Articles | Volume 38, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
09 Jun 2020
Regular paper |
| 09 Jun 2020
| 09 Jun 2020
Outer radiation belt and inner magnetospheric response to sheath regions of coronal mass ejections: a statistical analysis
Milla M. H. Kalliokoski
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Emilia K. J. Kilpua
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Adnane Osmane
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Drew L. Turner
Space Sciences Department, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, California, USA
Allison N. Jaynes
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Lucile Turc
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Harriet George
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Minna Palmroth
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
The Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Emilia Kilpua, Liisa Juusola, Maxime Grandin, Antti Kero, Stepan Dubyagin, Noora Partamies, Adnane Osmane, Harriet George, Milla Kalliokoski, Tero Raita, Timo Asikainen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 557–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms, and they cause dramatic changes in radiation belt electron fluxes. Differences in precipitation of high-energy electrons from the belts to the upper atmosphere are thus expected. We investigate here differences in sheath- and ejecta-induced precipitation using the Finnish riometer (relative ionospheric opacity meter) chain.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Konstantinos Papadakis, Markku Alho, Markus Battarbee, Giulia Cozzani, Lauri Pänkäläinen, Urs Ganse, Fasil Kebede, Jonas Suni, Konstantinos Horaites, Maxime Grandin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-26, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-26, 2024
Preprint under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Flux ropes are peculiar structures of twisted magnetic field occurring in many regions of space, near Earth and other planets, at the Sun, and in astrophysical objects. We developed a new way of detecting flux ropes in large supercomputer simulations of near-Earth space and we use it to follow the evolution of flux ropes for long distances past the Earth in the flow direction. This will be useful in future studies as these flux ropes are involved in the transport of matter and energy in space.
Leo Kotipalo, Markus Battarbee, Yann Pfau-Kempf, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6401–6413, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6401-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper examines a method called adaptive mesh refinement in optimization of the space plasma simulation model Vlasiator. The method locally adjusts resolution in regions which are most relevant to modelling, based on the properties of the plasma. The runs testing this method show that adaptive refinement manages to highlight the desired regions with manageable performance overhead. Performance in larger-scale production runs and mitigation of overhead are avenues of further research.
Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Hongyang Zhou, Liisa Juusola, Abiyot Workayehu, Fasil Kebede, Konstantinos Papadakis, Maxime Grandin, Markku Alho, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Dubart, Leo Kotipalo, Arnaud Lalagüe, Jonas Suni, Konstantinos Horaites, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-101, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Vlasiator is a kinetic space-plasma model that simulates the behaviour of plasma, solar wind and magnetic fields in near-Earth space. So far, these simulations had been run without any interaction wtih the ionosphere, the uppermost layer of Earth's atmosphere. In this manuscript, we present the new methods that add an ionospheric electrodynamics model to Vlasiator, coupling it with the existing methods and presenting new simulation results of how space Plasma and Earth's ionosphere interact.
Tuomas Häkkilä, Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Monika E. Szeląg, Markku Alho, Leo Kotipalo, Niilo Kalakoski, Pekka T. Verronen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-7, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
We study the atmospheric impact of auroral electron precipitation, by the novel combination of both magnetospheric and atmospheric modelling. We first simulate fluxes of auroral electrons, and then use these fluxes to model their atmospheric impact. We find an increase of up to 200 % in thermospheric odd nitrogen, and a corresponding decrease in stratospheric ozone of around 0.7 %. The produced auroral electron precipitation is realistic, and shows the potential for future studies.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Simon Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, and Venla Koikkalainen
Ann. Geophys., 42, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind is organised into slow and fast streams, interaction regions, and transient structures originating from solar eruptions. Their internal characteristics are not well understood. A more comprehensive understanding of such features can give insight itno physical processes governing their formation and evolution. Using tools from information theory, we find that the solar wind shows universal turbulent properties on smaller scales, while on larger scales, clear differences arise.
Markku Alho, Giulia Cozzani, Ivan Zaitsev, Fasil Tesema Kebede, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Maarja Bussov, Maxime Dubart, Sanni Hoilijoki, Leo Kotipalo, Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Jonas Suni, Vertti Tarvus, Abiyot Workayehu, Hongyang Zhou, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 42, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-145-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-145-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetic reconnection is one of the main processes for energy conversion and plasma transport in space plasma physics, associated with plasma entry into the magnetosphere of Earth and Earth’s substorm cycle. Global modelling of these plasma processes enables us to understand the magnetospheric system in detail. However, finding sites of active reconnection from large simulation datasets can be challenging, and this paper develops tools to find magnetic topologies related to reconnection.
Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Lucile Turc, Mikko Savola, Veera Lipsanen, Harriet George, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-3, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Structures originating from the Sun, such as coronal mass ejections and high-speed streams, may impact the Earth's magnetosphere differently. The occurrence rate of these structures depends on the phase solar cycle. We use mutual information to study the change in the statistical dependence between solar wind and inner magnetosphere. We find that the non-linearity between solar wind and inner magnetosphere varies over the solar cycle and during different solar wind drivers.
Jonas Suni, Minna Palmroth, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Giulia Cozzani, Maxime Dubart, Urs Ganse, Harriet George, Evgeny Gordeev, Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Vertti Tarvus, Fasil Tesema, and Hongyang Zhou
Ann. Geophys., 41, 551–568, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are structures of enhanced plasma density and/or velocity in a region of near-Earth space known as the magnetosheath. When they propagate towards the Earth, these jets can disturb the Earth's magnetic field and cause hazards for satellites. In this study, we use a simulation called Vlasiator to model near-Earth space and investigate jets using case studies and statistical analysis. We find that jets that propagate towards the Earth are different from jets that do not.
Konstantinos Papadakis, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Markku Alho, Maxime Grandin, Maxime Dubart, Lucile Turc, Hongyang Zhou, Konstantinos Horaites, Ivan Zaitsev, Giulia Cozzani, Maarja Bussov, Evgeny Gordeev, Fasil Tesema, Harriet George, Jonas Suni, Vertti Tarvus, and Minna Palmroth
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7903–7912, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7903-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7903-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Vlasiator is a plasma simulation code that simulates the entire near-Earth space at a global scale. As 6D simulations require enormous amounts of computational resources, Vlasiator uses adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) to lighten the computational burden. However, due to Vlasiator’s grid topology, AMR simulations suffer from grid aliasing artifacts that affect the global results. In this work, we present and evaluate the performance of a mechanism for alleviating those artifacts.
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Ioannis A. Daglis, Loren C. Chang, Sergio Dasso, Nat Gopalswamy, Olga V. Khabarova, Emilia Kilpua, Ramon Lopez, Daniel Marsh, Katja Matthes, Dibyendu Nandy, Annika Seppälä, Kazuo Shiokawa, Rémi Thiéblemont, and Qiugang Zong
Ann. Geophys., 39, 1013–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a detailed account of the science programme PRESTO (PREdictability of the variable Solar–Terrestrial cOupling), covering the period 2020 to 2024. PRESTO was defined by a dedicated committee established by SCOSTEP (Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics). We review the current state of the art and discuss future studies required for the most effective development of solar–terrestrial physics.
Vertti Tarvus, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Jonas Suni, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Markku Alho, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Andreas Johlander, Konstantinos Papadakis, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 39, 911–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use simulations of Earth's magnetosphere and study the formation of transient wave structures in the region where the solar wind first interacts with the magnetosphere. These transients move earthward and play a part in the solar wind–magnetosphere interaction. We show that the transients are a common feature and their properties are altered as they move earthward, including an increase in temperature, decrease in solar wind speed and an alteration in their propagation properties.
Andrei Runov, Maxime Grandin, Minna Palmroth, Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Heli Hietala, Sanni Hoilijoki, Emilia Kilpua, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Sergio Toledo-Redondo, Lucile Turc, and Drew Turner
Ann. Geophys., 39, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-599-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In collisionless systems like space plasma, particle velocity distributions contain fingerprints of ongoing physical processes. However, it is challenging to decode this information from observations. We used hybrid-Vlasov simulations to obtain ion velocity distribution functions at different locations and at different stages of the Earth's magnetosphere dynamics. The obtained distributions provide valuable examples that may be directly compared with observations by satellites in space.
Minna Palmroth, Savvas Raptis, Jonas Suni, Tomas Karlsson, Lucile Turc, Andreas Johlander, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Mojtaba Akhavan-Tafti, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Vertti Tarvus, and Adnane Osmane
Ann. Geophys., 39, 289–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-289-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are high-velocity features within the Earth's turbulent magnetosheath, separating the Earth's magnetic domain from the solar wind. The characteristics of the jets are difficult to assess statistically as a function of their lifetime because normally spacecraft observe them only at one position within the magnetosheath. This study first confirms the accuracy of the model used, Vlasiator, by comparing it to MMS spacecraft, and then carries out the first jet lifetime statistics.
Minna Palmroth, Maxime Grandin, Theodoros Sarris, Eelco Doornbos, Stelios Tourgaidis, Anita Aikio, Stephan Buchert, Mark A. Clilverd, Iannis Dandouras, Roderick Heelis, Alex Hoffmann, Nickolay Ivchenko, Guram Kervalishvili, David J. Knudsen, Anna Kotova, Han-Li Liu, David M. Malaspina, Günther March, Aurélie Marchaudon, Octav Marghitu, Tomoko Matsuo, Wojciech J. Miloch, Therese Moretto-Jørgensen, Dimitris Mpaloukidis, Nils Olsen, Konstantinos Papadakis, Robert Pfaff, Panagiotis Pirnaris, Christian Siemes, Claudia Stolle, Jonas Suni, Jose van den IJssel, Pekka T. Verronen, Pieter Visser, and Masatoshi Yamauchi
Ann. Geophys., 39, 189–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This is a review paper that summarises the current understanding of the lower thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI) in terms of measurements and modelling. The LTI is the transition region between space and the atmosphere and as such of tremendous importance to both the domains of space and atmosphere. The paper also serves as the background for European Space Agency Earth Explorer 10 candidate mission Daedalus.
Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Markku Alho, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Maxime Grandin, Urs Ganse, Konstantinos Papadakis, Andreas Johlander, Lucile Turc, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 39, 85–103, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-85-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-85-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate local acceleration dynamics of electrons with a new numerical simulation method, which is an extension of a world-leading kinetic plasma simulation. We describe how large supercomputer simulations can be used to initialize the electron simulations and show numerical stability for the electron method. We show that features of our simulated electrons match observations from Earth's magnetic tail region.
Maxime Dubart, Urs Ganse, Adnane Osmane, Andreas Johlander, Markus Battarbee, Maxime Grandin, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1283–1298, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1283-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1283-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Plasma waves are ubiquitous in the Earth's magnetosphere. They are responsible for many energetic processes happening in Earth's atmosphere, such as auroras. In order to understand these processes, thorough investigations of these waves are needed. We use a state-of-the-art numerical model to do so. Here we investigate the impact of different spatial resolutions in the model on these waves in order to improve in the future the model without wasting computational resources.
Markus Battarbee, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Lucile Turc, Primož Kajdič, Andreas Johlander, Vertti Tarvus, Stephen Fuselier, Karlheinz Trattner, Markku Alho, Thiago Brito, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Mojtaba Akhavan-Tafti, Tomas Karlsson, Savvas Raptis, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Jonas Suni, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1081–1099, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the dynamics of helium in the foreshock, a part of near-Earth space found upstream of the Earth's bow shock. We show how the second most common ion in interplanetary space reacts strongly to plasma waves found in the foreshock. Spacecraft observations and supercomputer simulations both give us a new understanding of the foreshock edge and how to interpret future observations.
Lucile Turc, Vertti Tarvus, Andrew P. Dimmock, Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Andreas Johlander, Maxime Grandin, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1045–1062, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1045-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1045-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Using global computer simulations, we study properties of the magnetosheath, the region of near-Earth space where the stream of particles originating from the Sun, the solar wind, is slowed down and deflected around the Earth's magnetic field. One of our main findings is that even for idealised solar wind conditions as used in our model, the magnetosheath density shows large-scale spatial and temporal variation in the so-called quasi-parallel magnetosheath, causing varying levels of asymmetry.
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Dominique Fontaine, Simon W. Good, Matti Ala-Lahti, Adnane Osmane, Erika Palmerio, Emiliya Yordanova, Clement Moissard, Lina Z. Hadid, and Miho Janvier
Ann. Geophys., 38, 999–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-999-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies magnetic field fluctuations in three turbulent sheath regions ahead of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) in the near-Earth solar wind. Our results show that fluctuation properties vary significantly in different parts of the sheath when compared to solar wind ahead. Turbulence in sheaths resembles that of the slow solar wind in the terrestrial magnetosheath, e.g. regarding compressibility and intermittency, and it often lacks Kolmogorov's spectral indices.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Markus Battarbee, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Tuomas Koskela, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 625–643, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-625-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-625-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The structure and medium-scale dynamics of Earth's bow shock and how charged solar wind particles are reflected by it are studied in order to better understand space weather effects. We use advanced supercomputer simulations to model the shock and reflected ions. We find that the thickness of the shock depends on solar wind conditions but also has small-scale variations. Charged particle reflection is shown to be non-localized. Magnetic fields are important for ion reflection.
Theodoros E. Sarris, Elsayed R. Talaat, Minna Palmroth, Iannis Dandouras, Errico Armandillo, Guram Kervalishvili, Stephan Buchert, Stylianos Tourgaidis, David M. Malaspina, Allison N. Jaynes, Nikolaos Paschalidis, John Sample, Jasper Halekas, Eelco Doornbos, Vaios Lappas, Therese Moretto Jørgensen, Claudia Stolle, Mark Clilverd, Qian Wu, Ingmar Sandberg, Panagiotis Pirnaris, and Anita Aikio
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 153–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Daedalus aims to measure the largely unexplored area between Eart's atmosphere and space, the Earth's
ignorosphere. Here, intriguing and complex processes govern the deposition and transport of energy. The aim is to quantify this energy by measuring effects caused by electrodynamic processes in this region. The concept is based on a mother satellite that carries a suite of instruments, along with smaller satellites carrying a subset of instruments that are released into the atmosphere.
Emilia Kilpua, Liisa Juusola, Maxime Grandin, Antti Kero, Stepan Dubyagin, Noora Partamies, Adnane Osmane, Harriet George, Milla Kalliokoski, Tero Raita, Timo Asikainen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 557–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-557-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal mass ejection sheaths and ejecta are key drivers of significant space weather storms, and they cause dramatic changes in radiation belt electron fluxes. Differences in precipitation of high-energy electrons from the belts to the upper atmosphere are thus expected. We investigate here differences in sheath- and ejecta-induced precipitation using the Finnish riometer (relative ionospheric opacity meter) chain.
Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Adnane Osmane, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, Thiago Brito, Tuomas Koskela, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 37, 791–806, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
When the terrestrial magnetic field is disturbed, particles from the near-Earth space can precipitate into the upper atmosphere. This work presents, for the first time, numerical simulations of proton precipitation in the energy range associated with the production of aurora (∼1–30 keV) using a global kinetic model of the near-Earth space: Vlasiator. We find that nightside proton precipitation can be regulated by the transition region between stretched and dipolar geomagnetic field lines.
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia Kilpua, Matti Ala-Lahti, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Osku Raukunen
Ann. Geophys., 37, 561–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the Earth's space environment responds to two different amplitude interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) events that occurred in 2012 and 2014 by using the GUMICS-4 global MHD model. We examine local and large-scale dynamics of the Earth's space environment and compare simulation results to in situ data. It is shown that during moderate driving simulation agrees well with the measurements; however, GMHD results should be interpreted cautiously during strong driving.
Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Riku Jarvinen, Markus Battarbee, Emilia Kilpua, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1183–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1183-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, forming a magnetosphere. On the night side solar wind stretches the magnetosphere into a long tail. A process called magnetic reconnection opens the magnetic field lines and reconnects them, accelerating particles to high energies. We study this in the magnetotail using a numerical simulation model of the Earth’s magnetosphere. We study the motion of the points where field lines reconnect and the fast flows driven by this process.
Minna Palmroth, Heli Hietala, Ferdinand Plaschke, Martin Archer, Tomas Karlsson, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, David Sibeck, Primož Kajdič, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Markus Battarbee, and Lucile Turc
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1171–1182, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1171-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1171-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetosheath jets are high-velocity plasma structures that are commonly observed within the Earth's magnetosheath. Previously, they have mainly been investigated with spacecraft observations, which do not allow us to infer their spatial sizes, temporal evolution, or origin. This paper shows for the first time their dimensions, evolution, and origins within a simulation whose dimensions are directly comparable to the Earth's magnetosphere. The results are compared to previous observations.
Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Markus Battarbee, Lucile Turc, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, David G. Sibeck, Paul A. Cassak, Robert C. Fear, Riku Jarvinen, Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Rami Vainio, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1081–1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We use the Vlasiator code to study the characteristics of transient structures that exist in the Earth's foreshock, i.e. upstream of the bow shock. The structures are cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies (SHFAs). These transients can interact with the bow shock. We study the changes the shock suffers via this interaction. We also investigate ion distributions associated with the cavitons and SHFAs. A very important result is that the arrival of multiple SHFAs results in shock erosion.
Liisa Juusola, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Markus Battarbee, Thiago Brito, Maxime Grandin, Lucile Turc, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1027–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1027-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's magnetic field is shaped by the solar wind. On the dayside the field is compressed and on the nightside it is stretched as a long tail. The tail has been observed to occasionally undergo flapping motions, but the origin of these motions is not understood. We study the flapping using a numerical simulation of the near-Earth space. We present a possible explanation for how the flapping could be initiated by a passing disturbance and then maintained as a standing wave.
Matti M. Ala-Lahti, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Tuija Pulkkinen, and Jan Souček
Ann. Geophys., 36, 793–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of mirror mode waves and the properties of their plasma surroundings in sheath regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) to deepen our understanding of these geo-effective plasma environments. The results imply that mirror modes are common structures in ICME sheaths and occur almost exclusively as dip-like structures and in mirror stable stable plasma.
Minna Palmroth, Sanni Hoilijoki, Liisa Juusola, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Heli Hietala, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, Rami Vainio, and Michael Hesse
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1269–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Much like solar flares, substorms occurring within the Earth's magnetic domain are explosive events that cause vivid auroral displays. A decades-long debate exists to explain the substorm onset. We devise a simulation encompassing the entire near-Earth space and demonstrate that detailed modelling of magnetic reconnection explains the central substorm observations. Our results help to understand the unpredictable substorm process, which will significantly improve space weather forecasts.
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Pekka Janhunen
Ann. Geophys., 35, 907–922, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the impact on global MHD simulations from different simulation initialisation methods. While the global MHD code used is GUMICS-4 we conclude that the results might be generalisable to other codes as well. It is found that different initialisation methods affect the dynamics of the Earth's space environment by creating differences in momentum transport several hours afterwards. These differences may even grow as a response to rapid solar wind condition changes.
Yann Pfau-Kempf, Heli Hietala, Steve E. Milan, Liisa Juusola, Sanni Hoilijoki, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 34, 943–959, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-943-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We have simulated the interaction of the solar wind – the charged particles and magnetic fields emitted by the Sun into space – with the magnetic field of the Earth. The solar wind flows supersonically and creates a shock when it encounters the obstacle formed by the geomagnetic field. We have identified a new chain of events which causes phenomena in the downstream region to eventually cause perturbations at the shock and even upstream. This is confirmed by ground and satellite observations.
Erika Palmerio, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, and Neel P. Savani
Ann. Geophys., 34, 313–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are giant clouds of plasma and magnetic field that erupt from the Sun and travel though the solar wind. They can cause interplanetary shocks in the vicinity of Earth. We show in our paper that the region that follows CME-driven shocks, known as sheath region, can obtain a planar configuration of the magnetic field lines (planar magnetic structure, PMS) due to the compression resulting from the shock itself or from the draping of the magnetic field ahead of the CME.
C. Katsavrias, I. A. Daglis, W. Li, S. Dimitrakoudis, M. Georgiou, D. L. Turner, and C. Papadimitriou
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1173–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1173-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1173-2015, 2015
M. Myllys, E. Kilpua, and T. Pulkkinen
Ann. Geophys., 33, 845–855, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015, 2015
P. T. Verronen, M. E. Andersson, A. Kero, C.-F. Enell, J. M. Wissing, E. R. Talaat, K. Kauristie, M. Palmroth, T. E. Sarris, and E. Armandillo
Ann. Geophys., 33, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-381-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-381-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Electron concentrations observed by EISCAT radars can be reasonable well represented using AIMOS v1.2 satellite-data-based ionization model and SIC D-region ion chemistry model. SIC-EISCAT difference varies from event to event, probably because the statistical nature of AIMOS ionization is not capturing all the spatio-temporal fine structure of electron precipitation. Below 90km, AIMOS overestimates electron ionization because of proton contamination of the satellite electron detectors.
K. Andréeová, L. Juusola, E. K. J. Kilpua, and H. E. J. Koskinen
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1293-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1247–1261, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1247-2014, 2014
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 32, 157–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-157-2014, 2014
D. Pokhotelov, S. von Alfthan, Y. Kempf, R. Vainio, H. E. J. Koskinen, and M. Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 31, 2207–2212, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2207-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2207-2013, 2013
E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, D. Fontaine, and L. Turc
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1559–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, 2013
E. K. J. Kilpua, A. Isavnin, A. Vourlidas, H. E. J. Koskinen, and L. Rodriguez
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1251–1265, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1251-2013, 2013
A. T. Aikio, T. Pitkänen, I. Honkonen, M. Palmroth, and O. Amm
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1021–1034, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1021-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1021-2013, 2013
L. Turc, D. Fontaine, P. Savoini, H. Hietala, and E. K. J. Kilpua
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1011–1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1011-2013, 2013
K. Andreeova, E. K. J. Kilpua, H. Hietala, H. E. J. Koskinen, A. Isavnin, and R. Vainio
Ann. Geophys., 31, 555–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-555-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Radiation belts
Comparison of radiation belt electron fluxes simultaneously measured with PROBA-V/EPT and RBSP/MagEIS instruments
Electron radiation belt safety indices based on the SafeSpace modelling pipeline and dedicated to the internal charging risk
The “SafeSpace” database of ULF power spectral density and radial diffusion coefficients: dependencies and application to simulations
Quantifying the non-linear dependence of energetic electron fluxes in the Earth's radiation belts with radial diffusion drivers
On the semi-annual variation of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt
Seasonal dependence of the Earth's radiation belt – new insights
Distribution of Earth's radiation belts' protons over the drift frequency of particles
Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
Energetic electron enhancements under the radiation belt (L < 1.2) during a non-storm interval on 1 August 2008
GREEN: the new Global Radiation Earth ENvironment model (beta version)
Van Allen Probes observation of plasmaspheric hiss modulated by injected energetic electrons
Alexandre Winant, Viviane Pierrard, and Edith Botek
Ann. Geophys., 41, 313–325, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-313-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-313-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we analyzed and compared measurements of electron fluxes in the radiation belts from two instruments with different orbits. In the outer belt, where the altitude difference is the largest between the two instruments, we find that the observations are in good agreement, except during geomagnetic storms, during which fluxes at low altitudes are much lower than at high altitudes. In general, both at low and high altitudes, the correlation between the instruments was found to be good.
Nour Dahmen, Antoine Brunet, Sebastien Bourdarie, Christos Katsavrias, Guillerme Bernoux, Stefanos Doulfis, Afroditi Nasi, Ingmar Sandberg, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Jesus Oliveros Fernandez, and Ioannis Daglis
Ann. Geophys., 41, 301–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earth’s space environment is populated with charged particles. The energetic ones are trapped around Earth in radiation belts. Orbiting spacecraft that cross their region can accumulate charges on their internal surfaces, leading to hazardous electrostatic discharges. This paper showcases the SafeSpace safety prototype, which aims to warn satellite operators of probable incoming hazardous events by simulating the dynamics of the electron radiation belts from their origin at the Sun.
Christos Katsavrias, Afroditi Nasi, Ioannis A. Daglis, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Nourallah Dahmen, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Marina Georgiou, Antoine Brunet, and Sebastien Bourdarie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 379–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The radial diffusion mechanism is of utmost importance to both the acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt and, consequently, for physics-based models, which provide nowcasting and forecasting of the electron population. In the framework of the "SafeSpace" project, we have created a database of calculated radial diffusion coefficients, and, furthermore, we have exploited it to provide insights for future modelling efforts.
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Christos Katsavrias, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Ioannis A. Daglis, Ingmar Sandberg, and Piers Jiggens
Ann. Geophys., 39, 413–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The nature of the semi-annual variation in the relativistic electron fluxes in the Earth's outer radiation belt has been a debate for over 30 years. Our work shows that it is primarily driven by the Russell–McPherron effect, which indicates that reconnection is responsible not only for the short-scale but also the seasonal variability of the electron belt as well. Moreover, it is more pronounced during the descending phase of the solar cycles and coexists with periods of fast solar wind speed.
Rajkumar Hajra
Ann. Geophys., 39, 181–187, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-181-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-181-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Geomagnetic activity is known to exhibit semi-annual variation with larger occurrences during equinoxes. A similar seasonal feature was reported for relativistic (∼ MeV) electrons throughout the entire outer zone radiation belt. Present work, for the first time reveals that electron fluxes increase with an ∼ 6-month periodicity in a limited L-shell only with large dependence in solar activity cycle. In addition, flux enhancements are not essentially equinoctial.
Alexander S. Kovtyukh
Ann. Geophys., 39, 171–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-171-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-171-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This is a continuation of work published in Annales Gephysicae between 2016 and 2020. In this paper, a new method for analyzing experimental data is proposed, calculations are carried out, and a new class of distributions of particles of radiation belts is constructed. As a result of this work, new, finer physical regularities of the structure of the Earth's proton radiation belt and its solar-cyclic variations have been obtained, which cannot be obtained by other methods.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Alla V. Suvorova, Alexei V. Dmitriev, and Vladimir A. Parkhomov
Ann. Geophys., 37, 1223–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1223-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1223-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's radiation belts control the space environment, often affecting the GPS signal propagation and satellite operations. Intense fluxes of energetic particles can penetrate even below the inner belt near the Equator. We analysed electron penetrations under geomagnetic quiet conditions and found in the solar wind an external driver cause. Satellite observations prove that disturbance of the inner belt was associated with impact of plasma jets formed in the solar wind nearby the Earth.
Angélica Sicard, Daniel Boscher, Sébastien Bourdarie, Didier Lazaro, Denis Standarovski, and Robert Ecoffet
Ann. Geophys., 36, 953–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
GREEN (Global Radiation Earth ENvironment) is a new model providing particle fluxes at any location in the radiation belts, for energy between 1 keV
and 10 MeV for electrons and between 1 keV and 800 MeV for protons. This model is composed of global models (AE8 and AP8, and SPM) and
local models (SLOT model, OZONE and IGE-2006 for electrons; OPAL and IGP for protons).
Run Shi, Wen Li, Qianli Ma, Seth G. Claudepierre, Craig A. Kletzing, William S. Kurth, George B. Hospodarsky, Harlan E. Spence, Geoff D. Reeves, Joseph F. Fennell, J. Bernard Blake, Scott A. Thaller, and John R. Wygant
Ann. Geophys., 36, 781–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-781-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-781-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Abel, B. and Thorne, R. M.: Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner
magnetosphere 1. Dominant physical processes, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 2385–2396,
https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA02919, 1998. a
Albert, J. M., Ginet, G. P., and Gussenhoven, M. S.: CRRES observations
of radiation belt protons 1. Data overview and steady state radial
diffusion, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9261–9274, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA02869, 1998. a
Alves, L. R., Da Silva, L. A., Souza, V. M., Sibeck, D. G., Jauer,
P. R., Vieira, L. E. A., Walsh, B. M., Silveira, M. V. D., Marchezi,
J. P., Rockenbach, M., Lago, A. D., Mendes, O., Tsurutani, B. T.,
Koga, D., Kanekal, S. G., Baker, D. N., Wygant, J. R., and
Kletzing, C. A.: Outer radiation belt dropout dynamics following the
arrival of two interplanetary coronal mass ejections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 978–987,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067066, 2016. a
Anderson, B. R., Millan, R. M., Reeves, G. D., and Friedel, R. H. W.:
Acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons during small geomagnetic
storms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10113–10119, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066376, 2015. a, b, c
Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G., Li, X., Monk, S. P., Goldstein, J., and
Burch, J. L.: An extreme distortion of the Van Allen belt arising from the
`Hallowe'en' solar storm in 2003, Nature, 432, 878–881,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03116, 2004. a
Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G., Hoxie, V. C., Batiste, S., Bolton, M.,
Li, X., Elkington, S. R., Monk, S., Reukauf, R., Steg, S.,
Westfall, J., Belting, C., Bolton, B., Braun, D., Cervelli, B.,
Hubbell, K., Kien, M., Knappmiller, S., Wade, S., Lamprecht, B.,
Stevens, K., Wallace, J., Yehle, A., Spence, H. E., and Friedel,
R.: The Relativistic Electron-Proton Telescope (REPT) Instrument on Board
the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Spacecraft: Characterization of
Earth's Radiation Belt High-Energy Particle Populations, Space Sci. Rev., 179,
337–381, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9950-9, 2013. a
Baker, D. N., Jaynes, A. N., Hoxie, V. C., Thorne, R. M., Foster,
J. C., Li, X., Fennell, J. F., Wygant, J. R., Kanekal, S. G.,
Erickson, P. J., Kurth, W., Li, W., Ma, Q., Schiller, Q., Blum,
L., Malaspina, D. M., Gerrard, A., and Lanzerotti, L. J.: An
impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen
radiation belts, Nature, 515, 531–534, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13956,
2014a. a
Baker, D. N., Jaynes, A. N., Li, X., Henderson, M. G., Kanekal,
S. G., Reeves, G. D., Spence, H. E., Claudepierre, S. G., Fennell,
J. F., Hudson, M. K., Thorne, R. M., Foster, J. C., Erickson, P. J.,
Malaspina, D. M., Wygant, J. R., Boyd, A., Kletzing, C. A.,
Drozdov, A., and Shprits, Y. Y.: Gradual diffusion and punctuated phase
space density enhancements of highly relativistic electrons: Van Allen Probes
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1351–1358, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058942,
2014b. a
Bingham, S. T., Mouikis, C. G., Kistler, L. M., Boyd, A. J., Paulson,
K., Farrugia, C. J., Huang, C. L., Spence, H. E., Claudepierre,
S. G., and Kletzing, C.: The Outer Radiation Belt Response to the Storm
Time Development of Seed Electrons and Chorus Wave Activity During CME and
CIR Driven Storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 10139–10157, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025963,
2018. a
Bingham, S. T., Mouikis, C. G., Kistler, L. M., Paulson, K. W.,
Farrugia, C. J., Huang, C. L., Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., and
Kletzing, C.: The Storm Time Development of Source Electrons and Chorus
Wave Activity During CME- and CIR-Driven Storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 6438–6452,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026689, 2019. a
Blake, J. B., Carranza, P. A., Claudepierre, S. G., Clemmons, J. H.,
Crain, W. R., Dotan, Y., Fennell, J. F., Fuentes, F. H., Galvan,
R. M., George, J. S., Henderson, M. G., Lalic, M., Lin, A. Y.,
Looper, M. D., Mabry, D. J., Mazur, J. E., McCarthy, B., Nguyen,
C. Q., O'Brien, T. P., Perez, M. A., Redding, M. T., Roeder, J. L.,
Salvaggio, D. J., Sorensen, G. A., Spence, H. E., Yi, S., and
Zakrzewski, M. P.: The Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS)
Instruments Aboard the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev.,
179, 383–421, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9991-8, 2013. a
Blum, L. W., Artemyev, A., Agapitov, O., Mourenas, D., Boardsen, S.,
and Schiller, Q.: EMIC Wave-Driven Bounce Resonance Scattering of
Energetic Electrons in the Inner Magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 2484–2496,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026427, 2019. a
Bortnik, J. and Thorne, R. M.: The dual role of ELF/VLF chorus waves in
the acceleration and precipitation of radiation belt electrons, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 69, 378–386,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.05.030, 2007. a
Boyd, A. J., Reeves, G. D., Spence, H. E., Funsten, H. O., Larsen,
B. A., Skoug, R. M., Blake, J. B., Fennell, J. F., Claudepierre,
S. G., Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G., and Jaynes, A. N.: RBSP-ECT
Combined Spin-Averaged Electron Flux Data Product, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 9124–9136,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026733, 2019. a
Brito, T., Woodger, L., Hudson, M., and Millan, R.: Energetic
radiation belt electron precipitation showing ULF modulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,
L22104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053790, 2012. a
Burtis, W. J. and Helliwell, R. A.: Banded chorus – A new type
of VLF radiation observed in the magnetosphere by OGO 1 and OGO 3, J. Geophys. Res., 74,
3002, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA074i011p03002, 1969. a
NASA: CDAWeb, available at: https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html/, last access: 1 June 2020. a
Chen, Y., Friedel, R. H. W., Reeves, G. D., Onsager, T. G., and
Thomsen, M. F.: Multisatellite determination of the relativistic electron
phase space density at geosynchronous orbit: Methodology and results during
geomagnetically quiet times, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A10210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010895,
2005. a
Chen, Y., Reeves, G. D., and Friedel, R. H. W.: The energization of
relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen radiation belt, Nat. Phys., 3,
614–617, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys655, 2007. a
Claudepierre, S. G., Elkington, S. R., and Wiltberger, M.: Solar wind
driving of magnetospheric ULF waves: Pulsations driven by velocity shear at
the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A05218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012890, 2008. a
Claudepierre, S. G., Hudson, M. K., Lotko, W., Lyon, J. G., and
Denton, R. E.: Solar wind driving of magnetospheric ULF waves: Field line
resonances driven by dynamic pressure fluctuations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, A11202,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015399, 2010. a
Claudepierre, S. G., O'Brien, T. P., Blake, J. B., Fennell, J. F.,
Roeder, J. L., Clemmons, J. H., Looper, M. D., Mazur, J. E.,
Mulligan, T. M., Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., Friedel, R. H. W.,
Henderson, M. G., and Larsen, B. A.: A background correction algorithm
for Van Allen Probes MagEIS electron flux measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120,
5703–5727, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021171, 2015. a
Coroniti, F. V. and Kennel, C. F.: Electron precipitation pulsations,
J. Geophys. Res., 75, 1279–1289, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i007p01279, 1970. a
Daglis, I. A., Katsavrias, C., and Georgiou, M.: From solar sneezing to
killer electrons: outer radiation belt response to solar eruptions, Philos. T. R. Soc. A,
377, 20180097, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0097, 2019. a
Engebretson, M. J., Posch, J. L., Braun, D. J., Li, W., Ma, Q.,
Kellerman, A. C., Huang, C. L., Kanekal, S. G., Kletzing, C. A.,
Wygant, J. R., Spence, H. E., Baker, D. N., Fennell, J. F.,
Angelopoulos, V., Singer, H. J., Lessard, M. R., Horne, R. B.,
Raita, T., Shiokawa, K., Rakhmatulin, R., Dmitriev, E., and
Ermakova, E.: EMIC Wave Events During the Four GEM QARBM Challenge
Intervals, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 6394–6423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025505, 2018. a
Feynman, J. and Gabriel, S. B.: On space weather consequences and
predictions, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10543–10564, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA000141, 2000. a
Georgiou, M., Daglis, I. A., Rae, I. J., Zesta, E., Sibeck, D. G.,
Mann, I. R., Balasis, G., and Tsinganos, K.: Ultralow Frequency Waves
as an Intermediary for Solar Wind Energy Input Into the Radiation Belts,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 10,090–10,108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025355, 2018. a
Gonzalez, W. D., Joselyn, J. A., Kamide, Y., Kroehl, H. W., Rostoker,
G., Tsurutani, B. T., and Vasyliunas, V. M.: What is a geomagnetic
storm?, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5771–5792, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867, 1994. a
Green, J. C. and Kivelson, M. G.: A tale of two theories: How the
adiabatic response and ULF waves affect relativistic electrons, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
25777–25792, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000054, 2001. a
Green, J. C. and Kivelson, M. G.: Relativistic electrons in the outer
radiation belt: Differentiating between acceleration mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 109,
A03213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010153, 2004. a
Green, J. C., Likar, J., and Shprits, Y.: Impact of space weather on the
satellite industry, Space Weather, 15, 804–818, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001646, 2017. a
Hands, A. D. P., Ryden, K. A., Meredith, N. P., Glauert, S. A., and
Horne, R. B.: Radiation Effects on Satellites During Extreme Space Weather
Events, Space Weather, 16, 1216–1226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001913, 2018. a
Hartinger, M. D., Turner, D. L., Plaschke, F., Angelopoulos, V., and
Singer, H.: The role of transient ion foreshock phenomena in driving Pc5
ULF wave activity, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 299–312, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018349, 2013. a
Horne, R. B. and Pitchford, D.: Space Weather Concerns for All-Electric
Propulsion Satellites, Space Weather, 13, 430–433, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001198,
2015. a
Iyemori, T.: Storm-time magnetospheric currents inferred from mid-latitude
geomagnetic field variations, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr.,
42, 1249–1265, https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.42.1249, 1990. a
Iyemori, T. and Rao, D. R. K.: Decay of the Dst field of geomagnetic disturbance after substorm onset and its implication to storm-substorm relation, Ann. Geophys., 14, 608–618, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0608-3, 1996. a
Jacobs, J. A., Kato, Y., Matsushita, S., and Troitskaya, V. A.:
Classification of Geomagnetic Micropulsations, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 180–181,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ069i001p00180, 1964. a
Jaynes, A. N., Li, X., Schiller, Q. G., Blum, L. W., Tu, W.,
Turner, D. L., Ni, B., Bortnik, J., Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G.,
Blake, J. B., and Wygant, J.: Evolution of relativistic outer belt
electrons during an extended quiescent period, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 9558–9566,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020125, 2014. a, b
Jaynes, A. N., Baker, D. N., Singer, H. J., Rodriguez, J. V.,
Loto'aniu, T. M., Ali, A. F., Elkington, S. R., Li, X., Kanekal,
S. G., Fennell, J. F., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Kletzing, C. A.,
Spence, H. E., and Reeves, G. D.: Source and seed populations for
relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120,
7240–7254, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021234, 2015. a, b
Jaynes, A. N., Ali, A. F., Elkington, S. R., Malaspina, D. M., Baker,
D. N., Li, X., Kanekal, S. G., Henderson, M. G., Kletzing, C. A., and
Wygant, J. R.: Fast Diffusion of Ultrarelativistic Electrons in the Outer
Radiation Belt: 17 March 2015 Storm Event, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 10874–10882,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079786, 2018. a
Kataoka, R. and Miyoshi, Y.: Flux enhancement of radiation belt electrons
during geomagnetic storms driven by coronal mass ejections and corotating
interaction regions, Space Weather, 4, 09004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005SW000211, 2006. a, b
Katsavrias, C., Daglis, I. A., Turner, D. L., Sand berg, I.,
Papadimitriou, C., Georgiou, M., and Balasis, G.: Nonstorm loss of
relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
10521–10530, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066773, 2015. a
Katsavrias, C., Daglis, I. A., and Li, W.: On the Statistics of
Acceleration and Loss of Relativistic Electrons in the Outer Radiation Belt:
A Superposed Epoch Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 2755–2768,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026569, 2019a. a
Katsavrias, C., Sandberg, I., Li, W., Podladchikova, O., Daglis,
I. A., Papadimitriou, C., Tsironis, C., and Aminalragia-Giamini, S.:
Highly Relativistic Electron Flux Enhancement During the Weak Geomagnetic
Storm of April–May 2017, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 4402–4413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026743,
2019b. a
Kepko, L. and Spence, H. E.: Observations of discrete, global
magnetospheric oscillations directly driven by solar wind density
variations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1257, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009676, 2003. a
Kilpua, E., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Coronal mass
ejections and their sheath regions in interplanetary space, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, 5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0009-6, 2017. a, b, c, d
Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Koskinen, H. E. J., Fontaine, D., and Turc, L.: Magnetic field and dynamic pressure ULF fluctuations in coronal-mass-ejection-driven sheath regions, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1559–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1559-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Turner, D. L., Koskinen, H. E. J.,
Pulkkinen, T. I., Rodriguez, J. V., Reeves, G. D., Claudepierre,
S. G., and Spence, H. E.: Unraveling the drivers of the storm time
radiation belt response, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3076–3084, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063542,
2015. a, b, c, d, e, f
Kilpua, E. K. J., Fontaine, D., Moissard, C., Ala-Lahti, M.,
Palmerio, E., Yordanova, E., Good, S. W., Kalliokoski, M. M. H.,
Lumme, E., Osmane, A., Palmroth, M., and Turc, L.: Solar wind
properties and geospace impact of coronal mass ejection-driven sheath
regions: Variation and driver dependence, Space Weather, 17, 1257–1280,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002217, 2019a. a, b
Kilpua, E. K. J., Turner, D. L., Jaynes, A. N., Hietala, H.,
Koskinen, H. E. J., Osmane, A., Palmroth, M., Pulkkinen, T. I.,
Vainio, R., Baker, D., and Claudepierre, S. G.: Outer Van Allen
Radiation Belt Response to Interacting Interplanetary Coronal Mass
Ejections, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1927–1947, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026238,
2019b. a, b, c, d, e
Kletzing, C. A., Kurth, W. S., Acuna, M., MacDowall, R. J., Torbert,
R. B., Averkamp, T., Bodet, D., Bounds, S. R., Chutter, M.,
Connerney, J., Crawford, D., Dolan, J. S., Dvorsky, R.,
Hospodarsky, G. B., Howard, J., Jordanova, V., Johnson, R. A.,
Kirchner, D. L., Mokrzycki, B., Needell, G., Odom, J., Mark, D.,
Pfaff, R., Phillips, J. R., Piker, C. W., Remington, S. L., Rowland, D., Santolik, O., Schnurr, R., Sheppard, D., Smith, C. W.,
Thorne, R. M., and Tyler, J.: The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument
Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP, Space Sci. Rev., 179, 127–181,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9993-6, 2013. a
Koons, H. C. and Roeder, J. L.: A survey of equatorial magnetospheric wave
activity between 5 and 8 RE, Planet Space Sci., 38, 1335–1341,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(90)90136-E, 1990. a
Kurth, W. S., De Pascuale, S., Faden, J. B., Kletzing, C. A.,
Hospodarsky, G. B., Thaller, S., and Wygant, J. R.: Electron densities
inferred from plasma wave spectra obtained by the Waves instrument on Van
Allen Probes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 904–914, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020857, 2015. a
Lepping, R. P., Acũna, M. H., Burlaga, L. F., Farrell, W. M.,
Slavin, J. A., Schatten, K. H., Mariani, F., Ness, N. F., Neubauer,
F. M., Whang, Y. C., Byrnes, J. B., Kennon, R. S., Panetta, P. V.,
Scheifele, J., and Worley, E. M.: The Wind Magnetic Field
Investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207–229, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751330, 1995. a
Lugaz, N., Farrugia, C. J., Winslow, R. M., Al-Haddad, N., Kilpua,
E. K. J., and Riley, P.: Factors affecting the geoeffectiveness of shocks
and sheaths at 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 10861–10879, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023100,
2016. a
Masías-Meza, J. J., Dasso, S., Démoulin, P., Rodriguez, L.,
and Janvier, M.: Superposed epoch study of ICME sub-structures near Earth
and their effects on Galactic cosmic rays, Astron. Astrophys., 592, A118,
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628571, 2016. a
Mauk, B. H., Fox, N. J., Kanekal, S. G., Kessel, R. L., Sibeck,
D. G., and Ukhorskiy, A.: Science Objectives and Rationale for the
Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 179, 3–27,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9908-y, 2013. a
McIlwain, C. E.: Coordinates for Mapping the Distribution of Magnetically
Trapped Particles, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 3681–3691, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i011p03681,
1961. a, b
Moya, P. S., Pinto, V. A., Sibeck, D. G., Kanekal, S. G., and Baker,
D. N.: On the Effect of Geomagnetic Storms on Relativistic Electrons in the
Outer Radiation Belt: Van Allen Probes Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122,
11100–11108, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024735, 2017. a
Murphy, K. R., Watt, C. E. J., Mann, I. R., Jonathan Rae, I., Sibeck,
D. G., Boyd, A. J., Forsyth, C. F., Turner, D. L., Claudepierre,
S. G., Baker, D. N., Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., Blake, J. B., and
Fennell, J.: The Global Statistical Response of the Outer Radiation Belt
During Geomagnetic Storms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3783–3792, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076674,
2018. a, b
NOAA: GOES Data Access, available at: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/satellite/goes/dataaccess.html, last access: 1 June 2020. a
O'Brien, T. P., McPherron, R. L., Sornette, D., Reeves, G. D.,
Friedel, R., and Singer, H. J.: Which magnetic storms produce
relativistic electrons at geosynchronous orbit?, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
15533–15544, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000052, 2001. a, b, c
Ogilvie, K. W., Chornay, D. J., Fritzenreiter, R. J., Hunsaker, F.,
Keller, J., Lobell, J., Miller, G., Scudder, J. D., Sittler Jr.,
E. C., Torbert, R. B., Bodet, D., Needell, G., Lazarus, A. J.,
Steinberg, J. T., Tappan, J. H., Mavretic, A., and Gergin, E.: SWE,
A Comprehensive Plasma Instrument for the Wind Spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55–77,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751326, 1995. a
Palmerio, E., Kilpua, E. K. J., and Savani, N. P.: Planar magnetic structures in coronal mass ejection-driven sheath regions, Ann. Geophys., 34, 313–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-313-2016, 2016. a
Palmroth, M., Praks, J., Vainio, R., Janhunen, P., Kilpua, E. K. J.,
Ganushkina, N. Y., Afanasiev, A., Ala-Lahti, M., Alho, A.,
Asikainen, T., Asvestari, E., Battarbee, M., Binios, A., Bosser,
A., Brito, T., Envall, J., Ganse, U., George, H., Gieseler, J.,
Good, S., Grand in, M., Haslam, S., Hedman, H. P., Hietala, H.,
Jovanovic, N., Kakakhel, S., Kalliokoski, M., Kettunen, V. V.,
Koskela, T., Lumme, E., Meskanen, M., Morosan, D., Rizwan Mughal,
M., Niemelä, P., Nyman, S., Oleynik, P., Osmane, A., Palmerio,
E., Pfau-Kempf, Y., Peltonen, J., Plosila, J., Polkko, J.,
Poluianov, S., Pomoell, J., Price, D., Punkkinen, A., Punkkinen,
R., Riwanto, B., Salomaa, L., Slavinskis, A., Säntti, T.,
Tammi, J., Tenhunen, H., Toivanen, P., Tuominen, J., Turc, L.,
Valtonen, E., Virtanen, P., and Westerlund, T.: FORESAIL-1 cubesat
mission to measure radiation belt losses and demonstrate deorbiting, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
124, 5783–5799, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026354, 2019. a
RBSP–ECT Data Center: RBSP–ECT Science Data Products, LANL, available at: https://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/DataDirectories.php, last access: 1 June 2020. a
RBSP–EMFISIS: Data Index, University of Iowa, available at: https://emfisis.physics.uiowa.edu/data/index, last access: 1 June 2020. a
Reeves, G. D., Spence, H. E., Henderson, M. G., Morley, S. K.,
Friedel, R. H. W., Funsten, H. O., Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G.,
Blake, J. B., Fennell, J. F., Claudepierre, S. G., Thorne, R. M.,
Turner, D. L., Kletzing, C. A., Kurth, W. S., Larsen, B. A., and
Niehof, J. T.: Electron Acceleration in the Heart of the Van Allen
Radiation Belts, Science, 341, 991–994, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237743,
2013. a
Reeves, G. D., Friedel, R. H. W., Larsen, B. A., Skoug, R. M.,
Funsten, H. O., Claudepierre, S. G., Fennell, J. F., Turner, D. L.,
Denton, M. H., Spence, H. E., Blake, J. B., and Baker, D. N.:
Energy-dependent dynamics of keV to MeV electrons in the inner zone, outer
zone, and slot regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 397–412, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021569,
2016. a, b
Richardson, I. G. and Cane, H. V.: Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass
Ejections During Solar Cycle 23 (1996–2009): Catalog and Summary of
Properties, Sol. Phys., 264, 189–237, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6, 2010. a, b
Schiller, Q., Li, X., Blum, L., Tu, W., Turner, D. L., and Blake,
J. B.: A nonstorm time enhancement of relativistic electrons in the outer
radiation belt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7–12, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058485, 2014. a
Selesnick, R. S., Baker, D. N., Jaynes, A. N., Li, X., Kanekal,
S. G., Hudson, M. K., and Kress, B. T.: Inward diffusion and loss of
radiation belt protons, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 1969–1978, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022154,
2016. a
Shprits, Y. Y., Thorne, R. M., Friedel, R., Reeves, G. D., Fennell,
J., Baker, D. N., and Kanekal, S. G.: Outward radial diffusion driven by
losses at magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A11214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011657,
2006. a
Shprits, Y. Y., Kellerman, A., Aseev, N., Drozdov, A. Y., and
Michaelis, I.: Multi-MeV electron loss in the heart of the radiation
belts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1204–1209, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072258, 2017. a
Shue, J. H., Song, P., Russell, C. T., Steinberg, J. T., Chao, J. K.,
Zastenker, G., Vaisberg, O. L., Kokubun, S., Singer, H. J., and
Detman, T. R.: Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17691–17700, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01103, 1998. a, b, c
Singer, H., Matheson, L., Grubb, R., Newman, A., and Bouwer, D.:
Monitoring space weather with the GOES magnetometers, in: GOES-8 and
Beyond, edited by: Washwell, E. R., Vol. 2812 of Society of
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,
299–308, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.254077, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Denver, CO, USA, 1996. a
Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., Baker, D. N., Blake, J. B., Bolton, M.,
Bourdarie, S., Chan, A. A., Claudepierre, S. G., Clemmons, J. H.,
Cravens, J. P., Elkington, S. R., Fennell, J. F., Friedel, R. H. W.,
Funsten, H. O., Goldstein, J., Green, J. C., Guthrie, A.,
Henderson, M. G., Horne, R. B., Hudson, M. K., Jahn, J.-M.,
Jordanova, V. K., Kanekal, S. G., Klatt, B. W., Larsen, B. A., Li,
X., MacDonald, E. A., Mann, I. R., Niehof, J., O'Brien, T. P.,
Onsager, T. G., Salvaggio, D., Skoug, R. M., Smith, S. S., Suther,
L. L., Thomsen, M. F., and Thorne, R. M.: Science Goals and Overview of
the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Energetic Particle, Composition, and
Thermal Plasma (ECT) Suite on NASA's Van Allen Probes Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 179,
311–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0007-5, 2013. a
Su, Z., Zhu, H., Xiao, F., Zong, Q. G., Zhou, X. Z., Zheng, H.,
Wang, Y., Wang, S., Hao, Y. X., Gao, Z., He, Z., Baker, D. N.,
Spence, H. E., Reeves, G. D., Blake, J. B., and Wygant, J. R.:
Ultra-low-frequency wave-driven diffusion of radiation belt relativistic
electrons, Nat. Commun., 6, 10096, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10096, 2015. a
Thorne, R. M.: Radiation belt dynamics: The importance of wave-particle
interactions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044990, 2010. a
Tsyganenko, N. A. and Sitnov, M. I.: Modeling the dynamics of the inner
magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A03208,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010798, 2005. a, b
Turner, D. L., Shprits, Y., Hartinger, M., and Angelopoulos, V.:
Explaining sudden losses of outer radiation belt electrons during
geomagnetic storms, Nat. Phys., 8, 208–212, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2185, 2012. a, b
Turner, D. L., Angelopoulos, V., Li, W., Hartinger, M. D., Usanova,
M., Mann, I. R., Bortnik, J., and Shprits, Y.: On the storm-time
evolution of relativistic electron phase space density in Earth's outer
radiation belt, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 2196–2212, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50151, 2013. a, b, c
Turner, D. L., Angelopoulos, V., Li, W., Bortnik, J., Ni, B., Ma,
Q., Thorne, R. M., Morley, S. K., Henderson, M. G., Reeves, G. D.,
Usanova, M., Mann, I. R., Claudepierre, S. G., Blake, J. B., Baker,
D. N., Huang, C. L., Spence, H., Kurth, W., Kletzing, C., and
Rodriguez, J. V.: Competing source and loss mechanisms due to
wave-particle interactions in Earth's outer radiation belt during the 30
September to 3 October 2012 geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 1960–1979,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019770, 2014. a, b, c
Turner, D. L., Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Claudepierre, S. G.,
O'Brien, T. P., Fennell, J. F., Blake, J. B., Jaynes, A. N.,
Kanekal, S., Baker, D. N., Spence, H. E., Ripoll, J.-F., and
Reeves, G. D.: The Response of Earth's Electron Radiation Belts to
Geomagnetic Storms: Statistics From the Van Allen Probes Era Including
Effects From Different Storm Drivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1013–1034,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026066, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q
Usanova, M. E., Drozdov, A., Orlova, K., Mann, I. R., Shprits, Y.,
Robertson, M. T., Turner, D. L., Milling, D. K., Kale, A., and
Baker, D. N.: Effect of EMIC waves on relativistic and ultrarelativistic
electron populations: Ground-based and Van Allen Probes observations, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 1375–1381, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059024, 2014. a, b
Van Allen, J. A.: The Geomagnetically Trapped Corpuscular Radiation, J. Geophys. Res.,
64, 1683–1689, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i011p01683, 1959. a
Wang, C.-P., Thorne, R., Liu, T. Z., Hartinger, M. D., Nagai, T.,
Angelopoulos, V., Wygant, J. R., Breneman, A., Kletzing, C.,
Reeves, G. D., Claudepierre, S. G., and Spence, H. E.: A
multispacecraft event study of Pc5 ultralow-frequency waves in the
magnetosphere and their external drivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 5132–5147,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023610, 2017. a, b
Yermolaev, Y. I., Lodkina, I. G., and Yermolaev, M. Y.: Dynamics of
Large-Scale Solar-Wind Streams Obtained by the Double Superposed Epoch
Analysis: 3. Deflection of the Velocity Vector, Sol. Phys., 293, 91,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1310-9, 2018. a
Zhang, X. J., Mourenas, D., Artemyev, A. V., Angelopoulos, V., and
Sauvaud, J. A.: Precipitation of MeV and Sub-MeV Electrons Due to Combined
Effects of EMIC and ULF Waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 7923–7935,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026566, 2019. a
Zhao, H., Baker, D. N., Li, X., Jaynes, A. N., and Kanekal, S. G.:
The Acceleration of Ultrarelativistic Electrons During a Small to Moderate
Storm of 21 April 2017, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5818–5825, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078582,
2018.
a
Zhao, H., Baker, D. N., Li, X., Jaynes, A. N., and Kanekal, S. G.:
The Effects of Geomagnetic Storms and Solar Wind Conditions on the
Ultrarelativistic Electron Flux Enhancements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 1948–1965,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026257, 2019. a
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical study of the response of the Earth's space environment in sheath regions prior to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. The inner magnetospheric wave activity is enhanced in sheath regions, and the sheaths cause significant changes to the outer radiation belt electron fluxes over short timescales. We also show that non-geoeffective sheaths can result in a significant response.
We present a comprehensive statistical study of the response of the Earth's space environment in...
