Articles | Volume 41, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
16 Nov 2023
Regular paper |
| 16 Nov 2023
| 16 Nov 2023
Three principal components describe the spatiotemporal development of mesoscale ionospheric equivalent currents around substorm onsets
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Ari Viljanen
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Noora Partamies
Department of Arctic Geophysics, University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), Longyearbyen, Norway
Heikki Vanhamäki
Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Mirjam Kellinsalmi
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Simon Walker
Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Related authors
Noora Partamies, Bas Dol, Vincent Teissier, Liisa Juusola, Mikko Syrjäsuo, and Hjalmar Mulders
Ann. Geophys., 42, 103–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral imaging produces large amounts of image data that can no longer be analyzed by visual inspection. Thus, every step towards automatic analysis tools is crucial. Previously supervised learning methods have been used in auroral physics, with a human expert providing ground truth. However, this ground truth is debatable. We present an unsupervised learning method, which shows promising results in detecting auroral breakups in the all-sky image data.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Audrey Schillings, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have examined events during which the measured magnetic field on the ground changes very rapidly, causing a risk to technological conductor networks. According to our results, such events occur when strong electric currents in the ionosphere at 100 km altitude are abruptly modified by sudden compression or expansion of the magnetospheric magnetic field farther in space.
Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Sebastian Käki
Ann. Geophys., 40, 545–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eruptions from the Sun can pose a hazard to Earth's power grids via, e.g., geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). We study magnetic measurements from Fennoscandia to find ways to understand and forecast GIC. We find that the direction of the time derivative of the magnetic field has a short
reset time, about 2 min. We conclude that this result gives insight on the current systems high in Earth’s atmosphere, which are the main driver behind the time derivative’s behavior and GIC formation.
Sebastian Käki, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
During auroral substorms, the ionospheric electric currents change rapidly, and a large amount of energy is dissipated. We combine ionospheric current data derived from the Swarm satellite mission with the substorm database from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network. We obtain statistics of the strength and location of the currents relative to the substorm onset. Our results show that low-earth orbit satellites give a coherent picture of the main features in the substorm current system.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Ari Viljanen, and Maxim Smirnov
Ann. Geophys., 38, 983–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Rapid variations of the magnetic field measured on the ground can be used to estimate space weather risks to power grids, but forecasting the variations remains a challenge. We show that part of this problem stems from the fact that, in addition to electric currents in space, the magnetic field variations are strongly affected by underground electric currents. We suggest that separating the measured field into its space and underground parts could improve our understanding of space weather.
Emilia Kilpua, Liisa Juusola, Maxime Grandin, Antti Kero, Stepan Dubyagin, Noora Partamies, Adnane Osmane, Harriet George, Milla Kalliokoski, Tero Raita, Timo Asikainen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 557–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms, and they cause dramatic changes in radiation belt electron fluxes. Differences in precipitation of high-energy electrons from the belts to the upper atmosphere are thus expected. We investigate here differences in sheath- and ejecta-induced precipitation using the Finnish riometer (relative ionospheric opacity meter) chain.
Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Riku Jarvinen, Markus Battarbee, Emilia Kilpua, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1183–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, forming a magnetosphere. On the night side solar wind stretches the magnetosphere into a long tail. A process called magnetic reconnection opens the magnetic field lines and reconnects them, accelerating particles to high energies. We study this in the magnetotail using a numerical simulation model of the Earth’s magnetosphere. We study the motion of the points where field lines reconnect and the fast flows driven by this process.
Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1027–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's magnetic field is shaped by the solar wind. On the dayside the field is compressed and on the nightside it is stretched as a long tail. The tail has been observed to occasionally undergo flapping motions, but the origin of these motions is not understood. We study the flapping using a numerical simulation of the near-Earth space. We present a possible explanation for how the flapping could be initiated by a passing disturbance and then maintained as a standing wave.
Minna Palmroth, Sanni Hoilijoki, Liisa Juusola, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Heli Hietala, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, Rami Vainio, and Michael Hesse
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1269–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Much like solar flares, substorms occurring within the Earth's magnetic domain are explosive events that cause vivid auroral displays. A decades-long debate exists to explain the substorm onset. We devise a simulation encompassing the entire near-Earth space and demonstrate that detailed modelling of magnetic reconnection explains the central substorm observations. Our results help to understand the unpredictable substorm process, which will significantly improve space weather forecasts.
Noora Partamies, James M. Weygand, and Liisa Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1069–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale undulations of the diffuse aurora boundary, auroral omega bands, have been studied based on 438 omega-like structures identified over Fennoscandian Lapland from 1996 to 2007. The omegas mainly occurred in the post-magnetic midnight sector, in the region between oppositely directed ionospheric field-aligned currents, and during substorm recovery phases. The omega bands were observed during substorms, which were more intense than the average substorm in the same region.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Heli Hietala, Steve E. Milan, Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 34, 943–959, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We have simulated the interaction of the solar wind – the charged particles and magnetic fields emitted by the Sun into space – with the magnetic field of the Earth. The solar wind flows supersonically and creates a shock when it encounters the obstacle formed by the geomagnetic field. We have identified a new chain of events which causes phenomena in the downstream region to eventually cause perturbations at the shock and even upstream. This is confirmed by ground and satellite observations.
Johannes Norberg, Lassi Roininen, Antti Kero, Tero Raita, Thomas Ulich, Markku Markkanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory has been producing ionospheric tomography data since 2003. Based on these data, one solar cycle of ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) estimates is constructed. The measurements are compared against the IRI-2012 model, F10.7 solar flux index and sunspot number data. Qualitatively the tomographic VTEC estimate corresponds to reference data very well, but the IRI-2012 model are on average 40 % higher of that of the tomographic results.
Kirsti Kauristie, Minna Myllys, Noora Partamies, Ari Viljanen, Pyry Peitso, Liisa Juusola, Shabana Ahmadzai, Vikramjit Singh, Ralf Keil, Unai Martinez, Alexej Luginin, Alexi Glover, Vicente Navarro, and Tero Raita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 253–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We use the connection between auroras and geomagnetic field variations in a concept for a Regional Auroral Forecast (RAF) service. RAF is based on statistical relationships between alerts by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and magnetic time derivatives measured by five MIRACLE magnetometer stations located in the surroundings of the Sodankylä research station. As an improvement to previous similar services RAF yields knowledge on typical auroral storm durations at different latitudes.
M. Myllys, N. Partamies, and L. Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 33, 573–581, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, 2015
K. Andréeová, L. Juusola, E. K. J. Kilpua, and H. E. J. Koskinen
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, 2014
N. Partamies, L. Juusola, E. Tanskanen, and K. Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 31, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, 2013
Noora Partamies, Bas Dol, Vincent Teissier, Liisa Juusola, Mikko Syrjäsuo, and Hjalmar Mulders
Ann. Geophys., 42, 103–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral imaging produces large amounts of image data that can no longer be analyzed by visual inspection. Thus, every step towards automatic analysis tools is crucial. Previously supervised learning methods have been used in auroral physics, with a human expert providing ground truth. However, this ground truth is debatable. We present an unsupervised learning method, which shows promising results in detecting auroral breakups in the all-sky image data.
Spencer Mark Hatch, Heikki Vanhamäki, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Johnathan Burchill, Levan Lomidze, David Knudsen, Michael Madelaire, and Habtamu Tesfaw
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2920, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2920, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In studies of the Earth's ionosphere, a hot topic is how to estimate ionospheric conductivity. This is hard to do for a variety of reasons that mostly amount to a lack of measurements. In this study we use satellite measurements to estimate electromagnetic work and ionospheric conductances in both hemispheres. We identify where our model estimates are inconsistent with laws of physics, which partially solves a previous problem with unrealistic predictions of ionospheric conductances.
Anton Goertz, Noora Partamies, Daniel Whiter, and Lisa Baddeley
Ann. Geophys., 41, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-115-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-115-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs) are specific types of aurora believed to be the signature of the connection of Earth's magnetic field to that of the sun. In this paper, we discuss the evolution of PMAFs with regard to their auroral morphology as observed in all-sky camera images. We interpret different aspects of this evolution in terms of the connection dynamics between the magnetic fields of Earth and the sun. This sheds more light on the magnetic interaction between the sun and Earth.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Audrey Schillings, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have examined events during which the measured magnetic field on the ground changes very rapidly, causing a risk to technological conductor networks. According to our results, such events occur when strong electric currents in the ionosphere at 100 km altitude are abruptly modified by sudden compression or expansion of the magnetospheric magnetic field farther in space.
Daniel K. Whiter, Noora Partamies, Björn Gustavsson, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 41, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We measured the height of green and blue aurorae using thousands of camera images recorded over a 7-year period. Both colours are typically brightest at about 114 km altitude. When they peak at higher altitudes the blue aurora is usually higher than the green aurora. This information will help other studies which need an estimate of the auroral height. We used a computer model to explain our observations and to investigate how the green aurora is produced.
Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Sebastian Käki
Ann. Geophys., 40, 545–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eruptions from the Sun can pose a hazard to Earth's power grids via, e.g., geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). We study magnetic measurements from Fennoscandia to find ways to understand and forecast GIC. We find that the direction of the time derivative of the magnetic field has a short
reset time, about 2 min. We conclude that this result gives insight on the current systems high in Earth’s atmosphere, which are the main driver behind the time derivative’s behavior and GIC formation.
Sebastian Käki, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
During auroral substorms, the ionospheric electric currents change rapidly, and a large amount of energy is dissipated. We combine ionospheric current data derived from the Swarm satellite mission with the substorm database from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network. We obtain statistics of the strength and location of the currents relative to the substorm onset. Our results show that low-earth orbit satellites give a coherent picture of the main features in the substorm current system.
Derek McKay, Juha Vierinen, Antti Kero, and Noora Partamies
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 25–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-25-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-25-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When radio waves from our galaxy enter the Earth's atmosphere, they are absorbed by electrons in the upper atmosphere. It was thought that by measuring the amount of absorption, it would allow the height of these electrons in the atmosphere to be determined. If so, this would have significance for future instrument design. However, this paper demonstrates that it is not possible to do this, but it does explain how multiple-frequency measurements can nevertheless be useful.
Fasil Tesema, Noora Partamies, Daniel K. Whiter, and Yasunobu Ogawa
Ann. Geophys., 40, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present the comparison between an auroral model and EISCAT radar electron densities during pulsating aurorae. We test whether an overpassing satellite measurement of the average energy spectrum is a reasonable estimate for pulsating aurora electron precipitation. When patchy pulsating aurora is dominant in the morning sector, the overpass-averaged spectrum is found to be a reasonable estimate – but not when there is a mix of pulsating aurora types in the post-midnight sector.
Daniel K. Whiter, Hanna Sundberg, Betty S. Lanchester, Joshua Dreyer, Noora Partamies, Nickolay Ivchenko, Marco Zaccaria Di Fraia, Rosie Oliver, Amanda Serpell-Stevens, Tiffany Shaw-Diaz, and Thomas Braunersreuther
Ann. Geophys., 39, 975–989, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-975-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-975-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an analysis of high-resolution optical and radar observations of a phenomenon called fragmented aurora-like emissions (FAEs) observed close to aurora in the high Arctic. The observations suggest that FAEs are not caused by high-energy electrons or protons entering the atmosphere along Earth's magnetic field and are, therefore, not aurora. The speeds of the FAEs and their internal dynamics were measured and used to evaluate theories for how the FAEs are produced.
Florine Enengl, Noora Partamies, Nickolay Ivchenko, and Lisa Baddeley
Ann. Geophys., 39, 795–809, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-795-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-795-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Energetic particle precipitation has the potential to change the neutral atmospheric temperature at the bottom of the ionosphere. We have searched for events and investigated a possible correlation between lower-ionosphere electron density enhancements and simultaneous neutral temperature changes. Six of the 10 analysed events are associated with a temperature decrease of 10–20K. The events change the chemical composition in the mesosphere, and the temperatures are probed at lower altitudes.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Ari Viljanen, and Maxim Smirnov
Ann. Geophys., 38, 983–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Rapid variations of the magnetic field measured on the ground can be used to estimate space weather risks to power grids, but forecasting the variations remains a challenge. We show that part of this problem stems from the fact that, in addition to electric currents in space, the magnetic field variations are strongly affected by underground electric currents. We suggest that separating the measured field into its space and underground parts could improve our understanding of space weather.
Emilia Kilpua, Liisa Juusola, Maxime Grandin, Antti Kero, Stepan Dubyagin, Noora Partamies, Adnane Osmane, Harriet George, Milla Kalliokoski, Tero Raita, Timo Asikainen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 557–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms, and they cause dramatic changes in radiation belt electron fluxes. Differences in precipitation of high-energy electrons from the belts to the upper atmosphere are thus expected. We investigate here differences in sheath- and ejecta-induced precipitation using the Finnish riometer (relative ionospheric opacity meter) chain.
Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Riku Jarvinen, Markus Battarbee, Emilia Kilpua, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1183–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, forming a magnetosphere. On the night side solar wind stretches the magnetosphere into a long tail. A process called magnetic reconnection opens the magnetic field lines and reconnects them, accelerating particles to high energies. We study this in the magnetotail using a numerical simulation model of the Earth’s magnetosphere. We study the motion of the points where field lines reconnect and the fast flows driven by this process.
Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1027–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's magnetic field is shaped by the solar wind. On the dayside the field is compressed and on the nightside it is stretched as a long tail. The tail has been observed to occasionally undergo flapping motions, but the origin of these motions is not understood. We study the flapping using a numerical simulation of the near-Earth space. We present a possible explanation for how the flapping could be initiated by a passing disturbance and then maintained as a standing wave.
Minna Palmroth, Sanni Hoilijoki, Liisa Juusola, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Heli Hietala, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, Rami Vainio, and Michael Hesse
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1269–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Much like solar flares, substorms occurring within the Earth's magnetic domain are explosive events that cause vivid auroral displays. A decades-long debate exists to explain the substorm onset. We devise a simulation encompassing the entire near-Earth space and demonstrate that detailed modelling of magnetic reconnection explains the central substorm observations. Our results help to understand the unpredictable substorm process, which will significantly improve space weather forecasts.
Noora Partamies, James M. Weygand, and Liisa Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1069–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale undulations of the diffuse aurora boundary, auroral omega bands, have been studied based on 438 omega-like structures identified over Fennoscandian Lapland from 1996 to 2007. The omegas mainly occurred in the post-magnetic midnight sector, in the region between oppositely directed ionospheric field-aligned currents, and during substorm recovery phases. The omega bands were observed during substorms, which were more intense than the average substorm in the same region.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Heli Hietala, Steve E. Milan, Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 34, 943–959, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We have simulated the interaction of the solar wind – the charged particles and magnetic fields emitted by the Sun into space – with the magnetic field of the Earth. The solar wind flows supersonically and creates a shock when it encounters the obstacle formed by the geomagnetic field. We have identified a new chain of events which causes phenomena in the downstream region to eventually cause perturbations at the shock and even upstream. This is confirmed by ground and satellite observations.
Johannes Norberg, Lassi Roininen, Antti Kero, Tero Raita, Thomas Ulich, Markku Markkanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-263-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory has been producing ionospheric tomography data since 2003. Based on these data, one solar cycle of ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) estimates is constructed. The measurements are compared against the IRI-2012 model, F10.7 solar flux index and sunspot number data. Qualitatively the tomographic VTEC estimate corresponds to reference data very well, but the IRI-2012 model are on average 40 % higher of that of the tomographic results.
Kirsti Kauristie, Minna Myllys, Noora Partamies, Ari Viljanen, Pyry Peitso, Liisa Juusola, Shabana Ahmadzai, Vikramjit Singh, Ralf Keil, Unai Martinez, Alexej Luginin, Alexi Glover, Vicente Navarro, and Tero Raita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 253–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-253-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We use the connection between auroras and geomagnetic field variations in a concept for a Regional Auroral Forecast (RAF) service. RAF is based on statistical relationships between alerts by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and magnetic time derivatives measured by five MIRACLE magnetometer stations located in the surroundings of the Sodankylä research station. As an improvement to previous similar services RAF yields knowledge on typical auroral storm durations at different latitudes.
Peter Wintoft, Ari Viljanen, and Magnus Wik
Ann. Geophys., 34, 485–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-485-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-485-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme value analysis has been applied to 1-minute-resolution magnetic fields and computed electric fields over Europe. We find that on average the largest disturbances of the fields are observed close to the auroral oval, as expected. However, the analysis indicates that as we move south from Scandinavia to northern continental Europe the distribution becomes more extreme. This could be due to that strong storms regularly occur at high latitudes, while the extreme storms push the oval south.
M. Myllys, N. Partamies, and L. Juusola
Ann. Geophys., 33, 573–581, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-573-2015, 2015
K. Andréeová, L. Juusola, E. K. J. Kilpua, and H. E. J. Koskinen
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, 2014
N. Partamies, L. Juusola, E. Tanskanen, and K. Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 31, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Earth's ionosphere & aeronomy | Keywords: Ionosphere–magnetosphere interactions
Parallel electric fields produced by ionospheric injection
A comparison of Jason-2 plasmasphere electron content measurements with ground-based measurements
Multi-instrument observations of polar cap patches and traveling ionospheric disturbances generated by solar wind Alfvén waves coupling to the dayside magnetosphere
Responses of intermediate layers to geomagnetic activity during the 2009 deep solar minimum over the Brazilian low-latitude sector
Whistler waves produced by monochromatic currents in the low nighttime ionosphere
Ionospheric control of space weather
Swarm field-aligned currents during a severe magnetic storm of September 2017
Osuke Saka
Ann. Geophys., 41, 369–373, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-369-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-369-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Transverse electric fields transmitted from the magnetosphere and those generated by the neutral winds yield a local breakdown of the charge neutrality at the boundaries between the thermosphere and mesosphere. The breakdown may create parallel electric fields in the thermosphere to produce spiral auroras and outflows. This explanation supposes an auroral generator located not in a distant space, but rather in our much nearer upper atmosphere.
Andrew J. Mazzella Jr. and Endawoke Yizengaw
Ann. Geophys., 41, 269–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-269-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements of plasmasphere electron content (PEC) by Jason-2 are compared to PEC for ground-based GPS receivers in Africa. Jason-2 vertical PEC measurements corroborated the ground-based measurements, and its co-aligned slant PEC values were generally close to the ground-based slant PEC values. This correspondence indicates that the Jason-2 PEC measurements could be used to resolve some ambiguities in the determination of the ground-based PEC values.
Paul Prikryl, Robert G. Gillies, David R. Themens, James M. Weygand, Evan G. Thomas, and Shibaji Chakraborty
Ann. Geophys., 40, 619–639, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-619-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-619-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interaction with Earth’s magnetic field deposits energy into the upper portion of the atmosphere at high latitudes. The coupling process that modulates the ionospheric convection and intensity of ionospheric currents leads to formation of densely ionized patches convecting across the polar cap. The ionospheric currents launch traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) propagating equatorward. The polar cap patches and TIDs are then observed by networks of radars and GPS receivers.
Ângela M. Santos, Christiano G. M. Brum, Inez S. Batista, José H. A. Sobral, Mangalathayil A. Abdu, and Jonas R. Souza
Ann. Geophys., 40, 259–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-259-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-259-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using the Digisonde data this paper shows that the small variation in the geomagnetic activity during low solar activity can affect both the parameter of height and the frequency of the intermediate layer (ILs) over the low-latitude Brazilian sector. The most expressive responses of the ILs to geomagnetic activity were observed during the summer when the height of the ILs suffered a significant decrease with the increase of the magnetic activity magnetic in the first hours of the day.
Vera G. Mizonova and Peter A. Bespalov
Ann. Geophys., 39, 479–486, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-479-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-479-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The paper discusses the excitation of monochromatic ELF/VLF electromagnetic waves produced by HF heating facility currents in the nighttime ionosphere. The ground-based magnetic field is predominantly located under the source, and the wave has right-hand polarization typical for a whistler but left-hand polarization at large distances from the source. About half of the source energy propagates upward, and approximately 20 % propagates to the Earth–ionosphere waveguide.
Osuke Saka
Ann. Geophys., 39, 455–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-455-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-455-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The ionosphere is a partly ionized medium above the atmosphere. Because of its anisotropic properties, the imposed electric fields from the magnetosphere produce space charge. Polarization electric fields induced in the ionosphere by this process generate ion drifts (Pedersen currents) and plasma evaporation along the field lines, thus achieving a quasi-neutral equilibrium of the ionosphere. The evaporation grows as a large-scale parallel potential structure in the magnetosphere.
Renata Lukianova
Ann. Geophys., 38, 191–206, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-191-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
During the most intense storm of solar cycle 24, the magnetosphere–ionosphere interaction, which is primarily associated with field-aligned currents (FACs), was much stronger than usual. Measurements onboard the low-latitude polar-orbiting Swarm satellites have shown that the intensities of FACs increase dramatically during the storm-time substorms. The extreme values of 1 s (7.5 km width) FACs reach 80 μA m−2. The lowest latitude of the FAC region is limited to 49–50 MLat.
Cited articles
Akasofu, S.-I.: The development of the auroral substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 273–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(64)90151-5, 1964. a, b, c
Akasofu, S.-I., Chapman, S., and Meng, C.-I.: The polar electrojet, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 27, 1275–1305, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(65)90087-5, 1965a. a
Akasofu, S.-I., Kimball, D. S., and Meng, C.-I.: The dynamics of the aurora – II Westward traveling surges, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 27, 173–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(65)90114-5, 1965b. a
Akasofu, S.-I., Meng, C.-I., and Kimball, D. S.: Dynamics of the aurora – IV: Polar magnetic substorms and westward traveling surges, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 28, 489–496, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(66)90058-4, 1966. a
Amm, O.: Ionospheric elementary current systems in spherical coordinates and their application, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 49, 947–955, https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.49.947, 1997. a, b, c
Amm, O. and Fujii, R.: Separation of Cowling channel and local closure currents in the vicinity of a substorm breakup spiral, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A06304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013021, 2008. a, b, c
Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation from the ground to ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems, Earth Planet. Space, 51, 431–440, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352247, 1999. a
Amm, O., Engebretson, M. J., Hughes, T., Newitt, L., Viljanen, A., and Watermann, J.: A traveling convection vortex event study: Instantaneous ionospheric equivalent currents, estimation of field-aligned currents, and the role of induced currents, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1334, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009472, 2002. a, b
Baumjohann, W. and Glaßmeier, K.-H.: The transient response mechanism and Pi2 pulsations at substorm onset – Review and outlook, Planet. Space Sci., 32, 1361–1370, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(84)90079-5, 1984. a
Birn, J., Nakamura, R., Panov, E. V., and Hesse, M.: Bursty bulk flows and dipolarization in MHD simulations of magnetotail reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A01210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016083, 2011. a
Chen, C. X. and Wolf, R. A.: Theory of thin-filament motion in Earth's magnetotail and its application to bursty bulk flows, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 14613–14626, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900005, 1999. a
Coroniti, F. V. and Kennel, C. F.: Polarization of the auroral electrojet, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 2835–2850, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA077i016p02835, 1972. a
Emmert, J. T., Richmond, A. D., and Drob, D. P.: A computationally compact representation of Magnetic-Apex and Quasi-Di pole coordinates with smooth base vectors, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A08322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015326, 2010. a, b
Forsyth, C., Fazakerley, A. N., Rae, I. J., Watt, C. E. J., Murphy, K., Wild, J. A., Karlsson, T., Mutel, R., Owen, C. J., Ergun, R., Masson, A., Berthomier, M., Donovan, E., Frey, H. U., Matzka, J., Stolle, C., and Zhang, Y.: In situ spatiotemporal measurements of the detailed azimuthal substructure of the substorm current wedge, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 927–946, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019302, 2014. a, b
Gjerloev, J. W., Hoffman, R. A., Sigwarth, J. B., Frank, L. A., and Baker, J. B. H.: Typical auroral substorm: A bifurcated oval, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A03211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012431, 2008. a, b, c
Haines, G. V. and Torta, J. M.: Determination of equivalent current sources from spherical cap harmonic models of geomagnetic field variations, Geophys. J. Int., 118, 3, 499–514, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb03981.x, 1994. a, b
Ieda, A., Kauristie, K., Nishimura, Y., Miyashita, Y., Frey, H. U., Juusola, L., Whiter, D., Nosé, M., Fillingim, M. O., Honary, F., Rogers, N. C., Miyoshi, Y., Miura, T., Kawashima, T., and Machida, S.: Simultaneous observation of auroral substorm onset in Polar satellite global images and ground-based all-sky images, Earth Planet. Space, 70, 73, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0843-3, 2018. a, b, c
IMAGE data: IMAGE data download [data set], https://space.fmi.fi/image/www/?page=user_defined (last access: 14 November 2023), 2023. a
Janhunen, P., Olsson, A., Amm, O., and Kauristie, K.: Characteristics of a stable arc based on FAST and MIRACLE observations, Ann. Geophys., 18, 152–160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0152-5, 2000. a
Juusola, L., Nakamura, R., Amm, O., and Kauristie, K.: Conjugate ionospheric equivalent currents during bursty bulk flows, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A04313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013908, 2009. a
Juusola, L., Andréeová, K., Amm, O., Kauristie, K., Milan, S. E., Palmroth, M., and Partamies, N.: Effects of a solar wind dynamic pressure increase in the magnetosphere and in the ionosphere, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1945–1959, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1945-2010, 2010. a
Juusola, L., Kubyshkina, M., Nakamura, R., Pitkänen, T., Amm, O., Kauristie, K., Partamies, N., Rème, H., Snekvik, K., and Whiter, D.: Ionospheric signatures of a plasma sheet rebound flow during a substorm onset, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 350–363, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018132, 2013. a
Juusola, L., Kauristie, K., Vanhamäki, H., and Aikio, A.: Comparison of auroral ionospheric and field-aligned currents derived from Swarm and ground magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 9256–9283, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022961, 2016. a
Juusola, L., Viljanen, A., Dimmock, A. P., Kellinsalmi, M., Schillings, A., and Weygand, J. M.: Drivers of rapid geomagnetic variations at high latitudes, Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Kauristie, K., Pulkkinen, T. I., Pellinen, R. J., and Opgenoorth, H. J.: What can we tell about global auroral-electrojet activity from a single meridional magnetometer chain?, Ann. Geophys., 14, 1177–1185, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1177-1, 1996. a, b
Kauristie, K., Sergeev, V. A., Amm, O., Kubyshkina, M. V., Jussila, J., Donovan, E., and Liou, K.: Bursty bulk flow intrusion to the inner plasma sheet as inferred from auroral observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1040, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009371, 2003. a
Kellinsalmi, M., Viljanen, A., Juusola, L., and Käki, S.: The time derivative of the geomagnetic field has a short memory, Ann. Geophys., 40, 545–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, 2022. a
Kepko, L. ., McPherron, R. L., Amm, O., Apatenkov, S., Baumjohann, W., Birn, J., Lester, M., Nakamura, R., Pulkkinen, T. I., and Sergeev, V.: Substorm Current Wedge revisited, Space Sci. Rev., 190, 1–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0124-9, 2015. a
Kruglyakov, M., Kuvshinov, A., and Marshalko, E.: Real-time 3-D modeling of the ground electric field due to space weather events. A concept and its validation, Space Weather, 20, e2021SW002906, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002906, 2022. a, b
Laundal, K. M., Yee, J. H., Merkin, V. G., Gjerloev, J. W., Vanhamäki, H., Reistad, J. P., Madelaire, M., Sorathia, K., and Espy, P. J.: Electrojet estimates from mesospheric magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2020JA028644, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028644, 2021. a
Liu, J., Lyons, L. R., Wang, C.-P., Hairston, M. R., Zhang, Y., and Zou, Y.: Dawnside auroral polarization streams, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027742, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027742, 2020. a, b
Lyons, L. R., Nishimura, Y., Xing, X., Runov, A., Angelopoulos, V., Donovan, E., and Kikuchi, T.: Coupling of dipolarization front flow bursts to substorm expansion phase phenomena within the magnetosphere and ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A02212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017265, 2012. a, b
Lyons, L. R., Nishimura, Y., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Zou, Y., Donovan, E., Mende, S., Angelopoulos, V., Ruohoniemi, M. J., and McWilliams, K.: Westward traveling surges: Sliding along boundary arcs and distinction from onset arc brightening, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 7643–7653, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019334, 2013. a, b, c, d
Lyons, L. R., Nishimura, Y., Liu, J., Bristow, W. A., Zou, Y., and Donovan, E. F.: Verification of substorm onset from intruding flow channels with high-resolution SuperDARN radar flow maps, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2022JA030723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030723, 2022. a, b
McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., and Aubry, M. P.: Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968: 9. Phenomenological model for substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3131–3149, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i016p03131, 1973. a, b
McPherron, R. L., Hsu, T.-S., Kissinger, J., Chu, X., and Angelopoulos, V.: Characteristics of plasma flows at the inner edge of the plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A00I33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015923, 2011. a
Milan, S. E., Carter, J. A., Korth, H., and Anderson, B. J.: Principal component analysis of Birkeland currents determined by the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 10415–10424, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021680, 2015. a
Milan, S. E., Imber, S. M., Fleetham, A. L., and Gjerloev, J.: Solar cycle and solar wind dependence of the occurrence of large dB/dt events at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 128, e2022JA030953, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030953, 2023. a, b
MIRACLE: Magnetometers – Ionospheric Radars- All-Sky Cameras Large Experiment All-Sky Cameras, https://space.fmi.fi/MIRACLE/ (last access: 14 November 2023), 2023. a
Newell, P. T. and Gjerloev, J. W.: Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A12211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016779, 2011. a
Nishimura, Y., Lyons, L., Zou, S., Angelopoulos, V., and Mende, S.: Substorm triggering by new plasma intrusion: THEMIS all-sky imager observations, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A07222, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015166, 2010. a
Ohtani, S., Miyashita, Y., Singer, H., and Mukai, T.: Tailward flows with positive BZ in the near-Earth plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A06218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014159, 2009. a
Opgenoorth, H. J., Oksman, J., Kaila, U., Nielsen, E., and Johann, W. B.: Characteristics of eastward drifting omega bands in the morning sector of the auroral oval, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 9171–9185, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA088iA11p09171, 1983. a
Panov, E. V., Nakamura, R., Baumjohann, W., Sergeev, V. A., Petrukovich, A. A., Angelopoulos, V., Volwerk, M., Retinó, A., Takada, T., Glassmeier, K.-H., McFadden, J. P., and Larson, D.: Plasma sheet thickness during a bursty bulk flow reversal, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A05213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014743, 2010. a
Partamies, N., Freeman, M. P., and Kauristie, K.: On the winding of auroral spirals: Interhemispheric observations and Hallinan's theory revisited, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28913–28924, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900093, 2001. a
Partamies, N., Amm, O., Kauristie, K., Pulkkinen, T. I., and Tanskanen, E.: A pseudo-breakup observation: Localized current wedge across the postmidnight auroral oval, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009276, 2003. a
Partamies, N., Kauristie, K., Donovan, E., Spanswick, E., and Liou, K.: Meso-scale aurora within the expansion phase bulge, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2209–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2209-2006, 2006. a
Partamies, N., Weygand, J. M., and Juusola, L.: Statistical study of auroral omega bands, Ann. Geophys., 35, 1069–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1069-2017, 2017. a
Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., and Flannery, B.: Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, 2nd Edn., The Art of Scientific Computing, Campridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521430647, 1992. a
Pulkkinen, A., Amm, O., Viljanen, A., and BEAR Working Group: Ionospheric equivalent current distributions determined with the method of spherical elementary current systems, J. Geophys. Res., 108, A2, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA005085, 2003a. a
Pulkkinen, A., Amm, O., Viljanen, A., and BEAR Working Group: Separation of the geomagnetic variation field on the ground into external and internal parts using the spherical elementary current system method, Earth Planets Space, 55, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351739, 2003b. a
Richmond, A. D.: Ionospheric electrodynamics using Magnetic Apex Coordinates, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 47, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.47.191, 1995. a, b
Ritter, P., Lühr, H., Viljanen, A., Amm, O., Pulkkinen, A., and Sillanpää, I.: Ionospheric currents estimated simultaneously from CHAMP satellite and IMAGE ground-based magnetic field measurements: a statistical study at auroral latitudes, Ann. Geophys., 22, 417–430, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-417-2004, 2004. a
Tanskanen, E. I., Viljanen, A., Pulkkinen, T. I., Pirjola, R., Häkkinen, L., Pulkkinen, A., and Amm, O.: At substorm onset, 40 % of AL comes from underground, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 13119–13134, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA900135, 2001. a, b, c
van de Kamp, M.: Harmonic quiet-day curves as magnetometer baselines for ionospheric current analyses, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 2, 289–304, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-289-2013, 2013. a
Vanhamäki, H. and Amm, O.: Analysis of ionospheric electrodynamic parameters on mesoscales – a review of selected techniques using data from ground-based observation networks and satellites, Ann. Geophys., 29, 467–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-467-2011, 2011. a
Vanhamäki, H. and Juusola, L.: Review of data analysis techniques for estimating ionospheric currents based on MIRACLE and satellite observations, in: Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond, 409–425, American Geophysical Union, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119324522.ch24, 2018. a
Vanhamäki, H. and Juusola, L.: Introduction to Spherical Elementary Current Systems, in: Ionospheric Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Tools, 5–33, ISSI Scientific Report Series 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26732-2, 2020. a, b, c, d
Vanhamäki, H., Amm, O., and Viljanen, A.: Role of inductive electric fields and currents in dynamical ionospheric situations, Ann. Geophys., 25, 437–455, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-437-2007, 2007. a, b
Vanhamäki, H., Kauristie, K., Amm, O., Senior, A., Lummerzheim, D., and Milan, S.: Electrodynamics of an omega-band as deduced from optical and magnetometer data, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3367–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3367-2009, 2009. a, b
Viljanen, A., Nevanlinna, H., Pajunpää, K., and Pulkkinen, A.: Time derivative of the horizontal geomagnetic field as an activity ind icator, Ann. Geophys., 19, 1107–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1107-2001, 2001. a
Viljanen, A., Tanskanen, E. I., and Pulkkinen, A.: Relation between substorm characteristics and rapid temporal variation s of the ground magnetic field, Ann. Geophys., 24, 725–733, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-725-2006, 2006. a, b, c
Wang, C.-P., Gkioulidou, M., Lyons, L. R., and Wolf, R. A.: Spatial distribution of plasma sheet entropy reduction caused by a plasma bubble: Rice Convection Model simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 3380–3397, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025347, 2018. a, b
Weygand, J. M., McPherron, R. L., Frey, H., Amm, O., Kauristie, K., Viljanen, A. T., and Koistinen, A.: Relation of substorm onset to Harang discontinuity, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A04213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012537, 2008. a, b, c
Whiter, D. K., Gustavsson, B., Partamies, N., and Sangalli, L.: A new automatic method for estimating the peak auroral emission height from all-sky camera images, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 2, 131–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-131-2013, 2013. a
Whiter, D. K., Partamies, N., Gustavsson, B., and Kauristie, K.: The altitude of green OI 557.7 nm and blue N
Yang, J., Toffoletto, F. R., and Wolf, R. A.: RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned auroral streamer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2695–2701, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059840, 2014. a, b
Yee, J.-H., Gjerloev, J., Perez, R., Swartz, W. H., Misra, S., Chidambaram, O., and Ruf, C.: The EZIE way to measure the ionospheric electrojets with a three-cubesat constellation, in: Proceedings of the Small Satellite Conference, Technical Session 6: Science/Mission Payloads, SSC21-VI-07, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2021/all2021/177/ (last access: 14 November 2023), 2021a. a
Yee, J.-H., Gjerloev, J., and Wu, D.: Remote sensing of magnetic fields induced by electrojets from space, in: Upper Atmosphere Dynamics and Energetics, American Geophysical Union, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815631.ch21, 2021b. a
Zou, S., Lyons, L. R., Nicolls, M. J., Heinselman, C. J., and Mende, S. B.: Nightside ionospheric electrodynamics associated with substorms: PFISR and THEMIS ASI observations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A12301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014259, 2009. a, b
Short summary
At times when auroras erupt on the sky, the magnetic field surrounding the Earth undergoes rapid changes. On the ground, these changes can induce harmful electric currents in technological conductor networks, such as powerlines. We have used magnetic field observations from northern Europe during 28 such events and found consistent behavior that can help to understand, and thus predict, the processes that drive auroras and geomagnetically induced currents.
At times when auroras erupt on the sky, the magnetic field surrounding the Earth undergoes rapid...
