62 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Total electron content: Synthesis of past storm studies and needed future work M. Mendillo & J. Klobuchar https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RS003394
2. First results from ITU-Dynasonde, Istanbul, Turkey on the ionospheric characteristics A. Moral et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.08.034
3. An upgrade of the solar-wind-driven empirical model for the middle latitude ionospheric storm-time response I. Tsagouri & A. Belehaki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.09.010
4. Estimating the state of the thermospheric composition using Kalman filtering C. Minter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003SW000006
5. Day-by-day modelling of the ionospheric F2-layer for year 2002 H. Rishbeth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.03.022
6. Ionospheric spatial and temporal variations during the 29–31 October 2003 storm L. Cander & S. Mihajlovic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.02.020
7. GPS based TEC measurements for a period August 2008– December 2009 near the northern crest of Indian equatorial ionospheric anomaly region S. KARIA & K. PATHAK https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0114-1
8. Investigation of Daytime Total Electron Content Enhancements over the Asian-Australian Sector Observed from the Beidou Geostationary Satellite during 2016–2018 O. Jimoh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203406
9. Patterns of F2-layer variability H. Rishbeth & M. Mendillo https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00036-0
10. Solar and latitude dependence of TEC and SLAB thickness S. Kouris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.03.009
11. Modelling total electron content during geomagnetic storm conditions using empirical orthogonal functions and neural networks J. Uwamahoro & J. Habarulema https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021961
12. The Comparison of Predicting Storm-Time Ionospheric TEC by Three Methods: ARIMA, LSTM, and Seq2Seq R. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040316
13. Highlights about the performances of storm-time TEC modelling techniques for low/equatorial and mid-latitude locations J. Uwamahoro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.01.027
14. Thermosphere–ionosphere coupling in response to recurrent geomagnetic activity P. Mukhtarov & D. Pancheva https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.02.013
15. An ensemble‐type Kalman filter for neutral thermospheric composition during geomagnetic storms M. Codrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004SW000088
16. Global structure of ionospheric TEC anomalies driven by geomagnetic storms D. Pancheva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.04.015
17. Horizontal spatial correlation of the ionospheric TEC derived from GPS global ionospheric maps S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.06.042
18. ASHLEY: A New Empirical Model for the High‐Latitude Electron Precipitation and Electric Field Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002671
19. Equatorial and Low Latitude Ionospheric Effects During Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events J. Chau et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9797-5
20. Mid-Latitude Single Station F region Storm Morphology and Forecast L. Cander https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0007
21. Pre-storm enhancements of foF2 above Europe D. Burešová & J. Laštovička https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.003
22. Response of the electron density profiles to geomagnetic disturbances in January 2005 R. Bojilova & P. Mukhtarov https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0510-6
23. Proposal of new models of the bottom-side B0 and B1 parameters for IRI D. Altadill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.08.014
24. Quiet time ionospheric variability over Arecibo during sudden stratospheric warming events J. Chau et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015378
25. A comparison of results derived from scaling VS chirp-ionosonde ionograms with the international reference ionosphere (IRI) V. Grozov & G. Kotovich https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00298-5
26. On the role of solar and geomagnetic activity in long-term trends in the atmosphere–ionosphere system J. Laštovička https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.07.019
27. Daytime mid-latitude F2-layer Q-disturbances: A formation mechanism L. Perrone et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66134-2
28. Pre-storm F2-layer Q-disturbances at middle latitudes: Do they exist? A. Mikhailov & L. Perrone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105473
29. Response to geomagnetic storm on 23–24 March 2023 long-lasting longitudinal variations of the global ionospheric TEC D. Pancheva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.023
30. Mid-Latitude Daytime F2-Layer Disturbance Mechanism under Extremely Low Solar and Geomagnetic Activity in 2008–2009 A. Mikhailov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081514
31. Optimal Estimation Inversion of Ionospheric Electron Density from GNSS-POD Limb Measurements: Part I-Algorithm and Morphology D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133245
32. Global empirical models of the density peak height and of the equivalent scale height for quiet conditions D. Altadill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.11.018
33. An Ensemble Kalman Filter for the Thermosphere‐Ionosphere S. Codrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001752
34. Storms in the ionosphere: Patterns and processes for total electron content M. Mendillo https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000193
35. Evaluation of the STORM model storm-time corrections for middle latitude D. Buresova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.06.007
36. On scientific inference in geophysics and the use of numerical simulations for scientific investigations A. Mannucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EA000108
37. Simultaneous ionospheric variability on Earth and Mars M. Mendillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009961
38. Assessment of Current Capabilities in Modeling the Ionospheric Climatology for Space Weather Applications: foF2 and hmF2 I. Tsagouri et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002035
39. F-region links with the lower atmosphere? H. Rishbeth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.017
40. Global empirical model of TEC response to geomagnetic activity P. Mukhtarov et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50576
41. Neural network prediction of the topside electron content over the Euro-African sector derived from Swarm-A measurements O. Abuelezz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.009
42. Forcing of the ionosphere from above and below during the Arctic winter of 2005/2006 P. Mukhtarov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.11.008
43. Quiet-time seasonal behaviour of the ionosphere measured by the Ionosphere PhotoMeter (IPM) on the Chinese meteorological satellite FY-3D compared with the IRI2016 model predictions F. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.01.014
44. Validation of Ionospheric Specifications During Geomagnetic Storms: TEC and foF2 During the 2013 March Storm Event J. Shim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002034
45. TEC variations during geomagnetic storm/substorm with Pc5/PI2 pulsation signature A. Hamada et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.010
46. 1999 Marmara Depremi ve Güneş Tutulmasının Naive Bayes Sınıflayıcısı ile İstatistiksel Analizi S. KARATAY & M. ALGAHANI https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.876223
47. Model/data comparison of F region ionospheric perturbation over Millstone Hill during the severe geomagnetic storm of July 15–16, 2000 A. Pavlov & J. Foster https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000387
48. A new short-term forecasting model for the total electron content storm time disturbances I. Tsagouri et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018019
49. Solar System Ionospheres O. Witasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9395-3
50. Multi-instrument analysis of F-region ionospheric irregularities suppression over South America during the November 3, 2021, geomagnetic storm G. González https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-024-00458-7
51. Examination of the solar cycle variation of foF2 for cycles 22 and 23 A. Özgüç et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.016
52. Ionospheric Horizontal Correlation Distances: Estimation, Analysis, and Implications for Ionospheric Data Assimilation V. Forsythe et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RS007159
53. Ionospheric total electron content: Spatial patterns of variability J. Lean et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023210
54. Modelling F2-layer seasonal trends and day-to-day variability driven by coupling with the lower atmosphere M. Mendillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00193-1
55. Characteristic of Ionospheric foF2 and Solar Indices during the 23rd Solar Cycle over High Latitude Station, Syowa, Antarctica P. Bhawre et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2015.45033
56. Performance of the IRI-2016 over Santa Maria, a Brazilian low-latitude station located in the central region of the South American Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) J. Moro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-457-2020
57. Validation of Ionospheric Modeled TEC in the Equatorial Ionosphere During the 2013 March and 2021 November Geomagnetic Storms M. Chou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003480
58. Ionospheric peak height behavior for low, middle and high latitudes: A potential empirical model for quiet conditions—Comparison with the IRI-2007 model S. Magdaleno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.04.019
59. One‐ to 10‐Day Forecasts of Ionospheric Total Electron Content Using a Statistical Model J. Lean https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002077
60. Earth magnetic field and geomagnetic activity effects on long-term trends in the F2 layer at mid-high latitudes A. Elias & N. Ortiz de Adler https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.02.008
61. Change in refractivity of the atmosphere and large variation in TEC associated with some earthquakes, observed from GPS receiver S. Karia & K. Pathak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.019
62. Empirical modeling of global ionospheric foF2 response to geomagnetic activity I. Kutiev & P. Muhtarov https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA009134