Articles | Volume 31, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-153-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-153-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Low-latitude equinoctial spread-F occurrence at different longitude sectors under low solar activity
M. Pezzopane
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy
E. Zuccheretti
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy
P. Abadi
Division of Ionosphere and Telecommunication, Space Science Center, Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN), Indonesia
A. J. de Abreu
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, Brazil
R. de Jesus
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, Brazil
P. R. Fagundes
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, Brazil
P. Supnithi
Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Bangkok 10520, Thailand
S. Rungraengwajiake
Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Bangkok 10520, Thailand
T. Nagatsuma
Space Weather and Environment Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan
T. Tsugawa
Space Weather and Environment Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan
M. A. Cabrera
Laboratorio de Telecomunicaciones, DEEC, FACET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina
Laboratorio de Ionósfera, Departamento de Física, FACET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina
CIASUR, Facultad Regional Tucumán, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Tucumán, Argentina
R. G. Ezquer
Laboratorio de Ionósfera, Departamento de Física, FACET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina
CIASUR, Facultad Regional Tucumán, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Tucumán, Argentina
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Related authors
Mirko Piersanti, Paola De Michelis, Dario Del Moro, Roberta Tozzi, Michael Pezzopane, Giuseppe Consolini, Maria Federica Marcucci, Monica Laurenza, Simone Di Matteo, Alessio Pignalberi, Virgilio Quattrociocchi, and Piero Diego
Ann. Geophys., 38, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the solar event that occurred on 25 August 2018. This kind of comprehensive analysis plays a key role in better understanding the complexity of the processes occurring in the Sun–Earth system determining the geoeffectiveness of manifestations of solar activity. The analysis presented here shows for the first time a direct link between characteristics of solar perturbation, the magnetosphere–ionosphere system response and space weather effects.
Carl-Fredrik Enell, Alexander Kozlovsky, Tauno Turunen, Thomas Ulich, Sirkku Välitalo, Carlo Scotto, and Michael Pezzopane
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 53–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Ionograms from the Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory ionosonde (station SO166) were scaled automatically with the Autoscala software during a test period. The results were compared with manually scaled ionospheric parameters. In general, the F-layer parameters were found to agree well, whereas high-latitude phenomena like auroral E layers were often misidentified.
A. Pignalberi, M. Pezzopane, and E. Zuccheretti
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1427–1440, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1427-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1427-2014, 2014
Pedro Alves Fontes, Marcio Tadeu de Assis Honorato Muella, Laysa Cristina Araújo Resende, Vânia Fátima Andrioli, Paulo Roberto Fagundes, Valdir Gil Pillat, Paulo Prado Batista, and Alexander Jose Carrasco
Ann. Geophys., 41, 209–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-209-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-209-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the terrestrial ionosphere, sporadic (metallic) layers are formed. The formation of these layers are related to the action of atmospheric waves. These waves, also named tides, are due to the absorption of solar radiation in the atmosphere. We investigated the role of the tides with 8 h period in the formation of the sporadic layers. The study was conducted using ionosonde and meteor radar data, as well as computing simulations. The 8 h tides intensified the density of the sporadic layers.
Mirko Piersanti, Paola De Michelis, Dario Del Moro, Roberta Tozzi, Michael Pezzopane, Giuseppe Consolini, Maria Federica Marcucci, Monica Laurenza, Simone Di Matteo, Alessio Pignalberi, Virgilio Quattrociocchi, and Piero Diego
Ann. Geophys., 38, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the solar event that occurred on 25 August 2018. This kind of comprehensive analysis plays a key role in better understanding the complexity of the processes occurring in the Sun–Earth system determining the geoeffectiveness of manifestations of solar activity. The analysis presented here shows for the first time a direct link between characteristics of solar perturbation, the magnetosphere–ionosphere system response and space weather effects.
Carl-Fredrik Enell, Alexander Kozlovsky, Tauno Turunen, Thomas Ulich, Sirkku Välitalo, Carlo Scotto, and Michael Pezzopane
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 53–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Ionograms from the Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory ionosonde (station SO166) were scaled automatically with the Autoscala software during a test period. The results were compared with manually scaled ionospheric parameters. In general, the F-layer parameters were found to agree well, whereas high-latitude phenomena like auroral E layers were often misidentified.
A. Pignalberi, M. Pezzopane, and E. Zuccheretti
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1427–1440, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1427-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1427-2014, 2014
Y. Otsuka, K. Suzuki, S. Nakagawa, M. Nishioka, K. Shiokawa, and T. Tsugawa
Ann. Geophys., 31, 163–172, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-163-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-163-2013, 2013
M. J. A. Bolzan, A. Tardelli, V. G. Pillat, P. R. Fagundes, and R. R. Rosa
Ann. Geophys., 31, 127–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-127-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-127-2013, 2013