Articles | Volume 33, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1485-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1485-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Magnetospheric conditions near the equatorial footpoints of proton isotropy boundaries
St. Petersburg State University, Ulyanovskaya 1, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia
I. A. Chernyaev
St. Petersburg State University, Ulyanovskaya 1, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia
V. Angelopoulos
Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
N. Y. Ganushkina
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
V. A. Sergeev, S. A. Chernyaeva, S. V. Apatenkov, N. Y. Ganushkina, and S. V. Dubyagin
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1059–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the precipitated-to-trapped flux ratio patterns near the proton isotropy boundary (IB) using NOAA-POES observations. For 30 and 80keV proton energies, we found only 31% of events showing the dispersion pattern predicted by the non-adiabatic scattering in the tail current sheet. Most frequent pattern had no measureable IB energy dispersion (63%); structured IBs with a few Jprec/Jtrap dropouts were also usual (60%). Roles of current sheet and wave-induced scattering are discussed.
A. V. Nikolaev, V. A. Sergeev, N. A. Tsyganenko, M. V. Kubyshkina, H. Opgenoorth, H. Singer, and V. Angelopoulos
Ann. Geophys., 33, 505–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we use two-loop model SCW (SCW2L) to quantitatively investigate distortion of the ionospheric footpoint pattern in response to changes of different SCW2L parameters. Calculation results show that SCW-related footprint shifts result in formation of auroral bulge and westward travelling surge and may contribute to rotation of auroral streamers, and that SCW2L combined with the AM03 model nicely describes the azimuthal progression and the observed magnitude of the auroral expansion.
N. Y. Ganushkina, M. W. Liemohn, S. Dubyagin, I. A. Daglis, I. Dandouras, D. L. De Zeeuw, Y. Ebihara, R. Ilie, R. Katus, M. Kubyshkina, S. E. Milan, S. Ohtani, N. Ostgaard, J. P. Reistad, P. Tenfjord, F. Toffoletto, S. Zaharia, and O. Amariutei
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1369–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1369-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A number of current systems exist in the Earth's magnetosphere. It is very difficult to identify local measurements as belonging to a specific current system. Therefore, there are different definitions of supposedly the same current, leading to unnecessary controversy. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques.
L. Dai, C. Wang, V. Angelopoulos, and K.-H. Glassmeier
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1147–1153, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1147-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1147-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Magnetic reconnection is a ubiquitous process that drives global-scale dynamics in plasmas. For reconnection to proceed, both ion and electrons must be unfrozen in a localized diffusion region. By analyzing in situ measurements, we show that the non-gyrotropic ion pressure is mainly responsible for breaking the ion frozen-in condition in reconnection. The reported non-gyrotropic ion pressure tensor can specify the reconnection electric field that controls how quickly reconnection proceeds.
V. A. Sergeev, S. A. Chernyaeva, S. V. Apatenkov, N. Y. Ganushkina, and S. V. Dubyagin
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1059–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1059-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the precipitated-to-trapped flux ratio patterns near the proton isotropy boundary (IB) using NOAA-POES observations. For 30 and 80keV proton energies, we found only 31% of events showing the dispersion pattern predicted by the non-adiabatic scattering in the tail current sheet. Most frequent pattern had no measureable IB energy dispersion (63%); structured IBs with a few Jprec/Jtrap dropouts were also usual (60%). Roles of current sheet and wave-induced scattering are discussed.
A. V. Nikolaev, V. A. Sergeev, N. A. Tsyganenko, M. V. Kubyshkina, H. Opgenoorth, H. Singer, and V. Angelopoulos
Ann. Geophys., 33, 505–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-505-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we use two-loop model SCW (SCW2L) to quantitatively investigate distortion of the ionospheric footpoint pattern in response to changes of different SCW2L parameters. Calculation results show that SCW-related footprint shifts result in formation of auroral bulge and westward travelling surge and may contribute to rotation of auroral streamers, and that SCW2L combined with the AM03 model nicely describes the azimuthal progression and the observed magnitude of the auroral expansion.
H. Breuillard, O. Agapitov, A. Artemyev, V. Krasnoselskikh, O. Le Contel, C. M. Cully, V. Angelopoulos, Y. Zaliznyak, and G. Rolland
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1477–1485, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1477-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1477-2014, 2014
S. Machida, Y. Miyashita, A. Ieda, M. Nosé, V. Angelopoulos, and J. P. McFadden
Ann. Geophys., 32, 99–111, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-99-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-99-2014, 2014
Short summary
Adaptive magnetospheric models based on THEMIS magnetic observations made at 6-9Re in the nightside magnetosphere are used to map the magnetically conjugate 30 and 80keV proton isotropy boundaries (IBs) to investigate the value of Kib=Rc/rc (magnetic curvature radius to particle gyroradius) in the neutral sheet at the IB generation place. For the most accurate mapping, the group Kib spread spans from 4 to 32; its median value is ~13, slightly larger than Kib8 expected for current sheet scatter.
Adaptive magnetospheric models based on THEMIS magnetic observations made at 6-9Re in the...