Articles | Volume 43, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-91-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-91-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Revisiting sunspot number as an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) proxy for ionospheric F2 critical frequency
Laboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera (LIANM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
INFINOA, CONICET-UNT, Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
Franco D. Medina
Laboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera (LIANM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
INFINOA, CONICET-UNT, Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
Trinidad Duran
Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Bahía Blanca, 8000, Argentina
Instituto de Física del Sur (CONICET-UNS), Bahía Blanca, 8000, Argentina
Blas F. de Haro Barbas
Laboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera (LIANM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
INFINOA, CONICET-UNT, Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
Ana G. Elias
Laboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera (LIANM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
INFINOA, CONICET-UNT, Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
Related authors
Trinidad Duran, Bruno Santiago Zossi, Yamila Daniela Melendi, Blas Federico de Haro Barbas, Fernando Salvador Buezas, and Ana Georgina Elias
Ann. Geophys., 42, 473–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our research investigates how different proxies of solar activity influence long-term trends in the Earth's ionosphere. By analyzing data from two mid-latitude stations up to 2022, we found that the choice of solar activity measures significantly affects trends in ionospheric electron density, while trends in ionospheric height remain more stable. Selecting the correct solar activity measure is crucial for accurate density trend predictions and improving space weather forecasting models.
Bruno S. Zossi, Trinidad Duran, Franco D. Medina, Blas F. de Haro Barbas, Yamila Melendi, and Ana G. Elias
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13973–13986, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) is a widely used ionospheric empirical model based on observations from a worldwide network of ionospheric stations. It is reasonable, then, to expect that it captures long-term changes in ionospheric parameters linked to trend forcings like greenhouse gases increasing concentration and the Earth's magnetic field secular variation. We show that the IRI model can be a valuable tool for obtaining preliminary approximations of experimental trends.
Trinidad Duran, Bruno Santiago Zossi, Yamila Daniela Melendi, Blas Federico de Haro Barbas, Fernando Salvador Buezas, and Ana Georgina Elias
Ann. Geophys., 42, 473–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our research investigates how different proxies of solar activity influence long-term trends in the Earth's ionosphere. By analyzing data from two mid-latitude stations up to 2022, we found that the choice of solar activity measures significantly affects trends in ionospheric electron density, while trends in ionospheric height remain more stable. Selecting the correct solar activity measure is crucial for accurate density trend predictions and improving space weather forecasting models.
Bruno S. Zossi, Trinidad Duran, Franco D. Medina, Blas F. de Haro Barbas, Yamila Melendi, and Ana G. Elias
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13973–13986, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) is a widely used ionospheric empirical model based on observations from a worldwide network of ionospheric stations. It is reasonable, then, to expect that it captures long-term changes in ionospheric parameters linked to trend forcings like greenhouse gases increasing concentration and the Earth's magnetic field secular variation. We show that the IRI model can be a valuable tool for obtaining preliminary approximations of experimental trends.
Cited articles
Australian Bureau of Meteorology: Index of /wdc/iondata/au, Australian Bureau of Meteorology [data set], https://downloads.sws.bom.gov.au/wdc/iondata/au/ (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
Balan, N., Bailey, G. J., and Moffett, R. J.: Modeling studies of ionospheric variations during an intense solar cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 99, 17467–17475, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA01262, 1994.
Bilitza, D., Pezzopane, M., Truhlik, V., Altadill, D., Reinisch, B. W., and Pignalberi, A.: The International Reference Ionosphere Model: A Review and Description of an Ionospheric Benchmark, Rev. Geophys., 60, e2022RG000792, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000792, 2022.
Brown, M. K., Lewis, H. G., Kavanagh, A. J., Cnossen, I., and Elvidge, S.: Future Climate Change in the Thermosphere Under Varying Solar Activity Conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 129, e2024JA032659, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA032659, 2024.
Clette, F.: Is the F10.7 cm – Sunspot Number relation linear and stable?, J. Space Weather Spac., 11, 25 pp., https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2020071, 2021.
Damboldt, T. and Suessmann, P.: Consolidated Database of Worldwide Measured Monthly Medians of Ionospheric Characteristics foF2 and M(3000)F2, INAG (Ionosonde Network Advisory Group) Bull., 19 pp., https://www.ursi.org/files/CommissionWebsites/INAG/web-73/2012/damboldt_consolidated_database.pdf (last access: 16 January 2025), 2012.
Danilov, A. and Berbeneva, N.: Statistical analysis of the critical frequency foF2 dependence on various solar activity indices, Adv. Space Res., 73, 685–689, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2023.09.047, 2023.
de Haro Barbás, B. F., Elias, A. G., Venchiarutti, J. V., Fagre, M., Zossi, B. S., Tan Jun, G., and Medina, F. D.: MgII as a Solar Proxy to Filter F2-Region Ionospheric Parameters, Pure Appl. Geophys., 178, 4605–4618, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00024-021-02884-Y, 2021.
Dudok de Wit, T. and Bruinsma, S.: The 30 cm radio flux as a solar proxy for thermosphere density modelling, J. Space Weather Spac., 7, 11 pp., https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2017008, 2017.
Emmert, J. T., Picone, J. M., and Meier, R. R.: Thermospheric global average density trends, 1967–2007, derived from orbits of 5000 near-Earth objects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 5101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032809, 2008.
Jakowski, N., Hoque, M. M., and Mielich, J.: Long-term relationships of ionospheric electron density with solar activity, J. Space Weather Spac., 14, 16 pp., https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2024023, 2024.
Laštovička, J., Mikhailov, A. V., Ulich, T., Bremer, J., Elias, A. G., Ortiz de Adler, N., Jara, V., Abarca del Rio, R., Foppiano, A. J., Ovalle, E., and Danilov, A. D.: Long-term trends in foF2: A comparison of various methods, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 1854–1870, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASTP.2006.02.009, 2006.
Laštovička, J.: The best solar activity proxy for long-term ionospheric investigations, Adv. Space Res., 68, 2354–2360, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2021.06.032, 2021.
Laštovička, J.: Progress in investigating long-term trends in the mesosphere, thermosphere, and ionosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5783–5800, https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-23-5783-2023, 2023.
Laštovička, J.: Dependence of long-term trends in foF2 at middle latitudes on different solar activity proxies, Adv. Space Res., 73, 685–689, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2023.09.047, 2024.
Liu, L., Wan, W., Ning, B., Pirog, O., and Kurkin, V.: Solar activity variations of the ionospheric peak electron density, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A08304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011598, 2006.
Liu, H. L., Foster, B. T., Hagan, M. E., McInerney, J. M., Maute, A., Qian, L., Richmond, A. D., Roble, R. G., Solomon, S. C., Garcia, R. R., Kinnison, D., Marsh, D. R., Smith, A. K., Richter, J., Sassi, F., and Oberheide, J.: Thermosphere extension of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, 12302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015586, 2010.
Liu, J. Y., Chen, V. I., and Lin, J. S.: Statistical investigation of the saturation effect in the ionospheric foF2 versus sunspot, solar radio noise, and solar EUV radiation, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1067, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA007543, 2003.
Lowell GIRO Data Center: Digital Ionogram Data Base (DIDBase), Lowell GIRO Data Center [data set], https://giro.uml.edu/didbase/scaled.php (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
Ma, R., Xu, J., Wang, W., and Yuan, W.: Seasonal and latitudinal differences of the saturation effect between ionospheric NmF2 and solar activity indices, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, 10303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014353, 2009.
Mielich, J. and Bremer, J.: Long-term trends in the ionospheric F2 region with different solar activity indices, Ann. Geophys., 31, 291–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-291-2013, 2013.
Mikhailov, A. V., Perrone, L., and Nusinov, A. A.: A mechanism of midlatitude noon-time foE long-term variations inferred from European observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 4466–4473, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023909, 2017.
Mursula, K., Qvick, T., Holappa, L., and Asikainen, T.: Magnetic Storms During the Space Age: Occurrence and Relation to Varying Solar Activity, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2022JA030830, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030830, 2022.
Mursula, K., Pevtsov, A. A., Asikainen, T., Tähtinen, I., and Yeates, A. R.: Transition to a weaker Sun: Changes in the solar atmosphere during the decay of the Modern Maximum, Astron. Astrophys., 685, A170, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449231, 2024.
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan: Nobeyama Radio Polarimeters, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan [data set], https://solar.nro.nao.ac.jp/norp/index.html (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology: Manually scaled parameters, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology [data set], https://wdc.nict.go.jp/Ionosphere/en/archive/isdj_manual_txt.html (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
Reinisch, B. W. and Galkin, I. A.: Global Ionospheric Radio Observatory (GIRO), Earth Planet. Sci., 63, 377–381, https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.03.001, 2011.
Solomon, S. C., Liu, H. L., Marsh, D. R., McInerney, J. M., Qian, L., and Vitt, F. M.: Whole Atmosphere Simulation of Anthropogenic Climate Change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1567–1576, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076950, 2018.
Space Weather Canada: Solar radio flux – solar monitoring program, Space Weather Canada [data set], https://spaceweather.gc.ca/forecast-prevision/solar-solaire/solarflux/sx-en.php (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations: Sunspot Number, Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations [data set], https://www.sidc.be/SILSO/datafiles (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
UK Solar System Data Centre: https://www.ukssdc.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wdcc1/secure/geophysical_parameters.pl (last access: 16 January 2025), 2025.
Zolesi, B. and Cander, L. R.: Ionospheric prediction and forecasting, Ionospheric Prediction and Forecasting, 1–240, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38430-1, 2014.
Zossi, B. S., Medina, F. D., Duran, T., and Elias, A. G.: Selecting the best solar EUV proxy for long-term timescale applications, Adv. Space Res., 75, 856–863, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2024.07.023, 2024.
Short summary
This study explores how solar sunspot number (Sn) compares with other solar indicators like solar radio fluxes in predicting changes in Earth's ionosphere, particularly its critical frequency, over more than 60 years. The work finds that Sn, despite recent fluctuations in other proxies, remains the most stable predictor across all time periods. When adjusting for potential data saturation, Sn outperforms other proxies, providing a more accurate forecast of long-term ionospheric trends.
This study explores how solar sunspot number (Sn) compares with other solar indicators like...