Articles | Volume 44, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-17-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-17-2026
Regular paper
 | 
12 Jan 2026
Regular paper |  | 12 Jan 2026

A comparison of modeled daytime E regions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations

Daniel J. Emmons, Cornelius Csar Jude H. Salinas, Dong L. Wu, Nimalan Swarnalingam, Eugene V. Dao, Jorge L. Chau, Yosuke Yamazaki, Kyle E. Fitch, and Victoriya V. Forsythe

Viewed

Total article views: 9,591 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
7,897 1,546 148 9,591 333 360
  • HTML: 7,897
  • PDF: 1,546
  • XML: 148
  • Total: 9,591
  • BibTeX: 333
  • EndNote: 360
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 9,591 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 9,550 with geography defined and 41 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 18 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
The E-region of the Earth’s ionosphere plays an important role in atmospheric energy balance and High Frequency radio propagation. In this paper, we compare predictions from two recently developed ionospheric models to observations by ionospheric sounders (ionosondes). Overall, the models show reasonable agreement with the observations. However, there are several areas for improvement in the models as well as questions about the accuracy of the automatically processed ionosonde dataset.
Share