19 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Anomalous Variation in GPS Based TEC Prior to the 5 Earthquakes in 2009 and 2010 K. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/pos.2015.64010
2. Modeling and analysis of GPS-TEC low latitude climatology during the 24th solar cycle using empirical orthogonal functions J. Dabbakuti & D. Venkata Ratnam https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.048
3. Impact of Sudden Stratospheric Warming of 2009 on the Equatorial and Low‐Latitude Ionosphere of the Indian Longitudes: A Case Study S. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024392
4. The response of the ionosphere over Ilorin to some geomagnetic storms B. Joshua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.027
5. Effects of the Super Intense Geomagnetic Storm on 10-11 May, 2024 on Total Electron Content at Bhopal A. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.029
6. Ionospheric perturbations over Delhi caused by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake H. Dutta et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160601099590
7. Characterization of ionospheric variability in TEC using EOF and wavelets over low-latitude GNSS stations J. Dabbakuti & D. Venkata Ratnam https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.029
8. Ionospheric response of intense geomagnetic storms near the peak phase of Solar Cycle 25 at low mid-latitude Indian station, New Delhi A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.11.096
9. Generation of Regional Ionospheric TEC Maps With EIA Nowcasting/Forecasting Capability During Geomagnetic Storm Conditions P. Harsha & D. Ratnam https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982468
10. Local time dependence of the prompt ionospheric response for the 7, 9, and 10 November 2004 superstorms A. Mannucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014043
11. Current Systems in the Earth's Magnetosphere N. Ganushkina et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000590
12. Investigation of Ionospheric Variations During Magnetic Storm Over Turkey . Samed Inyurt https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793220010120
13. Growth and decay of a post-sunset equatorial anomaly at low latitudes: Control of E×B, neutral winds and daytime electrojet strength R. Dabas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.05.020
14. Ionospheric response to a geomagnetic storm during November 8–10, 2004 K. Simi et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.09.005
15. A severe negative response of the ionosphere to the intense geomagnetic storm on March 17, 2015 observed at mid- and low-latitude stations in the China zone G. Liu & H. Shen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.021
16. A comparative study of TEC response for the African equatorial and mid-latitudes during storm conditions J. Habarulema et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.008
17. Comparison of maximum usable frequency (MUF) variability over Peninsular Malaysia with IRI model during the rise of solar cycle 24 R. Malik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.12.013
18. Study of TEC changes during geomagnetic storms occurred near the crest of the equatorial ionospheric ionization anomaly in the Indian sector R. Trivedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.08.008
19. Suspected seismo‐ionospheric coupling observed by satellite measurements and GPS TEC related to the M7.9 Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008 K. Ryu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020613