Articles | Volume 41, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-301-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-301-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
04 Aug 2023
Regular paper |
| 04 Aug 2023
| 04 Aug 2023
Electron radiation belt safety indices based on the SafeSpace modelling pipeline and dedicated to the internal charging risk
ONERA/DPHY, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Antoine Brunet
ONERA/DPHY, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Sebastien Bourdarie
ONERA/DPHY, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Christos Katsavrias
Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Guillerme Bernoux
ONERA/DPHY, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Stefanos Doulfis
Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Afroditi Nasi
Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Ingmar Sandberg
Space Applications and Research Consultancy (SPARC), Athens, Greece
Constantinos Papadimitriou
Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Space Applications and Research Consultancy (SPARC), Athens, Greece
Jesus Oliveros Fernandez
Thales Alenia Space, Madrid, Spain
Ioannis Daglis
Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Hellenic Space Center, Athens, Greece
Related authors
Christos Katsavrias, Afroditi Nasi, Ioannis A. Daglis, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Nourallah Dahmen, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Marina Georgiou, Antoine Brunet, and Sebastien Bourdarie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 379–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The radial diffusion mechanism is of utmost importance to both the acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt and, consequently, for physics-based models, which provide nowcasting and forecasting of the electron population. In the framework of the "SafeSpace" project, we have created a database of calculated radial diffusion coefficients, and, furthermore, we have exploited it to provide insights for future modelling efforts.
Christos Katsavrias, Afroditi Nasi, Ioannis A. Daglis, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Nourallah Dahmen, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Marina Georgiou, Antoine Brunet, and Sebastien Bourdarie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 379–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The radial diffusion mechanism is of utmost importance to both the acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt and, consequently, for physics-based models, which provide nowcasting and forecasting of the electron population. In the framework of the "SafeSpace" project, we have created a database of calculated radial diffusion coefficients, and, furthermore, we have exploited it to provide insights for future modelling efforts.
Ioannis A. Daglis, Loren C. Chang, Sergio Dasso, Nat Gopalswamy, Olga V. Khabarova, Emilia Kilpua, Ramon Lopez, Daniel Marsh, Katja Matthes, Dibyendu Nandy, Annika Seppälä, Kazuo Shiokawa, Rémi Thiéblemont, and Qiugang Zong
Ann. Geophys., 39, 1013–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a detailed account of the science programme PRESTO (PREdictability of the variable Solar–Terrestrial cOupling), covering the period 2020 to 2024. PRESTO was defined by a dedicated committee established by SCOSTEP (Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics). We review the current state of the art and discuss future studies required for the most effective development of solar–terrestrial physics.
Christos Katsavrias, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Ioannis A. Daglis, Ingmar Sandberg, and Piers Jiggens
Ann. Geophys., 39, 413–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The nature of the semi-annual variation in the relativistic electron fluxes in the Earth's outer radiation belt has been a debate for over 30 years. Our work shows that it is primarily driven by the Russell–McPherron effect, which indicates that reconnection is responsible not only for the short-scale but also the seasonal variability of the electron belt as well. Moreover, it is more pronounced during the descending phase of the solar cycles and coexists with periods of fast solar wind speed.
Angélica Sicard, Daniel Boscher, Sébastien Bourdarie, Didier Lazaro, Denis Standarovski, and Robert Ecoffet
Ann. Geophys., 36, 953–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
GREEN (Global Radiation Earth ENvironment) is a new model providing particle fluxes at any location in the radiation belts, for energy between 1 keV
and 10 MeV for electrons and between 1 keV and 800 MeV for protons. This model is composed of global models (AE8 and AP8, and SPM) and
local models (SLOT model, OZONE and IGE-2006 for electrons; OPAL and IGP for protons).
Constantinos Papadimitriou, Georgios Balasis, Ioannis A. Daglis, and Omiros Giannakis
Ann. Geophys., 36, 287–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-287-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-287-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Swarm is the fourth Earth Explorer mission of the European Space Agency (ESA), launched on 23 November 2013. The mission provides an opportunity for better knowledge of the near-Earth electromagnetic environment. This study presents an initial attempt to derive an ultra low-frequency (ULF) wave index from low-Earth orbit satellite data. The technique can be potentially used to define a new product from the mission, the Swarm ULF wave index, which would be suitable for space weather applications.
C. Tsironis, A. Anastasiadis, C. Katsavrias, and I. A. Daglis
Ann. Geophys., 34, 171–185, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-171-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-171-2016, 2016
M. Georgiou, I. A. Daglis, E. Zesta, G. Balasis, I. R. Mann, C. Katsavrias, and K. Tsinganos
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1431–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1431-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1431-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Our study demonstrates a remarkable association between the earthward penetration of ULF waves and radiation belt electron enhancements during four magnetic storms that occurred in 2001. In the past, ULF waves had been observed at unusual depths during rare superstorms. But ULF wave activity, reaching magnetic shells as low as 2, was also observed during relatively intense storms when it played a key role in diffusing electrons radially inward and thereby accelerating them to higher energies.
N. Y. Ganushkina, M. W. Liemohn, S. Dubyagin, I. A. Daglis, I. Dandouras, D. L. De Zeeuw, Y. Ebihara, R. Ilie, R. Katus, M. Kubyshkina, S. E. Milan, S. Ohtani, N. Ostgaard, J. P. Reistad, P. Tenfjord, F. Toffoletto, S. Zaharia, and O. Amariutei
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1369–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A number of current systems exist in the Earth's magnetosphere. It is very difficult to identify local measurements as belonging to a specific current system. Therefore, there are different definitions of supposedly the same current, leading to unnecessary controversy. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques.
G. Balasis, I. A. Daglis, I. R. Mann, C. Papadimitriou, E. Zesta, M. Georgiou, R. Haagmans, and K. Tsinganos
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1237–1252, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1237-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1237-2015, 2015
C. Katsavrias, I. A. Daglis, W. Li, S. Dimitrakoudis, M. Georgiou, D. L. Turner, and C. Papadimitriou
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1173–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1173-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1173-2015, 2015
H. Breuillard, O. Agapitov, A. Artemyev, E. A. Kronberg, S. E. Haaland, P. W. Daly, V. V. Krasnoselskikh, D. Boscher, S. Bourdarie, Y. Zaliznyak, and G. Rolland
Ann. Geophys., 33, 583–597, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-583-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-583-2015, 2015
T. M. Giannaros, D. Melas, I. A. Daglis, and I. Keramitsoglou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 347–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-347-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-347-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Radiation belts
Comparison of radiation belt electron fluxes simultaneously measured with PROBA-V/EPT and RBSP/MagEIS instruments
The “SafeSpace” database of ULF power spectral density and radial diffusion coefficients: dependencies and application to simulations
Quantifying the non-linear dependence of energetic electron fluxes in the Earth's radiation belts with radial diffusion drivers
On the semi-annual variation of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt
Seasonal dependence of the Earth's radiation belt – new insights
Distribution of Earth's radiation belts' protons over the drift frequency of particles
Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
Outer radiation belt and inner magnetospheric response to sheath regions of coronal mass ejections: a statistical analysis
Energetic electron enhancements under the radiation belt (L < 1.2) during a non-storm interval on 1 August 2008
GREEN: the new Global Radiation Earth ENvironment model (beta version)
Van Allen Probes observation of plasmaspheric hiss modulated by injected energetic electrons
Alexandre Winant, Viviane Pierrard, and Edith Botek
Ann. Geophys., 41, 313–325, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-313-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-313-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we analyzed and compared measurements of electron fluxes in the radiation belts from two instruments with different orbits. In the outer belt, where the altitude difference is the largest between the two instruments, we find that the observations are in good agreement, except during geomagnetic storms, during which fluxes at low altitudes are much lower than at high altitudes. In general, both at low and high altitudes, the correlation between the instruments was found to be good.
Christos Katsavrias, Afroditi Nasi, Ioannis A. Daglis, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Nourallah Dahmen, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Marina Georgiou, Antoine Brunet, and Sebastien Bourdarie
Ann. Geophys., 40, 379–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The radial diffusion mechanism is of utmost importance to both the acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt and, consequently, for physics-based models, which provide nowcasting and forecasting of the electron population. In the framework of the "SafeSpace" project, we have created a database of calculated radial diffusion coefficients, and, furthermore, we have exploited it to provide insights for future modelling efforts.
Adnane Osmane, Mikko Savola, Emilia Kilpua, Hannu Koskinen, Joseph E. Borovsky, and Milla Kalliokoski
Ann. Geophys., 40, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It has long been known that particles get accelerated close to the speed of light in the near-Earth space environment. Research in the last decades has also clarified what processes and waves are responsible for the acceleration of particles. However, it is difficult to quantify the scale of the impact of various processes competing with one another. In this study we present a methodology to quantify the impact waves can have on energetic particles.
Christos Katsavrias, Constantinos Papadimitriou, Sigiava Aminalragia-Giamini, Ioannis A. Daglis, Ingmar Sandberg, and Piers Jiggens
Ann. Geophys., 39, 413–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The nature of the semi-annual variation in the relativistic electron fluxes in the Earth's outer radiation belt has been a debate for over 30 years. Our work shows that it is primarily driven by the Russell–McPherron effect, which indicates that reconnection is responsible not only for the short-scale but also the seasonal variability of the electron belt as well. Moreover, it is more pronounced during the descending phase of the solar cycles and coexists with periods of fast solar wind speed.
Rajkumar Hajra
Ann. Geophys., 39, 181–187, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-181-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-181-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Geomagnetic activity is known to exhibit semi-annual variation with larger occurrences during equinoxes. A similar seasonal feature was reported for relativistic (∼ MeV) electrons throughout the entire outer zone radiation belt. Present work, for the first time reveals that electron fluxes increase with an ∼ 6-month periodicity in a limited L-shell only with large dependence in solar activity cycle. In addition, flux enhancements are not essentially equinoctial.
Alexander S. Kovtyukh
Ann. Geophys., 39, 171–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-171-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-171-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This is a continuation of work published in Annales Gephysicae between 2016 and 2020. In this paper, a new method for analyzing experimental data is proposed, calculations are carried out, and a new class of distributions of particles of radiation belts is constructed. As a result of this work, new, finer physical regularities of the structure of the Earth's proton radiation belt and its solar-cyclic variations have been obtained, which cannot be obtained by other methods.
Harriet George, Emilia Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Timo Asikainen, Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Craig J. Rodger, Stepan Dubyagin, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 931–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-931-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compared trapped outer radiation belt electron fluxes to high-latitude precipitating electron fluxes during two interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) with opposite magnetic cloud rotation. The electron response had many similarities and differences between the two events, indicating that different acceleration mechanisms acted. Van Allen Probe data were used for trapped electron flux measurements, and Polar Operational Environmental Satellites were used for precipitating flux data.
Milla M. H. Kalliokoski, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Adnane Osmane, Drew L. Turner, Allison N. Jaynes, Lucile Turc, Harriet George, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 683–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-683-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive statistical study of the response of the Earth's space environment in sheath regions prior to interplanetary coronal mass ejections. The inner magnetospheric wave activity is enhanced in sheath regions, and the sheaths cause significant changes to the outer radiation belt electron fluxes over short timescales. We also show that non-geoeffective sheaths can result in a significant response.
Alla V. Suvorova, Alexei V. Dmitriev, and Vladimir A. Parkhomov
Ann. Geophys., 37, 1223–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1223-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1223-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's radiation belts control the space environment, often affecting the GPS signal propagation and satellite operations. Intense fluxes of energetic particles can penetrate even below the inner belt near the Equator. We analysed electron penetrations under geomagnetic quiet conditions and found in the solar wind an external driver cause. Satellite observations prove that disturbance of the inner belt was associated with impact of plasma jets formed in the solar wind nearby the Earth.
Angélica Sicard, Daniel Boscher, Sébastien Bourdarie, Didier Lazaro, Denis Standarovski, and Robert Ecoffet
Ann. Geophys., 36, 953–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
GREEN (Global Radiation Earth ENvironment) is a new model providing particle fluxes at any location in the radiation belts, for energy between 1 keV
and 10 MeV for electrons and between 1 keV and 800 MeV for protons. This model is composed of global models (AE8 and AP8, and SPM) and
local models (SLOT model, OZONE and IGE-2006 for electrons; OPAL and IGP for protons).
Run Shi, Wen Li, Qianli Ma, Seth G. Claudepierre, Craig A. Kletzing, William S. Kurth, George B. Hospodarsky, Harlan E. Spence, Geoff D. Reeves, Joseph F. Fennell, J. Bernard Blake, Scott A. Thaller, and John R. Wygant
Ann. Geophys., 36, 781–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-781-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-781-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Aminalragia-Giamini, S., Katsavrias, C., Papadimitriou, C., Daglis, I., Nasi,
A., Brunet, A., Bourdarie, S., Dahmen, N., and Balasis, G.: The EMERALD model
for the estimation of the radial diffusion coefficients in the outer Van
Allen belt, Space Weather, 21, e2022SW003283 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003283,, 2022. a
Benton, E. R. and Benton, E.: Space radiation dosimetry in low-Earth orbit and
beyond, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam
Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 184, 255–294, 2001. a
Bernoux, G. and Maget, V.: Characterizing Extreme Geomagnetic Storms Using
Extreme Value Analysis: A Discussion on the Representativeness of Short Data
Sets, Space Weather, 18, e2020SW002450,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002450, 2020. a, b
Bernoux, G., Brunet, A., Buchlin, É., Janvier, M., and Sicard, A.: An
operational approach to forecast the Earth’s radiation belts dynamics,
J. Space Weather Spac., 11, 60, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021045, 2021. a
Beutier, T. and Boscher, D.: A three-dimensional analysis of the electron
radiation belt by the Salammbô code, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 100, 14853–14861, 1995. a
Botek, E., Pierrard, V., and Darrouzet, F.: Assessment of the Earth’s cold
plasmatrough modeling by using Van Allen Probes/EMFISIS and Arase/PWE
electron density data, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 126,
e2021JA029737, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029737, 2021. a
Bothmer, V. and Daglis, I. A.: Space weather: physics and effects, Springer
Science & Business Media, ISBN 10 3-540-23907-3, 2007. a
Bourdarie, S. A. and Maget, V. F.: Electron radiation belt data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter relying on the Salammbô code, Ann. Geophys., 30, 929–943, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-929-2012, 2012. a
Brunet, A., Dahmen, N., Katsavrias, C., Santolík, O., Bernoux, G., Pierrard,
V., Botek, E., Darrouzet, F., Nasi, A., Aminalragia-Giamini, S.,
Papadimitriou, C., Bourdarie, S., and Daglis, I. A.: Improving the electron
radiation belt nowcast and forecast using the SafeSpace data assimilation
modelling pipeline, Space Weather, accepted, 2023. a, b
Caron, P., Inguimbert, C., Artola, L., Chatry, N., Sukhaseum, N., Ecoffet, R.,
and Bezerra, F.: Physical mechanisms inducing electron single-event upset,
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 65, 1759–1767, 2018. a
Carver, M. R., Sullivan, J. P., Morley, S. K., and Rodriguez, J. V.: Cross
calibration of the GPS constellation CXD proton data with GOES EPS, Space
Weather, 16, 273–288, 2018 (data available at: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/satellite-data/satellite-systems/gps/data/ns54, last access: 2 August 2023). a, b, c
Chakraborty, S. and Morley, S. K.: Probabilistic prediction of geomagnetic
storms and the Kp index, J. Space Weather Spac., 10, 36, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020037,
2020. a
Claudepierre, S. G., O'Brien, T. P., Fennell, J., Blake, J., Clemmons, J.,
Looper, M., Mazur, J., Roeder, J., Turner, D. L., Reeves, G. D., and Spence, H. E.: The
hidden dynamics of relativistic electrons (0.7–1.5 MeV) in the inner zone
and slot region, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 122,
3127–3144, 2017. a
Dahmen, N., Rogier, F., and Maget, V.: On the modelling of highly anisotropic
diffusion for electron radiation belt dynamic codes,
Comput. Phys. Commun., 254, 107342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107342, 2020. a
Dahmen, N., Sicard, A., Brunet, A., Santolik, O., Pierrard, V., Botek, E.,
Darrouzet, F., and Katsavrias, C.: FARWEST: Efficient Computation of
Wave-Particle Interactions for a Dynamic Description of the Electron
Radiation Belt Diffusion, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys.,
127, e2022JA030518, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030518, 2022. a
Davis, G. K.: History of the NOAA satellite program, J. Appl. Remote
Sens., 1, 012504, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2642347, 2007. a
Dever, J., Banks, B., de Groh, K., and Miller, S.: Degradation of spacecraft
materials, in: Handbook of environmental degradation of materials, Elsevier, pp.
465–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-081551500-5.50025-2, 2005. a
Devezas, T., de Melo, F. C. L., Gregori, M. L., Salgado, M. C. V., Ribeiro,
J. R., and Devezas, C. B.: The struggle for space: past and future of the
space race, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 79, 963–985, 2012. a
Doornbos, E. and Klinkrad, H.: Modelling of space weather effects on satellite
drag, Adv. Space Res., 37, 1229–1239, 2006. a
Durante, M.: Radiation protection in space, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, 25,
1–70, 2002. a
Durante, M. and Cucinotta, F. A.: Physical basis of radiation protection in
space travel, Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 1245, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1245, 2011. a
Evans, D. S.: Polar orbiting environmental satellite space environment
monitor-2: instrument description and archive data, NOAA technical memorandum OAR SEC, 93, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/19636/noaa_19636_DS1.pdf (last access: 2 August 2023), 2000. a
Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical
implementation, Ocean Dynam., 53, 343–367, 2003. a
Fok, M.-C.: Current status of inner magnetosphere and radiation belt modeling,
Dayside Magnetosphere Interactions, Chap. 13, 231–242, ISBN 9781119509592, 2020. a
Garrett, H. B. and Whittlesey, A. C.: Spacecraft charging, an update,
IEEE T. Plasma Sci., 28, 2017–2028, 2000. a
George, K. W.: The economic impacts of the commercial space industry, Space
Policy, 47, 181–186, 2019. a
Gruet, M. A., Chandorkar, M., Sicard, A., and Camporeale, E.:
Multiple-hour-ahead forecast of the Dst index using a combination of long
short-term memory neural network and Gaussian process, Space Weather, 16,
1882–1896, 2018. a
Herrera, D., Maget, V., and Sicard-Piet, A.: Characterizing magnetopause
shadowing effects in the outer electron radiation belt during geomagnetic
storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 121, 9517–9530,
2016. a
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory,
Neural Computation,
9, 1735–1780, 1997. a
Katsavrias, C., Aminalragia-Giamini, S., Papadimitriou, C., Sandberg, I.,
Jiggens, P., Daglis, I. A., and Evans, H.: On the interplanetary parameter
schemes which drive the variability of the source/seed electron population at
GEO, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 126, e2020JA028939, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028939,
2021. a
Kieokaew, R., Pinto, R. F., Lavraud, B., Brunet, A., Bernoux, G., Samara, E.,
Poedts, S., Génot, V., Rouillard, A., Bourdarie, S., Grison, B.,
Souček, J., and
Daglis, I.: Modeling the
propagation of solar disturbances to Earth for the EU H2020 SafeSpace
project, Authorea Preprints [preprint], 2022. a
Kieokaew, R., Pinto, R., Samara, E., Tao, C., Indurain, M., Lavraud, B.,
Brunet, A., Génot, V., Rouillard, A., André, N., Bourdarie, S., Katsavrias, C., Darrouzet, F., Grison, B., and Daglis, I.:
Physics-based model of solar wind stream interaction regions: Interfacing
between Multi-VP and 1D MHD for operational forecasting at L1, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.09221, 2023. a
Kodheli, O., Lagunas, E., Maturo, N., Sharma, S. K., Shankar, B., Montoya, J.
F. M., Duncan, J. C. M., Spano, D., Chatzinotas, S., Kisseleff, S., Querol, J., Lei, L., Vu, T. X., and Goussetis, G.:
Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future
challenges, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23, 70–109, 2020. a
Koons, H., Mazur, J., Selesnick, R., Blake, J., and Fennell, J.: The impact of
the space environment on space systems, Tech. rep., AEROSPACE CORP EL SEGUNDO
CA EL SEGUNDO TECHNICAL OPERATIONS, 1999. a
Lyon, J. G.: The solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere system, Science, 288,
1987–1991, 2000. a
Mann, I., Di Pippo, S., Opgenoorth, H. J., Kuznetsova, M., and Kendall, D.:
International collaboration within the United Nations Committee on the
Peaceful Uses of Outer Space: Framework for international space weather
services (2018–2030), Space Weather, 16, 428–433, 2018. a
Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Yamazaki, Y., Bronkalla, O., and Morschhauser, A.: The
Geomagnetic Kp Index and Derived Indices of Geomagnetic Activity,
Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002641, 2021. a
McCormack, P. D.: Radiation hazards in low earth orbit, polar orbit,
geosynchronous orbit, and deep space, in: Terrestrial Space Radiation and Its
Biological Effects, Springer, pp. 71–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1567-4_6, 1988. a
Meredith, N. P., Horne, R. B., Isles, J. D., and Rodriguez, J. V.: Extreme
relativistic electron fluxes at geosynchronous orbit: Analysis of GOES E>2
MeV electrons, Space Weather, 13, 170–184,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001143, 2015. a
Moldwin, M.: An introduction to space weather, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866538,
2022. a
Mursula, K., Usoskin, I. G., and Maris, G.: Introduction to space climate,
Adv. Space Res., 40, 885–887, 2007. a
Onsager, T., Grubb, R., Kunches, J., Matheson, L., Speich, D., Zwickl, R. W.,
and Sauer, H.: Operational uses of the GOES energetic particle detectors, in:
GOES-8 and Beyond, vol. 2812, pp. 281–290, SPIE, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.254075, 1996. a, b
Petersen, E.: Single event effects in aerospace, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. a
Pierrard, V., Botek, E., and Darrouzet, F.: Improving predictions of the 3D
dynamic model of the plasmasphere, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences,
8, 681401, https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2021.681401, 2021a. a
Pierrard, V., Ripoll, J.-F., Cunningham, G., Botek, E., Santolik, O., Thaller,
S., Kurth, W. S., and Cosmides, M.: Observations and simulations of dropout
events and flux decays in October 2013: Comparing MEO equatorial with LEO
polar orbit, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys., 126,
e2020JA028850, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028850, 2021b. a
Richardson, I. and Cane, H.: Geoeffectiveness (Dst and Kp) of interplanetary
coronal mass ejections during 1995–2009 and implications for storm
forecasting, Space Weather, 9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011SW000670, 2011. a
Ripoll, J.-F., Claudepierre, S., Ukhorskiy, A., Colpitts, C., Li, X., Fennell,
J., and Crabtree, C.: Particle dynamics in the Earth's radiation belts:
Review of current research and open questions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space Phys., 125, e2019JA026735, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026735, 2020. a, b
Ripoll, J.-F., Pierrard, V., Cunningham, G., Chu, X., Sorathia, K., Hartley,
D., Thaller, S. A., Merkin, V., Delzanno, G. L., De Pascuale, S., and Ukhorskiy, A. Y.:
Modeling of the cold electron plasma density for radiation belt physics, Front. Astron. Space Sci., 10, 1096595, https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1096595,
2023. a
Rockville, M.: Customer Needs and Requirements for Space Weather Products and
Services, report
for Abt Associates Inc., Rockville, MD, NOAA Office for Coastal Management, 2019. a
Roederer, J. G.: Dynamics of geomagnetically trapped radiation, vol. 2,
Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49300-3, 2012. a
Roston, R.: The space radiation environment at synchronous altitude and its
effects on communication satellites, in: 3rd Communications Satellite Systems
Conference, 481 pp., https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1970-481, 1970. a
Russell, C. and Thorne, R.: STRUCTURE OF THE INNER MAGNETOSPHERE, Tech. rep.,
Univ. of California, Los Angeles, NSA-24-032754, 1970. a
Samara, E., Pinto, R. F., Magdalenić, J., Wijsen, N., Jerčić, V.,
Scolini, C., Jebaraj, I. C., Rodriguez, L., and Poedts, S.: Implementing the
MULTI-VP coronal model in EUHFORIA: Test case results and comparisons with
the WSA coronal model, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 648, A35, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039325, 2021. a
Samara, E., Laperre, B., Kieokaew, R., Temmer, M., Verbeke, C., Rodriguez, L.,
Magdalenić, J., and Poedts, S.: Dynamic Time Warping as a Means of
Assessing Solar Wind Time Series, Astrophys. J., 927, 187, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4af6, 2022. a
Sandberg, I., Aminalragia-Giamini, S., Provatas, G., Hands, A., Ryden, K.,
Heynderickx, D., Tsigkanos, A., Papadimitriou, C., Nagatsuma, T., Evans, H.,
and Rodgers, D.: Data exploitation of new Galileo environmental monitoring units, IEEE
T. Nucl. Sci., 66, 1761–1769, 2019. a
Sandberg, I., Papadimitriou, C., Katsavrias, C., Doulfis, S., Katsavrias, C., Nasi, A., and Daglis, I. A.: Space Safety Service page of the Horizon 2020 SafeSpace project, SafeSpace, http://www.safespace-service.eu/, last access: 31 July 2023. a
Santolík, O., Miyoshi, Y., Kolmašová, I., Matsuda, S.,
Hospodarsky, G., Hartley, D., Kasahara, Y., Kojima, H., Matsuoka, A.,
Shinohara, I., Kurth, W. S., and Kletzing, C. A.: Inter-Calibrated Measurements of Intense Whistlers by
Arase and Van Allen Probes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space Phys.,
126, e2021JA029700, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029700, 2021. a
Satellite Industry Association: Satellite Industry Association website,
https://sia.org/, last access: 6 December 2022.
a
Sicard, A., Boscher, D., Bourdarie, S., Lazaro, D., Standarovski, D., and Ecoffet, R.: GREEN: the new Global Radiation Earth ENvironment model (beta version), Ann. Geophys., 36, 953–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-953-2018, 2018. a
Tsyganenko, N. A.: Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere: a review, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1745–1772, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013, 2013. a
Vette, J. I.: The AE-8 trapped electron model environment, vol. 91, National
Space Science Data Center (NSSDC), World Data Center A for Rockets, 1991. a
Zheng, Y., Ganushkina, N. Y., Jiggens, P., Jun, I., Meier, M., Minow, J. I.,
O'Brien, T. P., Pitchford, D., Shprits, Y., Tobiska, W. K., Xapsos MA, Guild, T. B., Mazur, J. E., and Kuznetsova, M. M.: Space
radiation and plasma effects on satellites and aviation: Quantities and
metrics for tracking performance of space weather environment models, Space
Weather, 17, 1384–1403, 2019. a
Short summary
Earth’s space environment is populated with charged particles. The energetic ones are trapped around Earth in radiation belts. Orbiting spacecraft that cross their region can accumulate charges on their internal surfaces, leading to hazardous electrostatic discharges. This paper showcases the SafeSpace safety prototype, which aims to warn satellite operators of probable incoming hazardous events by simulating the dynamics of the electron radiation belts from their origin at the Sun.
Earth’s space environment is populated with charged particles. The energetic ones are trapped...
