Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae
ANGEO
Articles | Volume 37, issue 6
Articles | Volume 37, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1095-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1095-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 37, issue 6
Regular paper
 | 
10 Dec 2019
Regular paper |  | 10 Dec 2019

Comparing high-latitude thermospheric winds from Fabry–Perot interferometer (FPI) and challenging mini-satellite payload (CHAMP) accelerometer measurements

Anasuya Aruliah, Matthias Förster, Rosie Hood, Ian McWhirter, and Eelco Doornbos

Viewed

Total article views: 2,969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,936 966 67 2,969 107 140
  • HTML: 1,936
  • PDF: 966
  • XML: 67
  • Total: 2,969
  • BibTeX: 107
  • EndNote: 140
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,678 with geography defined and 291 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Winds near the top of the atmosphere are expected to be the same at all heights for a given location by assuming high viscosity in rarefied gases. However, wind measurements from satellite drag at 350–400 km altitude were found to be up to 2 times larger than optical measurements at ∼240 km. Satellites provide global measurements, and ground-based FPIs provide long-term monitoring at single sites. So we must understand this inconsistency to model and predict atmospheric behaviour correctly.
Read more
Share