Articles | Volume 39, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021
Regular paper
 | 
15 Jul 2021
Regular paper |  | 15 Jul 2021

Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm: influence on high frequency radio wave characteristics

Yiyang Luo, Leonid Chernogor, Kostiantyn Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng

Related authors

Global geomagnetic response to repetitive geospace storm of March 21–25, 2024
Leonid F. Chernogor
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4375,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4375, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Features Investigates of the geospace storm over China During May 10–12, 2024
Tao Xu, Yaya Liu, Leonid Chernogor, Zhejun Jin, Mykyta Shevelev, Yevhen Zhdanko, and Yu Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3661,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3661, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
A two-step geospace storm as a new tool of opportunity for experimentally estimating the threshold condition for the formation of a substorm current wedge
Leonid F. Chernogor
Ann. Geophys., 43, 15–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-15-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-15-2025, 2025
Short summary
A statistical study of the magnetic signatures of the unique Tonga volcanic explosion of 15 January 2022
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Effects of the super-powerful tropospheric western Pacific phenomenon of September–October 2018 on the ionosphere over China: results from oblique sounding
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Appleton, E. and Ingram, L.: Magnetic storms and upper atmospheric ionization, Nature, 136, 548–549, https://doi.org/10.1038/136548b0, 1935. 
Benestad, R. E.: Solar activity and Earth's climate, Springer-Praxis, Springer, Chichester, UK, p. 316, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30621-8, 2006. 
Blagoveshchensky, D. and Sergeeva, M.: Impact of geomagnetic storm of September 7–8, 2017 on ionosphere and HF propagation: A multi-instrument study, Adv. Space Res., 63, 239–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.016, 2019. 
Blanch, E., Altadill, D., Boška, J., Burešová, D., and Hernández-Pajares, M.: November 2003 event: Effects on the Earth's ionosphere observed from ground-based ionosonde and GPS data, Ann. Geophys., 23, 3027–3034, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-3027-2005, 2005. 
Borries, C., Berdermann, J., Jakowski, N., and Wilken, V.: Ionospheric storms – A challenge for empirical forecast of the total electron content, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 3175–3186, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020988, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
Share