Articles | Volume 40, issue 4
Ann. Geophys., 40, 531–544, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022
Ann. Geophys., 40, 531–544, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022
Regular paper
05 Aug 2022
Regular paper | 05 Aug 2022

Multiple conjugate observations of magnetospheric fast flow bursts using THEMIS observations

Homayon Aryan et al.

Related authors

Observation of shocks associated with CMEs in 2007
H. Aryan, M. A. Balikhin, A. Taktakishvili, and T. L. Zhang
Ann. Geophys., 32, 223–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-223-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-223-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Magnetosphere–ionosphere interactions
Ionospheric plasma flows associated with the formation of the distorted nightside end of a transpolar arc
Motoharu Nowada, Adrian Grocott, and Quan-Qi Shi
Ann. Geophys., 40, 299–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-299-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Relation between the asymmetric ring current effect and the anti-sunward auroral currents, as deduced from CHAMP observations
Hermann Lühr and Yun-Liang Zhou
Ann. Geophys., 38, 749–764, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-749-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-749-2020, 2020
Short summary
Estimating the fate of oxygen ion outflow from the high-altitude cusp
Patrik Krcelic, Stein Haaland, Lukas Maes, Rikard Slapak, and Audrey Schillings
Ann. Geophys., 38, 491–505, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-491-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-491-2020, 2020
Short summary
Hybrid-Vlasov modelling of nightside auroral proton precipitation during southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions
Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Adnane Osmane, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Lucile Turc, Thiago Brito, Tuomas Koskela, Maxime Dubart, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 37, 791–806, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-791-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Akasofu, S.-I.: The Development of the Auroral Substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 273–282, 1964. a, b
Akasofu, S.-I.: Physics of Magnetospheric Substorms, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 170–187, 1976. a
Amm, O. and Viljanen, A.: Ionospheric disturbance magnetic field continuation from the ground to the ionosphere using spherical elementary current systems, Earth Planets Space, 51, 431–440, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352247, 1999. a
Amm, O., Engebretson, M. J., Hughes, T., Newitt, L., Viljanen, A., and Watermann, J.: A traveling convection vortex event study: Instantaneous ionospheric equivalent currents, estimation of field-aligned currents, and the role of induced currents, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 107, SIA1-1–SIA1-11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009472, 2002. a, b
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
In this study, we use a multipoint analysis of conjugate magnetospheric and ionospheric observations to investigate the magnetospheric and ionospheric responses to fast flow bursts that are associated with different space weather conditions. The results show that ionospheric currents are connected to the magnetospheric flows for different space weather conditions. The connection is more apparent and global for flows that are associated with a geomagnetically active condition.