Articles | Volume 40, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
06 Oct 2022
Regular paper |
| 06 Oct 2022
| 06 Oct 2022
Ionospheric effects of the 5–6 January 2019 eclipse over the People's Republic of China: results from oblique sounding
Leonid F. Chernogor
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National
University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin
Engineering University, 145 Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin,
150001, China
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia
Road, Qingdao, 266071, China
Kostyantyn P. Garmash
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National
University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
Qiang Guo
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin
Engineering University, 145 Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin,
150001, China
Victor T. Rozumenko
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National
University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia
Road, Qingdao, 266071, China
Related authors
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
The Tonga volcano explosion launched a rich assortment of disturbances in the solid Earth, ocean, entire atmosphere, and the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Statistical and spectral analysis of the measurements made at 19 INTERMAGNET recording stations closest to the volcano shows that the quasi-periodic disturbances were transported by fast and slow magnetohydrodynamic waves, blast wave, atmospheric gravity wave, and Lamb wave; the parameters of geomagnetic bay disturbances have also estimated.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
The Tonga volcano explosion launched a rich assortment of disturbances in the solid Earth, ocean, entire atmosphere, and the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Statistical and spectral analysis of the measurements made at 19 INTERMAGNET recording stations closest to the volcano shows that the quasi-periodic disturbances were transported by fast and slow magnetohydrodynamic waves, blast wave, atmospheric gravity wave, and Lamb wave; the parameters of geomagnetic bay disturbances have also estimated.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Related subject area
Subject: Earth's ionosphere & aeronomy | Keywords: Ionospheric disturbances
Effects of the super-powerful tropospheric western Pacific phenomenon of September–October 2018 on the ionosphere over China: results from oblique sounding
Study of the equatorial and low-latitude total electron content response to plasma bubbles during solar cycle 24–25 over the Brazilian region using a Disturbance Ionosphere indeX
Diagnostic study of geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric changes over very low-frequency signal propagation paths in the mid-latitude D region
Complex analysis of the ionosphere variations during the geomagnetic storm at 20 January 2010 performed by Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) software and DEMETER satellite data
Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm: influence on high frequency radio wave characteristics
Tomographic imaging of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance during the Halloween storm of 2003
Ionospheric anomalies associated with the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq border earthquake and a moderate magnetic storm
Model of the propagation of very low-frequency beams in the Earth–ionosphere waveguide: principles of the tensor impedance method in multi-layered gyrotropic waveguides
Strong influence of solar X-ray flares on low-frequency electromagnetic signals in middle latitudes
A case study of the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the eastern Asian sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic conjugate observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to a North Korean underground nuclear explosion on 3 September 2017
Emergence of a localized total electron content enhancement during the severe geomagnetic storm of 8 September 2017
Mitigation of ionospheric signatures in Swarm GPS gravity field estimation using weighting strategies
PPP-based Swarm kinematic orbit determination
Impact of magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Giorgio Arlan Silva Picanço, Clezio Marcos Denardini, Paulo Alexandre Bronzato Nogueira, Laysa Cristina Araujo Resende, Carolina Sousa Carmo, Sony Su Chen, Paulo França Barbosa-Neto, and Esmeralda Romero-Hernandez
Ann. Geophys., 40, 503–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we use the Disturbance Ionosphere indeX (DIX) to study equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) events over the Brazilian equatorial and low latitudes. Our results showed that the DIX detected EPB disturbances in terms of their intensity and occurrence times. Therefore, these responses agreed with the ionosphere behavior before, during, and after the studied EPBs. Finally, these disturbances tended to be higher (lower) in high (low) solar activity.
Victor U. J. Nwankwo, William Denig, Sandip K. Chakrabarti, Olugbenga Ogunmodimu, Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye, Johnson O. Fatokun, Paul I. Anekwe, Omodara E. Obisesan, Olufemi E. Oyanameh, and Oluwaseun V. Fatoye
Ann. Geophys., 40, 433–461, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We combined the observed diurnal VLF amplitude variation in the D region with standard measurements of the E and F regions to perform a diagnostic investigation of coupled geomagnetic storm effects in order to understand the observed storm-induced variations in VLF narrowband based on state and responses of the ionosphere. The dayside VLF amplitude showed a tendency for attenuation following geomagnetic storms, and the h’E and h’F variations confirmed strong storm response over the signal paths.
Anatoliy Lozbin, Viktor Fedun, and Olga Kryakunova
Ann. Geophys., 40, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) for detection, identification, and analysis of ionosphere anomalies from satellite spectrograms and time series row data from instruments onboard the DEMETER satellite was designed. Using this software, the analyses of ionosphere parameter variations caused by various factors are provided. The scientific data processing and visualization technologies used in the development of DIA can be used in the creation of software for other scientific space missions.
Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 39, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Karl Bolmgren, Cathryn Mitchell, Talini Pinto Jayawardena, Gary Bust, Jon Bruno, and Elizabeth Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1149–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Travelling ionospheric disturbances behave like waves in the ionosphere, the ionised upper part of the atmosphere. In this study, we use an ionospheric tomography technique to map the electron content as affected by the passage of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance launched during the largest geomagnetic storm observed by modern instruments. This is the first such imaging using this software and to the authors' knowledge the first study of this travelling ionospheric disturbance.
Erman Şentürk, Samed Inyurt, and İbrahim Sertçelik
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1031–1043, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The analysis of unexpected ionospheric phases before large earthquakes is one of the cutting-edge issues in earthquake prediction studies. Ionospheric TEC data were analyzed by short-time Fourier transform and a classic running median to detect abnormalities before the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq earthquake on November 12, 2017. The results showed clear positive anomalies 8–9 d before the earthquake as an earthquake precursor due to quiet space weather, local dispersion, and proximity to the epicenter.
Yuriy Rapoport, Vladimir Grimalsky, Viktor Fedun, Oleksiy Agapitov, John Bonnell, Asen Grytsai, Gennadi Milinevsky, Alex Liashchuk, Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, and Andrey Gulin
Ann. Geophys., 38, 207–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper analytically and numerically treats the new theoretical basis for ground-based and satellite monitoring of the most powerful processes in the lower atmosphere and Earth (hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.), solar-wind magnetosphere (magnetic storms) and ionosphere (lightning discharges, thunderstorms, etc.). This can be provided by the determination of phases and amplitudes of radio waves in the Earth and ionosphere. In perspective, damage from the natural disasters can be decreased.
Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, Viktor Fedun, Peter Gallagher, Joseph McCauley, Mohammed Y. Boudjada, Sergiy Shelyag, and Hans U. Eichelberger
Ann. Geophys., 37, 843–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, 2019
Jing Liu, Dong-He Zhang, Anthea J. Coster, Shun-Rong Zhang, Guan-Yi Ma, Yong-Qiang Hao, and Zuo Xiao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 673–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, 2019
Yi Liu, Chen Zhou, Qiong Tang, Guanyi Chen, and Zhengyu Zhao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Underground nuclear explosion (UNE) can produce ionospheric disturbances through a lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling mechanism, which is very similar with earthquakes. By using the total electron content observations and Swarm ionospheric current data, we have investigated the geomagnetic conjugate ionospheric disturbances. We proposed that the electric field generated during the UNE test can be an important mechanism for ionospheric disturbance.
Carlos Sotomayor-Beltran and Laberiano Andrade-Arenas
Ann. Geophys., 37, 153–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A localized total electron content enhancement (LTE) was observed as a product of the geomagnetic storm that happened on 8 September 2017. This result was unexpected because it was located south of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA). The origin of the enhancement of the TEC in the EIA is very likely due to the super-fountain effect. On the other hand, the LTE is suggested to be produced by the contribution of the super-fountain effect along with traveling ionospheric disturbances.
Lucas Schreiter, Daniel Arnold, Veerle Sterken, and Adrian Jäggi
Ann. Geophys., 37, 111–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing Swarm GPS-only gravity fields to the ultra-precise GRACE K-Band gravity field schematic errors occurs around the geomagnetic equator. Due to the end of the GRACE mission, and the gap to the GRACE-FO mission, only Swarm can provide a continuous time series of gravity fields. We present different and assess different approaches to remove the schematic errors and thus improve the quality of the Swarm gravity fields.
Le Ren and Steffen Schön
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1227–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we analyse the performance of the Swarm onboard GPS receiver and present the approach for determination of the IfE Swarm kinematic orbit with PPP. The differences between our kinematic orbits and ESA reduced-dynamic orbits are at 1.5 cm, 1.5 cm and 2.5 cm level in along-track, cross-track and radial directions, respectively. A comparison with SLR underlines an accuracy of the kinematic orbits of 3–4 cm.
Donat V. Blagoveshchensky, Olga A. Maltseva, and Maria A. Sergeeva
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Aa, E., Zhang, S.-R., Shen, H., Liu, S., and Li, J.: Local and conjugate
ionospheric total electron content variation during the 21 June 2020 solar
eclipse, Adv. Space Res., 68, 3435–3454,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.06.015, 2021.
Afraimovich, E. L., Voeykov, S. V., Perevalova, N. P., Vodyannikov, V. V.,
Gordienko, G. I., Litvinov, Y. G., and Yakovets, A. F.: Ionospheric effects of
the March 29, 2006, solar eclipse over Kazakhstan, Geomag. Aeron., 47,
461–469, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793207040068, 2007.
Akimov, A. L. and Chernogor, L. F.: Effects of the Solar Eclipse of August
1, 2008 on the Earth's Lower Atmosphere, Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies, 26,
135–145, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591310030050, 2010.
Akimov, L. A., Bogovskii, V. K., Grigorenko, E. I., Taran, V. I., and Chernogor,
L. F.: Atmospheric–Ionospheric Effects of the Solar Eclipse of May 31, 2003,
in Kharkov, Geomag. Aeron., 45, 494–518, 2005 (in Russian).
Anastassiades, M. (Ed): Solar Eclipses and the Ionosphere, Plenum Press, New
York, ISBN 978-1-4684-1839-2, 1970.
Burmaka, V. P., Taran, V. I., and Chernogor, L. F.: Wave-Like Processes in the
Ionosphere under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions, 1. Kharkov Incoherent
Scatter Radar Observations, Geomag. Aeron., 46, 183–198, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793206020071, 2006a.
Burmaka, V. P., Taran, V. I., and Chernogor, L. F.: Wave-Like Processes in the
Ionosphere under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions, 2. Analysis of Observations
and Simulation, Geomag. Aeron., 46, 199–208, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793206020083, 2006b.
Beynon, W. J. G., and Brown, G. M. (Eds.): Solar Eclipses and the Ionosphere,
Pergamon Press, London, UK, ISBN 978-0080090467, 1956.
Chandra, H., Sethia, G., Vyas, G. D., Deshpande, M. R., and Vats, H. O.:
Ionospheric effects of the total solar eclipse of 16 Feb. 1980, P. Indian.
Natl. Acad. Sci., 47, 57–60, 1980.
Chapman, S.: The influence of a solar eclipse upon the upper atmospheric
ionization, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 92, 413–420, 1932.
Chen, Y., Feng, P., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Huang, L., Duan, J., Hua, Y., and
Li, X.: Impact of the annular solar eclipse on June 21, 2020 on BPL time
service performance, AIP Adv., 11, 115003, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0064445, 2021.
Chernogor, L. F.: Physics of Earth, Atmosphere, and Geospace from the
Standpoint of System Paradigm, Radio Phys. Radio Astron., 8,
59–106, http://rpra-journal.org.ua/index.php/ra/article/view/797 (last access: 22 September 2022), 2003 (in Russian).
Chernogor, L. F.: Variations in the Amplitude and Phase of VLF Radiowaves in
the Ionosphere during the August 1, 2008, Solar Eclipse, Geomag. Aeron., 50,
96–106, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793210010111, 2010a.
Chernogor, L. F.: Wave Response of the Ionosphere to the Partial Solar
Eclipse of August 1, 2008, Geomag. Aeron., 50, 346–361, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793210030096, 2010b.
Chernogor, L. F.: The Earth–atmosphere–geospace system: main properties and
processes, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 32, 3199–3218, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541510, 2011.
Chernogor, L. F.: Effects of solar eclipses in the ionosphere: Results of
Doppler sounding: 1. Experimental data, Geomag. Aeron., 52, 768–778,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212050039, 2012a.
Chernogor, L. F.: Effects of Solar Eclipses in the Ionosphere: Doppler
Sounding Results: 2. Spectral Analysis, Geomag. Aeron., 52,
779–792, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212050040, 2012b.
Chernogor, L. F.: Physical Effects of Solar Eclipses in Atmosphere and
Geospace: monograph, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Publ., Kharkiv, Ukraine, https://karazinbook.com/knyga/fizicheskie-effekty-solnechnyh-zatmeniy-v-atmosfere-i-geokosmose (last access: 22 September 2022), 2013a (in Russian).
Chernogor, L. F.: Physical Processes in the Middle Ionosphere Accompanying
the Solar Eclipse of January 4, 2011, in Kharkov, Geomag. Aeron., 53,
19–31, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793213010052, 2013b.
Chernogor, L. F.: Atmosphere–Ionosphere response to Solar Eclipse over
Kharkiv on March 20, 2015, Geomag. Aeron., 56, 592–603, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793216050030, 2016a.
Chernogor, L. F.: Wave Processes in the Ionosphere over Europe that
Accompanied the Solar Eclipse of March 20, 2015, Kinemat. Phys. Celest.
Bodies, 32, 196–206, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591316040024, 2016b.
Chernogor, L. F.: Convection Effect in the Surface Atmosphere of Solar
Eclipses of March 20, 2015, and June 10, 2021, Kinemat. Phys. Celest.
Bodies, 37, 284–292, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321060039, 2021a.
Chernogor, L. F.: Thermal Effect in Surface Atmosphere of the Solar Eclipse
on June 10, 2021, Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies, 37, 293–299, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321060040, 2021b.
Chernogor, L. F.: Geomagnetic Effect of the Solar Eclipse of June 10, 2021,
Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies, 38, 11–24, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591322010020, 2022.
Chernogor, L. F. and Garmash, K. P.: Magneto-Ionospheric Effects of the Solar
Eclipse of March 20, 2015, over Kharkov, Geomag. Aeron., 57, 72–83,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793216060062, 2017.
Chernogor, L. F. and Garmash, K. P.: Ionospheric Processes during the Partial
Solar Eclipse above Kharkiv on June 10, 2021, Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies,
38, 61–72, 2022.
Chernogor, L. F. and Mylovanov, Y. B.: Ionospheric Effects from the June 10,
2021 Solar Eclipse in the Polar Region, Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies, 38, 197–209, 2022.
Chernogor, L. F. and Rozumenko, V. T.: Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an
Open Nonlinear Dynamical System, Radio Phys. Radio Astron., 13, 120–137,
http://rpra-journal.org.ua/index.php/ra/article/view/563 (last access: 22 September 2022), 2008.
Chernogor, L. F., Domnin, I. F., Emelyanov, L. Y., and Lyashenko, M. V.:
Physical processes in the ionosphere during the solar eclipse on March 20,
2015 over Kharkiv, Ukraine (49.6∘ N, 36.3∘ E),
J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 182, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.016, 2019.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Luo, Y., Rozumenko, V. T., and
Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric storm effects over the People's Republic of China on
14 May 2019: Results from multipath multi-frequency oblique radio sounding,
Adv. Space Res., 66, 226–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.037, 2020.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Zheng, Y., and
Luo, Y.: Supertyphoon Hagibis action in the ionosphere on 6–13 October
2019: Results from multi-frequency multiple path sounding at oblique
incidence, Adv. Space Res., 67, 2439–2469, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.038, 2021.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Zheng, Y., and
Luo, Y.: Disturbances in the Ionosphere That Accompanied Typhoon Activity in
the Vicinity of China in September 2019, Radio Sci., 57,
e2022RS007431, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RS007431,
2022.
Chimonas, G. and Hines, C. O.: Atmospheric gravity waves induced by a solar
eclipse, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 875–876, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i004p00875, 1970.
Coster, A. J., Goncharenko, L., Zhang, S. R., Erickson, P. J., Rideout, W., and
Vierinen, J.: GNSS observations of ionospheric variations during the 21
August 2017 solar eclipse, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 12041–12048, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075774, 2017.
Dang, T., Lei, J. H., Wang, W. B., Yan, M. D., Ren, D. X., and Huang, F. Q.:
Prediction of the thermospheric and ionospheric responses to the 21 June
2020 annular solar eclipse, Earth Planet. Phys, 4, 231–237, https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2020032, 2020.
Davies, K.: Ionospheric Radio, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., London, UK, ISBN 1-84919-387-8, 2008.
Deshpande, M. R., Chandra, H., Sethia, G., Vats, Hari Om, Vyas, G. D., Iyer,
K. N., and Janve, A. V.: Effects of the total solar eclipse of 16 February
1980 on TEC at low latitudes, P. Indian. Natl. Acad. Sci., 48, 427–433,
1982.
Founda, D., Melas, D., Lykoudis, S., Lisaridis, I., Gerasopoulos, E.,
Kouvarakis, G., Petrakis, M., and Zerefos, C.: The effect of the total solar
eclipse of 29 March 2006 on meteorological variables in Greece, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 5543–5553, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5543-2007, 2007.
Garmash, K.: Software for Passive 14-Channel Doppler Radar, Harvard
Dataverse [software code], V1, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MTGAVH, 2021.
Garmash, K.: RAW Data for Solar Eclipse of January 5–6, 2019 over China, Harvard Dataverse [data set], V1,
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RMFBRN, 2022.
Garmash, K. P., Leus, S. G., and Chernogor, L. F.: January 4, 2011 Solar
Eclipse Effects over Radio Circuits at Oblique Incidence, Radio
Phys. Radio Astron., 16, 164–176, http://rpra-journal.org.ua/index.php/ra/article/view/442 (last access: 22 September 2022), 2011 (in Russian).
Gossard, E. E. and Hooke, W. H.: Waves in the Atmosphere, Vol. 456, Elsevier,
New York, ISBN 9978-0444411969, 1975.
Grigorenko, E. I., Lyashenko, M. V., and Chernogor, L. F.: Effects of Solar
Eclipse of March 29, 2006, in the Ionosphere and Atmosphere, Geomag. Aeron.,
48, 337–351, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208030092, 2008.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Dynamical processes in the ionosphere following the moderate earthquake in
Japan on 7 July 2018, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 186, 88–103,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.02.003, 2019.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Radio Monitoring of Dynamic Processes in the Ionosphere Over China During
the Partial Solar Eclipse of 11 August 2018, Radio Sci., 55, e2019RS006866,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006866, 2020.
Higgs, A. J.: Ionospheric measurements made during the total Solar eclipse of
1940, October 1-st, South Africa, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 102,
24–34, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/102.1.24, 1942.
Huang, L., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Feng, P., and Li, X.: Observations
and analysis of the impact of annular eclipse on 10 MHz short-wave signal in
Sanya area on June 21, 2020, AIP Adv., 11, 115317, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0068778, 2021.
Huang, F., Li, Q., Shen, X., Xiong, C., Yan, R., Zhang, S.-R., Wang, W., Aa,
E., Zhong, J., Dang, T., and Lei, J.: Ionospheric responses at low latitudes
to the annular solar eclipse on 21 June 2020, J. Geophys. Res., 125,
e2020JA028483, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028483, 2020.
Jakowski, N., Stankov, S. M., Wilken, V., Borries, C., Altadill, D., Chum,
J., Buresova, D., Boska, J., Sauli, P., Hruska, F., and Cander, L. R.:
Ionospheric behavior over Europe during the solar eclipse of 3 October 2005,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 70, 836–853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.02.016, 2008.
Le, H., Liu, L., Ren, Z., Chen, Y., and Zhang, H.: Effects of the 21 June
2020 solar eclipse on conjugate hemispheres: A modeling study, J. Geophys.
Res., 125, e2020JA028344, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028344, 2020.
Liu, J. Y., Hsiao, C. C., Tsai, L. C., Liu, C. H., Kuo, F. S., Lue, H. Y., and
Huang, C. M.: Vertical phase and group velocities of internal gravity waves
derived from ionograms during the solar eclipse of 24 October 1995, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 60, 1679–1686, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00103-5, 1998.
Luo, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Shulga,
S. N., and Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric effects of the Kamchatka meteoroid: Results
from multipath oblique sounding, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 207,
105336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105336, 2020.
Lyashenko, M. V. and Chernogor, L. F.: Tropospheric-ionospheric effects of
the 3 October 2005 partial solar eclipse in Kharkiv, 2. Modeling and
discussion, Space Sci. Tech., 14, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2008.01.057, 2008 (in Russian).
Marlton, G. J., Williams, P. D., and Nicoll, K. A.: On the detection and
attribution of gravity waves generated by the 20 March 2015 solar eclipse,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 374, 20150222, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0222, 2016.
Marple Jr., S. L.: Digital Spectral Analysis: with Applications,
Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398548, 1987.
Mrak, S., Semeter, J. L., Drob, D., and Huba, J. D.: Direct EUV/X-ray
modulation of the ionosphere during the August 2017 total solar eclipse,
Geophys. Res. Let., 45, 3820–3828, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GL076771, 2018.
Özcan, O. and Aydoğdu, M.: Possible effects of the total solar
eclipse of August 11, 1999 on the geomagnetic field variations over
Elaziğ-Turkey, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 66, 997–1000,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.03.009, 2004.
Panasenko, S. V., Otsuka, Y., van de Kamp, M., Chernogor, L. F., Shinbori, A.,
Tsugawa, T., and Nishioka, M.: Observation and characterization of traveling
ionospheric disturbances induced by solar eclipse of 20 March 2015 using
incoherent scatter radars and GPS networks, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.,
191, 105051, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.05.015, 2019.
Patel, K. and Singh, A. K.: Changes in atmospheric parameters due to annular
solar eclipse of June 21, 2020, over India, Indian J. Phys.,
96, 1613–1624, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-021-02112-2, 2021.
Rama Rao, P. V. S., Rao, B. V. P. S., Nru, D., and Niranjan, K.: TEC observations
at Waltair during the total solar eclipse of 16 Februrary 1980, P. Indian
Natl. Acad. Sci., 48, 434–438, 1982.
Roble, R. G., Emery, B. A., and Ridley, E. C.: Ionospheric and thermospheric
response over Millstone Hill to the May 30, 1984, annular solar eclipse, J.
Geophys. Res., 91, 1661–1670, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA02p01661, 1986.
Salah, J. E., Oliver, W. L., Foster, J. C., Holt, J. M., Emery, B. A., and Roble,
R. G.: Observations of the May 30, 1984, annular solar eclipse at Millstone
Hill, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 1651–1660, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA02p01651, 1986.
Šauli, P., Roux, S. G., Abry, P., and Boška, J.: Acoustic–gravity
waves during solar eclipses: Detection and characterization using wavelet
transforms, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 69, 2465–2484, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.06.012, 2007.
Sen Gurta, A., Goel, G. K., and Mathur, B. S.: Effect of the 16 February 1980
solar eclipse on VLF propagation, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 42, 907–909,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(80)90107-5, 1980.
Şentürk, E., Arqim Adil, M., and Saqib, M.: Ionospheric total
electron content response to annular solar eclipse on June 21, 2020, Adv.
Space Res., 67, 1937–1947, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.024, 2021.
Shagimuratov, I. I., Zakharenkova, I. E., Tepenitsyna, N. Y., Yakimova, G. A.,
and Efishov, I. I.: Features of the Ionospheric Total Electronic Content
Response to the Annular Solar Eclipse of June 21, 2020, Geomagn. Aeron., 61,
756–762, https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322105011X, 2021.
Stankov, S. M., Bergeot, N., Berghmans, D., Bolsée, D., Bruyninx, C.,
Chevalier, J. M., Clette, F., De Backer, H., De Keyser, J., D'Huys, E.,
Dominique, M., Lemaire, J. F., Magdalenić, J., Marqué, C., Pereira,
N., Pierrard, V., Sapundjiev, D., Seaton, D. B., Stegen, K., Linden, R. V.,
Verhulst, T. G. W., and West, M. J.: Multi-instrument observations of the solar
eclipse on 20 March 2015 and its effects on the ionosphere over Belgium and
Europe, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 7, A19, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017017, 2017.
Sun, Y.-Y., Chen, C.-H., Qing, H., Xu, R., Su, X., Jiang, C., Yu, T., Wang,
J., Xu, H., and Lin, K.: Nighttime ionosphere perturbed by the annular solar
eclipse on June 21, 2020, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JA029419,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029419, 2021.
Tripathi, G., Singh, S. B., Kumar, S., Ashutosh, K., Singh Singh, R., and
Singh, A. K.: Effect of 21 June 2020 solar eclipse on the ionosphere using
VLF and GPS observations and modeling, Adv. Space Res., 69, 254–265,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.11.007, 2022.
Uryadov, V. P., Leonov, A. M., Ponyatov, A. A., Boiko, G. N., and Terent'ev,
S. P.: Variations in the Characteristics of a HF Signal over an Oblique
Sounding Path during the Solar Eclipse on August 11, 1999, Radiophys. Quant.
El., 43, 614–618, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004801201847, 2000.
Uryadov, V. P., Kolchev, A. A., Vybornov, F. I., Shumaev, V. V., Egoshin, A. I.,
and Chernov, A. G.: Ionospheric effects of a solar eclipse of March 20, 2015
on oblique sounding paths in the Eurasian longitudinal sector, Radiophys.
Quantum Electron., 59, 431–441, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-016-9711-9, 2016.
Verhulst, T. G. W. and Stankov, S. M.: Height dependency of solar eclipse
effects: the ionospheric perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125,
e2020JA028088, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028088, 2020.
Verhulst, T. G. W., Sapundjiev, D., and Stankov, S. M.: High-resolution
ionospheric observations and modeling over Belgium during the solar eclipse
of 20 March 2015 including first results of ionospheric tilt and plasma
drift measurements, Adv. Space Res., 57, 2407–2419, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.009, 2016.
Wang, J., Zuo, X., Sun, Y.-Y., Yu, T., Wang, Y., Qiu, L., Mao, T., Yan, X.,
Yang, N., Qi, Y., Lei, J., Sun, L., and Zhao, B.: Multilayered sporadic-E
response to the annular solar eclipse on June 21, 2020, Space Weather, 19,
e2020SW002643, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002643, 2021.
Wang, X., Li, B., Zhao, F., Luo, X., Huang, L., Feng, P., and Li, X.:
Variation of Low-Frequency Time-Code Signal Field Strength during the
Annular Solar Eclipse on 21 June 2020, Observ. Anal. Sens.,
21, 1216, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041216, 2021.
Zhang, R., Le, H., Li, W., Ma, H., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Li, Q., Zhao, X.,
Xie, H.,
Sun, W., Li, G., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., and Liu, L.: Multiple technique
observations of the ionospheric responses to the 21 June 2020 solar eclipse,
J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JA028450, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028450, 2020.
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed...
