Articles | Volume 31, issue 11 
            
                
                    
            
            
            https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2063-2013
                    © Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2063-2013
                    © Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Characteristics of the Taylor microscale in the solar wind/foreshock: magnetic field and electron velocity measurements
C. Gurgiolo
                                            Bitterroot Basic Research, Hamilton, MT, USA
                                        
                                    M. L. Goldstein
                                            Heliospheric Physics Laboratory, Code 672, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
                                        
                                    W. H. Matthaeus
                                            Bartol Research Foundation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
                                        
                                    A. Viñas
                                            Heliospheric Physics Laboratory, Code 672, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
                                        
                                    A. N. Fazakerley
                                            Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, UK
                                        
                                    Related authors
Chris Gurgiolo and Melvyn L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 35, 71–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-71-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-71-2017, 2017
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                Observations during periods when the solar wind has a speed < 425 km s−1 show that it is not uncommon to find no strahl present in the data. The research was done in response to observations and was performed through a detailed study of the electron velocity distribution functions. The conclusion arrived at is that the absence of the strahl appears to occur within individual flux tubes, which may indicate that the source lies  in the solar corona where the strahl is formed.
                                            
                                            
                                        Chris Gurgiolo and Melvyn L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 34, 1175–1189, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1175-2016, 2016
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                Using Cluster data we have noted observations of diffusion-like signatures in the energy range where the the solar wind halo and strahl populations overlap. This includes the development of a proto-halo. At present the source of this diffusion is not known or understood. The prime analysis was carried out through the use of phi–theta plots at individual energy steps.  The motivation was to understand if repartitioning in energy was occurring at these locations.
                                            
                                            
                                        Christopher A. Gurgiolo, Melvyn L. Goldstein, and Adolfo Viñas
                                    Ann. Geophys., 37, 243–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-243-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-243-2019, 2019
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                The reflection of solar wind electrons at the bow shock helps define the physical properties of the foreshock, the region where the interplanetary magnetic field directly connects to the bow shock. We report that the strahl, the field-aligned component of the electron solar wind distribution, appears to be nearly fully reflected at the bow shock and that the reflection occurs in the foot of the shock, implying that mirroring is not the primary cause of the electron reflection.
                                            
                                            
                                        Chris Gurgiolo and Melvyn L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 35, 71–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-71-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-71-2017, 2017
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                Observations during periods when the solar wind has a speed < 425 km s−1 show that it is not uncommon to find no strahl present in the data. The research was done in response to observations and was performed through a detailed study of the electron velocity distribution functions. The conclusion arrived at is that the absence of the strahl appears to occur within individual flux tubes, which may indicate that the source lies  in the solar corona where the strahl is formed.
                                            
                                            
                                        Chris Gurgiolo and Melvyn L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 34, 1175–1189, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1175-2016, 2016
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                Using Cluster data we have noted observations of diffusion-like signatures in the energy range where the the solar wind halo and strahl populations overlap. This includes the development of a proto-halo. At present the source of this diffusion is not known or understood. The prime analysis was carried out through the use of phi–theta plots at individual energy steps.  The motivation was to understand if repartitioning in energy was occurring at these locations.
                                            
                                            
                                        C. P. Escoubet, A. Masson, H. Laakso, and M. L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 33, 1221–1235, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1221-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1221-2015, 2015
                                    Short summary
                                    Short summary
                                            
                                                This paper presents recent highlights from the Cluster mission on solar wind turbulence, magnetopause asymmetries and magnetosheath density enhancements, dipolarisation currents, reconnection variability, FTE in greatest detail, plasmaspheric wind and re-filling of the plasmasphere, radiation belts, updates of magnetospheric electric and magnetic field models, and magnetosheath and magnetopause properties under low Mach number. Public access to all high-resolution data (CSA) is also presented.
                                            
                                            
                                        R. Wang, R. Nakamura, T. Zhang, A. Du, W. Baumjohann, Q. Lu, and A. N. Fazakerley
                                    Ann. Geophys., 32, 239–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-239-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-239-2014, 2014
                            C. P. Escoubet, M. G. G. T. Taylor, A. Masson, H. Laakso, J. Volpp, M. Hapgood, and M. L. Goldstein
                                    Ann. Geophys., 31, 1045–1059, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1045-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1045-2013, 2013
                            C. P. Escoubet, J. Berchem, K. J. Trattner, F. Pitout, R. Richard, M. G. G. T. Taylor, J. Soucek, B. Grison, H. Laakso, A. Masson, M. Dunlop, I. Dandouras, H. Reme, A. Fazakerley, and P. Daly
                                    Ann. Geophys., 31, 713–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-713-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-713-2013, 2013
                             
 
                        
                                         
                        
                                         
             
             
             
            