Articles | Volume 43, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-137-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-137-2025
Regular paper
 | 
12 Feb 2025
Regular paper |  | 12 Feb 2025

Statistical analysis of magnetopause response during substorm phases

Sanjay Kumar and Tuija I. Pulkkinen

Related authors

GUMICS-4 analysis of interplanetary coronal mass ejection impact on Earth during low and typical Mach number solar winds
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia Kilpua, Matti Ala-Lahti, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Osku Raukunen
Ann. Geophys., 37, 561–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019, 2019
Short summary
Statistical analysis of mirror mode waves in sheath regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection
Matti M. Ala-Lahti, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Tuija Pulkkinen, and Jan Souček
Ann. Geophys., 36, 793–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Tail reconnection in the global magnetospheric context: Vlasiator first results
Minna Palmroth, Sanni Hoilijoki, Liisa Juusola, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Heli Hietala, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Urs Ganse, Sebastian von Alfthan, Rami Vainio, and Michael Hesse
Ann. Geophys., 35, 1269–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1269-2017, 2017
Short summary
The impact on global magnetohydrodynamic simulations from varying initialisation methods: results from GUMICS-4
Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Adnane Osmane, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Pekka Janhunen
Ann. Geophys., 35, 907–922, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-907-2017, 2017
Short summary
The dawn–dusk asymmetry of ion density in the dayside magnetosheath and its annual variability measured by THEMIS
Andrew P. Dimmock, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Adnane Osmane, and Katariina Nykyri
Ann. Geophys., 34, 511–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-511-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-511-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Magnetosphere–ionosphere interactions
Does high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics exhibit hemispheric mirror symmetry?
Spencer Mark Hatch, Heikki Vanhamäki, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Johnathan K. Burchill, Levan Lomidze, David J. Knudsen, Michael Madelaire, and Habtamu Tesfaw
Ann. Geophys., 42, 229–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multiple conjugate observations of magnetospheric fast flow bursts using THEMIS observations
Homayon Aryan, Jacob Bortnik, Jinxing Li, James Michael Weygand, Xiangning Chu, and Vassilis Angelopoulos
Ann. Geophys., 40, 531–544, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ionospheric plasma flows associated with the formation of the distorted nightside end of a transpolar arc
Motoharu Nowada, Adrian Grocott, and Quan-Qi Shi
Ann. Geophys., 40, 299–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-299-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Relation between the asymmetric ring current effect and the anti-sunward auroral currents, as deduced from CHAMP observations
Hermann Lühr and Yun-Liang Zhou
Ann. Geophys., 38, 749–764, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-749-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-749-2020, 2020
Short summary
Estimating the fate of oxygen ion outflow from the high-altitude cusp
Patrik Krcelic, Stein Haaland, Lukas Maes, Rikard Slapak, and Audrey Schillings
Ann. Geophys., 38, 491–505, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-491-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-491-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Akasofu, S.-I.: The development of the auroral substorm, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 273–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(64)90151-5, 1964. a
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Aubry, M. P., Russell, C. T., and Kivelson, M. G.: Inward motion of the magnetopause before a substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 7018–7031, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i034p07018, 1970. a, b
Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W., Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P., Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka, K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer, Space Sci Rev., 141, 235–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9, 2008. a
Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., and McPherron, R. L.: Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 101, 12975–13010, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA03753, 1996. a
Download
Short summary
We analyzed the average magnetopause position influenced by solar winds and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) using data from the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS), Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP), and Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission from 2016–2020. Minimal movement occurred during substorm phases. The magnetopause moved to its closest inward position during the growth phase and relaxed from peak to recovery as in Shue's model.
Share