Dear Dr. Kozak,

thank you for a detailed response to the comments by the three reviewers. Despite the fact that the remarks by the reviewers were numerous, after studying them I believe the majority of those were minor and I consider all answers provided and suggested modifications to the original manuscript satisfactory. I also agree with you that referencing in your manuscript is extensive, and additional citations are not necessary, even though some of the recommendations by reviewer Dr. Kui Kiang could fit in your manuscript, if you believe that is necessary.

I am therefore happy to recommend consider your manuscript for publication in Annales Geophysicae, however before proceeding with the formal acceptance of your work, I would require that you submit the revised version of your article (based on your answers to the reviewers), with the changes from the original submission marked-up. While I believe I did manage to identify most of the changes done, these were not indicated on the submitted supplements and I would like to verify that I did not miss any point or modification that was implemented.

Some additional technical points:

1) You may also consider to shade the region below the "cone of influence" (Figures 4-6), as I assume this area contains invalid results.
2) I could not identify the reference to the work of T.W. Speiser (Conductivity without collisions or noise) in your supplements. From the answers to the anonymous reviewer, I believe this may be a valid reference to include. Please include it in the revision, if necessary.

Kind regards,

Elias Roussos