Articles | Volume 44, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-123-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-123-2026
Regular paper
 | 
17 Feb 2026
Regular paper |  | 17 Feb 2026

Effect of Ionospheric Variability on the Electron Energy Spectrum estimated from Incoherent Scatter Radar Measurements

Oliver Stalder, Björn Gustavsson, and Ilkka Virtanen

Related authors

Optical and Radar Observations of the February 2025 Falcon 9 Upper-Stage Re-entry
Juha Vierinen, Dabrowka Knach, Jorge Luis Chau, Gerd Baumgarten, Devin Huyghebaert, Matthias Clahsen, Nico Pfeffer, Toralf Renkwitz, Robin Wing, Kenneth Obenberger, Björn Gustavsson, and Daniel Kastinen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2857,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2857, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Estimating the source altitude of auroral precipitation from dispersed Alfvén waves in the dayside ionosphere
Etienne Gavazzi, Andres Spicher, Björn Gustavsson, Juha Vierinen, James Clemmons, Robert Pfaff, and Douglas Rowland
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2126,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2126, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Improving the Magic constant – data-based calibration of phased array radars
Theresa Rexer, Björn Gustavsson, Juha Vierinen, Andres Spicher, Devin Ray Huyghebaert, Andreas Kvammen, Robert Gillies, and Asti Bhatt
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 15, 127–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-127-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-127-2026, 2026
Short summary
Non-Maxwellian electron distributions in the D region during artificial heating (Paper II): Electron cooling rates
Margaretha Myrvang and Björn Johan Gustavsson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1118,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1118, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Non-Maxwellian electron distributions in the D region during artificial heating (Paper I): Model development and electron temperature
Margaretha Myrvang and Björn Gustavsson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1117,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1117, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Bailey, S. M., Barth, C. A., and Solomon, S. C.: A model of nitric oxide in the lower thermosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 107, SIA 22-1–SIA 22-12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000258, 2002. a, b
Bilitza, D., Altadill, D., Zhang, Y., Mertens, C., Truhlik, V., Richards, P., McKinnell, L.-A., and Reinisch, B.: The International Reference Ionosphere 2012 – a model of international collaboration, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 4, A07, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014004, 2014. a
Brekke, A., Hall, C., and Hansen, T. L.: Auroral ionospheric conductances during disturbed conditions, Annales Geophysicae, 7, 269–280, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AnGeo...7..269B (last access: 10 August 2022), 1989. a, b
Dahlgren, H., Gustavsson, B., Lanchester, B. S., Ivchenko, N., Brändström, U., Whiter, D. K., Sergienko, T., Sandahl, I., and Marklund, G.: Energy and flux variations across thin auroral arcs, Annales Geophysicae, 29, 1699–1712, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1699-2011, 2011. a, b, c
Emmert, J. T., Jones Jr, M., Siskind, D. E., Drob, D. P., Picone, J. M., Stevens, M. H., Bailey, S. M., Bender, S., Bernath, P. F., Funke, B., Hervig, M. E., and Pérot, K.: NRLMSIS 2.1: An Empirical Model of Nitric Oxide Incorporated Into MSIS, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127, e2022JA030896, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030896, 2022. a
Download
Short summary
The rapid changes in ion composition during auroral are dynamically modeled by integrating the coupled continuity equations for 15 ionospheric species. The effect of the ionospheric variation on the inversion of incoherent scatter radar (ISR) electron density profiles to differential energy spectra of precipitating electrons is studied. A systematic overestimation at high electron energies can be removed using a dynamic model. Comparisons are made with static and steady-state ionospheric models.
Share