Articles | Volume 40, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022
Regular paper
 | 
05 Aug 2022
Regular paper |  | 05 Aug 2022

Multiple conjugate observations of magnetospheric fast flow bursts using THEMIS observations

Homayon Aryan, Jacob Bortnik, Jinxing Li, James Michael Weygand, Xiangning Chu, and Vassilis Angelopoulos

Related authors

Effects of geomagnetic mirror force and pitch angles of precipitating electrons on ionization of the polar upper atmosphere
Tomotaka Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Yuto Katoh, Mizuki Fukizawa, Anton Artemyev, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Xiao-Jia Zhang, Yoshimasa Tanaka, and Akira Kadokura
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-768,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-768, 2025
Short summary
Observations of traveling ionospheric disturbances driven by gravity waves from sources in the upper and lower atmosphere
Paul Prikryl, David R. Themens, Jaroslav Chum, Shibaji Chakraborty, Robert G. Gillies, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-6, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ANGEO
Short summary
Drivers of rapid geomagnetic variations at high latitudes
Liisa Juusola, Ari Viljanen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Mirjam Kellinsalmi, Audrey Schillings, and James M. Weygand
Ann. Geophys., 41, 13–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Multi-instrument observations of polar cap patches and traveling ionospheric disturbances generated by solar wind Alfvén waves coupling to the dayside magnetosphere
Paul Prikryl, Robert G. Gillies, David R. Themens, James M. Weygand, Evan G. Thomas, and Shibaji Chakraborty
Ann. Geophys., 40, 619–639, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-619-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-619-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akasofu, S.-I.: The Development of the Auroral Substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 273–282, 1964. a, b
Akasofu, S.-I.: Physics of Magnetospheric Substorms, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 170–187, 1976. a
Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation from the ground to the ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems, Earth Planets Space, 51, 431–440, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352247, 1999. a
Amm, O., Engebretson, M. J., Hughes, T., Newitt, L., Viljanen, A., and Watermann, J.: A traveling convection vortex event study: Instantaneous ionospheric equivalent currents, estimation of field-aligned currents, and the role of induced currents, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 107, SIA1-1–SIA1-11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009472, 2002. a, b
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
In this study, we use a multipoint analysis of conjugate magnetospheric and ionospheric observations to investigate the magnetospheric and ionospheric responses to fast flow bursts that are associated with different space weather conditions. The results show that ionospheric currents are connected to the magnetospheric flows for different space weather conditions. The connection is more apparent and global for flows that are associated with a geomagnetically active condition.
Share