Dear Authors,

I have read your answers to the two Referee's comments. In general, they are satisfying and revisions should be implemented accordingly in the manuscript. However, some of the referee comments are not or are incompletely answered, and some answers call for further argumentation and/or additional details. Attached you will find my specific remarks on the referees’ comments and your answers. You will also find my own comments on the manuscript in the last section. Please provide a line-by-line response to all remarks and comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript.

Best regards,
Olivier BOCK
Co-editor ANGEO for the GNSS4WEC Special Issue

Dear Authors,

Thank you for providing a revised manuscript and enhanced answers to the Referee’s comments. Please provide also answers to my additional editor comments. They are not optional.

Let me kindly remind you that ANGEO submissions go first through an open discussion stage during which two or more referees are asked to provide reports. The editor and the scientific community are also able to post short comments. After the open discussion, the authors are expected to post a response to all comments. Based on the responses, the topical editor either invites the authors to submit a revised manuscript or directly rejects the manuscript. If necessary, the editor may also consult referees in the same way as during the completion of a traditional peer-review process.

Best regards,
Olivier BOCK

Dear Authors,
Thank you for providing finally answers to all the comments raised by the Referee’s and by myself. Most answers are okay, but some of them require further discussion. I also carefully read the revised manuscript and while it has been noticeably improved, some revisions are still pending. Attached you will find my detailed comments and questions as well as my suggestions on how to further clarify the text and sharpen the discussion. I attach also an annotated manuscript with small edits. Please start with the corrections from the annotated manuscript and implement the suggested revisions in the review in a second step. A little reorganisation of the manuscript is suggested to improve the description of results and the discussion.
Looking forward to getting your revised manuscript for final validation (hopefully).
Best regards,
Olivier BOCK

Dear Authors,
Thank you for the substantial corrections that were implemented in the revised version of the manuscript and for the detailed answers to my comments. I think the manuscript is now well organised with adequate material (Figures and Tables) and presents significant and original results. Attached you will find my answers and comments to some of the points from my review that deserve for a reply and a few technical corrections to the revised text.
Looking forward to getting your final revised manuscript.
Best regards,
Olivier BOCK

Dear Authors,
please see the comments in the attached document
Best regards,
Olivier BOCK