54 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Ionospheric anomalies detection using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model as an earthquake precursor M. Saqib et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00616-3
2. Satellite monitoring of anomalous effects in the ionosphere related to the great Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008 S. Sarkar & A. Gwal https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9530-9
3. Multi‐sensor studies of the Sumatra earthquake and tsunami of 26 December 2004 R. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701237405
4. Ionospheric Ne disturbances before 2007 Pu’er, Yunnan, China, earthquake X. Ouyang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-008-0425-8
5. DORIS: System Description and Control of the Signal Integrity C. Jayles et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0046-8
6. Ionospheric anomalies detected by ground-based GPS before the Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008, China Z. Yiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.03.024
7. Low-latitude ionospheric scintillations and total electron content obtained with the CITRIS instrument on STPSat1 using radio transmissions from DORIS ground beacons P. Bernhardt & C. Siefring https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.12.001
8. Precursory signals using satellite and ground data associated with the Wenchuan Earthquake of 12 May 2008 R. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.487503
9. Intensity Variations of OI 557.7 nm and OI 630.0 nm Lines before M5.0 and Greater Earthquakes in Tokyo Region, Japan, in 1979 to 1990 P. Gole et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856018060210
10. Ionospheric perturbations associated with two recent major earthquakes (M>5.0) S. Priyadarshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/84/04/045901
11. A study of NOAA particle flux sensitivity to solar activity and strategies to search for correlations among satellite data and earthquake phenomena C. Fidani et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.638337
12. LSTM-Based Deep Learning Methods for Prediction of Earthquakes Using Ionospheric Data R. ABRİ & H. ARTUNER https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.950387
13. Ionospheric perturbations over Delhi caused by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake H. Dutta et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160601099590
14. Air ionization at rock surfaces and pre-earthquake signals F. Freund et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.07.013
15. Monitoring Earth using SDR Earth Imager R. Sharif et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105907
16. Ionospheric precursors observed at low latitudes around the time of koyna earthquake K. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.026
17. Anomalous changes in ionospheric TEC during an earthquake event of 13–14 April 2010 in the Chinese sector M. Aggarwal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.07.007
18. Statistical investigation of the noise added to a model of the effect of solar activities on the plasma of the ionosphere using DEMETER satellite data M. Sharzehei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.05.011
19. Carbon Monoxide Anomalies for the 2013 Mw =6.7 Lushan Earthquake Using MSSA-RST Approach Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3492254
20. Investigation of total electron content variability due to seismic and geomagnetic disturbances in the ionosphere S. Karatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RS004313
21. Study of thermal IR phenomena associated with 27 February 2010 Chile Mw 8.8 earthquake using MODIS data V. Kancherla et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1250824
22. Ionospheric anomalies detected by ionosonde and possibly related to crustal earthquakes in Greece L. Perrone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-361-2018
23. A Critical Review of Ground Based Observations of Earthquake Precursors L. Conti et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.676766
24. Temporal and spatial distribution of GPS-TEC anomalies prior to the strong earthquakes F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1411-8
25. The International DORIS Service: genesis and early achievements G. Tavernier et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0082-4
26. TEC anomalies observed before and after Sivrice-Elaziğ earthquake (24 January 2020, Mw: 6.8) S. Bulbul & F. Basciftci https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07426-3
27. Can electromagnetic disturbances related to the recent great earthquakes be detected by satellite magnetometers? G. Balasis & M. Mandea https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.038
28. IAP, the thermal plasma analyzer on DEMETER J. Berthelier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.018
29. Geospace perturbations induced by the Earth: The state of the art and future trends A. De Santis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.05.004
30. On-line Resources Supporting the Data, Products, and Information Infrastructure for the International DORIS Service C. Noll & L. Soudarin https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0051-y
31. Analysis of ionospheric TEC variations response to the Mw 7.2 VAN-earthquake S. Alcay https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2016.0007
32. Anomalous variation in GPS TEC prior to the 11 April 2012 Sumatra earthquake F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1389-2
33. Anomalies of total column CO and O<sub>3</sub> associated with great earthquakes in recent years Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2513-2013
34. Earthquake precursors in the light of peroxy defects theory: Critical review of systematic observations F. Freund et al. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000243-x
35. Ionospheric disturbances around the time of the Ms7.0 Lushan earthquake Z. Yiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.04026
36. DORIS: From orbit determination for altimeter missions to geodesy P. Willis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2005.11.013
37. Ionospheric variations observed by the DEMETER satellite in the mid-latitude region during strong earthquakes S. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.06.006
38. Ionosonde Data Analysis in Relation to the 2016 Central Italian Earthquakes A. Ippolito et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090354
39. A Machine Learning‐Based Detection of Earthquake Precursors Using Ionospheric Data A. Akyol et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006931
40. Challenges in the Detection of Ionospheric Pre-Earthquake Total Electron Content Anomalies (PETA) for Earthquake Forewarning B. Lim & E. Leong https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2083-7
41. Toward a unified solid state theory for pre-earthquake signals F. Freund https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-009-0066-x
42. Ionospheric perturbations before Pu’er earthquake observed on DEMETER R. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-008-0077-8
43. Investigation of the Relationship among Fault Types, Focal Depths, and Ionospheric TEC Anomalies before Large Earthquakes between 2000 and 2020 M. Ulukavak et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000395
44. Electro-magnetic earthquake bursts and critical rupture of peroxy bond networks in rocks F. Freund & D. Sornette https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.032
45. Unusual Change in Critical Frequency of F<sub>2</sub> Layer during and Prior to Earthquakes S. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2017.64012
46. Ionospheric applications of the scintillation and tomography receiver in space (CITRIS) mission when used with the DORIS radio beacon network P. Bernhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0064-6
47. Pre-earthquake signals: Underlying physical processes F. Freund https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.009
48. Co-seismic ionospheric GPS-TEC disturbances from different source characteristic earthquakes in the Himalaya and the adjoining regions P. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2018.05.009
49. Numerical modeling of possible lower ionospheric anomalies associated with Nepal earthquake in May, 2015 S. Chakraborty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.031
50. Sea temperature variation associated with the 2021 Haiti Mw 7.2 earthquake and possible mechanism L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2137439
51. Satellite detection of carbon monoxide emission prior to the Gujarat earthquake of 26 January 2001 R. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.01.014
52. Unique atmospheric wave: precursor to the 26 January 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake B. Gera et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.542208
53. The cross correlation method response prior to earthquakes using foF2 data from various ionospheric stations K. Benghanem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.01.016
54. Temporal distribution characteristics of GNSS ionospheric occultation data and its effects in earthquake-ionosphere anomaly detection Z. Ying & A. Jiachun https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.04040