75 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Diurnal and seasonal behavior of the Hokkaido East SuperDARN ground backscatter: simulation and observation A. Oinats et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0378-9
2. A comparison of EISCAT and SuperDARN F‐region measurements with consideration of the refractive index in the scattering volume R. Gillies et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014694
3. A new methodology for the development of high‐latitude ionospheric climatologies and empirical models G. Chisham https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023235
4. Storm Time Electrified MSTIDs Observed Over Mid‐Latitude North America I. Kelley et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031115
5. Seasonal and diurnal variations of PolarDARN F region echo occurrence in the polar cap and their causes M. Ghezelbash et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020726
6. Relation between magnetopause position and reconnection rate under quasi-steady solar wind dynamic pressure H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02101-9
7. Elevation angle‐of‐arrival determination for a standard and a modified superDARN HF radar layout A. McDonald et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RS005157
8. Large‐scale observations of a subauroral polarization stream by midlatitude SuperDARN radars: Instantaneous longitudinal velocity variations L. Clausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017232
9. The lower ionosphere response to its disturbances by powerful radio waves N. Bakhmetieva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.022
10. Statistical Patterns of Ionospheric Convection Derived From Mid‐latitude, High‐Latitude, and Polar SuperDARN HF Radar Observations E. Thomas & S. Shepherd https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JA025280
11. Comparison of interferometer calibration techniques for improved SuperDARN elevation angles G. Chisham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100638
12. An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing B. Kunduri et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003130
13. pyDARN: A Python software for visualizing SuperDARN radar data X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1022690
14. Monitoring the F-region peak electron density using HF backscatter interferometry P. Ponomarenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049675
15. Phase calibration of interferometer arrays at high‐frequency radars A. Burrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RS006089
16. Data‐Driven Basis Functions for SuperDARN Ionospheric Plasma Flow Characterization and Prediction R. Shore et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029272
17. A Model of High Latitude Ionospheric Convection Derived From SuperDARN EOF Model Data M. Lam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003428
18. Calibrating HF Radar Elevation Angle Measurements Using E Layer Backscatter Echoes P. Ponomarenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RS006638
19. Dynamic properties of throat aurora revealed by simultaneous ground and satellite observations X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023033
20. SuperDARN Observations During Geomagnetic Storms, Geomagnetically Active Times, and Enhanced Solar Wind Driving M. Walach & A. Grocott https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026816
21. Automatically determining the origin direction and propagation mode of high-frequency radar backscatter A. Burrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005808
22. Mapping high‐latitude ionospheric electrodynamics with SuperDARN and AMPERE E. Cousins et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020463
23. A Statistical Model of Vorticity in the Polar Ionosphere and Implications for Extreme Values G. Chisham & M. Freeman https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029307
24. Interferometric calibration and the first elevation observations at EKB ISTP SB RAS radar at 10–12 MHz O. Berngardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100628
25. Asymmetry in the Farley‐Buneman dispersion relation caused by parallel electric fields V. Forsythe & R. Makarevich https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023390
26. Super Dual Auroral Radar Network Expansion and Its Influence on the Derived Ionospheric Convection Pattern M. Walach et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029559
27. A land-based HF transmitter for ionospheric propagation studies using SuperDARN radars L. Mdibi et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0057
28. An EISCAT UHF/ESR Experiment That Explains How Ionospheric Irregularities Induce GPS Phase Fluctuations at Auroral and Polar Latitudes H. John et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RS007236
29. Spatial distribution of average vorticity in the high‐latitude ionosphere and its variation with interplanetary magnetic field direction and season G. Chisham et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014263
30. Calibrating SuperDARN Interferometers Using Meteor Backscatter G. Chisham https://doi.org/10.1029/2017RS006492
31. Dual radar investigation of E region plasma waves in the southern polar cap V. Forsythe & R. Makarevich https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021664
32. An adjusted location model for SuperDARN backscatter echoes E. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1769-2012
33. Elevation angle determination for SuperDARN HF radar layouts S. Shepherd https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006348
34. Virtual Height Characteristics of Ionospheric and Ground Scatter Observed by Mid‐Latitude SuperDARN HF Radars E. Thomas & S. Shepherd https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RS007429
35. A Ray Tracing Simulation of HF Ionospheric Radar Performance at African Equatorial Latitudes C. Michael et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006936
36. Separating Contributions to Plasma Vorticity in the High‐Latitude Ionosphere From Large‐Scale Convection and Meso‐Scale Turbulence G. Chisham & M. Freeman https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031885
37. Calibration and assessment of Swarm ion drift measurements using a comparison with a statistical convection model R. Fiori et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0472-7
38. Review of the accomplishments of mid-latitude Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) HF radars N. Nishitani et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0270-5
39. Coincident multi-point observations of the E- and F-region decametre-scale plasma waves at high latitudes B. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.02.014
40. Zhongshan HF Radar Elevation Calibration Based on Ground Backscatter Echoes W. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244236
41. Climatology of HF Propagation Characteristics at Very High Latitudes From SuperDARN Observations P. Ponomarenko & K. McWilliams https://doi.org/10.1029/2023RS007657
42. The importance of elevation angle measurements in HF radar investigations of the ionosphere R. Greenwald et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RS006186
43. Multi‐instrument, high‐resolution imaging of polar cap patch transportation E. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005672
44. Simultaneous ground‐based optical and HF radar observations of the ionospheric footprint of the open/closed field line boundary along the geomagnetic meridian X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021481
45. Coordinated radar observations of plasma wave characteristics in the auroral F region R. Makarevich & W. Bristow https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-875-2014
46. Dominant ocean wave direction measurements using the TIGER SuperDARN systems R. Greenwood et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.08.006
47. Determination of ionospheric parameters in real time using SuperDARN HF Radars E. Bland et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020076
48. First Joint Observations of Radio Aurora by the VHF and HF Radars of the ISTP SB RAS O. Berngardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-018-9832-4
49. Exploring the relationship between STEVE and SAID during three events observed by SuperDARN E. Macho et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1422164
50. Investigation of the temperature gradient instability as the source of midlatitude quiet time decameter‐scale ionospheric irregularities: 1. Observations S. de Larquier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019643
51. A reassessment of SuperDARN meteor echoes from the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere G. Chisham & M. Freeman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.018
52. Survey of ULF wave signatures seen in the Tasman International Geospace Environment Radars data L. Norouzi‐Sedeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020652
53. F region ionosphere effects on the mapping accuracy of SuperDARN HF radar echoes X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RS005957
54. On the spatial distribution of decameter‒scale subauroral ionospheric irregularities observed by SuperDARN radars S. de Larquier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50475
55. Ionospheric Disturbances and Irregularities During the 25–26 August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029843
56. Large‐Scale Comparison of Polar Cap Ionospheric Velocities Measured by RISR‐C, RISR‐N, and SuperDARN R. Gillies et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017RS006435
57. Dusk‐Dawn Asymmetries in SuperDARN Convection Maps M. Walach et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030906
58. SuperDARN, WINDII and WACCM-X neutral and ion winds observed at high latitudes during geomagnetic disturbances G. Shepherd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105773
59. Magnetosheath Control of the Cross Polar Cap Potential: Correcting for Measurement Uncertainty in Space Weather C. O’Brien et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033468
60. Coordinated observations of nighttime medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in 630‐nm airglow and HF radar echoes at midlatitudes S. Suzuki et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013963
61. Flow Velocity and Field‐Aligned Current Associated With Field Line Resonance: SuperDARN Measurements F. Fenrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026529
62. Estimating Maximum Usable Frequency of HF Communication Links Using the Low-Latitude Long-Range Ionospheric Radar L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2026.3682585
63. Simultaneous Observations of a Sporadic E Layer by Digisonde and SuperDARN HF Radars at Zhongshan, Antarctica X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029921
64. Fine structure of subauroral electric field and electron content R. Makarevich & W. Bristow https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019821
65. A modeling study of asymmetries in plasma irregularity characteristics near gradient reversals L. Lamarche & R. Makarevich https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-709-2016
66. Instrumentation, Databases, and Data Utilisation in Solar–Terrestrial Physics: An Overview of the Current Status and Recommendations for the Future L. Baddeley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09953-8
67. Echo occurrence in the southern polar ionosphere for the SuperDARN Dome C East and Dome C North radars M. Marcucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100684
68. Observational Evidence of Transient Lobe Reconnection Triggered by Sudden Northern Enhancement of IMF Bz Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029410
69. Energetic Electron Precipitation Occurrence Rates Determined Using the Syowa East SuperDARN Radar E. Bland et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026437
70. An FDTD Investigation of Orthogonality and the Backscattering of HF Waves in the Presence of Ionospheric Irregularities D. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028201
71. A statistical analysis of SuperDARN scattering volume electron densities and velocity corrections using a radar frequency shifting technique R. Gillies et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017866
72. A Quantitative Analysis of the Uncertainties on Reconnection Electric Field Estimates Using Ionospheric Measurements S. Gasparini et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA032599
73. Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High‐Frequency Radar Backscatter A. Burrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512
74. Modeling and Validating a SuperDARN Radar's Poynting Flux Profile G. Perry et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RS007323
75. Comparison of Digisonde derived ion drifts and SuperDARN line-of-sight velocities over Zhongshan Station, Antarctica X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2022.100789