Articles | Volume 42, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-103-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
25 Apr 2024
Regular paper |
| 25 Apr 2024
| 25 Apr 2024
Auroral breakup detection in all-sky images by unsupervised learning
Noora Partamies
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Arctic Geophysics, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
Bas Dol
Department of Arctic Geophysics, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Vincent Teissier
ENSTA Bretagne, Brest, France
Liisa Juusola
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Mikko Syrjäsuo
Department of Arctic Geophysics, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
Hjalmar Mulders
Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Related authors
Rumi Nakamura, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Geraint H. Jones, Matt G. G. T. Taylor, Nicolas C. Andre, Charlotte Goetz, Lina Z. Hadid, Laura A. Hayes, Heli Hietala, Caitriona M. Jackman, Larry Kepko, Aurelie Marchaudon, Adam Masters, Mathew Owens, Noora Partamies, Stefaan Poedts, Jonathan Rae, Yuri Shprits, Manuela Temmer, Daniel Verscharen, and Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3814, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
Heliophysics spans a wide range of disciplines covering the study of the Sun and the different Solar System bodies, such as Earth and other planets, moons, comets, and asteroids, and their interactions with the Sun, focusing on plasma and atmospheric processes. A grass-roots effort has been recently started toward establishing a European Heliophysics Community (https://www.heliophysics.eu/). This white paper outlines the motivation, priorities, and a future vision of Heliophysics in Europe.
Noora Partamies, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Katie Herlingshaw, Ilkka Virtanen, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Mikko Syrjäsuo, Fred Sigernes, Takanori Nishiyama, Toshi Nishimura, Mathieu Barthelemy, Anasuya Aruliah, Daniel Whiter, Lena Mielke, Maxime Grandin, Eero Karvinen, Marjan Spijkers, and Vincent E. Ledvina
Ann. Geophys., 43, 349–367, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-349-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-349-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the first broad band emissions, called continuum, in the dayside aurora. They are similar to Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement (STEVE) with white-, pale-pink-, or mauve-coloured light. But unlike STEVE, they follow the dayside aurora forming rays and other dynamic shapes. We used ground optical and radar observations and found evidence of heating and upwelling of both plasma and neutral air. This study provides new information on conditions for continuum emission, but its understanding will require further work.
Maxime Grandin, Emma Bruus, Vincent E. Ledvina, Noora Partamies, Mathieu Barthelemy, Carlos Martinis, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Katie Herlingshaw, Neethal Thomas, Eero Karvinen, Donna Lach, Marjan Spijkers, and Calle Bergstrand
Geosci. Commun., 7, 297–316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We carried out a citizen science study of aurora sightings and technological disruptions experienced during the extreme geomagnetic storm of 10 May 2024. We collected reports from 696 observers from over 30 countries via an online survey, supplemented with observations logged in the Skywarden database. We found that the aurora was seen from exceptionally low latitudes and had very bright red and pink hues, suggesting that high fluxes of low-energy electrons from space entered the atmosphere.
Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies, and Ilkka I. Virtanen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 355–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral displays typically take place at high latitudes, but the exact latitude where the auroral breakup occurs can vary. In this study, we compare the characteristics of the fluxes of precipitating electrons from space during auroral breakups occurring above Tromsø (central part of the auroral zone) and above Svalbard (poleward boundary of the auroral zone). We find that electrons responsible for the aurora above Tromsø carry more energy than those precipitating above Svalbard.
Noora Partamies, Daniel Whiter, Kirsti Kauristie, and Stefano Massetti
Ann. Geophys., 40, 605–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-605-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the local time behaviour of auroral structures and emission height. Data are collected from the Fennoscandian Lapland and Svalbard latitutes from 7 identical auroral all-sky cameras over about 1 solar cycle. The typical peak emission height of the green aurora varies from 110 km on the nightside to about 118 km in the morning over Lapland but stays systematically higher over Svalbard. During fast solar wind, nightside emission heights are 5 km lower than during slow solar wind.
Pekka T. Verronen, Antti Kero, Noora Partamies, Monika E. Szeląg, Shin-Ichiro Oyama, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, and Esa Turunen
Ann. Geophys., 39, 883–897, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is the first to simulate and analyse the pulsating aurorae impact on middle atmosphere on monthly/seasonal timescales. We find that pulsating aurorae have the potential to make a considerable contribution to the total energetic particle forcing and increase the impact on upper stratospheric odd nitrogen and ozone in the polar regions. Thus, it should be considered in atmospheric and climate simulations.
Joshua Dreyer, Noora Partamies, Daniel Whiter, Pål G. Ellingsen, Lisa Baddeley, and Stephan C. Buchert
Ann. Geophys., 39, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-277-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Small-scale auroral features are still being discovered and are not well understood. Where aurorae are caused by particle precipitation, the newly reported fragmented aurora-like emissions (FAEs) seem to be locally generated in the ionosphere (hence,
aurora-like). We analyse data from multiple instruments located near Longyearbyen to derive their main characteristics. They seem to occur as two types in a narrow altitude region (individually or in regularly spaced groups).
Emma Bland, Fasil Tesema, and Noora Partamies
Ann. Geophys., 39, 135–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-135-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-135-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A total of 10 Super Dual Auroral Radar Network radars were used to estimate the horizontal area over which energetic electrons impact the atmosphere at 70–100 km altitude during pulsating aurorae (PsAs). The impact area varies significantly from event to event. Approximately one-third extend over 12° of magnetic latitude, while others are highly localised. Our results could be used to improve the forcing used in atmospheric/climate models to properly capture the energy contribution from PsAs.
Noora Partamies, Fasil Tesema, Emma Bland, Erkka Heino, Hilde Nesse Tyssøy, and Erlend Kallelid
Ann. Geophys., 39, 69–83, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-69-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-69-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
About 200 nights of substorm activity have been analysed for their magnetic disturbance magnitude and the level of cosmic radio noise absorption. We show that substorms with a single expansion phase have limited lifetimes and spatial extents. Starting from magnetically quiet conditions, the strongest absorption occurs after 1 to 2 nights of substorm activity. This prolonged activity is thus required to accelerate particles to energies, which may affect the atmospheric chemistry.
Fasil Tesema, Noora Partamies, Hilde Nesse Tyssøy, and Derek McKay
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1191–1202, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1191-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present the ionization level from EISCAT radar experiments and cosmic noise absorption level
from KAIRA riometer observations during pulsating auroras. We found thick layers of ionization that reach down
to 70 km (harder precipitation) and higher cosmic noise absorption during patchy pulsating aurora than
during amorphous pulsating and patchy auroras.
Rumi Nakamura, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Geraint H. Jones, Matt G. G. T. Taylor, Nicolas C. Andre, Charlotte Goetz, Lina Z. Hadid, Laura A. Hayes, Heli Hietala, Caitriona M. Jackman, Larry Kepko, Aurelie Marchaudon, Adam Masters, Mathew Owens, Noora Partamies, Stefaan Poedts, Jonathan Rae, Yuri Shprits, Manuela Temmer, Daniel Verscharen, and Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3814, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
Heliophysics spans a wide range of disciplines covering the study of the Sun and the different Solar System bodies, such as Earth and other planets, moons, comets, and asteroids, and their interactions with the Sun, focusing on plasma and atmospheric processes. A grass-roots effort has been recently started toward establishing a European Heliophysics Community (https://www.heliophysics.eu/). This white paper outlines the motivation, priorities, and a future vision of Heliophysics in Europe.
Abiyot Bires Workayehu, Minna Palmroth, Maxime Grandin, Liisa Juusola, Markku Alho, Ivan Zaitsev, Venla Koikkalainen, Konstantinos Horaites, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, and Jonas Suni
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2282, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2282, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the ionospheric signatures of BBFs in the magnetotail utilising a global 6D hybrid-Vlasov simulation coupled with an ionospheric model. We analyse changes in the magnitudes of ionospheric observables and use them as the ionospheric manifestations of bursty bulk flows. Our results reveal that reconnection-driven BBF induce vortices that generate FACs, which map to the ionosphere with distinct east-west alignment and exhibit a characteristic westward drift.
Noora Partamies, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Katie Herlingshaw, Ilkka Virtanen, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Mikko Syrjäsuo, Fred Sigernes, Takanori Nishiyama, Toshi Nishimura, Mathieu Barthelemy, Anasuya Aruliah, Daniel Whiter, Lena Mielke, Maxime Grandin, Eero Karvinen, Marjan Spijkers, and Vincent E. Ledvina
Ann. Geophys., 43, 349–367, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-349-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-349-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the first broad band emissions, called continuum, in the dayside aurora. They are similar to Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement (STEVE) with white-, pale-pink-, or mauve-coloured light. But unlike STEVE, they follow the dayside aurora forming rays and other dynamic shapes. We used ground optical and radar observations and found evidence of heating and upwelling of both plasma and neutral air. This study provides new information on conditions for continuum emission, but its understanding will require further work.
Venla Koikkalainen, Maxime Grandin, Emilia Kilpua, Abiyot Workayehu, Ivan Zaitsev, Liisa Juusola, Shi Tao, Markku Alho, Lauri Pänkäläinen, Giulia Cozzani, Konstantinos Horaites, Jonas Suni, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, and Minna Palmroth
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2265, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2265, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use a numerical simulation to study phenomena that occur between the Earth’s dipolar magnetic field and the nightside of near-Earth space. We observe the formation of large-scale vortex flows with scales of several Earth radii. On the ionospheric grid of the simulation we find that the field-aligned currents formed in the simulation reflect the vortex flow in the transition region. The main finding is that the vortex flow is a result of a combination of flow dynamics and a plasma instability.
Liisa Juusola, Ilkka Virtanen, Spencer Mark Hatch, Heikki Vanhamäki, Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies, Urs Ganse, Ilja Honkonen, Abiyot Workayehu, Antti Kero, and Minna Palmroth
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2394, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2394, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key properties of the ionospheric electrodynamics are electric fields, currents, and conductances. They provide a window to the vast and distant near-Earth space, cause Joule heating that affect satellite orbits, and drive geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in technological conductor networks. We have developed a new method for solving the key properties of ionospheric electrodynamics from ground-based magnetic field observations.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Elena Marshalko, Mikhail Kruglyakov, and Ari Viljanen
Ann. Geophys., 43, 271–301, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-271-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-271-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Interaction between the magnetic field of the rapidly varying electric currents in space and the conducting ground produces an electric field at the Earth's surface. This geoelectric field drives geomagnetically induced currents in technological conductor networks, which can affect the performance of critical ground infrastructure such as electric power transmission grids. We have developed a new method suitable for monitoring the geoelectric field based on ground magnetic field observations.
Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Hongyang Zhou, Liisa Juusola, Abiyot Workayehu, Fasil Kebede, Konstantinos Papadakis, Maxime Grandin, Markku Alho, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Dubart, Leo Kotipalo, Arnaud Lalagüe, Jonas Suni, Konstantinos Horaites, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 511–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-511-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-511-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Vlasiator is a kinetic space plasma model that simulates the behavior of plasma, solar wind and magnetic fields in near-Earth space. So far, these simulations have been run without any interaction with the ionosphere, the uppermost layer of Earth's atmosphere. In this paper, we present the new methods that add an ionospheric electrodynamics model to Vlasiator, coupling it with the existing methods and presenting new simulation results of how space plasma and Earth's ionosphere interact.
Maxime Grandin, Emma Bruus, Vincent E. Ledvina, Noora Partamies, Mathieu Barthelemy, Carlos Martinis, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Katie Herlingshaw, Neethal Thomas, Eero Karvinen, Donna Lach, Marjan Spijkers, and Calle Bergstrand
Geosci. Commun., 7, 297–316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We carried out a citizen science study of aurora sightings and technological disruptions experienced during the extreme geomagnetic storm of 10 May 2024. We collected reports from 696 observers from over 30 countries via an online survey, supplemented with observations logged in the Skywarden database. We found that the aurora was seen from exceptionally low latitudes and had very bright red and pink hues, suggesting that high fluxes of low-energy electrons from space entered the atmosphere.
Maxime Grandin, Noora Partamies, and Ilkka I. Virtanen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 355–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Auroral displays typically take place at high latitudes, but the exact latitude where the auroral breakup occurs can vary. In this study, we compare the characteristics of the fluxes of precipitating electrons from space during auroral breakups occurring above Tromsø (central part of the auroral zone) and above Svalbard (poleward boundary of the auroral zone). We find that electrons responsible for the aurora above Tromsø carry more energy than those precipitating above Svalbard.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Noora Partamies, Heikki Vanhamäki, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, and Simon Walker
Ann. Geophys., 41, 483–510, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
At times when auroras erupt on the sky, the magnetic field surrounding the Earth undergoes rapid changes. On the ground, these changes can induce harmful electric currents in technological conductor networks, such as powerlines. We have used magnetic field observations from northern Europe during 28 such events and found consistent behavior that can help to understand, and thus predict, the processes that drive auroras and geomagnetically induced currents.
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Audrey Schillings, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have examined events during which the measured magnetic field on the ground changes very rapidly, causing a risk to technological conductor networks. According to our results, such events occur when strong electric currents in the ionosphere at 100 km altitude are abruptly modified by sudden compression or expansion of the magnetospheric magnetic field farther in space.
Noora Partamies, Daniel Whiter, Kirsti Kauristie, and Stefano Massetti
Ann. Geophys., 40, 605–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-605-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the local time behaviour of auroral structures and emission height. Data are collected from the Fennoscandian Lapland and Svalbard latitutes from 7 identical auroral all-sky cameras over about 1 solar cycle. The typical peak emission height of the green aurora varies from 110 km on the nightside to about 118 km in the morning over Lapland but stays systematically higher over Svalbard. During fast solar wind, nightside emission heights are 5 km lower than during slow solar wind.
Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Sebastian Käki
Ann. Geophys., 40, 545–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-545-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eruptions from the Sun can pose a hazard to Earth's power grids via, e.g., geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). We study magnetic measurements from Fennoscandia to find ways to understand and forecast GIC. We find that the direction of the time derivative of the magnetic field has a short
reset time, about 2 min. We conclude that this result gives insight on the current systems high in Earth’s atmosphere, which are the main driver behind the time derivative’s behavior and GIC formation.
Sebastian Käki, Ari Viljanen, Liisa Juusola, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-107-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
During auroral substorms, the ionospheric electric currents change rapidly, and a large amount of energy is dissipated. We combine ionospheric current data derived from the Swarm satellite mission with the substorm database from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network. We obtain statistics of the strength and location of the currents relative to the substorm onset. Our results show that low-earth orbit satellites give a coherent picture of the main features in the substorm current system.
Pekka T. Verronen, Antti Kero, Noora Partamies, Monika E. Szeląg, Shin-Ichiro Oyama, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, and Esa Turunen
Ann. Geophys., 39, 883–897, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is the first to simulate and analyse the pulsating aurorae impact on middle atmosphere on monthly/seasonal timescales. We find that pulsating aurorae have the potential to make a considerable contribution to the total energetic particle forcing and increase the impact on upper stratospheric odd nitrogen and ozone in the polar regions. Thus, it should be considered in atmospheric and climate simulations.
Joshua Dreyer, Noora Partamies, Daniel Whiter, Pål G. Ellingsen, Lisa Baddeley, and Stephan C. Buchert
Ann. Geophys., 39, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-277-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Small-scale auroral features are still being discovered and are not well understood. Where aurorae are caused by particle precipitation, the newly reported fragmented aurora-like emissions (FAEs) seem to be locally generated in the ionosphere (hence,
aurora-like). We analyse data from multiple instruments located near Longyearbyen to derive their main characteristics. They seem to occur as two types in a narrow altitude region (individually or in regularly spaced groups).
Emma Bland, Fasil Tesema, and Noora Partamies
Ann. Geophys., 39, 135–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-135-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-135-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A total of 10 Super Dual Auroral Radar Network radars were used to estimate the horizontal area over which energetic electrons impact the atmosphere at 70–100 km altitude during pulsating aurorae (PsAs). The impact area varies significantly from event to event. Approximately one-third extend over 12° of magnetic latitude, while others are highly localised. Our results could be used to improve the forcing used in atmospheric/climate models to properly capture the energy contribution from PsAs.
Noora Partamies, Fasil Tesema, Emma Bland, Erkka Heino, Hilde Nesse Tyssøy, and Erlend Kallelid
Ann. Geophys., 39, 69–83, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-69-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-69-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
About 200 nights of substorm activity have been analysed for their magnetic disturbance magnitude and the level of cosmic radio noise absorption. We show that substorms with a single expansion phase have limited lifetimes and spatial extents. Starting from magnetically quiet conditions, the strongest absorption occurs after 1 to 2 nights of substorm activity. This prolonged activity is thus required to accelerate particles to energies, which may affect the atmospheric chemistry.
Fasil Tesema, Noora Partamies, Hilde Nesse Tyssøy, and Derek McKay
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1191–1202, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1191-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present the ionization level from EISCAT radar experiments and cosmic noise absorption level
from KAIRA riometer observations during pulsating auroras. We found thick layers of ionization that reach down
to 70 km (harder precipitation) and higher cosmic noise absorption during patchy pulsating aurora than
during amorphous pulsating and patchy auroras.
Liisa Juusola, Heikki Vanhamäki, Ari Viljanen, and Maxim Smirnov
Ann. Geophys., 38, 983–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Rapid variations of the magnetic field measured on the ground can be used to estimate space weather risks to power grids, but forecasting the variations remains a challenge. We show that part of this problem stems from the fact that, in addition to electric currents in space, the magnetic field variations are strongly affected by underground electric currents. We suggest that separating the measured field into its space and underground parts could improve our understanding of space weather.
Cited articles
Akasofu, S.-I.: The development of the auroral substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 4, 273–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(64)90151-5, 1964. a
Clausen, L. B. N. and Nickisch, H.: Automatic classification of auroral images from the Oslo Auroral THEMIS (OATH) data set using machine learning, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 5640–5647, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025274, 2018. a, b
Cresswell-Moorcock, K., Rodger, C. J., Kero, A., Collier, A. B., Clilverd, M. A., Häggström, I., and Pitkänen, T.: A reexamination of latitudinal limits of substorm-produced energetic electron precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 6694–6705, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50598, 2013. a
Dol, B.: Viability of using images classified by an unsupervised AI for determining patterns in the evolution of auroral morphology, Internship report at The University Centre in Svalbard, Norway, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands, https://bibsys-almaprimo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=BIBSYS_ILS71681826100002201&vid=UNIS&search_scope=default_scope&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US&context=L (last access: 19 April 2024), 2023. a, b, c
Dreyer, J., Partamies, N., Whiter, D., Ellingsen, P. G., Baddeley, L., and Buchert, S. C.: Characteristics of fragmented aurora-like emissions (FAEs) observed on Svalbard, Ann. Geophys., 39, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-277-2021, 2021. a
Emmert, J. T., Richmond, A. D., and Drob, D. P.: A computationally compact representation of Magnetic-Apex and Quasi-Dipole coordinates with smooth base vectors, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A08322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015326, 2010. a
Forsyth, C., Rae, I. J., Coxon, J. C., Freeman, M. P., Jackman, C. M., Gjerloev, J., and Fazakerley, A. N.: A new technique for determining Substorm Onsets and Phases from Indices of the Electrojet (SOPHIE), J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 10592–10606, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021343, 2015. a
Fred, A.: Finding Consistent Clusters in Data Partitions, Proceedings of Multiple Classifier Systems, edited by: Kittler J. and Roli, F., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 309–318, ISBN 978-3-540-48219-2, 2001. a
Gjerloev, J. W.: The SuperMAG data processing technique, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A09213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017683, 2012. a
Goertz, A., Partamies, N., Whiter, D., and Baddeley, L.: Morphological evolution and spatial profile changes of poleward moving auroral forms, Ann. Geophys., 41, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-115-2023, 2023. a
Hu, Z.-J., Yang, H., Huang, D., Araki, T., Sato, N., Taguchi, M., Seran, E., Hu, H., Liu, R., Zhang, B., Han, D., Chen, Z., Zhang, Q., Liang, J., and Liu, S.: Synoptic distribution of dayside aurora: multiple-wavelength all-sky observation at Yellow River Station in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phy., 71, 794–804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.02.010, 2009. a
Juusola, L., Østgaard, N., Tanskanen, E., Partamies, N., and Snekvik, K.: Earthward plasma sheet flows during substorm phases, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A10228, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016852, 2011. a
Johnson, J. W., Hari, S., Hampton, D., Connor, Hyunju, K., and Keesee, A.: A Contrastive Learning Approach to Auroral Identification and Classification, 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 13–16 December 2021, Pasadena, CA, USA, 772–777, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA52953.2021.00128, 2021. a, b
Juusola, L., Vanhamäki, H., Viljanen, A., and Smirnov, M.: Induced currents due to 3D ground conductivity play a major role in the interpretation of geomagnetic variations, Ann. Geophys., 38, 983–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-983-2020, 2020. a, b
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 27–30 June 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770–778, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 2016. a
IMAGE data: IMAGE data download, IMAGE [data set], https://space.fmi.fi/image/www/index.php, last access: 19 April 2024. a
KHO keograms: UNIS Keograms, KHO [data set], http://kho.unis.no/Keograms/keograms.php, last access: 19 April 2024. a
Knudsen, D. J., Borovsky, J. E., Karlsson, T., Kataoka, R., and Partamies, N.: Editorial: Topical Collection on Auroral Physics, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00798-8, 2021. a
Kvammen, A., Wickstrøm, K., McKay, D., and Partamies, N.: Auroral image classification with deep neural networks, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2020JA027808, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027808, 2020. a, b
Laundal, K. M., van der Meeren, C., Burrell, A. G., Starr, G., Reimer, A., Morschhauser, A., and Lamarche, L.: ApexPy Contents, ApexPy [code], https://apexpy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (last access: 26 March 2024), 2022. a
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G.: Deep learning, Nature, 521, 436–444, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539, 2015. a
MacDonald, E. A., Donovan, E., Nishimura, Y., Case, N. A., Gillies, D. M., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Archer, W. E., Spanswick, E. L., Bourassa, N., Connors, M., Heavner, M., Jackel, B., Kosar, B., Knudsen, D. J., Ratzlaff, C., and Schofield, I.: New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 4, eaaq0030, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030, 2018. a
MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, edited by: Le Cam, L. M. and Neyman, J., Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Prob., 21 June–18 July 1965 and 27 December 1965–7 January 1966, 1, 281–297, 1967. a
McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Melville, J.: UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426, 18 September 2020. a
McKay, D., Paavilainen, T., Gustavsson, B., Kvammen, A., and Partamies, N.: Lumikot: Fast auroral transients during the growth phase of substorms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7214–7221, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082985, 2019. a
Murphy, K. R., Miles, D. M., Watt, C. E. J., Rae, I. J., Mann, I. R., and Frey, H. U.: Automated determination of auroral breakup during the substorm expansion phase using all-sky imager data, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 1414–1427, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA018773, 2014. a
Nanjo, S., Nozawa, S., Yamamoto, M., Kawabata, T., Johnsen, M. G., Tsuda, T. T., and Hosokawa, K.: An automated auroral detection system using deep learning: real-time operation in Tromsø, Norway. Sci. Rep., 12, 8038, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11686-8, 2022. a
Nielsen, F.: Hierarchical Clustering, in: Introduction to HPC with MPI for Data Science, Springer International Publishing, 195–211, ISBN 978-3-319-21903-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21903-5_8, 2016. a
Partamies, N.: Auroral images with morphological clusters, University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00132, 2023. a
Partamies, N., Juusola, L., Tanskanen, E., and Kauristie, K.: Statistical properties of substorms during different storm and solar cycle phases, Ann. Geophys., 31, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-349-2013, 2013. a
Partamies, N., Whiter, D., Syrjäsuo, M., and Kauristie, K.: Solar cycle and diurnal dependence of auroral structures, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 8448–8461, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019631, 2014. a
Partamies, N., Whiter, D., Kauristie, K., and Massetti, S.: Magnetic local time (MLT) dependence of auroral peak emission height and morphology, Ann. Geophys., 40, 605–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-605-2022, 2022. a
Richmond, A. D.: Ionospheric electrodynamics using Magnetic Apex Coordinates, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 47, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.47.191, 1995. a
Sado, P., Clausen, L. B. N., Miloch, W. J., and Nickisch, H.: Transfer learning aurora image classification and magnetic disturbance evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2021JA029683, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029683, 2022. a, b
Singh, A. K., Sinha, A. K., Rawat, R., Jayashree, B., Pathan, B. M., and Dhar, A.: A broad climatology of very high latitude substorms, Adv. Space Res., 50, 1512–1523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.07.034, 2012. a
Steinbach, M., Ertöz, L., and Kumar, V.: The Challenges of Clustering High Dimensional Data, in New Directions in Statistical Physics: Econophysics, Bioinformatics, and Pattern Recognition, edited by: Wille, L. T., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 273–309, ISBN 978-3-662-08968-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08968-2_16, 2004. a
Syrjäsuo, M. T. and Donovan, E. F.: Diurnal auroral occurrence statistics obtained via machine vision, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1103–1113, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1103-2004, 2004. a
Tanskanen, E. I.: A comprehensive high-throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993–2003 examined, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A05204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013682, 2009. a
Teissier, V.: Automatic morphological classification of auroral structures, GitHub [Master's thesis], https://github.com/Tadlai/auroral-classification/blob/main/master_thesis-final.pdf (last access: 22 April 2024), 2022 (code available at: https://github.com/Tadlai/auroral-classification, last access: 22 April 2024). a, b, c, d
Vanhamäki, H. and Juusola, L.: Introduction to Spherical Elementary Current Systems, in: Ionospheric Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Tools, edited by: Dunlop, M. and Lühr, H., ISSI Scientific Report Series, Vol. 17, Springer, Cham., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26732-2_2, 2020. a, b, c
Vanhamäki, H., Viljanen, A., and Amm, O.: Induction effects on ionospheric electric and magnetic fields, Ann. Geophys., 23, 1735–1746, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1735-2005, 2005. a
Yamazaki, Y., Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Kervalishvili, G., Rauberg, J., Bronkalla, O., Morschhauser, A., Bruinsma, S., Shprits, Y. Y., and Jackson, D. R.: Geomagnetic activity index Hpo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL098860, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098860, 2022. a
Yamauchi, M. and Brändström, U.: Auroral alert version 1.0: two-step automatic detection of sudden aurora intensification from all-sky JPEG images, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 71–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-71-2023, 2023. a
Yang, Q., Liu, C., and Liang, J.: Unsupervised automatic classification of all-sky auroral images using deep clustering technology, Earth Sci. Inform., 14, 1327–1337, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00634-1, 2021. a
Short summary
Auroral imaging produces large amounts of image data that can no longer be analyzed by visual inspection. Thus, every step towards automatic analysis tools is crucial. Previously supervised learning methods have been used in auroral physics, with a human expert providing ground truth. However, this ground truth is debatable. We present an unsupervised learning method, which shows promising results in detecting auroral breakups in the all-sky image data.
Auroral imaging produces large amounts of image data that can no longer be analyzed by visual...
