Articles | Volume 43, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-687-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regular paper
| 
05 Nov 2025
Regular paper |
| 05 Nov 2025
| 05 Nov 2025
A comparison of methods to compute the rate of horizontal geomagnetic field variation
Related authors
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 169–182, 2021
Cited articles
Abda, Z. M. K., Aziz, N. F. A., Kadir, M. Z. A. A., and Rhazali, Z. A.: A Review of Geomagnetically Induced Current Effects on Electrical Power System: Principles and Theory, IEEE Access, 8, 200237–200258, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034347, 2020. a
Akasofu, S. I.: The development of the auroral substorm, Planetary and Space Science, 12, 273–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(64)90151-5, 1964. a
Alken, P. and Egbert, G. D.: Modeling Toroidal Currents in the Ionospheric Electrojet Regions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 130, e2024JA033080, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033080, 2025. a
Bedrosian, P. A.: MT+, Integrating Magnetotellurics to Determine Earth Structure, Physical State, and Processes, Surveys in Geophysics, 28, 121–167, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-007-9019-6, 2007. a
Bennett, J. S., Vyhnalek, B. E., Greenall, H., Bridge, E. M., Gotardo, F., Forstner, S., Harris, G. I., Miranda, F. A., and Bowen, W. P.: Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: A Review, Sensors, 21, 5568, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165568, 2021. a
