23 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. SuperDARN: An example of a network approach to geospace science in the twenty-first century M. Lester https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.08.003
2. Remote sensing of the spatial and temporal structure of magnetopause and magnetotail reconnection from the ionosphere G. Chisham et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000223
3. Comparison of the open‐closed separatrix in a global magnetospheric simulation with observations: The role of the ring current I. Rae et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015068
4. High‐latitude energy input and its impact on the thermosphere G. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022294
5. Observations of unusually broadened HF radar spectra from heater-induced artificial plasma irregularities H. Vickers & T. Robinson https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015516
6. Multipoint observations of the open‐closed field line boundary as observed by the Van Allen Probes and geostationary satellites during the 14 November 2012 geomagnetic storm P. Dixon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020883
7. Geospace Plume and Its Impact on Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection Rate Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029117
8. On the use of directional derivatives of SuperDARN convection flow for estimating open-closed field line boundary during the intervals of substorm activity on 14 October 2001 S. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100655
9. Space- and ground-based investigations of solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling S. Milan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.009
10. Quiet time observations of the open‐closed boundary prior to the CIR‐induced storm of 9 August 2008 K. Urban et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011SW000688
11. The correspondence between dayside long-period geomagnetic pulsations and the open-closed field line boundary V. Pilipenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.02.012
12. Local time extent of magnetopause reconnection using space–ground coordination Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-215-2019
13. Spatial structure of ionospheric convection velocities in regions of open and closed magnetic field topology G. Abel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027919
14. Simultaneous ground‐based optical and HF radar observations of the ionospheric footprint of the open/closed field line boundary along the geomagnetic meridian X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021481
15. A new technique for understanding magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling using directional derivatives of SuperDARN convection flow S. Hoque & F. Fenrich https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-018-9561-2
16. Geomagnetic response to solar and interplanetary disturbances E. Saiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013048
17. Dependence of spectral width of ionosphericFregion HF echoes on electric field A. Kozlovsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016804
18. Are dayside long-period pulsations related to the cusp? V. Pilipenko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-395-2015
19. A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions G. Chisham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-007-9017-8
20. Signatures of the nightside open–closed magnetic field-line boundary during moderately disturbed conditions and ionospheric substorms M. Parkinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.082
21. Source of the dayside cusp aurora S. Mende et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022657
22. Analysis of the step response function relating the interplanetary electric field to the dayside magnetospheric reconnection potential G. Blanchard & K. Baker https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014681
23. F region ionosphere effects on the mapping accuracy of SuperDARN HF radar echoes X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RS005957