Articles | Volume 37, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019
Regular paper
 | 
11 Jul 2019
Regular paper |  | 11 Jul 2019

GUMICS-4 analysis of interplanetary coronal mass ejection impact on Earth during low and typical Mach number solar winds

Antti Lakka, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Andrew P. Dimmock, Emilia Kilpua, Matti Ala-Lahti, Ilja Honkonen, Minna Palmroth, and Osku Raukunen

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (17 Oct 2018) by Elias Roussos
AR by Antti Lakka on behalf of the Authors (19 Oct 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Oct 2018) by Elias Roussos
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (30 Nov 2018)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (08 Jan 2019) by Elias Roussos
AR by Antti Lakka on behalf of the Authors (19 Apr 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Apr 2019) by Elias Roussos
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (23 May 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (27 May 2019) by Elias Roussos
AR by Antti Lakka on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Jun 2019) by Elias Roussos
AR by Antti Lakka on behalf of the Authors (24 Jun 2019)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
We study how the Earth's space environment responds to two different amplitude interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) events that occurred in 2012 and 2014 by using the GUMICS-4 global MHD model. We examine local and large-scale dynamics of the Earth's space environment and compare simulation results to in situ data. It is shown that during moderate driving simulation agrees well with the measurements; however, GMHD results should be interpreted cautiously during strong driving.