42 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An evaluation of the IRI-2007 storm time model at low latitude stations E. Oyeyemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.027
2. Project Loon based augmentation for global ionospheric modeling over Southern Hemisphere C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45976
3. Ionospheric variation at Thailand equatorial latitude station: Comparison between observations and IRI-2001 model predictions N. Wichaipanich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.08.002
4. Comparison of peak characteristics of the F2 ionospheric layer obtained from the Cyprus Digisonde and IRI-2012 model during low and high solar activity period H. Haralambous & C. Oikonomou https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.036
5. foF2 diurnal variation at Dakar station during the period of geomagnetic shock of variable duration over solar cycle 21 and 22: Prediction with IRI 2016 M. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2023.5048
6. Comparative of foF2 Measurements with IRI-2016 Model Predictions for Different Latitudes during Low and High Solar Activity E. Timoçin & H. Temuçin https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221030166
7. Comparison of IRI‐2016 F2 Layer Model Parameters with Ionosonde Measurements F. Arıkan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027048
8. The variability and IRI2007-predictability of hmF2 over South Africa M. Mbambo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.06.022
9. A study on the variability of ionospheric total electron content over the East African low‐latitude region and storm time ionospheric variations O. Olwendo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005785
10. Comparative Study of foF2 during Quiet Geomagnetic Activity with URSI and CCIR Predictions during the Phase Minimum of Solar Cycle 22 M. Konaté et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2022.1012236
11. Daily and Monthly Variations of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) Over the Brazilian Sector During the Descending Phase of the Solar Cycle 24 M. Dias et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027906
12. F-region ionospheric parameters observed in the equatorial and low latitude regions during medium solar activity in the Brazilian sector and comparison with the IRI-2007 model results R. de Jesus et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.020
13. Assessment of IRI-2012 profile parameters by comparison with the ones inferred using NeQuick2, ionosonde and FORMOSAT-1 data during the high solar activity over Brazilian equatorial and low latitude sector K. Venkatesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.09.014
14. Modeling the Ionosphere during Quiet Time Variation at Ouagadougou in West Africa E. Nanema et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2018.82011
15. Ionospheric variability at taiwan low latitude station: Comparison between observations and IRI-2001 model Y. Chuo & C. Lee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.04.078
16. Influence of uncertainties of the empirical models for inferring the E-region electric fields at the dip equator J. Moro et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0479-0
17. Comparison of peak height of the F2-layer (hmF2) measurements with IRI-2012, IRI-2007 and IRI-2001 models predictions above Roquetes station (Spain) during the ascending phase of the solar cycle 24 F. Mohammed https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.06.013
18. Comparison between observed ionospheric foF2 and IRI-2001 predictions over periods of severe geomagnetic activities at Grahamstown, South Africa A. Adewale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.09.026
19. Monthly mean foF2 model for an African low-latitude station and comparison with IRI S. Ikubanni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.016
20. Comparison of peak characteristics of F2 ionospheric layer over Tehran region at a low solar activity period with IRI-2001 and IRI-2007 models predictions K. Karami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.05.013
21. Critical Frequency foF2 Variations at Korhogo Station from 1992 to 2001 Prediction with IRI-2012 K. Guibula et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2792101
22. Performance of the IRI-2016 over Santa Maria, a Brazilian low-latitude station located in the central region of the South American Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) J. Moro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-457-2020
23. On the variations of ionospheric parameters made at a near equatorial station in the African longitude sector: IRI validation with the experimental observations O. Oyekola & P. Fagundes https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.10.004
24. Comparison between IRI-2001 predictions and observed measurements of hmF2 over three high latitude stations during different solar activity periods E. Oyeyemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.03.009
25. Performance evaluation of ionospheric models over equatorial Indian region N. Mridula et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.12.040
26. Comparisons of foF2 with IRI model and equatorial vertical drifts O. Oyekola https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.06.027
27. Variability of the Critical Frequency foF2 during Minimum and Maximum Phases of Solar Cycles 20 and 21: A Comparative Study between American and African Equatorial Regions K. M’Bi et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2022.121008
28. Prediction of global ionospheric VTEC maps using an adaptive autoregressive model C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0762-8
29. Thailand low and equatorial F 2-layer peak electron density and comparison with IRI-2007 model N. Wichaipanich et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.01.011
30. Comparison of GPS TEC measurements with IRI-2007 TEC prediction over the Kenyan region during the descending phase of solar cycle 23 O. Olwendo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.007
31. Comparison of ionosphere characteristic parameters obtained by ionosonde with IRI-2007 model over Southeast Asia N. Wichaipanich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.018
32. Comparison of IRI-2016 model with IGS VTEC maps during low and high solar activity period C. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.022
33. Validating IRI-2016 for quiet-time F2-region peak electron density height (hmF2) at different latitudes during moderate solar activity J. Adeniyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.02.036
34. Evaluation of foF2 and hmF2 Parameters of IRI-2016 Model in Different Latitudes over China under High and Low Solar Activity Years B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040860
35. Bottom side profiles for two close stations at the southern crest of the EIA: Differences and comparison with IRI-2012 and NeQuick2 for low and high solar activity L. Perna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.007
36. GPS derived TEC and foF2 variability at an equatorial station and the performance of IRI-model S. Adebiyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.03.026
37. Variability of the Critical Frequency foF2 for Equatorial Regions during Solar Cycle’s Minima and Maxima at Ouagadougou and Manila Stations K. M’Bi et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2019.1010047
38. Comparisons of observed ionospheric F2 peak parameters with IRI-2001 predictions over South Africa A. Adewale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.10.014
39. Variations of ionospheric profile parameters during solar maximum and comparison with IRI-2007 over Chung-Li, Taiwan Y. Chuo https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1249-2012
40. Ionospheric high frequency wave propagation using different IRI hmF2 and foF2 models M. Fagre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105141
41. Comparison of ionospheric characteristic parameters obtained by GPS and ionosonde with IRI model over China C. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0694-x
42. Research on Sea Surface Elliptical Current Remote Sensing With Single-Station Wide-Beam High-Frequency Sky–Surface Wave Radar M. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3310218