Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.490 IF 1.490
  • IF 5-year value: 1.445 IF 5-year
    1.445
  • CiteScore value: 2.9 CiteScore
    2.9
  • SNIP value: 0.789 SNIP 0.789
  • IPP value: 1.48 IPP 1.48
  • SJR value: 0.74 SJR 0.74
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 88 Scimago H
    index 88
  • h5-index value: 21 h5-index 21
Volume 29, issue 7
Ann. Geophys., 29, 1295–1303, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1295-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Ann. Geophys., 29, 1295–1303, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1295-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  21 Jul 2011

21 Jul 2011

Using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to calibrate probabilistic surface temperature forecasts over Iran

I. Soltanzadeh1, M. Azadi2, and G. A. Vakili2 I. Soltanzadeh et al.
  • 1Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Atmospheric Science & Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC), Tehran, Iran

Abstract. Using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), an attempt was made to obtain calibrated probabilistic numerical forecasts of 2-m temperature over Iran. The ensemble employs three limited area models (WRF, MM5 and HRM), with WRF used with five different configurations. Initial and boundary conditions for MM5 and WRF are obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) and for HRM the initial and boundary conditions come from analysis of Global Model Europe (GME) of the German Weather Service. The resulting ensemble of seven members was run for a period of 6 months (from December 2008 to May 2009) over Iran. The 48-h raw ensemble outputs were calibrated using BMA technique for 120 days using a 40 days training sample of forecasts and relative verification data.

The calibrated probabilistic forecasts were assessed using rank histogram and attribute diagrams. Results showed that application of BMA improved the reliability of the raw ensemble. Using the weighted ensemble mean forecast as a deterministic forecast it was found that the deterministic-style BMA forecasts performed usually better than the best member's deterministic forecast.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation