<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article-commentary" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEOD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEOD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2568-6402</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-2020-52</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comment on &lt;q&gt;Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field&lt;/q&gt; by Troshichev et al. (2011)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stauning</surname>
<given-names>Peter</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-7932</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, Copenhagen</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>04</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2020</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>24</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2020 Peter Stauning</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/preprints/angeo-2020-52/">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/preprints/angeo-2020-52/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/preprints/angeo-2020-52/angeo-2020-52.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/preprints/angeo-2020-52/angeo-2020-52.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>&lt;p&gt;In the publication Troshichev et al. (2006) on the Polar Cap (PC) indices, PCN (North) and PCS (South), an error was made by using components of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) in their Geocentric Solar Ecliptic (GSE) representation instead of the prescribed Geocentric Solar Magnetosphere (GSM) representation for calculations of index scaling parameters in the version AARI_1998-2001 (named AARI#3) issued from the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) in St Petersburg, Russia. The mistake has caused a trail of incorrect relations and wrong conclusions extending since 2006 up to now (2020). The authors of the publication commented here, Troshichev, Podorozhkina, Janzhura (2011): Invariability of relationship between the polar cap magnetic activity and geoeffective interplanetary electric field, Ann. Geophys., 29, 1479-1489, state that they have used scaling parameters of the (invalid) AARI#3 PC index version in their work but have substituted parameters from the more recent AARI_1995-2005 (AARI#4) version instead. The mingling of PC index versions have resulted in erroneous illustrations in their Figs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 and the issuing of non-substantiated statements.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="24"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>