72 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Space weather monitoring with Health Canada’s terrestrial radiation monitoring network C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.06.018
2. Passage of ICMEs, Their Associated Shock Structure, and Transient Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1190-4
3. Interplanetary and geomagnetic parameters during January 16–26, 2005 R. Kane https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2011.12.011
4. Study of the cosmic ray intensity in relation to geomagnetic storms and solar interplanetary parameters for solar cycles 21 and 23 C. Bhoj et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-019-9593-2
5. Automated detection of simultaneous/non-simultaneous Forbush decreases and the associated cosmic ray phenomena O. Okike https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105460
6. Impact of space weather on human heart rate during the years 2011–2013 E. Galata et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3118-8
7. Study of the development and mechanism of large amplitude decreases in cosmic ray intensity during geomagnetic disturbances in the magnetosphere B. Badruddin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.019
8. A performance appraisal of the global survey and the fully automated methods of Forbush event identification and timing using small-amplitude Forbush decreases O. Okike & F. Menteso https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzae057
9. Precursory Signs of Large Forbush Decreases in Relation to Cosmic Rays Equatorial Anisotropy Variation M. Papailiou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070742
10. Evolution of Dst index, cosmic rays and global temperature during solar cycles 20–23 L. Biktash https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.016
11. Study of the Cosmic-Ray Modulation During the Passage of ICMEs and CIRs . Badruddin & A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0843-4
12. Solar modulation of low energy galactic cosmic rays in the near-earth space environment J. Valdés-Galicia & L. González https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.009
13. Study of the Forbush Decreases, Geomagnetic Storms, and Ground-Level Enhancements in Selected Intervals and Their Space Weather Implications . Badruddin & A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0665-4
14. Characteristics of Forbush Decreases Measured by the PAMELA Instrument During 2006–2014 I. Lagoida et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778819660347
15. Study of the evolution of the geomagnetic disturbances during the passage of high-speed streams from coronal holes in solar cycle 2009-2016 A. Kumar & B. Badruddin https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03927-5
16. Cosmic radiation influence on the physiological state of aviators M. Papailiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0057-5
17. Forbush Decreases and Geomagnetic Disturbances: 1. Events Associated with Different Types of Solar and Interplanetary Sources A. Melkumyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600650
18. Forbush decreases and geomagnetic storms A. Belov et al. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794024030015
19. Investigation of the relation between space-weather parameters and Forbush decreases automatically selected from Moscow and Apatity cosmic ray stations during solar cycle 23 J. Alhassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/273
20. Amplitude of the Observational Forbush Decreases in the Presence of Cosmic Ray Diurnal Anisotropy During High Solar Activity in 1972 O. Okike & J. Alhassan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01855-9
21. Study of the recovery characteristics of intense cosmic-ray decreases B. Badruddin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03968-w
22. A comparison of Solar Cycle 23rd and 24th for Solar type II radio bursts associated with coronal mass ejection in relation to interplanetary features H. Chandra & B. Bhatt https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-022-04156-0
23. Temporal Changes in the Rigidity Spectrum of Forbush Decreases Based on Neutron Monitor Data M. Alania et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0273-0
24. What determines the observational magnitudes of Forbush events on Earth: A critique of the traditional manual method O. Okike https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3123
25. Forbush Decreases and Geomagnetic Storms During a Highly Disturbed Solar and Interplanetary Period, 4–10 September 2017 B. Badruddin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001941
26. Forbush Decreases and <2 Day GCR Flux Non-recurrent Variations Studied with LISA Pathfinder M. Armano et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c99
27. On the variation of small-amplitude Forbush decreases with solar-geomagnetic parameters C. Ugwu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04310-w
28. Forbush Decreases and Associated Geomagnetic Storms: Statistical Comparison in Solar Cycles 23 and 24 A. Melkumyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02281-3
29. How are Forbush decreases related to interplanetary magnetic field enhancements? K. Arunbabu et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425115
30. Effect of solar wind disturbances on small-amplitude simultaneous Forbush events during solar cycle 23 C. Ugwu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.011
31. Study of transient modulation of galactic cosmic rays due to interplanetary manifestations of coronal mass ejections: 2010 - 2017 M. Fadaaq & B. Badruddin https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03918-6
32. Testing the Effects of Cosmic Ray Flux Intensity Modulation on Solar Emission Characteristics C. Onah et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/adb135
33. A multivariate study of Forbush decrease simultaneity O. Okike & A. Collier https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.015
34. Relationship of ground level enhancements with solar, interplanetary and geophysical parameters K. Firoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-010-0473-0
35. Image of Forbush Decrease in a Magnetic Cloud by Three Moments of Cosmic Ray Distribution Function A. Petukhova et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025964
36. Spectral Features of Forbush Decrease During Geomagnetic Storms B. Adhikari et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4051359
37. Does the duration of the magnetic storm recovery phase depend on the development rate in its main phase? 2. A new method Y. Yermolaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321603004X
38. Modeling the time behavior of the D st index during the main phase of magnetic storms generated by various types of solar wind N. Nikolaeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952513060038
39. Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections, Associated Features, and Transient Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays A. Kumar & . Badruddin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0465-7
40. Influence of a Carrington-like event on the atmospheric chemistry, temperature and dynamics: revised M. Calisto et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045010
41. Testing the Empirical Relationship between Forbush Decreases and Cosmic Ray Diurnal Anisotropy J. Adejoh Alhassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac5ee9
42. Rigidity spectrum of Forbush decrease calculated by neutron monitors data corrected and uncorrected for geomagnetic disturbances M. Alania et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/409/1/012184
43. Testing the effect of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic storm indices on Galactic cosmic ray flux variation with automatically-selected Forbush decreases J. Alhassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/9/234
44. Forbush decreases during strong geomagnetic storms: time delays, rigidity effects, and ICME-driven modulation O. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-025-04477-w
45. Does the duration of the magnetic storm recovery phase depend on the storm development rate in its main phase? Y. Yermolaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793215040039
46. Study of Galactic Cosmic-Ray Flux Modulation by Interplanetary Plasma Structures for the Evaluation of Space Instrument Performance and Space Weather Science Investigations C. Grimani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120749
47. Testing the impact of coronal mass ejections on cosmic-ray intensity modulation with algorithm selected Forbush decreases O. Okike et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa4002
48. Galactic cosmic-ray energy spectra and expected solar events at the time of future space missions C. Grimani et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094005
49. Investigation of Forbush Decreases and Other Solar/Geophysical Agents Associated With Lightning Over the U.S. Latitude Band and the Continental Africa O. Okike https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026456
50. Investigation of the rigidity and sensitivity dependence of neutron monitors for cosmic ray modulation using algorithm-selected Forbush decreases O. Okike & O. Nwuzor https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa370
51. Precursory Signs of Large Forbush Decreases: The Criterion of Anisotropy M. Papailiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02391-y
52. Space weather near Earth and energetic particles: selected results K. Kudela https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/409/1/012017
53. Dependence of geomagnetic activity during magnetic storms on solar-wind parameters for different types of streams: 4. Simulation for magnetic clouds N. Nikolaeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793214020145
54. Chree Method of Analysis: A Critique of Its Application to Forbush Events Selection Criteria and Timing O. Okike https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab32db
55. On the simultaneity of Forbush decreases: The simultaneous effects of interplanetary parameters and geomagnetic activity indices I. Eya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-024-10028-6
56. Influence of the interplanetary driver type on the durations of the main and recovery phases of magnetic storms Y. Yermolaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019826
57. The Empirical Implication of Conducting a Chree Analysis Using Data from Isolated Neutron Monitors O. Okike & A. Umahi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1405-y
58. Forbush Effects and Geomagnetic Storms A. Belov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793224600097
59. The Asymptotic Longitudinal Cosmic Ray Intensity Distribution as a Precursor of Forbush Decreases M. Papailiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-9945-4
60. Amplitude of the Usual Cosmic Ray Diurnal and Enhanced Anisotropies: Implications for the Observed Magnitude, Timing, and Ranking of Forbush Decreases O. Okike https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abfe60
61. Evolution of Cosmic-Ray Intensities While the Earth Was Engulfed by the Interplanetary Storm (Blob) of 1 – 3 October 2013 R. Kane https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0489-7
62. A comparison of catalogues of Forbush decreases identified from individual and a network of neutron monitors: a critical perspective O. Okike et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab680
63. Cosmic ray − global lightning causality O. Okike & A. Umahi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.04.002
64. Preliminary investigation of the multivariate relations between program-selected forbush decreases, worldwide lightning frequency, sunspot number and other solar-terrestrial drivers O. Okike & J. Alhassan https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02514-z
65. Accurate cataloging of Forbush decreases: implications for space weather research O. Okike et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-025-04507-7
66. The storm of March 1989 revisited: A fresh look at the event A. Shirochkov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.09.010
67. Radio-loud and radio-quiet CMEs: solar cycle dependency, influence on cosmic ray intensity, and geo-effectiveness H. Kharayat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03930-w
68. Forbush Decreases and Geomagnetic Disturbances: 1. Events Associated with Different Types of Solar and Interplanetary Sources A. Melkumyan et al. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794023600503
69. Study of the development of geomagnetic storms in the magnetosphere using solar wind data of three different time resolutions B. Badruddin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-04030-5
70. Forbush decreases at a middle latitude neutron monitor: relations to geomagnetic activity and to interplanetary plasma structures I. Parnahaj & K. Kudela https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2484-3
71. 23rd solar cycle: Solar activity parameters and associated Forbush decreases B. Bhatt & H. Chandra https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.10.046
72. Calculated cosmic rays dynamics before the geomagnetic storms onset caused by the interplanetary shocks I. Petukhov & S. Petukhov https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.05.021