the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comment on Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field
by Troshichev et al. (2011)
Peter Stauning
Abstract. In the publication Troshichev et al. (2006) on the Polar Cap (PC) indices, PCN (North) and PCS (South), an error was made by using components of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) in their Geocentric Solar Ecliptic (GSE) representation instead of the prescribed Geocentric Solar Magnetosphere (GSM) representation for calculations of index scaling parameters in the version AARI_1998-2001 (named AARI#3) issued from the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) in St Petersburg, Russia. The mistake has caused a trail of incorrect relations and wrong conclusions extending since 2006 up to now (2020). The authors of the publication commented here, Troshichev, Podorozhkina, Janzhura (2011): Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field, Ann. Geophys., 29, 1479-1489, state that they have used scaling parameters of the (invalid) AARI#3 PC index version in their work but have substituted parameters from the more recent AARI_1995-2005 (AARI#4) version instead. The mingling of PC index versions have resulted in erroneous illustrations in their Figs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 and the issuing of non-substantiated statements.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric fieldby Troshichev et al. (2011), Ann. Geophys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2020-52, 2020.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(3658 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(3658 KB) - Metadata XML
- Corresponding article
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Peter Stauning
Interactive discussion


-
RC1: 'Summary and comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Jan 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
SC1: 'Comment on angeo-2020-52', Oleg Troshichev, 15 Jan 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on SC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on SC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC3: 'Comment on angeo-2020-52', Peter Stauning, 27 Jan 2021
Interactive discussion


-
RC1: 'Summary and comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Jan 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
SC1: 'Comment on angeo-2020-52', Oleg Troshichev, 15 Jan 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on SC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on SC1', Peter Stauning, 16 Jan 2021
-
AC3: 'Comment on angeo-2020-52', Peter Stauning, 27 Jan 2021
Peter Stauning
Peter Stauning
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
518 | 126 | 23 | 667 | 24 | 24 |
- HTML: 518
- PDF: 126
- XML: 23
- Total: 667
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1