Articles | Volume 44, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-489-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-489-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Equatorial ionospheric plasma bubbles during intense geomagnetic storms of Solar Cycle 25
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Theoretical Physics Division, PINSTECH, Islamabad, Pakistan
Andres Calabia
School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China
Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain
Chukwuma Anoruo
Laboratório de Física e Astronomia, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911 Urbanova, São José Dos Campos (SP), Brazil
Aqsa Zahid
Department of Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Plasmas (LPP), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Saclay, Observatoire de Paris, Ecole polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris, France
Binod Adhikari
Department of Physics, Patan M. Campus, Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur, Nepal
Related authors
No articles found.
Mohamed Darrag, Shuanggen Jin, Andres Calabia, Aalaa Samy, Ivan Radevski, and Ali M. Radwan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6521, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6521, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the variability of climatic parameters over the Mediterranean and their teleconnection with tropical belt expansion. The results exhibit a dominant upward trend of tropopause height, with maximum trends in the eastern Mediterranean region, which shows more poleward occurrences of tropical edge latitudes. The analysis confirms the link between climatic parameter variability and tropical edge latitude occurrences.
Rasim Shahzad, Munawar Shah, Ayesha Abbas, Amna Hafeez, Andres Calabia, Angela Melgarejo-Morales, and Najam Abbas Naqvi
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-18, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-18, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The ionospheric satellite signals during geomagnetic storms can severely threaten navigation accuracy. We analyzed vertical Total Electron Content (vTEC) variations from the Global Navigation Satellite System at different latitudes around the world during the geomagnetic storms of June 2015 and August 2018. We also analyzed the vTEC from the Swarm satellites and found similar results to the GNSS retrieved vTEC during different phases of both geomagnetic storms.
Mohamed Darrag, Shuanggen Jin, Andrés Calabia, and Aalaa Samy
Ann. Geophys., 40, 359–377, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the possible widening of the tropical belt along with the probable drivers and impacts based on high-accuracy, high-resolution GNSS RO data (2001–2020). The results show that the tropical belt has significant expansion in the Northern Hemisphere, while the Southern Hemisphere has no significant expansion.
Drabindra Pandit, Basudev Ghimire, Christine Amory-Mazaudier, Rolland Fleury, Narayan Prasad Chapagain, and Binod Adhikari
Ann. Geophys., 39, 743–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-743-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-743-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse the climatology of the ionosphere over Nepal based on GPS-derived vertical total electron content (VTEC) during 2008–2018. The study illustrates the diurnal, monthly, annual, seasonal and solar cycle variations in VTEC. The results show equinoctial asymmetry in TEC in maximum phases in 2014, followed by descending, ascending and minimum phases. The winter anomalies are seen during increasing and maximum phases of the solar cycle (2011–2014) from almost all stations considered.
Cited articles
Aa, E., Zhu, S., and Liu, S.: Statistical Analysis of Equatorial Plasma Irregularities Retrieved From Swarm 2013–2019 Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027022, 2020. a
Aa, E., Chen, Y., and Luo, B.: Dynamic Expansion and Merging of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm, Remote Sens., 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224290, 2024. a, b, c
Abdu, M. A.: Equatorial F region, in: The Dynamical Ionosphere, edited by: Sojka, J. J. and Schunk, R. W., 257–278, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., https://doi.org/10.1029/GM181, 2006. a
Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S., Reinisch, B. W., Souza, J. R. D., Sobral, J. H. A., Pedersen, T. R., Medeiros, A. F., Schuch, N. J., Paula, E. R. D., and Groves, K. M.: Conjugate Point Equatorial Experiment (COPEX) campaign in Brazil: Electrodynamics highlights on spread F development conditions and day-to-day variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013749, 2009. a, b
Amaechi, P. O., Oyeyemi, E. O., and Akala, A. O.: Geomagnetic storm effects on the occurrences of ionospheric irregularities over the African equatorial/low-latitude region, Adv. Space Res., 61, 2074–2090, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.01.035, 2018. a, b
Araujo-Pradere, E. A., Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., and Bilitza, D.: Characteristics of the ionospheric variability as a function of season, latitude, local time, and geomagnetic activity, Radio Sci., 40, RS5009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RS003179, 2006. a, b
Astafyeva, E., Zakharenkova, I., Hozumi, K., Alken, P., Coïsson, P., Hairston, M. R., and Coley, W. R.: Study of the Equatorial and Low-Latitude Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Disturbances During the 22–23 June 2015 Geomagnetic Storm Using Ground-Based and Space-borne Techniques, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 123, 2424–2440, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024981, 2018. a, b
Axford, W. I.: Viscous interaction between the solar wind and the earth’s magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 45–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(64)90067-4, 1964. a
Balan, N., Alleyne, H., Otsuka, Y., Lekshmi, D. V., Fejer, B. G., and McCrea, I.: Relative effects of electric field and neutral wind on positive ionospheric storms, Earth Planets Space, 61, 1209–1221, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352971, 2009. a
Balan, N., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Liu, J. Y., and Bailey, G. J.: Physical mechanisms of the ionospheric storms at equatorial and higher latitudes during the recovery phase of geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 118, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50275, 2013. a
Balan, N., Liu, L., and Le, H. J.: A brief review of equatorial ionization anomaly and ionospheric irregularities, Earth Planet. Phys., 2, 257–275, https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2018025, 2018. a, b, c
Blanc, M. and Richmond, A. D.: The ionospheric disturbance dynamo, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 1669–1686, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA085iA04p01669, 1980. a, b
Buonsanto, M. J.: Ionospheric storms: A review, Space Sci. Rev., 88, 563–601, 1999. a
Calabia, A., Imtiaz, N., Altadill, D., Yasyukevich, Y., Segarra, A., Prol, F. S., Adhikari, B., del Peral, L., Frias, M. D. R., and Molina, I.: Uncovering the Drivers of Responsive Ionospheric Dynamics to Severe Space Weather Conditions: A Coordinated Multi-Instrumental Approach, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 129, e2023JA031862, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031862, 2024. a
Cueto, M., Magdaleno, S., Cezon, A., and Sardon, E.: Characterization of equatorial ionospheric features on the verge of the next solar cycle maximum, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 3055–3065, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010884, 2012. a
Dugassa, T., Habarulema, J. B., and Nigussie, M.: Longitudinal variability of occurrence of ionospheric irregularities over the American, African and Indian regions during geomagnetic storms, Adv. Space Res., 63, 2609–2622, 2019. a
Dungey, J. W.: Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones, Phys. Rev. Lett., 6, 47–48, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.47, 1961. a
Fejer, D. J.: The electrodynamics of the low-latitude ionosphere: Recent results and future challenges, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 59, 1465–1482, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00149-6, 1997. a
Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., Moffett, R. J., and Quegan, S.: Response of the Thermosphere and Ionosphere to Geomagnetic Storms, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3893–3914, 1994. a
González, G.: Storm-time variability of ionospheric irregularities over South America, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 241, 105980, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105980, 2022. a
Huang, C. S.: Long-Lasting Penetration Electric Fields during Geomagnetic Storms: Observations and Mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 124, 9640–9664, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026793, 2019. a, b
Huang, C. S., Foster, J., and Kelley, M.: Long-duration penetration of the interplanetary electric field to the low-latitude ionosphere during the main phase of magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011202, 2005. a, b
Huang, L., Huang, J., Wang, J., Jiang, Y., Deng, B., Zhao, K., and Lin, G.: Analysis of the north–south asymmetry of the equatorial ionization anomaly around 110°E longitude, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 102, 354–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.010, 2013. a
Imtiaz, N., Dugassa, T., Calabia, A., Anoruo, C., and Kashcheyev, A.: Westward PPEF plays important role in the suppression of post-midnight plasma irregularities: A case study of the November 2021 geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 129, e2023JA032367, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032367, 2024. a, b, c
Jin, H., Yan, C., Fang, G. Y., He, H., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Sun, Y., Li, K., Hu, J., and Jiang, J.: Interaction Between Equatorial to Low-Latitude Postmidnight F-Region Irregularities and LSTIDs in China During Geomagnetic Disturbances Based on Ground-Based Instruments, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 127, e2022JA030XXX, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030XXX, 2022. a
Kassa, T., Damtie, B., Bires, A., Yizengaw, E., and Cilliers, P.: Storm-time characteristics of the equatorial ionization anomaly in the East African sector, Adv. Space Res., 56, 57–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.04.002, 2015. a, b
Kassa, Y., Damtie, B., and Tebabal, A.: Ionospheric and magnetic signatures of extreme space weather events of 17 March and 23 June 2015 over the African sector, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 243, 106003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106003, 2023. a
Kassa, Y., Tebabal, A., and Damtie, B.: Nighttime ionospheric irregularity during intense geomagnetic storm events over the Europe-African longitudinal sector, Heliyon, 10, e38138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38138, 2024. a, b
Kelley, M. C.: The Earth's Ionosphere: Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, 2nd edn., Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA, 2009. a
Kikuchi, T., Hashimoto, K. K., and Nozaki, K.: Penetration of magnetospheric electric fields to the equator during a geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A05214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012628, 2008. a
Li, K. F., Lin, L. C., Bui, X. H., and Liang, M. C.: The 11 year solar cycle response of the equatorial ionization anomaly observed by GPS radio occultation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 123, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024634, 2018. a
Lin, C. H., Richmond, A. D., Heelis, R. A., Bailey, G. J., Lu, G., Liu, J. Y., and Su, S. Y.: Theoretical study of the low- and midlatitude ionospheric electron density enhancement during the October 2003 superstorm: Relative importance of the neutral wind and the electric field, J. Geophys. Res., 110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011304, 2005. a
Liu, J., Zhao, B., and Liu, L.: Time delay and duration of ionospheric total electron content responses to geomagnetic disturbances, Ann. Geophys., 28, 795–805, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-795-2010, 2010. a, b
Luan, X.: Equatorial Ionization Anomaly Variations During Geomagnetic Storms, Chap. 13, pp. 301–312, American Geophysical Union (AGU), https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815617.ch13, 2021. a, b
Lukianova, R.: Swarm field-aligned currents during a severe magnetic storm of September 2017, Ann. Geophys., 38, 191–206, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-191-2020, 2020. a
Maruyama, T.: A diagnostic model for equatorial spread F, 1, Model description and application to electric field and neutral wind effects, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 14611–14622, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA12p14611, 1988. a
Pi, X., Mannucci, A., Lindqwister, U. J., and Ho, C. M.: Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the worldwide GPS network, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2283–2286, 1997. a
Rastogi, R. G.: Seasonal variation of equatorial spread F in the American and Indian zones, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 722–726, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA085iA02p00722, 1980. a
Richmond, A. D. and Matsushita, S.: Thermospheric Response to a Magnetic Substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 2839–2850, 1975. a
Rideout, W. and Coster, A.: Automated GPS processing for global total electron content data, GPS Solutions, 10, 219–228, 2006. a
Rishbeth, H.: The equatorial F-layer: progress and puzzles, Ann. Geophys., 18, 730–739, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0730-6, 2000. a
Seba, E. B. and Nigussie, M.: Investigating the effect of geomagnetic storm and equatorial electrojet on equatorial ionospheric irregularity over East African sector, Adv. Space Res., 58, 1708–1719, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.06.037, 2016. a, b
Seemala, G.: GPS-TEC analysis application, Technical report, Institute for Scientific Research, 2011. a
Singh, R. and Sripathi, S.: A statistical study on the local time dependence of equatorial spread F (ESF) irregularities and their relation to low‐latitude Es layers under geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 125, e2019JA027212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027212, 2020. a, b, c
Smith, A. R., Ozturk, D. S., Delamere, P., Lu, G., and Kim, H.: Investigating the interhemispheric asymmetry in Joule heating during the 2022 geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 128, e2023JA031872, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031872, 2023. a
Sripathi, S. and Singh, R.: A study on the response of the ionosphere to the three major space weather events of 2015 using meridional chain of ionosondes and GPS receivers over India, Journal of Sun and Geosphere, 13/2, 169–172, https://doi.org/10.31401/SunGeo.2018.02.08, 2020. a, b
Tahir, A., Wu, F., Shah, M., Amory-Mazaudier, C., Jamjareegulgarn, P., Verhulst, T. G. W., and Ameen, M. A.: Multi-instrument observation of the ionospheric irregularities and disturbances during the 23–24 March 2023 geomagnetic storm, Remote Sens., 16, 1594, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091594, 2024. a
Tsunoda, R. T.: High-latitude F-region irregularities: A review and synthesis, Rev. Geophys., 23, 577–582, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG023i005p00577, 1985. a
Tsurutani, B., Mannucci, A., Iijima, B., Abdu, M. A., Sobral, J. H. A., Gonzalez, W., Guarnieri, F., Tsuda, T., Saito, A., Yumoto, K., Fejer, B., Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Kozyra, J., Foster, J. C., Coster, A., and Vasyliunas, V. M.: Global dayside ionospheric uplift and enhancement associated with interplanetary electric fields, Geophys. Res., 109, 08302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010342, 2004. a
Tulasi Ram, S., Su, S. Y., and Liu, C. H.: FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC observations of seasonal and longitudinal variations of equatorial ionization anomaly and its interhemispheric asymmetry during the solar minimum period, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013880, 2009. a, b
Vaggu, P. R., Deshpande, K. B., Datta-Barua, S., Bust, G. S., Hampton, D. L., López Rubio, A., and Conroy, J. P.: Morphological and spectral features of ionospheric structures at E- and F-region altitudes over Poker Flat analyzed using modeling and observations, Sensors, 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101940, 2023. a
Vankadara, R. K., Panda, S. K., Amory-Mazaudier, C., Fleury, R., Devanaboyina, V. R., Pant, T. K., Jamjareegulgarn, P., Haq, M. A., Okoh, D., and Seemala, G. K.: Signatures of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles and Ionospheric Scintillations from Magnetometer and GNSS Observations in the Indian Longitudes during the Space Weather Events of Early September 2017, Remote Sens., 14, 652, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030652, 2022. a
Wu, Q., Wang, W., Lin, D., Huang, C., and Zhang, Y.: Penetrating electric field during the Nov 3–4, 2021 geomagnetic storm, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 257, 106219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106219, 2024. a
Zhang, X., Wan, W., and Yue, X.: Storm-time development of the equatorial ionization anomaly in the East Asian sector, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 125, e2020JA027973, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071805, 2020. a
Short summary
Comprehensive analysis of geomagnetic storms from 23–25 March, 23–25 April, 4–6 November 2023, and 10–13 May 2024, reveals that solar wind parameters, geomagnetic activity, Joule heating, and Prompt Penetration Electric Fields significantly influence ionospheric Total Electron Content variations, Equatorial Ionization Anomaly crest formations, and post-sunset plasma irregularities. The storms highlighted the importance of inter-hemispheric asymmetries in Joule Heating, which affected the distribution and magnitude of ionospheric disturbances.
Comprehensive analysis of geomagnetic storms from 23–25 March, 23–25 April, 4–6 November 2023,...