Dear Dr. Vaishnav,

I have received now the reports of the two Reviewers. Based on the reviewer's comments, major revisions are needed. Please, consider every comment and corrections given by them, and provide also a detailed answer to their report with a list of all the changes made in the revised version of your manuscript.
Kind regards and looking forward your revised manuscript,

Prof. Dr. Erdal Yiğit

Dear Dr. Vaishnav,

Thanks indeed for addressing reviewer comments in the previous iteration. Now, while the first reviewer suggests the paper to be published as is, the second reviewer has the following minor concern in Figure 8:

"If Global TEC values are the average between SH and NH, and also the average between LL, ML and HL, I would expect that the correlation coefficient of Global TEC with F10.7 and with MgII) fall in the middle, or somewhere between the correlation between NH and NH TEC with F10 and MgII, and also in between the correlation coefficient between the other TECs."

This should be addressed in the final revision.

Prof Dr. Yiğit

Dear Dr. Vaishnav,

Thanks for fully addressing reviewers' comments. I am suggesting your paper to be published.

Prof. Dr. Yiğit