Articles | Volume 39, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm: influence on high frequency radio wave characteristics
Yiyang Luo
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China
Department of Theoretical Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Square, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine
Leonid Chernogor
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Square, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine
Kostiantyn Garmash
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Square, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine
Qiang Guo
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, 145 Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, China
Victor Rozumenko
Department of Space Radio Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Square, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine
College of Electronic Information, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-9, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2024-9, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ANGEO
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based magnetometer observations show that part of the near-Earth cross-tail current closed itself via the ionosphere, to which it was linked by the substorm current wedge, and manifested itself in the magnetograms acquired at high and equatorial latitude stations on the night side of the Earth. Observations suggest that the Bz interplanetary magnetic field component threshold for the formation of the substorm current wedge lies in the –(22–30) nT interval.
Leonid Chernogor
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2023-27, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The Tonga volcano explosion launched a rich assortment of disturbances in the solid Earth, ocean, entire atmosphere, and the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Statistical and spectral analysis of the measurements made at 19 INTERMAGNET recording stations closest to the volcano shows that the quasi-periodic disturbances were transported by fast and slow magnetohydrodynamic waves, blast wave, atmospheric gravity wave, and Lamb wave; the parameters of geomagnetic bay disturbances have also estimated.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Related subject area
Subject: Earth's ionosphere & aeronomy | Keywords: Ionospheric disturbances
Observations of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2020 Beirut explosion by Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and ground-based ionosondes
Effects of the super-powerful tropospheric western Pacific phenomenon of September–October 2018 on the ionosphere over China: results from oblique sounding
Ionospheric effects of the 5–6 January 2019 eclipse over the People's Republic of China: results from oblique sounding
Study of the equatorial and low-latitude total electron content response to plasma bubbles during solar cycle 24–25 over the Brazilian region using a Disturbance Ionosphere indeX
Diagnostic study of geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric changes over very low-frequency signal propagation paths in the mid-latitude D region
Complex analysis of the ionosphere variations during the geomagnetic storm at 20 January 2010 performed by Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) software and DEMETER satellite data
Tomographic imaging of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance during the Halloween storm of 2003
Ionospheric anomalies associated with the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq border earthquake and a moderate magnetic storm
Model of the propagation of very low-frequency beams in the Earth–ionosphere waveguide: principles of the tensor impedance method in multi-layered gyrotropic waveguides
Strong influence of solar X-ray flares on low-frequency electromagnetic signals in middle latitudes
A case study of the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the eastern Asian sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic conjugate observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to a North Korean underground nuclear explosion on 3 September 2017
Emergence of a localized total electron content enhancement during the severe geomagnetic storm of 8 September 2017
Mitigation of ionospheric signatures in Swarm GPS gravity field estimation using weighting strategies
PPP-based Swarm kinematic orbit determination
Impact of magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution
Rezy Pradipta and Pei-Chen Lai
Ann. Geophys., 42, 301–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-301-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A large explosion released a significant amount of energy into the Earth's upper atmosphere in Beirut on 4 Aug 2020, generating traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs). These TIDs were observed in previous work using GPS total electron content measurements around Beirut. Here, we used measurements from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and ionosondes in the Mediterranean to show that the TIDs from the Beirut explosion were able to reach greater distances than previously reported.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostiantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 41, 173–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and eight surrounding HF broadcast stations ~1000 km observed the response in the ionospheric electron density to the activity of Typhoon Kong-rey (30 September–6 October 2018). On 1–2 and 5–6 October 2018, the 20 min to 60 min period quasi-sinusoidal variations in the electron density with an amplitude of 0.4 % to 6 % resulted in 0.1 Hz to 0.5 Hz amplitude Doppler shift variations, a factor of 2–3 increase as compared to a quiet time reference.
Leonid F. Chernogor, Kostyantyn P. Garmash, Qiang Guo, Victor T. Rozumenko, and Yu Zheng
Ann. Geophys., 40, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The solar eclipse of 5–6 January 2019 perturbed the ionospheric electron density, N, observed with the receiver at the Harbin Engineering University and 14 HF broadcasting stations ~1 000 km around. It was accompanied by ±1.5 Hz Doppler-spectrum broadening, ±0.5 Hz Doppler shift, fD, variations, 15 min period variations in fD caused by 1.6–2.4 % perturbations in N, and period changes of 4–5 min in fD caused by 0.2–0.3 % disturbances in N. The decrease in N attained ~15 % (vs. modeled 16 %).
Giorgio Arlan Silva Picanço, Clezio Marcos Denardini, Paulo Alexandre Bronzato Nogueira, Laysa Cristina Araujo Resende, Carolina Sousa Carmo, Sony Su Chen, Paulo França Barbosa-Neto, and Esmeralda Romero-Hernandez
Ann. Geophys., 40, 503–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we use the Disturbance Ionosphere indeX (DIX) to study equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) events over the Brazilian equatorial and low latitudes. Our results showed that the DIX detected EPB disturbances in terms of their intensity and occurrence times. Therefore, these responses agreed with the ionosphere behavior before, during, and after the studied EPBs. Finally, these disturbances tended to be higher (lower) in high (low) solar activity.
Victor U. J. Nwankwo, William Denig, Sandip K. Chakrabarti, Olugbenga Ogunmodimu, Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye, Johnson O. Fatokun, Paul I. Anekwe, Omodara E. Obisesan, Olufemi E. Oyanameh, and Oluwaseun V. Fatoye
Ann. Geophys., 40, 433–461, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We combined the observed diurnal VLF amplitude variation in the D region with standard measurements of the E and F regions to perform a diagnostic investigation of coupled geomagnetic storm effects in order to understand the observed storm-induced variations in VLF narrowband based on state and responses of the ionosphere. The dayside VLF amplitude showed a tendency for attenuation following geomagnetic storms, and the h’E and h’F variations confirmed strong storm response over the signal paths.
Anatoliy Lozbin, Viktor Fedun, and Olga Kryakunova
Ann. Geophys., 40, 55–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection of Ionosphere Anomalies (DIA) for detection, identification, and analysis of ionosphere anomalies from satellite spectrograms and time series row data from instruments onboard the DEMETER satellite was designed. Using this software, the analyses of ionosphere parameter variations caused by various factors are provided. The scientific data processing and visualization technologies used in the development of DIA can be used in the creation of software for other scientific space missions.
Karl Bolmgren, Cathryn Mitchell, Talini Pinto Jayawardena, Gary Bust, Jon Bruno, and Elizabeth Mitchell
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1149–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1149-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Travelling ionospheric disturbances behave like waves in the ionosphere, the ionised upper part of the atmosphere. In this study, we use an ionospheric tomography technique to map the electron content as affected by the passage of a large-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance launched during the largest geomagnetic storm observed by modern instruments. This is the first such imaging using this software and to the authors' knowledge the first study of this travelling ionospheric disturbance.
Erman Şentürk, Samed Inyurt, and İbrahim Sertçelik
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1031–1043, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The analysis of unexpected ionospheric phases before large earthquakes is one of the cutting-edge issues in earthquake prediction studies. Ionospheric TEC data were analyzed by short-time Fourier transform and a classic running median to detect abnormalities before the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq earthquake on November 12, 2017. The results showed clear positive anomalies 8–9 d before the earthquake as an earthquake precursor due to quiet space weather, local dispersion, and proximity to the epicenter.
Yuriy Rapoport, Vladimir Grimalsky, Viktor Fedun, Oleksiy Agapitov, John Bonnell, Asen Grytsai, Gennadi Milinevsky, Alex Liashchuk, Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, and Andrey Gulin
Ann. Geophys., 38, 207–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-207-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper analytically and numerically treats the new theoretical basis for ground-based and satellite monitoring of the most powerful processes in the lower atmosphere and Earth (hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.), solar-wind magnetosphere (magnetic storms) and ionosphere (lightning discharges, thunderstorms, etc.). This can be provided by the determination of phases and amplitudes of radio waves in the Earth and ionosphere. In perspective, damage from the natural disasters can be decreased.
Alexander Rozhnoi, Maria Solovieva, Viktor Fedun, Peter Gallagher, Joseph McCauley, Mohammed Y. Boudjada, Sergiy Shelyag, and Hans U. Eichelberger
Ann. Geophys., 37, 843–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-843-2019, 2019
Jing Liu, Dong-He Zhang, Anthea J. Coster, Shun-Rong Zhang, Guan-Yi Ma, Yong-Qiang Hao, and Zuo Xiao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 673–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019, 2019
Yi Liu, Chen Zhou, Qiong Tang, Guanyi Chen, and Zhengyu Zhao
Ann. Geophys., 37, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-337-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Underground nuclear explosion (UNE) can produce ionospheric disturbances through a lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling mechanism, which is very similar with earthquakes. By using the total electron content observations and Swarm ionospheric current data, we have investigated the geomagnetic conjugate ionospheric disturbances. We proposed that the electric field generated during the UNE test can be an important mechanism for ionospheric disturbance.
Carlos Sotomayor-Beltran and Laberiano Andrade-Arenas
Ann. Geophys., 37, 153–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A localized total electron content enhancement (LTE) was observed as a product of the geomagnetic storm that happened on 8 September 2017. This result was unexpected because it was located south of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA). The origin of the enhancement of the TEC in the EIA is very likely due to the super-fountain effect. On the other hand, the LTE is suggested to be produced by the contribution of the super-fountain effect along with traveling ionospheric disturbances.
Lucas Schreiter, Daniel Arnold, Veerle Sterken, and Adrian Jäggi
Ann. Geophys., 37, 111–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing Swarm GPS-only gravity fields to the ultra-precise GRACE K-Band gravity field schematic errors occurs around the geomagnetic equator. Due to the end of the GRACE mission, and the gap to the GRACE-FO mission, only Swarm can provide a continuous time series of gravity fields. We present different and assess different approaches to remove the schematic errors and thus improve the quality of the Swarm gravity fields.
Le Ren and Steffen Schön
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1227–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we analyse the performance of the Swarm onboard GPS receiver and present the approach for determination of the IfE Swarm kinematic orbit with PPP. The differences between our kinematic orbits and ESA reduced-dynamic orbits are at 1.5 cm, 1.5 cm and 2.5 cm level in along-track, cross-track and radial directions, respectively. A comparison with SLR underlines an accuracy of the kinematic orbits of 3–4 cm.
Donat V. Blagoveshchensky, Olga A. Maltseva, and Maria A. Sergeeva
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Appleton, E. and Ingram, L.: Magnetic storms and upper atmospheric ionization, Nature, 136, 548–549, https://doi.org/10.1038/136548b0, 1935.
Benestad, R. E.: Solar activity and Earth's climate, Springer-Praxis, Springer, Chichester, UK, p. 316, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30621-8, 2006.
Blagoveshchensky, D. and Sergeeva, M.: Impact of geomagnetic storm of
September 7–8, 2017 on ionosphere and HF propagation: A multi-instrument
study, Adv. Space Res., 63, 239–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.016, 2019.
Blanch, E., Altadill, D., Boška, J., Burešová, D., and
Hernández-Pajares, M.: November 2003 event: Effects on the Earth's
ionosphere observed from ground-based ionosonde and GPS data, Ann. Geophys., 23, 3027–3034, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-3027-2005, 2005.
Borries, C., Berdermann, J., Jakowski, N., and Wilken, V.: Ionospheric storms – A challenge for empirical forecast of the total electron content, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 3175–3186, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020988, 2015.
Bothmer, V. and Daglis, I.: Space Weather: Physics and Effects, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 3-642-06289-X. 2007.
Buonsanto, M.: Ionospheric storms – A review, Space Sci. Rev., 88, 563–601, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631, 1999.
Carlowicz, M. J. and Lopez, R. E.: Storms from the Sun, 1st Edn., Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, p. 256, ISBN 0-309-07642-0, 2002.
Chernogor, L. and Rozumenko, V.: Physical effects in the geospace environment under quiet and disturbed conditions, Space Research in Ukraine, The Edition Report, Space Research Institute of NAS of Ukraine and NSA of Ukraine, Kyiv, 22–34, 2011.
Chernogor, L. and Rozumenko, V.: Features of Physical Effects in the Geospace Environment under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions, Space Research in Ukraine 2010–2012, Space Research Institute, Kyiv, 29–46, 2012.
Chernogor, L. and Rozumenko, V.: Study of Physical Effects in the Geospace
Environment under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions, Space Research in Ukraine 2012–2014, Space Research Institute, Kyiv, 13–20, 2014.
Chernogor, L. and Rozumenko, V.: Results of the investigation of physical effects in the geospace environment under quiet and disturbed conditions,
National Academy of Science of Ukraine, State Space Agency of Ukraine, Kyiv,
Akademperiodyka, 23–30, 2016.
Chernogor, L. and Rozumenko, V.: Results of the Investigation of Physical
Effects in the Geospace Environment under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions, Space Research in Ukraine 2016–2018, COSPAR, Kyiv, 41–51, 2018.
Chernogor, L. F.: Advanced Methods of Spectral Analysis of Quasiperiodic Wave-Like Processes in the Ionosphere: Specific Features and Experimental
Results, Geomag. Aeron., 48, 652–673, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050101, 2008.
Chernogor, L. F.: The Earth-atmosphere-geospace system: main properties and
processes, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 3199–3218, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541510, 2011.
Chernogor, L. F.: Geomagnetic field effects of the Chelyabinsk meteoroid,
Geomag. Aeron., 54, 613–624, https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321405003X, 2014.
Chernogor, L. F. and Domnin, I. F.: Physics of geospace storms, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, p. 408, 2014.
Chernogor, L. F. and Rozumenko, V. T.: Earth–Atmosphere–Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System, Radio Phys. Radio Astron., 13, 120–137, 2008.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Physical Effects of the Severe Ionospheric Storm of 26 August 2018, in: Fifth
UK–Ukraine–Spain Meeting on Solar Physics and Space Science, 26–30 August 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine, p. 33, 2019a.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Physical Processes Operating in the Ionosphere after the Earthquake of Richter Magnitude 5.9 in Japan on July 7, 2018, in: Book of Abstracts, Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University, International Conference, 28–31 May 2019, Kyiv, 87–88, 2019b.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Effects of the Severe Ionospheric Storm of 26 August 2018, in: Book of Abstracts, Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University, International
Conference, 28–31 May 2019, Kyiv, 88–90, 2019c.
Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Luo Y., Rozumenko, V. T., and
Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric storm effects over the People's Republic of China on
14 May 2019: Results from multipath multi-frequency oblique radio sounding,
Adv. Space Res., 66, 226–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.037, 2020.
Danilov, A. D.: Reaction of F region to geomagnetic disturbances, Heliogeophysical Research, 1–33, available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21273665 (last access: 17 June 2021), 2013.
Danilov, A. D. and Lastovička, J.: Effects of geomagnetic storms on the
ionosphere and atmosphere, Int. J. Geomag. Aeron., 2, 209–224, 2001.
Danilov, A. D. and Morozova, L. D.: Ionospheric storms in the F2 region.
Morphology and physics (review), Geomag. Aeron., 25, 705–721, 1985.
GNU Radio: https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/InstallingGR, last access: 17 June 2021.
Feldstein, Y. I., Dremukhina, L. A., Levitin, A. E., Mall, U., Alexeev, I. I., and Kalegaev, V. V.: Energetics of the magnetosphere during the magnetic
storm, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 65, 429–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00339-5, 2003.
Freeman, J. W.: Storms in Space, 1st Edn., Cambridge University Press,
London, New York, p 162, 2001.
Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., Roble, R. G., and Richmond, A. D.: How does the thermosphere and ionosphere react to a geomagnetic storm? Magnetic Storms, American Geophysical Union, Washington, 203–226, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM098p0203, 1997.
Gonzalez, W. D., Jozelyn, J. A., Kamide, Y., and Kroehl, H. W.: What is a
geomagnetic storm?, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5771–5792, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867, 1994.
Goodman, J. M.: Space Weather and Telecommunications, Springer-Verlag, USA,
p. 382, https://doi.org/10.1007/b102193, 2005.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Dynamical processes in the ionosphere following the moderate earthquake in
Japan on 7 July 2018, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 186, 88–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.02.003, 2019a.
Guo, Q., Zheng, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., and Rozumenko, V. T.:
Passive HF Doppler Radar for Oblique-Incidence Ionospheric Sounding, in: 2019 IEEE 2nd Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2–6 July 2019, Lviv, Ukraine, 88–93, https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRCON.2019.8879807, 2019b.
Guo, Q., Zheng, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., and Rozumenko, V. T.: Ionospheric processes observed with the passive oblique-incidence HF Doppler radar, series “Radio Physics and Electronics”, Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 30, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2019-30-01, 2019c.
Guo, Q., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Rozumenko, V. T., and Zheng, Y.:
Radio Monitoring of Dynamic Processes in the Ionosphere over China during the Partial Solar Eclipse of 11 August 2018, Radio Science, 55, e2019RS006866, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006866, 2020.
Habarulema, J. B., Katamzi-Joseph, Z. T., Burešová, D., Nndanganeni, R., Matamba, T., Tshisaphungo, M., Buchert, S., Kosch, M., Lotz, S., Cilliers, P., and Mahrous, A.: Ionospheric response at conjugate locations during the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm over the Europe-African longitude sector, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2020JA028307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028307, 2020.
Hafstad, L. and Tuve, M.: Further studies of the Kennelly-Heaviside layer by
the echo-method, Proc. Inst. Radio Eng., 17, 1513–1521, https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1929.221853, 1929.
Hajkowicz, L.: Auroral electrojet effect on the global occurrence pattern of
large scale travelling ionospheric disturbances, Planet. Space Sci., 39, 1189–1196, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90170-F, 1991.
Kamide, Y. and Maltsev, Y. P.: Geomagnetic Storms, in: Handbook of the Solar–Terrestrial Environment, edited by: Kamide, Y. and Chian, A.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 355–374, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46315-3_14, 2007.
Knipp, D. J. and Emery, B. A.: A report on the community study of the early
November 1993 geomagnetic storm, Adv. Space Res., 22, 41–54,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)01098-3, 1998.
Koskinen, H. E. J.: Physics of space storms. From Solar Surface to the Earth,
Springer in association with Praxis Publishing, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00319-6, 2011.
Laštovička, J.: Effects of geomagnetic storms in the lower ionosphere, middle atmosphere and troposphere, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 831–843, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(95)00106-9, 1996.
Lathuillère, C., Menvielle, M., Lilensten, J., Amari, T., and Radicella,
S. M.: From the Sun's atmosphere to the Earth's atmosphere: an overview of
scientific models available for space weather developments, Ann. Geophys., 20, 1081–1104, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-20-1081-2002, 2002.
Lei, J., Burns, A. G., Tsugawa, T., Wang, W., Solomon, S. C., and Wiltberger, M.: Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A06310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013090, 2008.
Lilensten, J. and Bornarel, J.: Space Weather – Environment and Societies,
Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, p. 242, ISBN 978-1-4020-4331-4,
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4332-5, 2006.
Liu, J., Wang, W., Burns, A., Yue, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., and Huang, C.:
Profiles of ionospheric storm-enhanced density during the 17 March 2015 great storm, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 727–744, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021832, 2016.
Luo, Y., Chernogor, L. F., Garmash, K. P., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V. T., Shulga, S. N., and Zheng, Y.: Ionospheric effects of the Kamchatka meteoroid: Results from multipath oblique sounding, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 207, 105336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105336, 2020a.
Luo, Y., Chernogor, L., Garmash, K., Guo, Q., Rozumenko, V., Zheng, Y.: RAW
Data on Parameters of Ionospheric HF Radio Waves Propagated Over China
During the 30 August–September 2, 2019 Geospace Storm, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/86LHDC, 2020b.
Lyons, L. R., Nishimura, Y., Zhang, S.-R., Coster, A. J., Bhatt, A., Kendall, E., and Deng, Y.: Identification of auroral zone activity driving largescale traveling ionospheric disturbances, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 700–714, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025980, 2019.
Matsushita, S.: A study of the morphology of ionospheric storms, J.
Geophys. Res., 64, 305–321, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i003p00305, 1959.
Mendillo, M.: Storms in the ionosphere: patterns and processes for total
electron content, Rev. Geophys., 44, RG4001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000193, 2006.
Mosna, Z., Kouba, D., Knizova, P. K., Burešová, D., Chum, J., Sindelarova, T., Urbar, J., Boska, J., and Saxonbergova-Jankovicova, D.:
Ionospheric storm of September 2017 observed at ionospheric station Pruhonice, the Czech Republic, Adv. Space Res., 65, 115–128,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.024, 2020.
Nieboer, G.: GNURadio Win64 Binaries, available at: http://www.gcndevelopment.com/gnuradio/index.htm, last access 17 June 2021.
Pirog, O. M., Polekh, N. M., Zherebtsov, G. A., Smirnov, V. F., Shi, J., and
Wang, X.: Seasonal variations of the ionospheric effects of geomagnetic storms at different latitudes of East Asia, Adv. Space Res., 37, 1075–1080, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.007, 2006.
Polekh, N., Zolotukhina, N., Kurkin, V., Zherebtsov, G., Shi, J., Wang, G.,
and Wang, Z.: Dynamics of ionospheric disturbances during the 17–19 March 2015 geomagnetic storm over East Asia, Adv. Space Res., 60, 2464–2476, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.09.030, 2017.
Prölss, G. W.: Common Origin of Positive Ionospheric Storms at Middle
Latitudes and the Geomagnetic Activity Effect at Low Latitudes, J. Geophys.
Res., 98, 5981–5991, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA02777, 1993a.
Prölss, G. W.: On explaining the local time variation of ionospheric storm effects, Ann. Geophys., 11, 1–9, 1993b.
Prölss, G. W.: Ionospheric F-region storms. Handbook of atmospheric
electrodynamics 2, 1st Edn., edited by: Volland, H., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 195–248, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203713297, 1995.
Prölss, G. W.: Magnetic storm associated perturbations of the upper
atmosphere, in: Magnetic storms, Geoph. Monog. Series. Vol. 98, edited by: Tsurutani, B. T., Gonzalez, W. D., Kamide, Y., and Arballo, J. K., AGU, Washington, DC, 249–290, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM098p0227, 1997.
Prölss, G. W.: Ionospheric F-region storms: Unsolved problems in
Characterizing the Ionosphere, in: Paper 10, Meeting Proc. RTO-MP-IST-056,
RTO, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 10-1–10-20, 2006.
Shpynev, B. G., Zolotukhina, N. A., Polekh, N. M., Ratovsky, K. G., Chernigovskaya, M. A., Belinskaya, A. Y., Stepanov, A. E., Bychkov, V. V.,
Grigorieva, S. A., Panchenko, V. A., Korenkova, N. A., and Mielich, J.: The
ionosphere response to severe geomagnetic storm in March 2015 on the base of
the data from Eurasian high-middle latitudes ionosonde chain, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 180, 93–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.10.014, 2018.
Space Weather: Geophysical Monograph, edited by: Song, P., Singer, H., and
Siscoe, G., Union, Washington, DC, ISBN 0-87590-984-1, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118668351, 2001.
Vijaya Lekshmi, D., Balan, N., Tulasi Ram, S., and Liu, J. Y.: Statistics of
geomagnetic storms and ionospheric storms at low and mid latitudes in two solar cycles, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A11328, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017042, 2011.
Yakovchouk, O. S., Mursula, K., Holappa, L., Veselovsky, I. S., and Karinen,
A.: Average properties of geomagnetic storms in 1932–2009, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A03201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017093, 2012.
Yamauchi, M., Sergienko, T., Enell, C.-F., Schillings, A., Slapak, R., Johnsen, M. G., Tjulin, A., and Nilsson, H.: Ionospheric response observed by EISCAT during the 6–8 September 2017 space weather event: Overview, Space Weather, 16, 1437–1450, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001937 2018.
Zalyubovsky, I., Chernogor, L., and Rozumenko V.: The Earth–Atmosphere–Geospace System: Main Properties, Processes and
Phenomena, Space Research in Ukraine, 2006–2008, Space Research Institute of NASU-NSAU, Kyiv, 19–29, 2008.
Zolotukhina, N. A., Kurkin, V. I., and Polekh N. M.: Ionospheric disturbances over East Asia during intense December magnetic storms of 2006 and 2015: similarities and differences, Solar-Terr. Phys., 4, 28–42, https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-43201805, 2018.
Short summary
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high frequency radio waves over the People's Republic of China have been analyzed. The geospace storm was weak, the magnetic storm was moderate, and the ionospheric storm was moderate to strongly negative, which manifested itself by the reduction in the ionospheric F-region electron density. Appreciable disturbances were also observed to occur in the ionospheric E-region and possibly in the Es layer.
The 30 August–2 September 2019 geospace storm and its influence on the characteristics of high...