Articles | Volume 39, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-533-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-533-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A comparison of contact charging and impact ionization in low-velocity impacts: implications for dust detection in space
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT – Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Ingrid Mann
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT – Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Jakub Vaverka
Department of Surface and Plasma Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics,
Charles University, Prague, 180 00, Czech Republic
Libor Nouzak
Department of Surface and Plasma Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics,
Charles University, Prague, 180 00, Czech Republic
Åshild Fredriksen
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT – Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Related authors
Ingrid Mann, Libor Nouzák, Jakub Vaverka, Tarjei Antonsen, Åshild Fredriksen, Karine Issautier, David Malaspina, Nicole Meyer-Vernet, Jiří Pavlů, Zoltan Sternovsky, Joan Stude, Shengyi Ye, and Arnaud Zaslavsky
Ann. Geophys., 37, 1121–1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1121-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1121-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a review of dust measurements from spacecraft Cassini, STEREO, MMS, Cluster, Maven and WIND. We also consider the details of dust impacts and charge generation, and how different antenna signals can be generated. We compare observational data to laboratory experiments and simulations and discuss the consequences for dust observation with the new NASA Parker Solar Probe and ESA Solar Orbiter spacecraft.
Tarjei Antonsen, Ove Havnes, and Andres Spicher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2139–2153, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2139-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2139-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents measurements of changes in mesospheric aerosol populations on different length scales, as detected by the DUSTY and MUDD probes on the MAXIDUSTY-1B rocket on 8 July 2016. Identical probes recorded very different currents, which we attribute to adverse flow effects. We find a general anti-correlation for charged aerosols and electrons, but not consistently on all length scales. We conclude that there is no simple relationship between aerosols and PMSE (radar echoes).
Ove Havnes, Tarjei Antonsen, Gerd Baumgarten, Thomas W. Hartquist, Alexander Biebricher, Åshild Fredriksen, Martin Friedrich, and Jonas Hedin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1673–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1673-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method of analyzing data from rocket-borne aerosol detectors of the Faraday cup type (DUSTY). By using models for how aerosols are charged in the mesosphere and how they interact in a collision with the probes, fundamental parameters like aerosol radius, charge, and number density can be derived. The resolution can be down to ~ 10 cm, which is much lower than other available methods. The theory is furthermore used to analyze DUSTY data from the 2016 rocket campaign MAXIDUSTY.
Dorota Jozwicki, Puneet Sharma, Devin Huyghebaert, and Ingrid Mann
Ann. Geophys., 42, 431–453, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-431-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-431-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the relationship between polar mesospheric summer echo (PMSE) layers and the solar cycle. Our results indicate that the average altitude of PMSEs, the echo power in the PMSEs and the thickness of the layers are, on average, higher during the solar maximum than during the solar minimum. We infer that higher electron densities at ionospheric altitudes might be necessary to observe multilayered PMSEs. We observe that the thickness decreases as the number of multilayers increases.
Adrien Pineau, Henriette Trollvik, Herman Greaker, Sveinung Olsen, Yngve Eilertsen, and Ingrid Mann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3843–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The mesosphere, part of the upper atmosphere, contains small solid dust particles, mostly made up of material from interplanetary space. We are preparing an experiment to collect such particles during a rocket flight. A new instrument has been designed and numerical simulations have been performed to investigate the airflow nearby as well as its dust collection efficiency. The collected dust particles will be further analyzed in the laboratory in order to study their chemical composition.
Tinna L. Gunnarsdottir, Ingrid Mann, Wuhu Feng, Devin R. Huyghebaert, Ingemar Haeggstroem, Yasunobu Ogawa, Norihito Saito, Satonori Nozawa, and Takuya D. Kawahara
Ann. Geophys., 42, 213–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-213-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-213-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Several tons of meteoric particles burn up in our atmosphere each day. This deposits a great deal of material that binds with other atmospheric particles and forms so-called meteoric smoke particles. These particles are assumed to influence radar measurements. Here, we have compared radar measurements with simulations of a radar spectrum with and without dust particles and found that dust influences the radar spectrum in the altitude range of 75–85 km.
Samuel Kočiščák, Andreas Kvammen, Ingrid Mann, Nicole Meyer-Vernet, David Píša, Jan Souček, Audun Theodorsen, Jakub Vaverka, and Arnaud Zaslavsky
Ann. Geophys., 42, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In situ observations are crucial for understanding interplanetary dust, yet not every spacecraft has a dedicated dust detector. Dust encounters happen at great speeds, leading to high energy density at impact, which leads to ionization and charge release, which is detected with electrical antennas. Our work looks at how the transient charge plume interacts with Solar Orbiter spacecraft. Our findings are relevant for the design of future experiments and the understanding of present data.
Florian Günzkofer, Dimitry Pokhotelov, Gunter Stober, Ingrid Mann, Sharon L. Vadas, Erich Becker, Anders Tjulin, Alexander Kozlovsky, Masaki Tsutsumi, Njål Gulbrandsen, Satonori Nozawa, Mark Lester, Evgenia Belova, Johan Kero, Nicholas J. Mitchell, and Claudia Borries
Ann. Geophys., 41, 409–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gravity waves (GWs) are waves in Earth's atmosphere and can be observed as cloud ripples. Under certain conditions, these waves can propagate up into the ionosphere. Here, they can cause ripples in the ionosphere plasma, observable as oscillations of the plasma density. Therefore, GWs contribute to the ionospheric variability, making them relevant for space weather prediction. Additionally, the behavior of these waves allows us to draw conclusions about the atmosphere at these altitudes.
Tinna L. Gunnarsdottir, Arne Poggenpohl, Ingrid Mann, Alireza Mahmoudian, Peter Dalin, Ingemar Haeggstroem, and Michael Rietveld
Ann. Geophys., 41, 93–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-93-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-93-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Temperatures at 85 km around Earth's poles in summer can be so cold that small ice particles form. These can become charged, and, combined with turbulence at these altitudes, they can influence the many electrons present. This can cause large radar echoes called polar mesospheric summer echoes. We use radio waves to heat these echoes on and off when the sun is close to or below the horizon. This allows us to gain some insight into these ice particles and how the sun influences the echoes.
Andreas Kvammen, Kristoffer Wickstrøm, Samuel Kociscak, Jakub Vaverka, Libor Nouzak, Arnaud Zaslavsky, Kristina Rackovic Babic, Amalie Gjelsvik, David Pisa, Jan Soucek, and Ingrid Mann
Ann. Geophys., 41, 69–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-69-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-69-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Collisional fragmentation of asteroids, comets and meteoroids is the main source of dust in the solar system. The dust distribution is however uncharted and the role of dust in the solar system is largely unknown. At present, the interplanetary medium is explored by the Solar Orbiter spacecraft. We present a novel method, based on artificial intelligence, that can be used for detecting dust impacts in Solar Orbiter observations with high accuracy, advancing the study of dust in the solar system.
Kyoko K. Tanaka, Ingrid Mann, and Yuki Kimura
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5639–5650, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5639-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5639-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We have investigated the nucleation process of noctilucent clouds observed in the mesosphere using a theoretical approach, where we adopt a more accurate model called the semi-phenomenological model for the nucleation process. We obtained an important result that rejects one of the two dominant nucleation mechanisms that have been proposed. Our results show it is extremely difficult for homogeneous nucleation of water to occur in the mesosphere, while heterogeneous nucleation occurs effectively.
Margaretha Myrvang, Carsten Baumann, and Ingrid Mann
Ann. Geophys., 39, 1055–1068, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1055-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-1055-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our model calculations indicate that meteoric smoke particles (MSPs) influence both the magnitude and shape of the electron temperature during artificial heating. Others have found that current theoretical models most likely overestimate heating in the D-region compared to observations. In a future study, we will compare our results to observations of the electron temperature during heating to investigate if the presence of MSPs can explain the discrepancy between model and observations.
Joshua Baptiste, Connor Williamson, John Fox, Anthony J. Stace, Muhammad Hassan, Stefanie Braun, Benjamin Stamm, Ingrid Mann, and Elena Besley
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8735–8745, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8735-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8735-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Agglomeration of ice and dust particles in the mesosphere are studied, using classical electrostatic approaches which are extended to capture the induced polarisation of surface charge. The instances of strong attraction between particles of the same sign of charge are predicted, which take place at small separation distances and also lead to the formation of stable aggregates.
Viswanathan Lakshmi Narayanan, Satonori Nozawa, Shin-Ichiro Oyama, Ingrid Mann, Kazuo Shiokawa, Yuichi Otsuka, Norihito Saito, Satoshi Wada, Takuya D. Kawahara, and Toru Takahashi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2343–2361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the past, additional sodium peaks occurring above the main sodium layer of the upper mesosphere were discussed. Here, formation of an additional sodium peak below the main sodium layer peak is discussed in detail. The event coincided with passage of multiple mesospheric bores, which are step-like disturbances occurring in the upper mesosphere. Hence, this work highlights the importance of such mesospheric bores in causing significant changes to the minor species concentration in a short time.
Carsten Baumann, Margaretha Myrvang, and Ingrid Mann
Ann. Geophys., 38, 919–930, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-919-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-919-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Dust grains exist throughout our solar system. This dust is subject to destruction processes like sublimation and sputtering. Sputtering is the erosion of dust through the impact solar wind and can be very effective near the Sun. We performed calculations to find out how important the sputtering process is compared to the sublimation of dust. Recently launched spacecraft will probe the proximity of the Sun and measure the dust population. Our work will help to understand these measurements.
Henriette Trollvik, Ingrid Mann, Sveinung Olsen, and Yngve Eilertsen
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-278, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-278, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We discuss the design of a rocket instrument to collect mesospheric dust consisting of ice with embedded non-volatile meteoric smoke particles. The instrument consists of a collection device and an attached conic funnel. We consider the dust trajectories in the airflow and fragmentation at the funnel. For summer atmospheric conditions at 85 km and assuming that the ice components vaporize we estimate that up to 1014 to 1015 amu of non-volatile dust material can be collected.
Ingrid Mann, Libor Nouzák, Jakub Vaverka, Tarjei Antonsen, Åshild Fredriksen, Karine Issautier, David Malaspina, Nicole Meyer-Vernet, Jiří Pavlů, Zoltan Sternovsky, Joan Stude, Shengyi Ye, and Arnaud Zaslavsky
Ann. Geophys., 37, 1121–1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1121-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1121-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a review of dust measurements from spacecraft Cassini, STEREO, MMS, Cluster, Maven and WIND. We also consider the details of dust impacts and charge generation, and how different antenna signals can be generated. We compare observational data to laboratory experiments and simulations and discuss the consequences for dust observation with the new NASA Parker Solar Probe and ESA Solar Orbiter spacecraft.
Tarjei Antonsen, Ove Havnes, and Andres Spicher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2139–2153, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2139-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2139-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents measurements of changes in mesospheric aerosol populations on different length scales, as detected by the DUSTY and MUDD probes on the MAXIDUSTY-1B rocket on 8 July 2016. Identical probes recorded very different currents, which we attribute to adverse flow effects. We find a general anti-correlation for charged aerosols and electrons, but not consistently on all length scales. We conclude that there is no simple relationship between aerosols and PMSE (radar echoes).
Ove Havnes, Tarjei Antonsen, Gerd Baumgarten, Thomas W. Hartquist, Alexander Biebricher, Åshild Fredriksen, Martin Friedrich, and Jonas Hedin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1673–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1673-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1673-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method of analyzing data from rocket-borne aerosol detectors of the Faraday cup type (DUSTY). By using models for how aerosols are charged in the mesosphere and how they interact in a collision with the probes, fundamental parameters like aerosol radius, charge, and number density can be derived. The resolution can be down to ~ 10 cm, which is much lower than other available methods. The theory is furthermore used to analyze DUSTY data from the 2016 rocket campaign MAXIDUSTY.
H. Gunell, L. Andersson, J. De Keyser, and I. Mann
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1331–1342, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1331-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1331-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In a simulation study of the downward current region of the aurora, i.e. where electrons are accelerated upward, double layers are seen to form at low altitude and move upward until they are disrupted at altitudes of ten thousand kilometres or thereabouts. When one double layer is disrupted a new one forms below, and the process repeats itself. The repeated demise and reformation allows ions to flow upward without passing through the double layers that otherwise would have kept them down.
H. Gunell, L. Andersson, J. De Keyser, and I. Mann
Ann. Geophys., 33, 279–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-279-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-279-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we simulate the plasma on a magnetic field line above the aurora. Initially, about half of the acceleration voltage is concentrated in a thin double layer at a few thousand km altitude. When the voltage is lowered, electrons trapped between the double layer and the magnetic mirror are released. In the process we see formation of electron beams and phase space holes. A temporary reversal of the polarity of the double layer is also seen as well as hysteresis effects in its position.
H. Gunell, J. De Keyser, E. Gamby, and I. Mann
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1227–1240, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1227-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1227-2013, 2013
I. Mann and M. Hamrin
Ann. Geophys., 31, 39–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-39-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-39-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Adams, N. and Smith, D.: Studies of microparticle impact phenomena leading to
the development of a highly sensitive micrometeoroid detector, Planet.
Space Sci., 19, 195–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(71)90199-1, 1971. a
Antonsen, T. and Havnes, O.: On the detection of mesospheric meteoric smoke
particles embedded in noctilucent cloud particles with rocket-borne dust
probes, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 86, 033305,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4914394, 2015. a, b
Antonsen, T., Havnes, O., and Mann, I.: Estimates of the Size Distribution of
Meteoric Smoke Particles From Rocket-Borne Impact Probes, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 12353–12365, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027220, 2017. a, b, c
Antonsen, T., Havnes, O., and Spicher, A.: Replication Data for: Multi-scale Measurements of Mesospheric Aerosols and Electrons During the MAXIDUSTY campaign, DataverseNO [Dataset], https://doi.org/10.18710/N8GF1U (last access: 11 June 2021), 2018. a
Auer, A. and Sitte, K.: Detection technique for micrometeoroids using impact
ionization, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 4, 178–183,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(68)90013-7, 1968. a
Auer, S.: Interplanetary dust, chap. 5, edited by: Grün, E., Gustafson,
B., Dermott, S., and Fechtig, H., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, chap. 5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56428-4, 2012. a, b
Auty, R. P. and Cole, R. H.: Dielectric Properties of Ice and Solid D2O,
J. Chem. Phys., 20, 1309–1314, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1700726, 1952. a
Collette, A., Grün, E., Malaspina, D., and Sternovsky, Z.: Micrometeoroid
impact charge yield for common spacecraft materials, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 119, 6019–6026, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020042, 2014. a, b, c
Copley, M. J. and Phipps, T. E.: The Surface Ionization of Potassium on
Tungsten, Phys. Rev., 48, 960–968, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.960, 1935. a
Cyr St, O. C., Kaiser, M. L., Meyer-Vernet, N., Howard, R. A., Harrison,
R. A., Bale, S. D., Thompson, W. T., Goetz, K., Maksimovic, M., Bougeret,
J. L., Wang, D., and Crothers, S.: STEREO SECCHI and S/WAVES Observations of
Spacecraft Debris Caused by Micron-Size Interplanetary Dust Impacts, Sol.
Phys., 256, 475–488, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9362-5, 2009. a
Dahneke, B.: The influence of flattening on the adhesion of particles, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 40, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(72)90168-3, 1972. a
Draine, B. T. and Sutin, B.: Collisional Charging of Interstellar Grains,
Astrophys. J., 320, 803–817, https://doi.org/10.1086/165596, 1987. a
Dresser, M. J.: The Saha‐Langmuir Equation and its Application, J.
Appl. Phys., 39, 338–339, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1655755, 1968. a
Evans, A.: The Dusty Universe, Series in astronomy, John Wiley & Sons, 53–56, 1994. a
Evans, B. and Goetze, C.: The temperature variation of hardness of olivine and
its implication for polycrystalline yield stress, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 84, 5505–5524, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB10p05505, 1979. a
Fedorov, A. V., Shul'gin, A. V., and Lavruk, S. A.: Investigation of the
physical properties of iron nanoparticles in the course of the melting and
solidification, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 118, 572–578,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X17040020, 2017. a
Froeschke, S., Kohler, S., Weber, A. P., and Kasper, G.: Impact fragmentation
of nanoparticle agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 275–287,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00185-4, 2003. a
Havnes, O. and Hartquist, T. W.: Nanodust shedding and its potential influence
on dust-related phenomena in the mesosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 12363–12376, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025037, 2016. a
Havnes, O. and Næsheim, L. I.: On the secondary charging effects and
structure of mesospheric dust particles impacting on rocket probes, Annal.
Geophys., 25, 623–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-623-2007, 2007. a
Havnes, O., Gumbel, J., Antonsen, T., Hedin, J., and Hoz, C. L.: On the size
distribution of collision fragments of NLC dust particles and their
relevance to meteoric smoke particles, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phys., 118, 190–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.03.008,
2014. a, b, c
Havnes, O., Latteck, R., Hartquist, T. W., and Antonsen, T.: First simultaneous
rocket and radar detections of rare low summer mesospheric clouds,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5727–5734, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078218,
2018. a
Havnes, O., Antonsen, T., Baumgarten, G., Hartquist, T. W., Biebricher, A.,
Fredriksen, Å., Friedrich, M., and Hedin, J.: A new method of inferring
the size, number density, and charge of mesospheric dust from its in situ
collection by the DUSTY probe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12,
1673–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1673-2019, 2019. a
Hervig, M. E., Deaver, L. E., Bardeen, C. G., III, J. M. R., Bailey, S. M., and
Gordley, L. L.: The content and composition of meteoric smoke in mesospheric
ice particles from SOFIE observations, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phys., 84-85, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.04.005,
2012. a
Hillier, J. K., Green, S. F., McBride, N. Altobelli, N., Postberg, F., Kempf, S., Schwanethal, J., Srama, R., McDonnell, J. A. M., and Grün, E.: Interplanetary dust detected by the Cassini CDA Chemical Analyser, Icarus, 190,
643–654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.03.024, 2007. a
John, W., Reischl, G., and Devor, W.: Charge transfer to metal surfaces from
bouncing aerosol particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 11, 115–138,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(80)90029-4, 1980. a, b, c
Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., and Hollenbach, D.: Grain Shattering in
Shocks: The Interstellar Grain Size Distribution, Astrophys. J.,
469, 740–764, https://doi.org/10.1086/177823, 1996. a, b
Kissel, J. and Krueger, F. R.: Ion formation by impact of fast dust particles
and comparison with related techniques, Appl. Phys. A, 42, 69–85,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00618161, 1987. a, b, c
Klinkrad, H.: The Current Space Debris Environment and its Sources, in: Space Debris, Springer Praxis Books, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 5–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7_2, 2006. a
Kuznetsov, N. and Raizer, Y. P.: Recombination of electrons in a plasma
expanding into a vacuum, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Ph.,
6, 6–12, 1965. a
MacDowell, L. G. and Vega, C.: Dielectric Constant of Ice Ih and Ice V: A
Computer Simulation Study, J. Phys. Chem. B, 114,
6089–6098, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp100167y, 2010. a
Mann, I., Nouzák, L., Vaverka, J., Antonsen, T., Fredriksen, Å.,
Issautier, K., Malaspina, D., Meyer-Vernet, N., Pavlů, J., Sternovsky,
Z., Stude, J., Ye, S., and Zaslavsky, A.: Dust observations with antenna
measurements and its prospects for observations with Parker Solar Probe and
Solar Orbiter, Ann. Geophys., 37, 1121–1140,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1121-2019, 2019. a, b
Matsusaka, S., Maruyama, H., Matsuyama, T., and Ghadiri, M.: Triboelectric
charging of powders: A review, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 5781–5807, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.005, 2010. a
McBride, N. and McDonnell, J.: Meteoroid impacts on spacecraft:: sporadics,
streams, and the 1999 Leonids, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 1005–1013,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00023-9, 1999. a
Mocker, A., Hornung, K., Grün, E., Kempf, S., Collette, A., Drake, K.,
Horányi, M., Munsat, T., O'Brien, L., Sternovsky, Z., and Srama, R.: On the
application of a linear time-of-flight mass spectrometer for the
investigation of hypervelocity impacts of micron and sub-micron sized dust
particles, Planet. Space Sci., 89, 47–57,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.07.013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f
Nimmo, F.: What is the Young's Modulus of Ice?, in: Workshop on Europa's Icy
Shell: Past, Present, and Future, edited by: Schenk, P., Nimmo, F., and
Prockter, L., p. 7005, 2004. a
Nunez-Valdez, M., Umemoto, K., and Wentzcovitch, R. M.: Fundamentals of
elasticity of (Mg1−xFex)2SiO4 olivine, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 37, L14308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044205, 2010. a
Omont, A.: Physics and chemistry of interstellar polycyclic aromatic
molecules, Astron. Astrophys., 164, 159–178,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4776-4_35, 1986. a
Page, B., Bale, S. D., Bonnell, J. W., Goetz, K., Goodrich, K., Harvey, P. R.,
Larsen, R., MacDowall, R. J., Malaspina, D. M., Pokorný, P., Pulupa,
M., and Szalay, J. R.: Examining Dust Directionality with the Parker Solar
Probe FIELDS Instrument, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 246,
51, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab5f6a, 2020. a
Pokorný, P. and Kuchner, M.: Co-orbital Asteroids as the Source of Venus'
Zodiacal Dust Ring, Astrophys. J., 873, L16,
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0827, 2019. a
Qi, W. and Wang, M.: Size effect on the cohesive energy of nanoparticle,
J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 21, 1743–1745,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020904317133, 2002. a
Raizer, Y. P.: Residual ionization of a gas expanding in vacuum, Sov. Phys.
JETP, 10, 411–416,
available at: http://jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_010_02_0411.pdf (last access: 12 June 2021, retrieved:
4 December 2019), 1960. a
Rapp, M., Plane, J. M. C., Strelnikov, B., Stober, G., Ernst, S., Hedin, J., Friedrich, M., and Hoppe, U.-P.: In situ observations of meteor smoke particles (MSP) during the Geminids 2010: constraints on MSP size, work function and composition, Ann. Geophys., 30, 1661–1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1661-2012, 2012. a
Ratcliff, P., Reber, M., Cole, M., Murphy, T., and Tsembelis, K.: Velocity
thresholds for impact plasma production, Adv. Space Res., 20, 1471–1476, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00419-5, 1997. a
Rennecke, S. and Weber, A. P.: Charge Transfer to Metal Nanoparticles Bouncing
from Conductive Surfaces, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 1059–1069,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.955566, 2014. a, b
Rizk, B., Hunten, D. M., and Engel, S.: Effects of size-dependent emissivity on
maximum temperatures during micrometeorite entry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 96, 1303–1314, https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA01998, 1991. a
Schildknecht, T.: Optical surveys for space debris, Astron.
Astrophys. Rev., 14, 41–111, 2007. a
Shibuta, Y. and Suzuki, T.: A molecular dynamics study of cooling rate during
solidification of metal nanoparticles, Chem. Phys. Lett., 502, 82–86,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.12.020, 2011. a
Soo, S. L.: Dynamics of Charged Suspensions, in: Topics in Current Aerosol
Research, edited by Hidy and Brock, Vol. 11, International Reviews in
aerosol physics, 61 pp.,
1971. a
Strelnikov, B., Staszak, T., Latteck, R., Renkwitz, T., Strelnikova, I., Lübken, F. J., and Fasoulas, S.: Sounding rocket project “PMWE” for investigation of polar mesosphere winter echoes, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 218, 105596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105596, 2021. a
Szalay, J. R., Pokorný, P., Bale, S. D., Christian, E. R., Goetz, K.,
Goodrich, K., Hill, M. E., Kuchner, M., Larsen, R., Malaspina, D., McComas,
D. J., Mitchell, D., Page, B., and Schwadron, N.: The Near-Sun Dust
Environment: Initial Observations from Parker Solar Probe, Astrophys.
J. Suppl. S., 246:27, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab50c1, 2020. a, b
Thomas, E., Simolka, J., DeLuca, M., Horányi, M., Janches, D., Marshall,
R. A., Munsat, T., Plane, J. M. C., and Sternovsky, Z.: Experimental setup
for the laboratory investigation of micrometeoroid ablation using a dust
accelerator, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 88, 034501,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977832, 2017. a
Tomsic, A., Andersson, P. U., Markovic, N., Piskorz, W., Svanberg, M., and
Pettersson, J. B. C.: Molecular dynamics simulations of cluster-surface
collisions: Emission of large fragments, J. Chem. Phys.,
115, 10509–10517, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1413740, 2001. a
Tomsic, A., Schröder, H., Kompa, K.-L., and Gebhardt, C. R.: Impact dynamics
of molecular clusters on surfaces: Fragmentation patterns and anisotropic
effects, J. Chem. Phys., 119, 6314–6323,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1603213, 2003.
a, b, c
Vourlidas, A., Howard, R. A., Plunkett, S. P., Korendyke, C. M., Thernisien,
A. F., Wang, D., Rich, N., Carter, M. T., Chua, D. H., Socker, D. G., Linton, M. G., Morrill, J. S., Lynch, S., Thurn, A., Van Duyne, P., Hagood, R., Clifford, G., Grey, P. J., Velli, M., Liewer, P. C., Hall, J. R., DeJong, E. M., Mikic, Z., Rochus, P., Mazy, E., Bothmer, V., and Rodmann, J.:
The wide-field imager for Solar Probe Plus (WISPR), Space Sci. Rev.,
204, 83–130, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0114-y, 2016. a
Wang, H.-C. and John, W.: Dynamic contact charge transfer considering plastic
deformation, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 399–411,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(88)90016-X, 1988. a, b, c
Wood, D. M.: Classical Size Dependence of the Work Function of Small Metallic
Spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 749–749, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.749,
1981. a, b
Zel'Dovich, Y. and Raizer, Y.: Physics of shock waves and high-temperature
hydrodynamic phenomena, Academic Press, 685–784,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395672-9.X5001-2, 1967. a
Short summary
This paper discusses the charge generation for impacts of nano- to micro-scale dust on metal surfaces at speeds below a few kilometres per second. By introducing a model of capacitive coupling between the dust and the impact surface, we find that at such low speeds, the charge can be dominated by contact charging as opposed to plasma generation.
This paper discusses the charge generation for impacts of nano- to micro-scale dust on metal...