Articles | Volume 43, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-303-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-303-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| Highlight paper
| 
11 Jun 2025
Regular paper | Highlight paper |
| 11 Jun 2025
| 11 Jun 2025
Leaping and vortex motion of the shock aurora toward the late evening sector observed on 26 February 2023
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden
Masatoshi Yamauchi
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden
Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen
Tromsø Geophysical Observatory, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
Yoshihiro Yokoyama
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden
Urban Brändström
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden
Yasunobu Ogawa
National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan
Anna Naemi Willer
National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU Space), Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Keisuke Hosokawa
Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan
Related authors
No articles found.
Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3070, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3070, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Knowing charged particle densities high above Earth is key for forecasting space weather effects on satellites and communications, but they are difficult to estimate at high latitudes because of auroras. We built an artificial intelligence model for northern Norway using radar observations, magnetic field measurements, geophysical indices and solar activity. It produces more accurate estimates than existing methods, even during auroral events, and can be adapted to other regions.
Anna Willer, Lars William Pedersen, Jan Oechsle, and Marie Vigger Eldor
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2567, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The new Arctic magnetic observatory at Pituffik Space Base in Greenland is strategically located in a sparsely monitored high-latitude region. Analysis of over a year of data, including baseline stability, temperature control, and calibrated magnetic field measurements demonstrates high data quality and confirms the observatory’s readiness for contribution to the international geomagnetic community.
Ingeborg Frøystein and Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen
Ann. Geophys., 43, 241–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-241-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The complete time series of the geomagnetic disturbance index (K) from Norwegian magnetic observatories have been digitized. We compare and discuss the tree methods used to derive the index, finding that each method has strengths and weaknesses. In total, we present all K indices derived from Norwegian observatories since the 1930s until today, the used derivation methods and the long historic time series as a whole, enabling critical use for future scientific work.
Tomotaka Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Yuto Katoh, Mizuki Fukizawa, Anton Artemyev, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Xiao-Jia Zhang, Yoshimasa Tanaka, and Akira Kadokura
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-768, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-768, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The magnetic mirror force bends the orbits of electrons precipitating into the atmosphere. It has been suggested that relativistic electrons make much less ionization due to the force than if it did not exist, but the actual effectivity in the atmospheric electron density has not been revealed. We used conjugated observational data from the ELFIN satellite and the EISCAT Tromsø radar to find that the electron density decreased by about 40 % at 80 km altitude because of the force.
Tinna L. Gunnarsdottir, Ingrid Mann, Wuhu Feng, Devin R. Huyghebaert, Ingemar Haeggstroem, Yasunobu Ogawa, Norihito Saito, Satonori Nozawa, and Takuya D. Kawahara
Ann. Geophys., 42, 213–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-213-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-213-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Several tons of meteoric particles burn up in our atmosphere each day. This deposits a great deal of material that binds with other atmospheric particles and forms so-called meteoric smoke particles. These particles are assumed to influence radar measurements. Here, we have compared radar measurements with simulations of a radar spectrum with and without dust particles and found that dust influences the radar spectrum in the altitude range of 75–85 km.
Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Akira Kadokura, Takehiko Aso, Björn Gustavsson, Urban Brändström, Tima Sergienko, Genta Ueno, and Satoko Saita
Ann. Geophys., 42, 179–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-179-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-179-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present via simulation how useful monochromatic images taken by a multi-point imager network are for auroral research in the EISCAT_3D project. We apply the generalized-aurora computed tomography (G-ACT) to modeled multiple auroral images and ionospheric electron density data. It is demonstrated that G-ACT provides better reconstruction results than the normal ACT and can interpolate ionospheric electron density at a much higher spatial resolution than observed by the EISCAT_3D radar.
Peter Dalin, Urban Brändström, Johan Kero, Peter Voelger, Takanori Nishiyama, Trond Trondsen, Devin Wyatt, Craig Unick, Vladimir Perminov, Nikolay Pertsev, and Jonas Hedin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1561–1576, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A novel infrared imaging instrument (OH imager) was put into operation in November 2022 at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics in Kiruna (Sweden). The OH imager is dedicated to the study of nightglow emissions coming from the hydroxyl (OH) and molecular oxygen (O2) layers in the mesopause (80–100 km). Based on a brightness ratio of two OH emission lines, the neutral temperature is estimated at around 87 km. The average daily winter temperature for the period January–April 2023 is 203±10 K.
Thomas B. Leyser, Tima Sergienko, Urban Brändström, Björn Gustavsson, and Michael T. Rietveld
Ann. Geophys., 41, 589–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-589-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-589-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful radio waves transmitted into the ionosphere from the ground were used to study electron energization in the pumped ionospheric plasma turbulence, by detecting optical emissions from atomic oxygen. Our results obtained with the EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association) facilities in northern Norway and optical detection with the ALIS (Auroral Large Imaging System) in northern Sweden suggest that long-wavelength upper hybrid waves are important in accelerating electrons.
Mizuki Fukizawa, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Keisuke Hosokawa, Tero Raita, and Kirsti Kauristie
Ann. Geophys., 41, 511–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-511-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-511-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use computed tomography to reconstruct the three-dimensional distributions of the Hall and Pedersen conductivities of pulsating auroras, a key research target for understanding the magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling process. It is suggested that the high-energy electron precipitation associated with pulsating auroras may have a greater impact on the closure of field-aligned currents in the ionosphere than has been previously reported.
Masatoshi Yamauchi and Urban Brändström
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 71–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-71-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-71-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Potential users of all-sky aurora images even include power companies, tourists, and aurora enthusiasts. However, these potential users are normally not familiar with interpreting these images. To make them comprehensive for more users, we developed an automatic evaluation system of auroral activity level. The method involves two steps: first making a simple set of numbers that describes the auroral activity and then further simplifying them into several levels (Level 6 is an auroral explosion).
Mizuki Fukizawa, Takeshi Sakanoi, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Keisuke Hosokawa, Björn Gustavsson, Kirsti Kauristie, Alexander Kozlovsky, Tero Raita, Urban Brändström, and Tima Sergienko
Ann. Geophys., 40, 475–484, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-475-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-475-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The pulsating auroral generation mechanism has been investigated by observing precipitating electrons using rockets or satellites. However, it is difficult for such observations to distinguish temporal changes from spatial ones. In this study, we reconstructed the horizontal 2-D distribution of precipitating electrons using only auroral images. The 3-D aurora structure was also reconstructed. We found that there were both spatial and temporal changes in the precipitating electron energy.
Fasil Tesema, Noora Partamies, Daniel K. Whiter, and Yasunobu Ogawa
Ann. Geophys., 40, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present the comparison between an auroral model and EISCAT radar electron densities during pulsating aurorae. We test whether an overpassing satellite measurement of the average energy spectrum is a reasonable estimate for pulsating aurora electron precipitation. When patchy pulsating aurora is dominant in the morning sector, the overpass-averaged spectrum is found to be a reasonable estimate – but not when there is a mix of pulsating aurora types in the post-midnight sector.
Minna Palmroth, Maxime Grandin, Theodoros Sarris, Eelco Doornbos, Stelios Tourgaidis, Anita Aikio, Stephan Buchert, Mark A. Clilverd, Iannis Dandouras, Roderick Heelis, Alex Hoffmann, Nickolay Ivchenko, Guram Kervalishvili, David J. Knudsen, Anna Kotova, Han-Li Liu, David M. Malaspina, Günther March, Aurélie Marchaudon, Octav Marghitu, Tomoko Matsuo, Wojciech J. Miloch, Therese Moretto-Jørgensen, Dimitris Mpaloukidis, Nils Olsen, Konstantinos Papadakis, Robert Pfaff, Panagiotis Pirnaris, Christian Siemes, Claudia Stolle, Jonas Suni, Jose van den IJssel, Pekka T. Verronen, Pieter Visser, and Masatoshi Yamauchi
Ann. Geophys., 39, 189–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-189-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This is a review paper that summarises the current understanding of the lower thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI) in terms of measurements and modelling. The LTI is the transition region between space and the atmosphere and as such of tremendous importance to both the domains of space and atmosphere. The paper also serves as the background for European Space Agency Earth Explorer 10 candidate mission Daedalus.
Masatoshi Yamauchi, Magnar G. Johnsen, Carl-Fredrik Enell, Anders Tjulin, Anna Willer, and Dmitry A. Sormakov
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper reports a new finding on space weather effects at around 70–75 ° geographic latitudes. We found that X flares cause an unexpectedly strong ionospheric current driven by solar flares. The effect is as large as a substorm that is known to cause strong auroras and may enhance ongoing substorms. However, it has been overlooked in the past due to the narrow latitudinal range at high latitudes. Since severe magnetic storms often occur with X flares, this may cause geomagnetic hazards.
Cited articles
Amm, O.: Method of characteristics in spherical geometry applied to a Harang-discontinuity situation, Ann. Geophys., 16, 413–424, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-998-0413-2, 1998. a
Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation from the ground to the ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems, Earth Planet. Space, 51, 431–440, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352247, 1999. a, b
Araki, T.: Global structure of geomagnetic sudden commencements, Planet. Space Sc., 25, 373–384, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(77)90053-8, 1977. a
Belakhovsky, V. B., Pilipenko, V. A., Sakharov, Y. A., Lorentzen, D. L., and Samsonov, S. N.: Geomagnetic and ionospheric response to the interplanetary shock on January 24, 2012, Earth, Planet. Space, 69, 105, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0696-1, 2017. a
Craven, J. D., Frank, L. A., Russell, C. T., Smith, E. J., and Lapping, R. P.: Global auroral responses to magnetospheric compressions by shocks in the solar wind: Two case studies. University of Iowa [report], https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860007325 (last access: 5 June 2025), 1985. a
Fujita, S., Tanaka, T., Kikuchi, T., Fujimoto, K., Hosokawa, K., and Itonaga, M.: A numerical simulation of the geomagnetic sudden commencement: 1. Generation of the field-aligned current associated with the preliminary impulse, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1416, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009407, 2003a. a
Fujita, S., Tanaka, T., Kikuchi, T., Fujimoto, K., and Itonaga, M.: A numerical simulation of the geomagnetic sudden commencement: 2. Plasma processes in the main impulse, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1417, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009763, 2003b. a
Fukizawa, M., Sakanoi, T., Miyoshi, Y., Hosokawa, K., Shiokawa, K., Katoh, Y., Kazama, Y., Kumamoto, A., Tsuchiya, F., Miyashita, Y., Tanaka, Y. M., Kasahara, Y., Ozaki, M., Matsuoka, A., Matsuda, S., Hikishima, M., Oyama, S., Ogawa, Y., Kurita, S., and Fujii, R.: Electrostatic Electron Cyclotron Harmonic Waves as a Candidate to Cause Pulsating Auroras, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12661–12668, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080145, 2018. a, b
Fukizawa, M., Sakanoi, T., Miyoshi, Y., Kazama, Y., Katoh, Y., Kasahara, Y., Matsuda, S., Matsuoka, A., Kurita, S., Shoji, M., Teramoto, M., Imajo, S., Sinohara, I., Wang, S.-Y., Tam, S. W.-Y., Chang, T.-F., Wang, B.-J., and Jun, C.-W.: Pitch-Angle Scattering of Inner Magnetospheric Electrons Caused by ECH Waves Obtained With the Arase Satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089926, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089926, 2020. a
Gjerloev, J. W.: The SuperMAG data processing technique, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, A09213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017683, 2012. a
Gonzalez, W. D., Joselyn, J. A., Kamide, Y., Kroehl, H. W., Rostoker, G., Tsurutani, B. T., and Vasyliunas, V. M.: What is a geomagnetic storm?, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 99, 5771–5792, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867, 1994. a
Gosling, J. T. and Pizzo, V. J.: Formation and Evolution of Corotating Interaction Regions and their Three Dimensional Structure, Space Sci. Rev., 89, 21–52, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005291711900, 1999. a
Haerendel, G.: Auroral arcs as sites of magnetic stress release, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 112, A09214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012378, 2007. a
Hosokawa, K., Oyama, S.-I., Ogawa, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Kurita, S., Teramoto, M., Nozawa, S., Kawabata, T., Kawamura, Y., Tanaka, Y.-M., Miyaoka, H., Kataoka, R., Shiokawa, K., Brändström, U., Turunen, E., Raita, T., Johnsen, M. G., Hall, C., Hampton, D., Ebihara, Y., Kasahara, Y., Matsuda, S., Shinohara, I., and Fujii, R.: A Ground-Based Instrument Suite for Integrated High-Time Resolution Measurements of Pulsating Aurora With Arase, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 128, e2023JA031527, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031527, 2023. a
Kasahara, S., Miyoshi, Y., Yokota, S., Mitani, T., Kasahara, Y., Matsuda, S., Kumamoto, A., Matsuoka, A., Kazama, Y., Frey, H. U., Angelopoulos, V., Kurita, S., Keika, K., Seki, K., and Shinohara, I.: Pulsating aurora from electron scattering by chorus waves, Nature, 554, 337–340, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25505, 2018. a, b
Kikuchi, T.: Transmission line model for the near-instantaneous transmission of the ionospheric electric field and currents to the equator, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 1131–1156, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019515, 2014. a
Kozlovsky, A., Safargaleev, V., Østgaard, N., Turunen, T., Koustov, A., Jussila, J., and Roldugin, A.: On the motion of dayside auroras caused by a solar wind pressure pulse, Ann. Geophys., 23, 509–521, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-509-2005, 2005. a
Imajo, S., Matsuoka, A., Toh, H., and Iyemori, T.: Mid-latitude Geomagnetic Indices ASY and SYM (ASY/SYM Indices), World Data Center for Geomagnetism (Kyoto) [data set], https://doi.org/10.14989/267216, 2022. a
Laundal, K. M. and Østgaard, N.: Persistent global proton aurora caused by high solar wind dynamic pressure, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A08231, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013147, 2008. a
Liou, K., Wu, C.-C., Lepping, R. P., Newell, P. T., and Meng, C.-I.: Midday sub-auroral patches (MSPs) associated with interplanetary shocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 18-1–18-4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014182, 2002. a
Liou, K., Newell, P. T., Shue, J.-H., Meng, C.-I., Miyashita, Y., Kojima, H., and Matsumoto, H.: “Compression aurora”: Particle precipitation driven by long-duration high solar wind ram pressure, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 112, A11216, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012443, 2007. a
Liu, J. J., Hu, H. Q., Han, D. S., Araki, T., Hu, Z. J., Zhang, Q. H., Yang, H. G., Sato, N., Yukimatu, A. S., and Ebihara, Y.: Decrease of auroral intensity associated with reversal of plasma convection in response to an interplanetary shock as observed over Zhongshan station in Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 116, A03210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016156, 2011. a, b, c, d
Liu, J.-J., Hu, H.-Q., Han, D.-S., Xing, Z.-Y., Hu, Z.-J., Huang, D.-H., and Yang, H.-G.: Response of Nightside Aurora to Interplanetary Shock from Ground Optical Observation, Chin. J. Geophys., 56, 598–611, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.20056, 2013. a
Liu, N., Su, Z., Jin, Y., He, Z., Yu, J., Li, K., Chen, Z., and Cui, J.: Plasmaspheric High-Frequency Whistlers as a Candidate Cause of Shock Aurora at Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105631, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105631, 2023. a
Matsushita, S.: On sudden commencements of magnetic storms at higher latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 162–166, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ062i001p00162, 1957. a
Matsushita, S.: Studies on sudden commencements of geomagnetic storms using IGY data from United States stations, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1423–1435, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i005p01423, 1960. a
Motoba, T., Kadokura, A., Ebihara, Y., Frey, H. U., Weatherwax, A. T., and Sato, N.: Simultaneous ground-satellite optical observations of postnoon shock aurora in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, A07209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA014007, 2009. a, b, c, d
Motoba, T., Ebihara, Y., Kadokura, A., and Weatherwax, A. T.: Fine-scale transient arcs seen in a shock aurora, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 6249–6255, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020229, 2014. a
Nanjo, S.: The video version of Figure 3, Swedish Institute of Space Physics [video], https://doi.org/10.5446/69281, 2024a. a
Nanjo, S.: The video version of Figure 4, Swedish Institute of Space Physics [video], https://doi.org/10.5446/69280, 2024b. a
Newell, P. T. and Gjerloev, J. W.: Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 116, A12211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016779, 2011. a
Ni, B., Gu, X., Fu, S., Xiang, Z., and Lou, Y.: A statistical survey of electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic waves based on THEMIS FFF wave data, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 3342–3353, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023433, 2017. a
Nishimura, Y., Bortnik, J., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Lyons, L. R., Angelopoulos, V., Mende, S. B., Bonnell, J. W., Contel, O. L., Cully, C., Ergun, R., and Auster, U.: Identifying the Driver of Pulsating Aurora, Science, 330, 81–84, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193186, 2010. a, b
Nishimura, Y., Kikuchi, T., Ebihara, Y., Yoshikawa, A., Imajo, S., Li, W., and Utada, H.: Evolution of the current system during solar wind pressure pulses based on aurora and magnetometer observations, Earth Planet. Space, 68, 144, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0517-y, 2016. a, b, c
Nishimura, Y., Lessard, M. R., Katoh, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Grono, E., Partamies, N., Sivadas, N., Hosokawa, K., Fukizawa, M., Samara, M., Michell, R. G., Kataoka, R., Sakanoi, T., Whiter, D. K., Oyama, S.-i., Ogawa, Y., and Kurita, S.: Diffuse and Pulsating Aurora, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-019-0629-3, 2020. a
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: DSCOVR Solar Wind Data Portal, NOAA [data set], https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/dscovr/portal/index.html, last access: 5 June 2025. a
Omura, Y.: Nonlinear wave growth theory of whistler-mode chorus and hiss emissions in the magnetosphere, Earth Planet. Space, 73, 95, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01380-w, 2021. a
Omura, Y., Nakamura, S., Kletzing, C. A., Summers, D., and Hikishima, M.: Nonlinear wave growth theory of coherent hiss emissions in the plasmasphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 7642–7657, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021520, 2015. a
Phan, T. D. and Paschmann, G.: Low-latitude dayside magnetopause and boundary layer for high magnetic shear: 1. Structure and motion, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 101, 7801–7815, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA03752, 1996. a
Samara, M., Michell, R., and Hampton, D.: BG3 Glass Filter Effects on Quantifying Rapidly Pulsating Auroral Structures, Adv. Remote Sens., 1, 53–57, https://doi.org/10.4236/ars.2012.13005, 2012. a
Sano, Y. and Nagano, H.: Early history of sudden commencement investigation and some newly discovered historical facts, Hist. Geo- Space Sci., 12, 131–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-12-131-2021, 2021. a
Slinker, S. P., Fedder, J. A., Hughes, W. J., and Lyon, J. G.: Response of the ionosphere to a density pulse in the solar wind: Simulation of traveling convection vortices, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3549–3552, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010688, 1999. a
Sonett, C. P., Colburn, D. S., Davis, L., Smith, E. J., and Coleman, P. J.: Evidence for a Collision-Free Magnetohydrodynamic Shock in Interplanetary Space, Phys. Rev. Lett., 13, 153–156, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.153, 1964. a
Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF): All-sky camera images from Kiruna on 26 February 2023, Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) [data set], https://www.irf.se/alis/allsky/krn/2023/02/26/19/ (last sccess: 5 June 2025), 2023. a
Tanskanen, E. I.: A comprehensive high-throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993–2003 examined, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, A05204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013682, 2009. a
Tsurutani, B. T., Zhou, X.-Y., Vasyliunas, V. M., Haerendel, G., Arballo, J. K., and Lakhina, G. S.: Interplanetary Shocks, Magnetopause Boundary Layers and Dayside Auroras: The Importance of a Very Small Magnetospheric Region, Surv. Geophys., 22, 101–130, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012952414384, 2001. a, b
University of Electro-Communications: All-sky camera images from Skibotn on 26 February 2023, University of Electro-Communications [data set], http://darndeb08.cei.uec.ac.jp/~nanjo/public/skibotn_imgs/2022_season/20230226/ (last access: 5 June 2025), 2023. a
van Bemmelan, W.: On magnetic disturbances as recorded at Batavia. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) [report], https://dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00013747.pdf (last access: 5 June 2025), 1906. a
Wang, C., Branduardi-Raymont, G., and Escoubet, C. P.: Recent Advance in the Solar Wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission, Chin. J. Space Sci., 42, 568–573, https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2022.04.yg08, 2022. a
Wilson, C. R. and Sugiura, M.: Hydromagnetic interpretation of sudden commencements of magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 4097–4111, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i012p04097, 1961. a
Yamauchi, M., Iyemori, T., Frey, H., and Henderson, M.: Unusually quick development of a 4000 nT substorm during the initial 10 min of the 29 October 2003 magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A04217, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011285, 2006. a
Yamauchi, M., Johnsen, M. G., Enell, C.-F., Tjulin, A., Willer, A., and Sormakov, D. A.: High-latitude crochet: solar-flare-induced magnetic disturbance independent from low-latitude crochet, Ann. Geophys., 38, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1159-2020, 2020. a
Zhou, X. and Tsurutani, B. T.: Rapid intensification and propagation of the dayside aurora: Large scale interplanetary pressure pulses (fast shocks), Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1097–1100, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900173, 1999. a, b, c, d
Zhou, X., Strangeway, R. J., Anderson, P. C., Sibeck, D. G., Tsurutani, B. T., Haerendel, G., Frey, H. U., and Arballo, J. K.: Shock aurora: FAST and DMSP observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 8019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009701, 2003. a, b
Zhou, X., Haerendel, G., Moen, J. I., Trondsen, E., Clausen, L., Strangeway, R. J., Lybekk, B., and Lorentzen, D. A.: Shock aurora: Field-aligned discrete structures moving along the dawnside oval, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 3145–3162, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022666, 2017. a, b, c
Zhou, X.-Y., Fukui, K., Carlson, H. C., Moen, J. I., and Strangeway, R. J.: Shock aurora: Ground-based imager observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, A12216, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014186, 2009. a, b
Editor-in-chief
The study is devoted to a shock auroral event that occurred on February 26, 2023, in northern Scandinavia, and represents the first time such nighttime auroral features have been captured by ground-based cameras. Shock auroras result from a very specific driving impulse in the solar wind. While the primary effects appear on the dayside of the Earth, the authors succeeded in observing the nightside signatures, which are rare and difficult to detect. The study is a successful scientific achievement as it presents newly discovered phenomena that provide new insights into solar wind interactions with the nightside ionosphere.
The study is devoted to a shock auroral event that occurred on February 26, 2023, in northern...
Short summary
Our research explores the shock aurora, which is typically observed on the dayside due to the rapid compression of the Earth's magnetic field. We observed this rare aurora on the nightside, a region where such events are difficult to detect. Using ground-based cameras, we identified new features, including leaping and vortex-like patterns. These findings offer a fresh insight into the interactions between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, enhancing our understanding of space weather and its effects.
Our research explores the shock aurora, which is typically observed on the dayside due to the...
