Articles | Volume 43, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-561-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-561-2025
Regular paper
 | 
01 Oct 2025
Regular paper |  | 01 Oct 2025

Electron-driven variability of the upper-atmospheric nitric oxide column density over the Syowa station in Antarctica

Pekka T. Verronen, Akira Mizuno, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Sandeep Kumar, Taku Nakajima, Shin-Ichiro Oyama, Tomoo Nagahama, Satonori Nozawa, Monika E. Szeląg, Tuomas Häkkilä, Niilo Kalakoski, Antti Kero, Esa Turunen, Satoshi Kasahara, Shoichiro Yokota, Kunihiro Keika, Tomoaki Hori, Takefumi Mitani, Takeshi Takashima, and Iku Shinohara

Related authors

Atmospheric odd nitrogen response to electron forcing from a 6D magnetospheric hybrid-kinetic simulation
Tuomas Häkkilä, Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Monika E. Szeląg, Markku Alho, Leo Kotipalo, Niilo Kalakoski, Pekka T. Verronen, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 43, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-217-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-217-2025, 2025
Short summary
Arecibo measurements of D-region electron densities during sunset and sunrise: implications for atmospheric composition
Carsten Baumann, Antti Kero, Shikha Raizada, Markus Rapp, Michael P. Sulzer, Pekka T. Verronen, and Juha Vierinen
Ann. Geophys., 40, 519–530, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-519-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-519-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ground-based Ku-band microwave observations of ozone in the polar middle atmosphere
David A. Newnham, Mark A. Clilverd, William D. J. Clark, Michael Kosch, Pekka T. Verronen, and Alan E. E. Rogers
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2361–2376, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2361-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2361-2022, 2022
Short summary
Simulated seasonal impact on middle atmospheric ozone from high-energy electron precipitation related to pulsating aurorae
Pekka T. Verronen, Antti Kero, Noora Partamies, Monika E. Szeląg, Shin-Ichiro Oyama, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, and Esa Turunen
Ann. Geophys., 39, 883–897, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-883-2021, 2021
Short summary
Lower-thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI) quantities: current status of measuring techniques and models
Minna Palmroth, Maxime Grandin, Theodoros Sarris, Eelco Doornbos, Stelios Tourgaidis, Anita Aikio, Stephan Buchert, Mark A. Clilverd, Iannis Dandouras, Roderick Heelis, Alex Hoffmann, Nickolay Ivchenko, Guram Kervalishvili, David J. Knudsen, Anna Kotova, Han-Li Liu, David M. Malaspina, Günther March, Aurélie Marchaudon, Octav Marghitu, Tomoko Matsuo, Wojciech J. Miloch, Therese Moretto-Jørgensen, Dimitris Mpaloukidis, Nils Olsen, Konstantinos Papadakis, Robert Pfaff, Panagiotis Pirnaris, Christian Siemes, Claudia Stolle, Jonas Suni, Jose van den IJssel, Pekka T. Verronen, Pieter Visser, and Masatoshi Yamauchi
Ann. Geophys., 39, 189–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Baker, D. N., Barth, C. A., Mankoff, K. E., Kanekal, S. G., Bailey, S. M., Mason, G. M., and Mazur, J. E.: Relationships between precipitating auroral zone electrons and lower thermospheric nitric oxide densities: 1998–2000, J. Geophys. Res., 24465–24480, 106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000078, 2001. a
Barth, C. A.: Nitric oxide in the lower thermosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 40, 315–336, 1992. a
Barth, C. A.: Reference models for thermospheric nitric oxide, 1994, Adv. Space Res., 18, 179–208, 1996. a
Callis, L. B. and Lambeth, J. D.: NOy formed by precipitating electron events in 1991 and 1992: Descent into the stratosphere as observed by ISAMS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1875–1878, https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL01219, 1998. a
Clilverd, M. A., Rodger, C. J., van de Kamp, M., and Verronen, P. T.: Electron precipitation from the outer radiation belt during the St. Patrick's day storm 2015: Observations, modeling, and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027725, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027725, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
We use NO column density data from the Syowa station in Antarctica from 2012–2017. We compare these ground-based radiometer observations with results from a global atmosphere model to understand the year-to-year and day-to-day variability, shortcomings of current electron forcing, and how geomagnetic storms are driving the variability of NO. Our results demonstrate an underestimation in the magnitude of day-to-day variability in simulations, which calls for improved electron forcing in models.
Share