Articles | Volume 22, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-2315-2004
© Author(s) 2004. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-2315-2004
© Author(s) 2004. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
14 Jul 2004
Alfvén waves in the foreshock propagating upstream in the plasma rest frame: statistics from Cluster observations
Y. Narita
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
K.-H. Glassmeier
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, Max-Planck-Straße 2, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
S. Schäfer
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
U. Motschmann
Institut für Theoretische Physik, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
M. Fränz
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, Max-Planck-Straße 2, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
I. Dandouras
CESR/CNRS, 9 Avenue du Colonel Roche, Toulouse Cedex 4, F-31028, France
K.-H. Fornaçon
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
E. Georgescu
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, D-85748 Garching, Germany
A. Korth
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, Max-Planck-Straße 2, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
H. Rème
CESR/CNRS, 9 Avenue du Colonel Roche, Toulouse Cedex 4, F-31028, France
I. Richter
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 2,311 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,250 | 975 | 86 | 2,311 | 118 | 175 |
- HTML: 1,250
- PDF: 975
- XML: 86
- Total: 2,311
- BibTeX: 118
- EndNote: 175
Cited
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Low-frequency waves upstream and downstream of the terrestrial bow shock Y. Narita https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.03.007
- Troitskaya-Bolshakova effect as a manifestation of the solar wind wave turbulence A. Potapov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.11.008
- Finding the dispersion of low-frequency waves in cosmic plasma from the results of multi-satellite measurements S. Romanov https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952508020019
- STATISTICALLY DETERMINED DISPERSION RELATIONS OF MAGNETIC FIELD FLUCTUATIONS IN THE TERRESTRIAL FORESHOCK B. Hnat et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/91
- 3-D global hybrid simulations of magnetospheric response to foreshock processes F. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01469-2
- The Early‐Phase Growth of ULF Waves in the Ion Foreshock Observed in a Hybrid‐Vlasov Simulation K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JA033848
- A STATISTICAL STUDY OF THE SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE AT ION KINETIC SCALES USING THEK-FILTERING TECHNIQUE AND CLUSTER DATA O. Roberts et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/2
- Identification of the dominant ULF wave mode and generation mechanism for obliquely propagating waves in the Earth's foreshock M. Strumik et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064915
- Foreshock compressional boundary N. Omidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013950
- Transmission of foreshock waves through Earth’s bow shock L. Turc et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01837-z
- Low‐frequency wave characteristics in the upstream and downstream regime of the terrestrial bow shock Y. Narita et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011231
- On finding polarization parameters of low-frequency plasma waves S. Romanov https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952507030124
- Density response to magnetic field fluctuation in the foreshock plasma Y. Narita & T. Hada https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0943-0
- Solar Wind Proton Deceleration in Front of the Terrestrial Bow Shock J. Urbář et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026734
- The upstream‐propagating Alfvénic fluctuations with power law spectra in the upstream region of the Earth's bow shock X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063893
- Characteristics of terrestrial foreshock ULF waves: Cluster observations Y. Hobara et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012142
- Different Types of Ion Populations Upstream of the 2013 October 8 Interplanetary Shock P. Kajdič et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa94c6
- Magnetic energy distribution in the four‐dimensional frequency and wave vector domain in the solar wind Y. Narita et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014742
- Statistical study of foreshock cavitons P. Kajdič et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2163-2013
- Mode decomposition scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamic plane waves in space‐time coordinates J. Podesta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012097
- Dispersion analysis of low‐frequency waves through the terrestrial bow shock Y. Narita & K. Glassmeier https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011256
- The propagation of ULF waves from the Earth's foreshock region to ground: the case study of 15 February 2009 M. Regi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-43
- Modulation of Ion and Electron Pitch Angle in the Presence of Large-amplitude, Low-frequency, Left-hand Circularly Polarized Electromagnetic Waves Observed by MMS J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae097
- The Wave Telescope Technique Y. Narita et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030165
- Impact of solar-wind turbulence on a planetary bow shock E. Behar et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451520
- Global Hybrid Simulations of Interaction Between Interplanetary Rotational Discontinuity and Bow Shock/Magnetosphere: Can Ion‐Scale Magnetic Reconnection be Driven by Rotational Discontinuity Downstream of Quasi‐Parallel Shock? Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028853
- On the Estimation of the Ratio of ULF Wave Electric Fields in Space and the Magnetic Fields at the Ground L. Warden et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA029052
- The Foreshock J. Eastwood et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-3824-3
Latest update: 12 Jun 2026
