Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-20-1039-2002
© Author(s) 2002. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-20-1039-2002
© Author(s) 2002. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
31 Jul 2002
OVATION: Oval variation, assessment, tracking, intensity, and online nowcasting
P. T. Newell
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
T. Sotirelis
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
J. M. Ruohoniemi
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
J. F. Carbary
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
K. Liou
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
J. P. Skura
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
C.-I. Meng
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
C. Deehr
University of Alaska at Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
D. Wilkinson
University of Alaska at Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
F. J. Rich
Air Force Research Laboratory Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts, USA
Correspondence to: P. T. Newell
(patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu)
Viewed
Total article views: 1,814 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 909 | 854 | 51 | 1,814 | 89 | 71 |
- HTML: 909
- PDF: 854
- XML: 51
- Total: 1,814
- BibTeX: 89
- EndNote: 71
Cited
45 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Intermittency in the auroral absorption fluctuations as manifestation of magnetospheric turbulence M. Stepanova et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.112
- Planetary features of aurorae: Results of the IGY (a review) Y. Feldstein et al. 10.1134/S0016793210040018
- The distribution of auroral power increases and decreases P. Newell et al. 10.1029/2002GL016288
- Simultaneous Ground- and Space-Based Observations of the Plasmaspheric Plume and Reconnection B. Walsh et al. 10.1126/science.1247212
- OVATION Prime‐2013: Extension of auroral precipitation model to higher disturbance levels P. Newell et al. 10.1002/2014SW001056
- Electron Aurora and Polar Rain Dependencies on Solar Wind Parameters S. Bouriat et al. 10.1029/2023JA031598
- Self‐consistent modeling of the large‐scale distortions in the geomagnetic field during the 24–27 September 1998 major magnetic storm Y. Feldstein et al. 10.1029/2004JA010584
- Response of the Geospace System to the Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Decrease on 11 June 2017: Numerical Models and Observations D. Ozturk et al. 10.1029/2018JA026315
- Plasma pressure distribution in the surrounding the Earth plasma ring and its role in the magnetospheric dynamics E. Antonova et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.005
- Toward a Next Generation Particle Precipitation Model: Mesoscale Prediction Through Machine Learning (a Case Study and Framework for Progress) R. McGranaghan et al. 10.1029/2020SW002684
- Pairs of solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling functions: Combining a merging term with a viscous term works best P. Newell et al. 10.1029/2007JA012825
- Comparison of neural network and support vector machine methods for Kp forecasting E. Ji et al. 10.1002/jgra.50500
- Evaluating Auroral Forecasts Against Satellite Observations M. Mooney et al. 10.1029/2020SW002688
- Assessing predictive ability of three auroral precipitation models using DMSP energy flux C. Lane et al. 10.1002/2014SW001085
- Characteristics of Pc5 activity at high latitudes stations in Antarctica H. Kwon et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105087
- Modeling of Ultraviolet Aurora Intensity Associated With Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Parameters Based on Neural Networks Z. Hu et al. 10.1029/2021SW002751
- A New Framework to Incorporate High‐Latitude Input for Mesoscale Electrodynamics D. Ozturk et al. 10.1029/2019JA027562
- Geomagnetic variations in the frequency range 2.5–12 Hz in the ionospheric F layer as measured by SWARM satellites N. Yagova et al. 10.12737/stp-91202305
- Kp forecast models S. Wing et al. 10.1029/2004JA010500
- Simulation of the formation of O+ density troughs at 6000 km altitude in the polar cap ionosphere‐magnetosphere region F. Jaafari et al. 10.1029/2007JA012690
- Review of Relationships Between Solar Wind and Ground-Level Atmospheric Electricity: Case Studies from Hornsund, Spitsbergen, and Swider, Poland S. Michnowski et al. 10.1007/s10712-021-09639-3
- Use of radio occultation to probe the high-latitude ionosphere A. Mannucci et al. 10.5194/amt-8-2789-2015
- On the Relation Between Soft Electron Precipitations in the Cusp Region and Solar Wind Coupling Functions T. Dang et al. 10.1002/2017JA024379
- Mobile and Wireless Communication: Space Weather Threats, Forecasts, and Risk Management S. Wing 10.1109/MITP.2012.69
- Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Origin and Propagation: Case Study of the December 2015 Geomagnetic Storm I. Cherniak & I. Zakharenkova 10.1029/2018SW001869
- A real‐time hybrid aurora alert system: Combining citizen science reports with an auroral oval model N. Case et al. 10.1002/2016EA000167
- Modeling Study of the Geospace System Response to the Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Enhancement on 17 March 2015 D. Ozturk et al. 10.1002/2017JA025099
- Snakes on a Spaceship—An Overview of Python in Heliophysics A. Burrell et al. 10.1029/2018JA025877
- Seasonal variations in diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora P. Newell et al. 10.1029/2009JA014805
- Geomagnetic variations in the frequency range 2.5–12 Hz in the ionospheric F layer as measured by SWARM satellites N. Yagova et al. 10.12737/szf-91202305
- Intermittency of the turbulent processes in the Earth's magnetosphere detected from the ground-based measurements M. Stepanova et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/134/1/012042
- A broad climatology of very high latitude substorms A. Singh et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2012.07.034
- The dependence of GPS positioning deviation on auroral activity S. Chernouss & N. Kalitenkov 10.1080/01431161.2010.541512
- Multipoint MMS observations of fine‐scale SAPS structure in the inner magnetosphere P. Erickson et al. 10.1002/2016GL069174
- Atomic oxygen retrievals in the MLT region from SCIAMACHY nightglow limb measurements O. Lednyts'kyy et al. 10.5194/amt-8-1021-2015
- Enhanced energetic electron fluxes at the region of the auroral oval during quiet geomagnetic conditions November 2009 M. Riazantseva et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2012.05.015
- Testing the expanding‐contracting polar cap paradigm T. Sotirelis et al. 10.1002/2017JA024238
- Intermittency of riometer auroral absorption observed at South Pole M. Stepanova et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2004.11.016
- GPS–TEC response to the substorm onset during April 5, 2010, magnetic storm O. Kozyreva et al. 10.1007/s10291-016-0581-6
- Systems science of the magnetosphere: Creating indices of substorm activity, of the substorm‐injected electron population, and of the electron radiation belt J. Borovsky & K. Yakymenko 10.1002/2017JA024250
- Links of the Plasmapause With Other Boundary Layers of the Magnetosphere: Ionospheric Convection, Radiation Belt Boundaries, Auroral Oval V. Pierrard et al. 10.3389/fspas.2021.728531
- A nearly universal solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables P. Newell et al. 10.1029/2006JA012015
- How well do we forecast the aurora? M. Mooney et al. 10.1093/astrogeo/atz177
- A Kp‐based model of auroral boundaries J. Carbary 10.1029/2005SW000162
- Real-time determination and monitoring of the auroral electrojet boundaries M. Johnsen 10.1051/swsc/2013050
Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
