Articles | Volume 31, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-395-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-395-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geometry of duskside equatorial current during magnetic storm main phase as deduced from magnetospheric and low-altitude observations
S. Dubyagin
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin aukio 1, Helsinki, 00101, Finland
N. Ganushkina
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin aukio 1, Helsinki, 00101, Finland
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, USA
S. Apatenkov
St.~Petersburg State University, Earth Physics Department, Ulyanovskaya 1, Petrodvoretz, St.~Petersburg, 198504, Russia
M. Kubyshkina
St.~Petersburg State University, Earth Physics Department, Ulyanovskaya 1, Petrodvoretz, St.~Petersburg, 198504, Russia
H. Singer
Space Weather Prediction Center, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, USA
M. Liemohn
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, USA
Related authors
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Daniil B. Korovinskiy, Darya I. Kubyshkina, Vladimir S. Semenov, Marina V. Kubyshkina, Nikolai V. Erkaev, and Stefan A. Kiehas
Ann. Geophys., 36, 641–653, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-641-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-641-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Harris–Fadeev–Kan–Manankova family of exact two-dimensional equilibria is generalized to reproduce the slow decrease of the normal magnetic component in the tailward direction, and the magnetotail current sheet bending and shifting in the vertical plane, arising from the Earth dipole tilting and the solar wind nonradial propagation. The analytical solution is found to fit the empirical T96 model, especially, at distances beyond 10–15 Earth radii at high levels of magnetospheric activity.
N. Y. Ganushkina, M. W. Liemohn, S. Dubyagin, I. A. Daglis, I. Dandouras, D. L. De Zeeuw, Y. Ebihara, R. Ilie, R. Katus, M. Kubyshkina, S. E. Milan, S. Ohtani, N. Ostgaard, J. P. Reistad, P. Tenfjord, F. Toffoletto, S. Zaharia, and O. Amariutei
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1369–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A number of current systems exist in the Earth's magnetosphere. It is very difficult to identify local measurements as belonging to a specific current system. Therefore, there are different definitions of supposedly the same current, leading to unnecessary controversy. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques.
V. A. Sergeev, S. A. Chernyaeva, S. V. Apatenkov, N. Y. Ganushkina, and S. V. Dubyagin
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1059–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the precipitated-to-trapped flux ratio patterns near the proton isotropy boundary (IB) using NOAA-POES observations. For 30 and 80keV proton energies, we found only 31% of events showing the dispersion pattern predicted by the non-adiabatic scattering in the tail current sheet. Most frequent pattern had no measureable IB energy dispersion (63%); structured IBs with a few Jprec/Jtrap dropouts were also usual (60%). Roles of current sheet and wave-induced scattering are discussed.
J. Paral, M. K. Hudson, B. T. Kress, M. J. Wiltberger, J. R. Wygant, and H. J. Singer
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1037–1050, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1037-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1037-2015, 2015
M. W. Liemohn, R. M. Katus, and R. Ilie
Ann. Geophys., 33, 965–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-965-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-965-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The different electric current systems flowing in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere each have a unique contribution to the magnetic and electric field distortion of geospace. This study quantifies the intensity and timing of five current systems as calculated from 90 storm events using an inner magnetospheric drift physics model. There is a systematic progression through the various current systems, leading to implications for nonlinear feedback on the geospace system.
A. V. Nikolaev, V. A. Sergeev, N. A. Tsyganenko, M. V. Kubyshkina, H. Opgenoorth, H. Singer, and V. Angelopoulos
Ann. Geophys., 33, 505–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we use two-loop model SCW (SCW2L) to quantitatively investigate distortion of the ionospheric footpoint pattern in response to changes of different SCW2L parameters. Calculation results show that SCW-related footprint shifts result in formation of auroral bulge and westward travelling surge and may contribute to rotation of auroral streamers, and that SCW2L combined with the AM03 model nicely describes the azimuthal progression and the observed magnitude of the auroral expansion.