of the most powerful processes in the lower atmosphere and Earth (hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.), solar-wind magnetosphere (magnetic storms) and ionosphere (lightning discharges, thunderstorms, etc.). This can be provided by the determination of phases and amplitudes of radio waves in the Earth and ionosphere. In perspective, damage from the natural disasters can be decreased.
The paper analytically and numerically treats the new theoretical basis for ground-based and...
Special issue