24 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Plasma environment of Venus: Comparison of Venus Express ASPERA‐4 measurements with 3‐D hybrid simulations C. Martinecz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JE003174
2. Global Electric Fields at Mars Inferred from Multifluid Hall-MHD Simulations S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc842
3. Non-thermal water loss of the early Mars: 3D multi-ion hybrid simulations A. Boesswetter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2010.10.003
4. Structure of the Martian Dayside Magnetosphere: Two Types O. Vaisberg & S. Shuvalov https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094622050069
5. Comparative pick-up ion distributions at Mars and Venus: Consequences for atmospheric deposition and escape S. Curry et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.03.026
6. The influence of production mechanisms on pick‐up ion loss at Mars S. Curry et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017665
7. Multispecies and Multifluid MHD Approaches for the Study of Ionospheric Escape at Mars L. Regoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA025117
8. Stellar winds and planetary bodies simulations: Lunar type interaction in super-Alfvénic and sub-Alfvénic flows Y. Vernisse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.04.004
9. High‐Altitude Closed Magnetic Loops at Mars Observed by MAVEN S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075831
10. Strong plume fluxes at Mars observed by MAVEN: An important planetary ion escape channel Y. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065346
11. Consequences of expanding exoplanetary atmospheres for magnetospheres E. Johansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200810509
12. Stellar winds and planetary bodies simulations: Magnetized obstacles in super-Alfvénic and sub-Alfvénic flows Y. Vernisse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2016.08.012
13. Comparison of high‐altitude production and ionospheric outflow contributions to O+ loss at Mars M. Liemohn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50388
14. Mars Express observations of high altitude planetary ion beams and their relation to the “energetic plume” loss channel M. Liemohn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019994
15. Mars‐solar wind interaction: LatHyS, an improved parallel 3‐D multispecies hybrid model R. Modolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022324
16. Modeling of Venus, Mars, and Titan E. Kallio et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9814-8
17. Mars as a comet: Solar wind interaction on a large scale M. Holmstrom & X. Wang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.017
18. Imaging Plasma Density Structures in the Soft X-Rays Generated by Solar Wind Charge Exchange with Neutrals D. Sibeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0504-7
19. Enhanced energization of plume ions around Mars from interplanetary shocks L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346644
20. Titan's induced magnetosphere under non-ideal upstream conditions: 3D multi-species hybrid simulations S. Simon & U. Motschmann https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.08.010
21. Simulated kinetic effects of the corona and solar cycle on high altitude ion transport at Mars S. Curry et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50358
22. Titan's plasma environment during a magnetosheath excursion: Real-time scenarios for Cassini's T32 flyby from a hybrid simulation S. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-669-2009
23. A comparison of global models for the solar wind interaction with Mars D. Brain et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.06.030
24. Formation Mechanisms of the Molecular Ion Polar Plume and Its Contribution to Ion Escape From Mars K. Sakakura et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029750