Articles | Volume 38, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1115-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1115-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Epoch-by-epoch estimation and analysis of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) receiver differential code biases with the additional BDS-3 observations
Qisheng Wang
School of Geography and Information Engineering, China
University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering,
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,
Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Engineering Center for Collaborative
Navigation/Positioning and Smart Applications, Nanjing 210044,
China
Shuanggen Jin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering,
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,
Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Engineering Center for Collaborative
Navigation/Positioning and Smart Applications, Nanjing 210044,
China
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China
Youjian Hu
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Geography and Information Engineering, China
University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Related authors
Qisheng Wang, Jiaru Zhu, and Genxin Yang
Ann. Geophys., 42, 45–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-45-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-45-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The GIM data of 2 years from high solar activity (2014) and low solar activity (2021) provided by CODE (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) are selected to calculate the total electron content (TEC) difference for each grid point in this paper. Based on the calculation of the spatial and temporal variations in the difference values, both spatial and temporal characteristics of the TEC difference values of the four grid points within the grid are analyzed in detail.
Yuanyuan Zhang, Ning Wang, and Shuanggen Jin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4885–4905, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4885-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite remote sensing helps monitor dust storms. Our study compared five satellite products that use ground-based PM10 data. Most products agreed on the daily dust distribution, with absorbing aerosol index (AAI) performing best under cloud cover. Overall, the Sentinel-5P AAI has the highest probability of correct detection (POCD) in dust events but is unstable and has a high probability of false detection (POFD). The FY4A/B infrared difference dust index (IDDI) has the lowest POCD, but it is relatively stable, and its POFD is low.
Qisheng Wang, Jiaru Zhu, and Genxin Yang
Ann. Geophys., 42, 45–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-45-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-45-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The GIM data of 2 years from high solar activity (2014) and low solar activity (2021) provided by CODE (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) are selected to calculate the total electron content (TEC) difference for each grid point in this paper. Based on the calculation of the spatial and temporal variations in the difference values, both spatial and temporal characteristics of the TEC difference values of the four grid points within the grid are analyzed in detail.
Linlin Li and Shuanggen Jin
Ann. Geophys., 41, 465–481, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We used the spherical harmonic function (SHF) and the local spherical symmetry (LSS) assumption methods to calculate the hourly and daily LEO satellite GPS differential code bias (DCB). The SHF method is more stable and precise than the LSS assumption. The daily DCB estimation is more accurate and stable than the hourly DCB due to more observation data. Hourly DCBs have large changes in one day, mainly be attributed to random errors because these error time series have a normal distribution.
Mohamed Darrag, Shuanggen Jin, Andrés Calabia, and Aalaa Samy
Ann. Geophys., 40, 359–377, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the possible widening of the tropical belt along with the probable drivers and impacts based on high-accuracy, high-resolution GNSS RO data (2001–2020). The results show that the tropical belt has significant expansion in the Northern Hemisphere, while the Southern Hemisphere has no significant expansion.
W. Geng, W. Zhou, and S. Jin
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIV-M-3-2021, 63–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-3-2021-63-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-3-2021-63-2021, 2021
Cited articles
Choi, B.-K. and Lee, S. J.: The influence of grounding on GPS receiver
differential code biases, Advances Space Res., 62, 457–463,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.04.033, 2018.
Crustal Dynamics Data Information System, ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/data/, last access: 20 May 2020.
Fan, L., Li, M., Wang, C., and Shi, C.: BeiDou satellite's differential code
biases estimation based on uncombined precise point positioning with
triple-frequency observable, Adv. Space Res., 59, 804–814,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.07.014, 2017.
Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., and Sanz, J.: New approaches in
global ionospheric determination using ground GPS data, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phy., 61, 1237–1247, 1999.
Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J., Sanz, J., Orus, R., Garcia-Rigo, A.,
Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S., and Krankowski, A.: The IGS VTEC
maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998, J.
Geodesy, 83, 263–275, 2009.
Hernández-Pajares, M., Roma-Dollase, D., Krankowski, A.,
García-Rigo, A., and Orús-Pérez, R.: Methodology and
consistency of slant and vertical assessments for ionospheric electron
content models, J. Geodesy, 91, 1–10, 2017.
Jin, R., Jin, S. G., and Feng, G. P.: M_DCB: Matlab code for
estimating GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases, Gps
Solutions, 16, 541–548, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0279-3, 2012.
Jin, S. G., Jin, R., and Li, D.: Assessment of BeiDou differential code bias variations from multi-GNSS network observations, Ann. Geophys., 34, 259–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-259-2016, 2016.
Jin, S. G. and Su, K.: PPP models and performances from single- to
quad-frequency BDS observations, Satellite Navigation, 1,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-020-00014-y, 2020.
Li, M., Yuan, Y., Wang, N., Liu, T., and Chen, Y.: Estimation and analysis
of the short-term variations of multi-GNSS receiver differential code biases
using global ionosphere maps, J. Geodesy, 92, 889–903,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1101-3, 2018.
Li, X., Xie, W., Huang, J., Ma, T., Zhang, X., and Yuan, Y.: Estimation and
analysis of differential code biases for BDS3/BDS2 using iGMAS and MGEX
observations, J. Geodesy, 93, 419—435, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1170-y, 2019.
Li, Z., Yuan, Y., Li, H., Ou, J., and Huo, X.: Two-step method for the
determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites, J.
Geodesy, 86, 1059–1076, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0565-4, 2012.
Li, Z., Yuan, Y., Fan, L., Huo, X., and Hsu, H.: Determination of the
Differential Code Bias for Current BDS Satellites, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 52, 3968–3979, https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2278545,
2014.
Liu, T., Zhang, B., Yuan, Y., Li, Z., and Wang, N.: Multi-GNSS
triple-frequency differential code bias (DCB) determination with precise
point positioning (PPP), J. Geodesy, 93, 765–784, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1194-3,
2019.
McCaffrey, A. M., Jayachandran, P. T., Themens, D. R., and Langley, R. B.:
GPS receiver code bias estimation: A comparison of two methods, Adv.
Space Res., 59, 1984–1991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.047, 2017.
Montenbruck, O., Hauschild, A., Steigenberger, P., Hugentobler, U.,
Teunissen, P., and Nakamura, S.: Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2
regional navigation satellite system, GPS Solutions, 17, 211–222, 2013.
Montenbruck, O., Hauschild, A., and Steigenberger, P.: Differential Code
Bias Estimation using Multi-GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps,
Navigation, 61, 191–201, https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.64, 2014.
Montenbruck, O., Steigenberger, P., Prange, L., Deng, Z., Zhao, Q.,
Perosanz, F., Romero, I., Noll, C., Stürze, A., and Weber, G.: The
Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service
(IGS) – achievements, prospects and challenges, Adv. Space Res.,
59, 1671–1697, 2017.
Sanz, J., Juan, J. M., Rovira-Garcia, A., and González-Casado, G.: GPS
differential code biases determination: methodology and analysis, GPS
Solutions, 21, 1549–1561, 2017.
Schaer, S.: Mapping and predicting the Earth's ionosphere using the Global
Positioning System, 59, Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, 1999.
Shi, C., Fan, L., Li, M., Liu, Z., Gu, S., Zhong, S., and Song, W.: An
enhanced algorithm to estimate BDS satellite's differential code biases, J.
Geodesy, 90, 161–177, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0863-8, 2015.
Su, K. and Jin, S.: Triple-frequency carrier phase precise time and
frequency transfer models for BDS-3, GPS Solutions, 23, 86, 2019.
Wang, N., Yuan, Y., Li, Z., Montenbruck, O., and Tan, B.: Determination of
differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations, J. Geodesy, 90,
209–228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0867-4, 2016.
Wang, Q., Jin, S. G., Yuan, L., Hu, Y., Chen, J., and Guo, J.: Estimation
and Analysis of BDS-3 Differential Code Biases from MGEX Observations,
Remote Sensing, 12, 68, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010068, 2019.
Wellenhof, B. H., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J.: Global positioning
system: theory and practice, Springer, ISBN 0387824774, 1992.
Xue, J., Song, S., and Zhu, W.: Estimation of differential code biases for
Beidou navigation system using multi-GNSS observations: How stable are the
differential satellite and receiver code biases?, J. Geodesy, 90, 309–321,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0874-5, 2016.
Short summary
In this paper, the receiver differential code bias (DCB) of BDS (BeiDou Navigation Satellite System) is estimated as the changing parameter within 1 d with epoch-by-epoch estimates. The intraday variability of receiver DCB is analyzed from 30 d of Multi-GNSS Experiment observations. In particular, the intraday stability of receiver DCB for the BDS-3 and BDS-2 observations is compared. The result shows that the intraday stability of BDS-3 receiver DCB is better than that of BDS-2 receiver DCB.
In this paper, the receiver differential code bias (DCB) of BDS (BeiDou Navigation Satellite...