Articles | Volume 31, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-409-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-409-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Investigation of a mesospheric bore event over northern China
Q. Li
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
J. Xu
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
J. Yue
Hampton University, Hampton, VA, USA
X. Liu
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China
W. Yuan
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
B. Ning
Beijing National Observatory of Space Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S. Guan
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
J. P. Younger
School of Chemistry and Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
ATRAD Pty Ltd., Thebarton, South Australia, Australia
Related authors
No articles found.
Kun Wu, Jiyao Xu, Xinan Yue, Chao Xiong, Wenbin Wang, Wei Yuan, Chi Wang, Yajun Zhu, and Ji Luo
Ann. Geophys., 38, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-163-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-163-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
An equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) event, emerging near dawn and developing after sunrise, was simultaneously observed by an all-sky imager and the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network. The observed EPBs showed westward drifts, different from post-sunset EPBs. The EPBs occurred in the recovery phase of a geomagnetic storm, possibly playing a key role in initializing their developments. The results provide a new perspective of EPBs, enriching our knowledge of ionospheric irregularity.
Wen Yi, Xianghui Xue, Iain M. Reid, Damian J. Murphy, Chris M. Hall, Masaki Tsutsumi, Baiqi Ning, Guozhu Li, Robert A. Vincent, Jinsong Chen, Jianfei Wu, Tingdi Chen, and Xiankang Dou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7567–7581, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7567-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7567-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The seasonal variations in the mesopause densities, especially with regard to its global structure, are still unclear. In this study, we report the climatology of the mesopause density estimated using multiyear observations from nine meteor radars from Arctic to Antarctic latitudes. The results reveal a significant AO and SAO in mesopause density, an asymmetry between the two polar regions and evidence of intraseasonal oscillations (ISOs), perhaps associated with the ISOs of the troposphere.
Feng Ding, Tian Mao, Lianhuan Hu, Baiqi Ning, Weixing Wan, and Yungang Wang
Ann. Geophys., 34, 1045–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1045-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1045-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Two traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) were observed by the GPS network in Asia following the large meteorite blast over Chelyabinsk, Russia. No TIDs propagating in a global range were found. Features of TIDs were compared with those excited by early nuclear explosion tests. It is inferred from our analysis that the energy release of the Chelyabinsk meteorite blast may not be large enough to excite such ionospheric disturbances in a global range as some nuclear explosions have done.
Y. Zhang, W. Wan, G. Li, L. Liu, L. Hu, and B. Ning
Ann. Geophys., 33, 1421–1430, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1421-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1421-2015, 2015
P. Prikryl, R. Ghoddousi-Fard, L. Spogli, C. N. Mitchell, G. Li, B. Ning, P. J. Cilliers, V. Sreeja, M. Aquino, M. Terkildsen, P. T. Jayachandran, Y. Jiao, Y. T. Morton, J. M. Ruohoniemi, E. G. Thomas, Y. Zhang, A. T. Weatherwax, L. Alfonsi, G. De Franceschi, and V. Romano
Ann. Geophys., 33, 657–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-657-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-657-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the period 7–17 March 2012 caused geomagnetic storms that strongly affected the high-latitude ionosphere in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere. Interhemispheric comparison of GPS phase scintillation reveals commonalities as well as asymmetries, as a consequence of the coupling between the solar wind and magnetosphere. The interhemispheric asymmetries are primarily caused by the dawn-dusk component of the interplanetary magnetic field.
L. Hu, B. Ning, L. Liu, B. Zhao, G. Li, B. Wu, Z. Huang, X. Hao, S. Chang, and Z. Wu
Ann. Geophys., 32, 1311–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1311-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1311-2014, 2014
X. Liu, J. Xu, H.-L. Liu, J. Yue, and W. Yuan
Ann. Geophys., 32, 543–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-543-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-543-2014, 2014
W. Yuan, X. Liu, J. Xu, Q. Zhou, G. Jiang, and R. Ma
Ann. Geophys., 31, 1365–1378, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1365-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1365-2013, 2013
F. Ding, W. Wan, B. Ning, B. Zhao, Q. Li, Y. Wang, L. Hu, R. Zhang, and B. Xiong
Ann. Geophys., 31, 377–385, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-377-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-377-2013, 2013