Articles | Volume 35, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1293-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1293-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Open and partially closed models of the solar wind interaction with outer planet magnetospheres: the case of Saturn
Elena S. Belenkaya
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Stanley W. H. Cowley
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Igor I. Alexeev
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Kalegaev
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Ivan A. Pensionerov
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Marina S. Blokhina
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
David A. Parunakian
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU),
1(2), Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation
Related authors
Ivan A. Pensionerov, Elena S. Belenkaya, Stanley W. H. Cowley, Igor I. Alexeev, Vladimir V. Kalegaev, and David A. Parunakian
Ann. Geophys., 37, 101–109, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-101-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-101-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In the present work we used unique data on the magnetic field in the
Jovian magnetosphere measured by the Juno spacecraft. The data allowed
us to determine optimal parameters of the magnetodisc in the paraboloid
magnetospheric model and find the ways to qualitatively improve the
model.
Elena S. Belenkaya, Vladimir V. Kalegaev, Stanley W. H. Cowley, Gabrielle Provan, Marina S. Blokhina, Oleg G. Barinov, Alexander A. Kirillov, and Maria S. Grigoryan
Ann. Geophys., 34, 641–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-641-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-641-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The paraboloid model of Saturn’s magnetosphere describes the magnetic field of the planet, the ring current, magnetopause current, and the tail current. The model parameters are determined by comparison with the Cassini magnetic field data from 18 near-equatorial passes that span wide ranges of LT. The best-fit model parameters are employed to determine how the parameters vary with the subsolar distance of the magnetopause, governed by pressure balance at the magnetospheric boundary.
E. S. Belenkaya, S. W. H. Cowley, C. J. Meredith, J. D. Nichols, V. V. Kalegaev, I. I. Alexeev, O. G. Barinov, W. O. Barinova, and M. S. Blokhina
Ann. Geophys., 32, 689–704, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-689-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-689-2014, 2014
E. S. Belenkaya, S. W. H. Cowley, V. V. Kalegaev, O. G. Barinov, and W. O. Barinova
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1447–1458, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1447-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1447-2013, 2013
Alexander S. Lavrukhin, Igor I. Alexeev, and Ilya V. Tyutin
Ann. Geophys., 37, 535–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-535-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-535-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper concerns the question of whether the maximum Earth ring current strength exists and at which moment the ring current can start to break up, thus making a new mechanism of the ring current decrease during the magnetic storm. We study this effect using the Stormer theory of particle motion. After transition of critical strength, Stormer's inner trapping region opens up and the ring current charged particles get the opportunity to leave it, thus decreasing the current strength.
Ivan A. Pensionerov, Elena S. Belenkaya, Stanley W. H. Cowley, Igor I. Alexeev, Vladimir V. Kalegaev, and David A. Parunakian
Ann. Geophys., 37, 101–109, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-101-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-101-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In the present work we used unique data on the magnetic field in the
Jovian magnetosphere measured by the Juno spacecraft. The data allowed
us to determine optimal parameters of the magnetodisc in the paraboloid
magnetospheric model and find the ways to qualitatively improve the
model.
Elena S. Belenkaya, Vladimir V. Kalegaev, Stanley W. H. Cowley, Gabrielle Provan, Marina S. Blokhina, Oleg G. Barinov, Alexander A. Kirillov, and Maria S. Grigoryan
Ann. Geophys., 34, 641–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-641-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-641-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The paraboloid model of Saturn’s magnetosphere describes the magnetic field of the planet, the ring current, magnetopause current, and the tail current. The model parameters are determined by comparison with the Cassini magnetic field data from 18 near-equatorial passes that span wide ranges of LT. The best-fit model parameters are employed to determine how the parameters vary with the subsolar distance of the magnetopause, governed by pressure balance at the magnetospheric boundary.
E. S. Belenkaya, S. W. H. Cowley, C. J. Meredith, J. D. Nichols, V. V. Kalegaev, I. I. Alexeev, O. G. Barinov, W. O. Barinova, and M. S. Blokhina
Ann. Geophys., 32, 689–704, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-689-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-689-2014, 2014
E. S. Belenkaya, S. W. H. Cowley, V. V. Kalegaev, O. G. Barinov, and W. O. Barinova
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1447–1458, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1447-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1447-2013, 2013
Short summary
The reconnection efficiency of the solar-wind-magnetized planet interaction depends on the conditions in the magnetized plasma flow passing the planet. When the reconnection efficiency is very low, the interplanetary magnetic field does not penetrate the magnetosphere. We study this issue for Saturn using Cassini magnetometer data, images of Saturn's aurora obtained by the HST, and the paraboloid model of Saturn's magnetospheric magnetic field. We conclude that the open model is preferable.
The reconnection efficiency of the solar-wind-magnetized planet interaction depends on the...