182 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Equinoctial asymmetry in ionosphere over Indian region during 2006–2013 using COSMIC measurements M. Aggarwal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.020
2. Unexpected Regional Zonal Structures in Low Latitude Ionosphere Call for a High Longitudinal Resolution of the Global Ionospheric Maps L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102315
3. GNSS radio occultation (RO) derived electron density quality in high latitude and polar region: NCAR-TIEGCM simulation and real data evaluation X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.03.009
4. Global model of the F2 layer peak height for low solar activity based on GPS radio-occultation data V. Shubin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.08.024
5. Ionospheric F2-Layer critical frequency retrieved from COSMIC radio occultation: A statistical comparison with measurements from a meridional ionosonde chain over Southeast Asia J. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.09.015
6. Using radio occultation-based electron density profiles for studying sporadic E layer spatial and temporal characteristics H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02038-z
7. The influence of the spatial and temporal collocation windows on the comparisons of the ionospheric characteristic parameters derived from COSMIC radio occultation and digisondes J. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.01.024
8. A New Empirical Model of NmF2 Based on CHAMP, GRACE, and COSMIC Radio Occultation Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111386
9. Performance Analysis of a Strong Constraint 4DVar and 4DEnVar on Regional Ionosphere Imaging N. Ssessanga et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003584
10. Diurnal variations of the ionospheric electron density height profiles over Irkutsk: Comparison of the incoherent scatter radar measurements, GSM TIP simulations and IRI predictions G. Zherebtsov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.008
11. Comparison between ionospheric peak parameters retrieved from COSMIC measurement and ionosonde observation over Sanya L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.05.012
12. The Early Results and Validation of FORMOSAT‐7/COSMIC‐2 Space Weather Products: Global Ionospheric Specification and Ne‐Aided Abel Electron Density Profile C. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028028
13. A New Global Ionospheric Electron Density Model Based on Grid Modeling Method H. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002992
14. Climatology of ionospheric upper transition height derived from COSMIC satellites during the solar minimum of 2008 X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.08.018
15. Modeling the global ionospheric electron densities based on the EOF decomposition of the ionospheric radio occultation observation M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.033
16. Global Validation and Characterization of the Ionospheric Bottomside Thickness (B0) Using Fengyun-3 Radio Occultation Observations G. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3657049
17. Observation and Simulation of the Development of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles: Post‐Sunset Rise or Upwelling Growth? M. Chou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028544
18. Optimal Estimation Inversion of Ionospheric Electron Density from GNSS-POD Limb Measurements: Part II-Validation and Comparison Using NmF2 and hmF2 N. Swarnalingam et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15164048
19. COSMIC Ionospheric Occultation Inversion Simulation and Constellation Optimization Research B. XU et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2024.01.2022-0072
20. New results of ionospheric total electron content measurements from a low-cost global navigation satellite system receiver and comparisons with other data sources D. Okoh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.018
21. The Validation of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Measurements in the Middle Latitude Region of China with Ionosonde Observations during 2015–2018 L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8100528
22. TIEGCM Ensemble Kalman Filter Assimilation Model Design and Preliminary Results Y. ZHANG et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2017.02.168
23. Ionosphere equatorial ionization anomaly observed by GPS radio occultations during 2006–2014 X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.04.004
24. Estimation of Ionospheric Total Electron Content From a Multi-GNSS Station in China C. She et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2941049
25. Data fusion of ground-based GNSS, radio occultation and empirical model to predict the ionospheric peak electron density via artificial neural networks Y. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01889-7
26. Interhemispheric Asymmetries in Ionospheric Electron Density Responses During Geomagnetic Storms: A Study Using Space‐Based and Ground‐Based GNSS and AMPERE Observations N. Swarnalingam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030247
27. From prediction to mechanistic understanding: SHAP-based interpretation of a low-latitude ionospheric three-dimensional electron density model D. Yang & H. Fang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-026-02071-3
28. Daytime altitude variations of the equatorial, topside magnetic field‐aligned ion transport at solar minimum A. Burrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50284
29. Artificial ionospheric wave number 4 structure below the F2 region due to the Abel retrieval of radio occultation measurements X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-010-0201-9
30. E‐CHAIM as a Model of Total Electron Content: Performance and Diagnostics D. Themens et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002872
31. Altitudinal comparison between FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 and digisonde bottomside electron density profiles matched at the F2-peak M. Moses et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.074
32. Global ionospheric response to nonmigrating DE3 and DE2 tides forced from below P. Mukhtarov & D. Pancheva https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016099
33. An ionospheric occultation inversion technique based on epoch difference J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.003
34. The nighttime winter anomaly phenomenon observed by the in situ electron density measurements from the CSES satellite X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.033
35. Longitudinal Structure of the Midlatitude Ionosphere Using COSMIC Electron Density Profiles Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA024927
36. Global characteristics of occurrence of an additional layer in the ionosphere observed by COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045744
37. GPS satellite differential code bias estimation with current eleven low earth orbit satellites X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01536-2
38. Thermosphere–ionosphere coupling in response to recurrent geomagnetic activity P. Mukhtarov & D. Pancheva https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.02.013
39. Specifying Satellite Drag Through Coupled Thermosphere‐Ionosphere Data Assimilation of Radio Occultation Electron Density Profiles N. Dietrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003147
40. The Global Navigation Satellite System occultation receiver onboard the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite: Data and observational results S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.07.030
41. F region electron density profile inversion from backscatter ionogram based on international reference ionosphere P. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.05.003
42. First Ionospheric Radio-Occultation Measurements From GNSS Occultation Sounder on the Chinese Feng-Yun 3C Satellite T. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2546978
43. Improving the vertical electron density profile in ionospheric imaging at storm time: A case study on 25–27 September 2011 P. Yin & C. Mitchell https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019899
44. Assessing the performance of a Northeast Asia Japan-centered 3-D ionosphere specification technique during the 2015 St. Patrick’s day geomagnetic storm N. Ssessanga et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01447-8
45. A study on the nighttime midlatitude ionospheric trough M. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016252
46. Radio occultation electron density profiles from the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites over the Brazilian region: A comparison with Digisonde data C. Ely et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.029
47. CSES GNSS ionospheric inversion technique, validation and error analysis J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9245-6
48. Accuracy assessment of the quiet-time ionospheric F2 peak parameters as derived from COSMIC-2 multi-GNSS radio occultation measurements I. Cherniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020080
49. Daytime climatology of ionospheric NmF2 and hmF2 from COSMIC data A. Burns et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017529
50. An Accurate Deep Neural Network-Based Inversion Approach for Multichannel Microwave Interferometer Characterization of Plasma Wake Electron Density Distribution Z. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2024.3430557
51. Comparison of ionospheric bottomside profile parameters (B0 & B1) from FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 radio occultation profiles with Digisonde and IRI-2020 model I. S et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-025-04490-z
52. Combination of High-Rate Ionosonde Measurements with COSMIC-2 Radio Occultation Observations for Reference Ionosphere Applications I. Cherniak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070804
53. An investigation of ionospheric upper transition height variations at low and equatorial latitudes deduced from combined COSMIC and C/NOFS measurements C. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.024
54. Simulated longitudinal variations in the E-region plasma density induced by non-migrating tides Z. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.12.004
55. Improvement of GPS radio occultation retrieval error of E region electron density: COSMIC measurement and IRI model simulation K. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020622
56. Estimating COSMIC ionospheric radio occultation foF2 error using the three-cornered hat method S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025055
57. Ionospheric winter anomaly and annual anomaly observed from Formosat-3/COSMIC Radio Occultation observations during the ascending phase of solar cycle 24 V. Sai Gowtam & S. Tulasi Ram https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.03.017
58. Gravity and Pressure‐Gradient Currents Using Ionospheric Electron Density Measurements From COSMIC Satellites J. Sreelakshmi & G. Vichare https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028401
59. Features of the middle- and low-latitude ionosphere during solar minimum as revealed from COSMIC radio occultation measurements L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016691
60. Global model SMF2 of the F2-layer maximum height V. Shubin et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321505014X
61. A novel neural network model of Earth’s topside ionosphere A. Smirnov et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28034-z
62. First ICON‐FUV Nighttime NmF2 and hmF2 Comparison to Ground and Space‐Based Measurements G. Wautelet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029360
63. A linear scale height Chapman model supported by GNSS occultation measurements G. Olivares‐Pulido et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022337
64. Seasonal features of topside scale height based on COSMIC measurements F. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.06.003
65. Assessment of IRI-2016 hmF2 model options with digisonde, COSMIC and ISR observations for low and high solar flux conditions H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.033
66. Local Time Variations of Ionospheric F Layer Radial Current in Response to Enhanced Solar Wind Input Y. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031709
67. New global electron density observations from GPS-RO in the D- and E-Region ionosphere D. Wu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.013
68. Transition of Interhemispheric Asymmetry of Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During Solstices H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026055
69. Effects of estimating the ionospheric and thermospheric parameters on electron density forecasts Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9251-4
70. Comparison of bottomside ionospheric profile parameters (B0 and B1) extracted from FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 GNSS Radio occultations with Digisondes and IRI-2016 model A. Kumar Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.045
71. Modeling the Lower Part of the Topside Ionospheric Vertical Electron Density Profile Over the European Region by Means of Swarm Satellites Data and IRI UP Method A. Pignalberi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001790
72. Comparative study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3, Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar, Irkutsk Digisonde and IRI model electron density vertical profiles K. Ratovsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.026
73. PYSAT: Python Satellite Data Analysis Toolkit R. Stoneback et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025297
74. Electron density retrieval from occulting GNSS signals using a gradient-aided inversion technique I. Kulikov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.002
75. A global picture of ionospheric slab thickness derived from GIM TEC and COSMIC radio occultation observations H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021964
76. A neural network based error correction method for radio occultation electron density retrieval V. Pham & J. Juang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.10.013
77. A quantitative analysis of latitudinal variation of ionospheric total electron content and comparison with IRI-2020 over China Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.05.040
78. A global 3-D electron density reconstruction model based on radio occultation data and neural networks J. Habarulema et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105702
79. A comparison of the LPIM-COSMIC F2 peak parameters determinations against the IRI(CCIR) F. Azpilicueta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.008
80. Double crests of peak height in the equatorial ionospheric F2 layer observed by COSMIC X. Luan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021611
81. Seasonal characteristics of COSMIC measurements over Indian sub-continent during different phases of solar activity M. Aggarwal & D. Sharma https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.018
82. Temporal and spatial deviation in F2 peak parameters derived from FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC S. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001351
83. Differences among the total electron content derived by radio occultation, global ionospheric maps and satellite altimetry M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01893-8
84. A simultaneous study of ionospheric parameters derived from FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC, GRACE, and CHAMP missions over middle, low, and equatorial latitudes: Comparison with ionosonde data J. Habarulema et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020192
85. The influence of hemispheric asymmetries on field‐aligned ion drifts at the geomagnetic equator A. Burrell & R. Heelis https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053637
86. Identifying equatorial ionospheric irregularities using in situ ion drifts R. Stoneback & R. Heelis https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-421-2014
87. Global ionospheric response observed by COSMIC satellites during the January 2009 stratospheric sudden warming event X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015466
88. A Low‐Latitude Three‐Dimensional Ionospheric Electron Density Model Based on Radio Occultation Data Using Artificial Neural Networks With Prior Knowledge D. Yang & H. Fang https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003299
89. Exploring the role of ionospheric drivers during the extreme solar minimum of 2008 J. Klenzing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2147-2013
90. Reply to comment by Lei et al. on “A new aspect of ionospheric E region electron density morphology” Y. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015334
91. Observations and Simulations of Eddy Diffusion and Tidal Effects on the Semiannual Oscillation in the Ionosphere Q. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024341
92. A technique for routinely updating the ITU-R database using radio occultation electron density profiles C. Brunini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0648-x
93. A New Artificial Neural Network‐Based Global Three‐Dimensional Ionospheric Model (ANNIM‐3D) Using Long‐Term Ionospheric Observations: Preliminary Results V. Gowtam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026540
94. Global median model of the F2-layer peak height based on ionospheric radio-occultation and ground-based Digisonde observations V. Shubin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.029
95. Longitudinal behaviors of the IRI-B parameters of the equatorial electron density profiles retrieved from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC radio occultation measurements L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.06.005
96. A new global model for the ionospheric F2 peak height for radio wave propagation M. Hoque & N. Jakowski https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-797-2012
97. Observing System Simulation Experiment Study on Imaging the Ionosphere by Assimilating Observations From Ground GNSS, LEO-Based Radio Occultation and Ocean Reflection, and Cross Link . Xinan Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2275753
98. Validation of COSMIC ionospheric peak parameters by the measurements of an ionosonde chain in China L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-1311-2014
99. Comparison between bottomside ionospheric profile parameters retrieved from FORMOSAT3 measurements and ground-based observations collected at Jicamarca Y. Chuo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.021
100. Assimilation of GPS TEC and COSMIC foF2/ hmF2 Into SPIM Model Using Unscented Kalman Filter Techniques Over the East African Equatorial Region D. Chekole et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023RS007919
101. Field‐aligned neutral wind bias correction scheme for global ionospheric modeling at midlatitudes by assimilating FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC hmF2 data under geomagnetically quiet conditions Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020768
102. Equatorial longitude and local time variations of topside magnetic field‐aligned ion drifts at solar minimum A. Burrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017264
103. Regional 3‐D ionospheric electron density specification on the basis of data assimilation of ground‐based GNSS and radio occultation data E. Aa et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001363
104. Global-scale gravity wave analysis methodology for the ESA Earth Explorer 11 candidate CAIRT S. Rhode et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5785-2024
105. Assessment of space weather modeling capabilities and transition to operations M. Kuznetsova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.03.027
106. The ionospheric midlatitude trough observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC during solar minimum I. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015544
107. Topside electron density profiles observed at low latitudes by COSMIC and compared with in situ ion densities measured by C/NOFS P. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50287
108. Local ensemble transform Kalman filter for ionospheric data assimilation: Observation influence analysis during a geomagnetic storm event J. Durazo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024274
109. Magnetic meridional winds in the thermosphere obtained from Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements (GAIM) model L. Lomidze et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021098
110. Ionospheric F2 region perturbed by the 25 April 2015 Nepal earthquake Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022280
111. Evaluation of E Layer Dominated Ionosphere Events Using COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 and CHAMP Ionospheric Radio Occultation Data S. Kamal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020333
112. Exploring the link between convectively generated gravity waves and ionospheric anomalies: Insights from observations near the low-mid latitude geomagnetic transition region M. Rather et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.027
113. On the possible use of radio occultation middle latitude electron density profiles to retrieve thermospheric parameters A. Mikhailov et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014009
114. Ionosphere probing with simultaneous GNSS radio occultations V. Pham & J. Juang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0501-1
115. Specifying the equatorial ionosphere using CINDI on C/NOFS, COSMIC, and data interpolating empirical orthogonal functions R. Stoneback et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50596
116. Adapting a climatology model to improve estimation of ionosphere parameters and subsequent validation with radio occultation and ionosonde data J. Habarulema & N. Ssessanga https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001549
117. Determination of Total Electron Content at Equatorial Region—Thailand Using Radio Occultation Technique W. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2016.62027
118. Three‐Dimensional Ionospheric Evolution and Asymmetry of the Electron Density Depletion Generated by the 21 June 2020 Annular Solar Eclipse C. Zhai et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031725
119. A long-term study on the deletion criterion of questionable electron density profiles caused by ionospheric irregularities – COSMIC radio occultation technique G. Uma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.034
120. Data Assimilation for Ionospheric Space-Weather Forecasting in the Presence of Model Bias J. Durazo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2021.679477
121. Iterative Gradient Correction (IGC) Method for True Height Analysis of Ionograms M. Ankita & S. Tulasi Ram https://doi.org/10.1029/2023RS007808
122. Exploring Earth's atmosphere with radio occultation: contributions to weather, climate and space weather R. Anthes https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1077-2011
123. Evaluating the effect of the global ionospheric map on aiding retrieval of radio occultation electron density profiles X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0281-9
124. A Global Empirical Model of Electron Density Profile in the F Region Ionosphere Basing on COSMIC Measurements Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002642
125. A model-assisted radio occultation data inversion method based on data ingestion into NeQuick M. Shaikh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.09.006
126. Ionospheric electron density inversion for Global Navigation Satellite Systems radio occultation using aided Abel inversions M. Chou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023027
127. Improving the NeQuick Model in the Plasmasphere Through Radio Occultation and POD TEC Observations A. Pignalberi et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3635770
128. Comment on “A new aspect of ionospheric E region electron density morphology” by Yen‐Hsyang Chu, Kong‐Hong Wu, and Ching‐Lun Su J. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015234
129. On the Analytical Description of the Topside Ionosphere by NeQuick: Modeling the Scale Height Through COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Selected Data A. Pignalberi et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2986683
130. Use of radio occultation to probe the high-latitude ionosphere A. Mannucci et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2789-2015
131. Calibration and Validation of Swarm Plasma Densities and Electron Temperatures Using Ground‐Based Radars and Satellite Radio Occultation Measurements L. Lomidze et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006415
132. Validation of COSMIC-2-Derived Ionospheric Peak Parameters Using Measurements of Ionosondes S. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214238
133. Optimal Estimation Inversion of Ionospheric Electron Density from GNSS-POD Limb Measurements: Part I-Algorithm and Morphology D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133245
134. Machine Learning Detection of Radio Occultation Electron Density Profiles Perturbed by the Equatorial Plasma Bubbles S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3543427
135. An aided Abel inversion technique assisted by artificial neural network-based background ionospheric model for near real-time correction of FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 data V. Sai Gowtam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.05.008
136. An update global model of hmF2 from values estimated from ionosonde and COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 radio occultation M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.053
137. Long-term comparison of the ionospheric F2 layer electron density peak derived from ionosonde data and Formosat-3/COSMIC occultations M. Limberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2015023
138. Comparison of a Bottom-Up GNSS Radio Occultation Method to Measure D- and E-Region Electron Densities with Ionosondes and FIRI D. Shaver et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15184363
139. Theoretical study of the ionospheric plasma cave in the equatorial ionization anomaly region Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020235
140. Supervised Detection of Ionospheric Scintillation in Low-Latitude Radio Occultation Measurements V. Ludwig-Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091690
141. The Impact of Solar Activity on Forecasting the Upper Atmosphere via Assimilation of Electron Density Data T. Kodikara et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002660
142. Global Gridded Ionospheric Electron Density Derivation During 2006–2016 by Assimilating COSMIC TEC and Its Validation J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030955
143. Height-integrated Pedersen conductivity in both E and F regions from COSMIC observations C. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.013
144. Development and Validation of Precipitation Enhanced Densities for the Empirical Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model C. Watson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002779
145. Modeling the Topside Ionosphere Effective Scale Height through In Situ Electron Density Observations by Low-Earth-Orbit Satellites A. Pignalberi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9060280
146. Effects observed in the equatorial and low latitude ionospheric F-region in the Brazilian sector during low solar activity geomagnetic storms and comparison with the COSMIC measurements Y. Sahai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.07.006
147. The International Reference Ionosphere Model: A Review and Description of an Ionospheric Benchmark D. Bilitza et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000792
148. Climatology of the ionospheric slab thickness along the longitude of 120° E in China and its adjacent region during the solar minimum years of 2007–2009 Z. Huang & H. Yuan https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1311-2015
149. Wavenumber-4 Structure in COSMIC-2 Observations: Vertical Plane Perspective L. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082105
150. Global Response of the Ionosphere to Atmospheric Tides Forced from Below: Recent Progress Based on Satellite Measurements D. Pancheva & P. Mukhtarov https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9837-1
151. The ESA Swarm mission to help ionospheric modeling: a new NeQuick topside formulation for mid-latitude regions M. Pezzopane & A. Pignalberi https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48440-6
152. Global Longitudinal Behavior of IRI Bottomside Profile Parameters From FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC Ionospheric Occultations S. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025246
153. An empirical model of the occurrence of an additional layer in the ionosphere from the occultation technique: Preliminary results B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020220
154. First Results From the Ionospheric Extension of WACCM‐X During the Deep Solar Minimum Year of 2008 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA025010
155. Comparison and evaluation of a bottom-up GPS-RO electron density retrieval for D and E regions using radar observations and models N. Swarnalingam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105333
156. Interhemispheric asymmetry of the equatorial ionization anomaly in solstices observed by COSMIC during 2007–2012 X. Luan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020820
157. Intercalibration of the Plasma Density Measurements in Earth's Topside Ionosphere A. Smirnov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029334
158. An improved inversion for FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC ionosphere electron density profiles N. Pedatella et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021704
159. Differential Code Bias Estimation and Accuracy Analysis Based on CSES Onboard GPS and BDS Observations J. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030374
160. A global neural network model of 3D ionospheric electron density based on COSMIC radio occultation measurements Q. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.011
161. Ionospheric Peak Parameters Retrieved from FY-3C Radio Occultation: A Statistical Comparison with Measurements from COSMIC RO and Digisondes Over the Globe H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121419
162. An attempt to establish a statistical model of the day-to-day variability of the NF2 and hF2 parameters computed from IRI C. Brunini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.023
163. Ionospheric electron density observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC over the European region and validated by ionosonde data A. Krankowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0481-z
164. Global accuracy assessment of ionospheric F2 peak characteristics based on coincident-colocated COSMIC-2 RO and Digisonde measurements: a three-year period analysis (2020–2022) K. Paul et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.083
165. Data assimilation retrieval of electron density profiles from radio occultation measurements X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015980
166. El Niño–Southern Oscillation effect on ionospheric tidal/SPW amplitude in 2007–2015 FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC observations Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1009-7
167. Effects of inferring unobserved thermospheric and ionospheric state variables by using an Ensemble Kalman Filter on global ionospheric specification and forecasting C. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020390
168. The Impact of Assimilating COSMIC‐2 Observations of Electron Density in WACCMX N. Pedatella & J. Anderson https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029906
169. A self-contained GIM-aided Abel retrieval method to improve GNSS-Radio Occultation retrieved electron density profiles S. Tulasi Ram et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0491-z
170. Global GNSS-RO Electron Density in the Lower Ionosphere D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071577
171. Long‐term analysis between radio occultation and ionosonde peak electron density and height during geomagnetic storms J. Habarulema & S. Carelse https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068944
172. Comparison of advanced troposphere models for aiding reduction of PPP convergence time in Australia M. Deo & A. El-Mowafy https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2018.1472046
173. Longitudinal Variations of the Occurrence Probability of the Ionospheric F1 Layer Peak at Middle and High Latitudes Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026236
174. Interhemispheric comparison of the ionosphere and plasmasphere total electron content using GPS, radio occultation and ionosonde observations J. Habarulema et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.05.004
175. An Abel inversion method assisted by background model for GPS Ionospheric Radio Occultation data P. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.12.008
176. Reply to comment by A. V. Mikhailov and L. Perrone on “The winter anomaly in the middle‐latitude F region during the solar minimum period observed by the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate” W. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020445
177. Comparison of the characteristics of ionospheric parameters obtained from FORMOSAT-3 and digisonde over Ascension Island Y. Chuo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-787-2013
178. Evaluation of Abel Inversion Method Assisted By an Improved IRI Model M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026880
179. Three-dimensional electron density along the WSA and MSNA latitudes probed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC F. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0326-8
180. Validation of CSES RO measurements using ionosonde and ISR observations X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.08.028
181. Application of the Fengyun 3 C GNSS occultation sounder for assessing the global ionospheric response to a magnetic storm event W. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1483-2019
182. The ionosphere: effects, GPS modeling and the benefits for space geodetic techniques M. Hernández-Pajares et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0508-5