Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae
ANGEO
Articles | Volume 36, issue 2
Articles | Volume 36, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-621-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-621-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 36, issue 2
Regular paper
 | 
16 Apr 2018
Regular paper |  | 16 Apr 2018

A critical note on the IAGA-endorsed Polar Cap (PC) indices: excessive excursions in the real-time index values

Peter Stauning

Viewed

Total article views: 1,564 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,091 411 62 1,564 155 60 55
  • HTML: 1,091
  • PDF: 411
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 1,564
  • Supplement: 155
  • BibTeX: 60
  • EndNote: 55
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Apr 2018)

Cited

Latest update: 09 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
The Polar Cap (PC) indices, PCN (North) based on magnetic data from Qaanaaq (Thule) and PCS (South) based on Vostok data, reflect the transpolar convection of plasma and magnetic fields. The PC indices could be used, among others, to indicate the energy transfer from the solar wind to the magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere system in space weather monitoring applications. The present IAGA-endorsed methods to derive PC indices in real time are found to generate inconsistent index values.
Read more