20 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Effects of interplanetary electric field on the development of an equatorial spread F event D. Chakrabarty et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011884
2. Observations of nighttime equatorial-upper-E-valley region irregular structures from São Luís radar and their occurrence statistics: A manifestation of vertical coupling between E and F regions E. Alam Kherani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.08.017
3. Characterization of ionospheric irregularities over the equatorial and low latitude Nigeria region A. Ogwala et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-022-04110-0
4. Ionospheric irregularity behavior during the September 6–10, 2017 magnetic storm over Brazilian equatorial–low latitudes E. de Paula et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1020-z
5. Automatic identification of Spread F using decision trees T. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.09.007
6. The influence of Corotating Interaction Region (CIR) driven geomagnetic storms on the development of equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) over wide range of longitudes S. Tulasi Ram et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.013
7. Midlatitude postsunset plasma bubbles observed over Europe during intense storms in April 2000 and 2001 Z. Katamzi‐Joseph et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001674
8. Imaging equatorial spread F irregularities with the São Luís coherent backscatter radar interferometer F. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004929
9. Occurrence and zonal drifts of small-scale ionospheric irregularities over an equatorial station during solar maximum – Magnetic quiet and disturbed conditions M. Muella et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.03.017
10. Equatorial ionospheric zonal drift by monitoring local GPS reference networks S. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015993
11. Statistical analysis of radar observed F region irregularities from three longitudinal sectors R. Cueva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2137-2013
12. Longitudinal variability of occurrence of ionospheric irregularities over the American, African and Indian regions during geomagnetic storms T. Dugassa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.01.001
13. A comparative study between two percentage of occurrence methodologies for computing ionospheric scintillation statistics B. Paul et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.024
14. Survey and prediction of the ionospheric scintillation using data mining techniques L. Rezende et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009SW000532
15. On the characteristics of 150-km echoes observed in the Brazilian longitude sector by the 30 MHz São Luís radar F. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1905-2011
16. Findings of the unusual plasma bubble occurrences at dawn during the recovery phase of a moderate geomagnetic storm over the Brazilian sector C. Carmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105908
17. Equatorial 150 km echoes and daytime F region vertical plasma drifts in the Brazilian longitude sector F. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1867-2013
18. Prediction of ionospheric scintillation using neural network over East African region during ascending phase of sunspot cycle 24 S. Taabu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.01.014
19. Comments on the percentage of occurrence methodology used in “a study of L band scintillations during the initial phase of rising solar activity at an Indian low latitude station” by H J Tanna, S P Karia and K N Pathak B. Paul et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.12.003
20. Ionospheric–Thermospheric Responses in South America to the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm Based on Multiple Observations M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3134495