386 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Earthquakes and global electrical circuit A. Namgaladze https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793113050229
2. Investigation of LAI disturbances associated with the Shahid-Rajaee port explosion in Iran (April 26, 2025) using satellite data M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.078
3. Changes in animal activity prior to a major (M= 7) earthquake in the Peruvian Andes R. Grant et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.012
4. Analysis of GNSS Data for Earthquake Precursor Studies Using IONOLAB-TEC in the Himalayan Region S. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6020027
5. Emergence of a localized total electron content enhancement during the severe geomagnetic storm of 8 September 2017 C. Sotomayor-Beltran & L. Andrade-Arenas https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-153-2019
6. Possible seismo-ionospheric anomalies associated with the 2016 Mw 6.5 Indonesia earthquake from GPS TEC and Swarm satellites A. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1065453
7. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies related to the Mw 6.6, July 20, 2017, earthquake in Bodrum, Turkey E. Eroglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05914-1
8. Possibility of tsunami early-warning from post-seismic ionospheric disturbance for 2 July, 2013, Mw = 6.1 Indonesia’s Bireun earthquake: Two-dimensional principal component analysis J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2014.08.001
9. Remotely sensed atmospheric anomalies of the 2022 Mw 7.0 Bantay, Philippines earthquake S. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.013
10. Reduction of electron temperature in low‐latitude ionosphere at 600 km before and after large earthquakes K. Oyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013367
11. Ultra-low-frequency (ULF) and total electron content (TEC) anomalies observed at Agra and their association with regional earthquakes V. Chauhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.06.002
12. Numerical Study of Global ELF Electromagnetic Wave Propagation with Respect to Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204107
13. Ionospheric anomalies of local earthquakes detected by GPS TEC measurements using data from Tashkent and Kitab stations S. Tojiev et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.06.011
14. Investigation of the Relationship among Fault Types, Focal Depths, and Ionospheric TEC Anomalies before Large Earthquakes between 2000 and 2020 M. Ulukavak et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000395
15. GPS-TEC variations analysis around the time and location of volcanoes eruption to detect volcano-ionospheric anomalies M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2025-0114
16. Analyses of data from the first Chinese seismo electromagnetic satellite (CSES-01) together with other earthquake precursors associated with the Turkey earthquakes (February 6, 2023) M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2024-0024
17. Analysis of space- and ground-based parameters prior to an earthquake on 12 December 2009 S. Karia et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.827341
18. Potential utilization of air temperature, total electron content, and air relative humidity as possible earthquake precursors: A case study of Mexico M7.4 earthquake H. Salh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105927
19. Preseismic Perturbations and their Inhomogeneity as Computed from Ground‐ and Space‐Based Investigation during the 2016 Fukushima Earthquake S. Biswas et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7159204
20. Spatio-temporal characteristics of ionospheric irregularities in low latitude regions during the peak of solar cycle 25 N. Tongkasem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.062
21. Is an unusual large enhancement of ionospheric electron density linked with the 2008 great Wenchuan earthquake? B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013613
22. Analysis of GPS-based TEC and electron density by the DEMETER satellite before the Sumatra earthquake on 30 September 2009 S. Karia et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.657375
23. Ionospheric anomalies related to the Mw 6.5 Samar, Philippines earthquake E. Eroglu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00980-8
24. Pre-seismic ionospheric disturbances following the 2025 Mw 7.7 Mandalay, Burma (Myanmar) Earthquake from GNSS observations H. Eshkuvatov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.068
25. The variations of plasma density recorded by CSES-1 satellite possibly related to Mexico Ms 7.1 earthquake on 8th September 2021 H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2021.12.002
26. Ionospheric anomalies detected by ground-based GPS before the Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008, China Z. Yiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.03.024
27. Abnormal perturbations in the ionospheric F2 region before Wenchuan earthquake on 12 May 2008 T. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-4046-4
28. Ionospheric anomaly before the 2011 Tohoku Mw 9.0 earthquake Y. Jian et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2012.00017
29. Air Temperature Variations Analysis of the Hualian M6.9 Earthquake X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121463
30. GPS/GNSS Current Bibliography T. Soler https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-004-0108-4
31. Formation mechanism of great positive TEC disturbances prior to Wenchuan earthquake on May 12, 2008 M. Klimenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.03.040
32. Fluctuations in the ionosphere related to Honshu Twin Large Earthquakes of September 2004 observed by the DEMETER and CHAMP satellites K. Ryu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.10.003
33. Analysis of Ionospheric Perturbations Possibly Related to Yangbi Ms6.4 and Maduo Ms7.4 Earthquakes on 21 May 2021 in China Using GPS TEC and GIM TEC Data L. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101725
34. Studies on the anomalies in the behaviour of transmitted subionospheric VLF electromagnetic signals and the changes in the fourth Schumann resonance mode as signatures of two pending earthquakes S. De et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-011-0047-1
35. Space technologies for short-term earthquake warning S. Pulinets https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.12.074
36. The results of experimental studies of VLF–ULF electromagnetic emission by rock samples due to mechanical action A. Panfilov https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1383-2014
37. LSTM-Based Deep Learning Methods for Prediction of Earthquakes Using Ionospheric Data R. ABRİ & H. ARTUNER https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.950387
38. The International DORIS Service G. Tavernier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.102
39. Lithosphere ionosphere coupling associated with three earthquakes in Pakistan from GPS and GIM TEC M. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2021.101860
40. A study using satellite data on LAI anomalies observed before the powerful earthquake of March 28, 2025 in Myanmar M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.07.029
41. STUDY OF TEC VARIATIONS USING PERMANENT STATIONS GNSS DATA IN RELATION WITH SEISMIC EVENTS. APPLICATION ON SAMOTHRACE EARTHQUAKE OF 24 MAY 2014 C. Pikridas et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2019.10246
42. Earthquake/Tsunami‐Linked Imprints in the Equatorial F Region Zonal Plasma Drifts and Spatial Structures of Plasma Bubbles P. Gurram et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025798
43. North-south components of the annual asymmetry in the ionosphere T. Gulyaeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RS005401
44. Signal-Processing Investigations on the Precursors of Strong Earthquakes Using GPS-TEC, ULF, and VLF Data . Swati et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322460070X
45. Anomalous variations in ionospheric TEC prior to the 2011 Japan Ms9. 0 earthquake Z. Fuying & W. Yun https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2011.00008
46. Nonlinear frequency down-conversion of acoustic wave beams in the atmosphere and ionosphere under different types of modulation (regular item) V. Grimalsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105774
47. Atmospheric and ionospheric disturbances associated with the M > 6 earthquakes in the East Asian sector: A case study of two consecutive earthquakes in Taiwan M. Adil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104918
48. Effect of Some Major Shallow Earthquakes (M > 6.0, Depth < 30 km) that Occurred in and Around India on the GPS-Based Total Electron Content (TEC) of the Ionosphere . Manish Awasthi et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600819
49. Short-term ionospheric precursors of earthquakes using vertical and oblique ionosondes N. Blaunstein & M. Hayakawa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.07.002
50. Study of the ionospheric anomaly before the Wenchuan earthquake T. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0587-8
51. Physical models of coupling in the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere system before earthquakes V. Liperovsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208060133
52. Electromagnetic Phenomena Possibly Associated with the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake K. Hattori https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.129.345
53. Numerical study of heating the upper atmosphere by acoustic-gravity waves from a local source on the Earth's surface and influence of this heating on the wave propagation conditions I. Karpov & S. Kshevetskii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.019
54. Earthquake forewarning — A multidisciplinary challenge from the ground up to space F. Freund https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0130-4
55. Precursory phenomena associated with the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan as identified under the iSTEP program Y. Tsai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.035
56. Removing Solar Radiation Based on the Empirical Mode Decomposition Method for Seismo-Ionospheric Anomaly Before the M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake Y. HU et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2013.05.518
57. A statistical investigation of pre-earthquake ionospheric TEC anomalies Z. Fuying et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2011.00061
58. An electric field penetration model for seismo-ionospheric research C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.08.007
59. Statistical characterization of ionosphere anomalies and their relationship to space weather events C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2015046
60. Features of the ionosphere behavior before the Kythira 2006 earthquake I. Zakharenkova et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0031-5
61. The Characteristics of the Abnormal Day-to-Day TEC Variation above East Asian Region F. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101493
62. Near real-time global ionospheric total electron content modeling and nowcasting based on GNSS observations X. Jin & S. Song https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01715-3
63. Seismo-Ionospheric Variations during Strong Earthquakes Based on the Example of the 2010 Earthquake in Chile V. Smirnov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952518040068
64. Unusual Sunrise and Sunset Terminator Variations in the Behavior of Sub-Ionospheric VLF Phase and Amplitude Signals Prior to the Mw7.8 Turkey Syria Earthquake of 6 February 2023 M. Boudjada et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234448
65. Application of AR Model in the Analysis of Preearthquake Ionospheric Anomalies X. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/157184
66. Seismo-ionospheric precursors of strong sequential earthquakes in Nepal region M. Ulukavak & S. Inyurt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.033
67. Temporal distribution characteristics of GNSS ionospheric occultation data and its effects in earthquake-ionosphere anomaly detection Z. Ying & A. Jiachun https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.04040
68. Precursory enhancement of EIA in the morning sector: Contribution from mid-latitude large earthquakes in the north-east Asian region K. Ryu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.08.030
69. Comparative Statistical Detection of Ionospheric GPS-TEC Anomalies Associated with the 2021 Haiti and 2022 Cyprus Earthquakes S. Pal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16030129
70. A statistical analysis of ionospheric anomalies before 736M6.0+ earthquakes during 2002-2010 H. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015781
71. Investigation of Ionospheric Earthquake Precursors Using US-TEC Data during the Solar Maximum of 2013–2015 J. Park & S. Park https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2020.37.1.61
72. INKONSISTENSI TEC GIM DARI DATA GNSS SEBAGAI PREKURSOR GEMPABUMI DI WILAYAH MALUKU UTARA TAHUN 2019 B. Sunardi et al. https://doi.org/10.14710/elipsoida.2020.9182
73. A Multi-Input Convolutional Neural Networks Model for Earthquake Precursor Detection Based on Ionospheric Total Electron Content H. Uyanık et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245690
74. A Review of Earthquake Precursor Anomaly Extraction Techniques for Geophysical Time-Series Observations Z. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09927-w
75. Development of ionospheric tomography using neural network and its application to the 2007 Southern Sumatra earthquake S. Hirooka et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eej.22298
76. A New Ionosphere Tomography Algorithm With Two-Grid Virtual Observations Constraints and Three-Dimensional Velocity Profile Y. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2359762
77. Comprehensive ionospheric precursor analysis of selected Mw ≥ 7 earthquakes G. Gurbuz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11136-2
78. Exploring Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Through the Ionosphere Over Seismic Active Zones H. Eshkuvatov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03532-x
79. A comprehensive study on the synchronized outgoing longwave radiation and relative humidity anomalies related to global Mw ≥ 6.5 earthquakes M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06262-w
80. Ionospheric disturbances before the great earthquakes in Haiti (М = 7.2) and Japan (М = 9.0) from data of satellite radionavigation systems V. Khizhniak et al. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2012.06.035
81. Maximum electron concentration and total electron content of the ionosphere over Concepción, Chile, prior to the 27 February 2010 earthquake E. Ovalle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.005
82. Analysis of ionospheric parameters above active seismic regions V. Patil et al. https://doi.org/10.2205/2016ES000564
83. A statistical study of ionospheric earthquake precursors monitored by using equatorial ionization anomaly of GPS TEC in Taiwan during 2001–2007 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.02.012
84. Variations in the total electron content of the ionosphere during preparation of earthquakes O. Zolotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793111030146
85. Identification of seismic activity sources on the subsatellite track by ionospheric plasma disturbances detected with the Sich-2 onboard probes V. Shuvalov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.08.001
86. Investigations of anomalous gravity signals prior to 71 large earthquakes based on a 4-years long superconducting gravimeter records D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.07.002
87. Statistical seismo-ionospheric precursors of M7.0+ earthquakes in Circum-Pacific seismic belt by GPS TEC measurements W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.013
88. Applying two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) to the early detection of a weak earthquake-induced tsunami: a case study J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2016.1257958
89. Estimates of disturbances of space vehicle orbits in the upper ionosphere prior to strong earthquakes A. Tertyshnikov & V. Skripachev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952509050049
90. Investigation of Atmospheric Anomalies due to the Great Tohoku Earthquake Disturbance Using NRLMSISE-00 Atmospheric Model Measurement L. Endeshaw https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03476-2
91. Reply to comment by F. Masci and J. N. Thomas on “Temporal and spatial precursors in ionospheric total electron content of the 16 October 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake” Y. Su & J. Liu https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020132
92. Is there any difference in local time variation in ionospheric F2-layer disturbances between earthquake-induced and Q-disturbance events? T. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-687-2015
93. A stable and fast method of ionospheric tomography by using diverse data sources H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.03.003
94. Advances and challenges in the study of ULF geomagnetic anomalies for earthquake precursors: A four-decade critical literature review E. Winata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100438
95. TEC variation as earthquake precursor: A statistical and SARIMA-based study from Northeast India P. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.083
96. Ionospheric tomography by combining vertical and oblique sounding data with TEC retrieved from a tri‐band beacon H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015285
97. Ionospheric disturbances before and after the January 14, 2018 eartquake in Peru C. Sotomayor Beltran https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2019.0001
98. Ionospheric anomaly at the occurring time of China’s May 12, 2008, M = 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake using nonlinear principal component analyses and image decoding J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2012.11.005
99. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies in ionospheric TEC and plasma density before the 17 July 2006 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;7.7 south of Java earthquake D. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-589-2017
100. Statistical analysis of ionospheric TEC anomalies before global M w ≥ 7.0 earthquakes using data of CODE GIM W. Liu & L. Xu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9634-0
101. Diurnal and seasonal variation of F2-layer ionospheric parameters at equatorial ionization anomaly crest region and their comparison with IRI-2001 S. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.08.018
102. Precursor analysis of ionospheric GPS-TEC variations before the 2010M7.2 Baja California earthquake M. Ulukavak & M. Yalcinkaya https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1208684
103. On the spatial scales of ionospheric perturbations caused by moderate earthquakes that occurred in Indian subcontinents K. Chaudhary et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01992-0
104. The fast development of solar terrestrial sciences in Taiwan J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0049-0
105. Study of ionospheric precursors using GPS and GIM-TEC data related to earthquakes occurred on 16 April and 24 September, 2013 in Pakistan region D. Pundhir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.010
106. Ionospheric disturbances around the time of the Ms7.0 Lushan earthquake Z. Yiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.04026
107. An Investigation on the Ionospheric Response to the Volcanic Explosion at Hunga Ha'apai in 2021 S. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031731
108. Ground-based acoustic parametric generator impact on the atmosphere and ionosphere in an active experiment Y. Rapoport et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-53-2017
109. Detection of possible ionospheric precursor caused by Papua New Guinea earthquake (Mw 7.5) M. Ulukavak & S. Inyurt https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8146-0
110. Estimation of frequency and duration of ionospheric disturbances over Turkey with IONOLAB-FFT algorithm S. Karatay https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01416-1
111. Study of GPS-TEC related to Wenchuan earthquake (M=7.9) of 12 May 2008 and their fractal analysis V. Chauhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1541/jae.30.63
112. Seismic reversal pattern for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, MW 7.6 earthquake Y. Wu & C. Chen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.09.015
113. Ionospheric perturbations initiated due to the forest-fire over Greece as a consequence of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling S. Priyadarshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1842810
114. Statistical Study on Variations of the Ionospheric Ion Density Observed by DEMETER and Related to Seismic Activities R. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024623
115. Earthquake prediction using satellite data: Advances and ahead challenges M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.054
116. Variations of ionospheric total electron content before three strong earthquakes in the Qinghai-Tibet region C. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.006
117. Analysis on Ionospheric Perturbations before Yushu Earthquake X. ZHANG et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2014.06.822
118. Validation of three-dimensional ionospheric tomography over North America region S. Hirooka et al. https://doi.org/10.1541/jae.36.1
119. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies before M7.2 Haiti earthquake of August 14, 2021, from GPS-TEC J. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00903-7
120. Singular spectrum analysis of ionospheric anomalies preceding great earthquakes: Case studies of Kaikoura and Fukushima earthquakes J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2019.01.005
121. Ionospheric disturbances on 8 September, 2010: Was it connected with the incoming moderate Chongqing earthquake? T. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.032
122. Total Electron Content Variations Observed by a DORIS Station During the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake F. Li & M. Parrot https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0053-9
123. Possible Identification of Precursor ELF Signals on Recent EQs That Occurred Close to the Recording Station I. Contopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091134
124. Earth’s Outgoing Longwave Radiation Variability Prior to M ≥6.0 Earthquakes in the Taiwan Area During 2009–2019 C. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00364
125. Principal component analysis method in the detection of total electron content anomalies in the 24 hrs prior to large earthquakes J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0204-4
126. Temporal and spatial precursors in the ionospheric global positioning system (GPS) total electron content observed before the 26 December 2004 M9.3 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015313
127. TEC anomalies—Local TEC changes prior to earthquakes or TEC response to solar and geomagnetic activity changes? E. Afraimovich & E. Astafyeva https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352851
128. Ionospheric total electron content disturbance associated with May 12, 2008, Wenchuan earthquake J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2015.01.003
129. Comparative analysis of TEC anomalies preceding the 2022 Cyprus and Alaska earthquakes E. Eroglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.011
130. Lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling associated with four Yutian earthquakes in China from GPS TEC and electromagnetic observations onboard satellites X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2022.101943
131. Ionospheric anomalies observed over South Korea preceding the Great Tohoku earthquake of 2011 B. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.04.011
132. A MLP neural network as an investigator of TEC time series to detect seismo-ionospheric anomalies M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.01.012
133. Monitoring and Prediction of the changes in water zone of wetlands using an intelligent neural-fuzzy system based on data from Google Eearth Engine system (Case study of Anzali Wetland, 2000-2019) S. Seyed Mousavi & M. Akhoondzadeh Hanzaei https://doi.org/10.52547/jgit.9.4.19
134. Ionospheric activity and possible connection with seismicity: Contribution from the analysis of long time series of GNSS signals F. Mancini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2014.10.005
135. Estimation of parameters (date and magnitude) of two strong earthquakes in Iran by integrating different earthquake precursors M. Khoshgoftar & M. Saradjian https://doi.org/10.52547/jgit.9.2.67
136. Statistical Behavior of Electron Density in the Ionosphere before 2016 Manipur Earthquake from GPS Observation Stations at North East India G. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852121040130
137. GNSS ionospheric seismology: Recent observation evidences and characteristics S. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.003
138. Anomalous seismo-LAI variations potentially associated with the 2017 Mw = 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake from Swarm satellites, GPS-TEC and climatological data M. Akhoondzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.020
139. Ionospheric pre-cursors observed over low latitudes during some of the recent major earthquakes R. Dabas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.09.005
140. Investigation of the LAIC mechanism of the Haiti earthquake (August 14, 2021) using CSES-01 satellite observations and other earthquake precursors M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.042
141. Seismo-ionospheric precursor of the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC C. Hsiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0129-0
142. Localized Increment and Decrement in the Total Electron Content of the Ionosphere as a Response to the April 20, 2018, Geomagnetic Storm C. Sotomayor-Beltran https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1986306
143. Ionospheric anomalies detection using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model as an earthquake precursor M. Saqib et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00616-3
144. Anomalous phenomena in Schumann resonance band observed in China before the 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake in Japan H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020269
145. Positive and negative ionospheric disturbances prior to the 2016 christmas earthquake in Chile C. Sotomayor-Beltran https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1536081
146. A Study of Lithosphere–Ionosphere Seismic Precursors from Detecting Gamma-Ray and Total Electron Content Anomalies Prior to the 2018 ML6.2 Hualien Earthquake in Eastern Taiwan C. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020188
147. Seismogenic ionospheric anomalies associated with the strong Indonesian earthquake occurred on 11 April 2012 (M = 8.5) U. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.022
148. Variations in deceleration of space vehicles in the upper ionosphere before strong earthquakes A. Tertyshnikov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X09010395
149. Study of local ionospheric plasma perturbation induced by pre-seismic activities A. Mahmoudian & A. Ghayour https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00633-2
150. Possible seismo-ionospheric anomalies associated with M  > 5.0 earthquakes during 2000–2020 from GNSS TEC M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.025
151. Statistical analysis of ionospheric vertical total electron content anomalies before global Mw≥6.0 shallow earthquakes during 2000–2020 Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1137177
152. The Analysis of Ionospheric TEC Anomalies Prior to the Jiuzhaigou Ms7.0 Earthquake Based on BeiDou GEO Satellite Data X. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040660
153. Recent Progress and State of the Art of Seismo-Electromagnetics K. Hattori & M. Hayakawa https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.127.4
154. On the Diurnal Dependence of &lt;i&gt;f&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;E&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;-Variations Due to Earthquakes E. Liperovskaya et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2015.67053
155. Analysis of ionospheric TEC variations response to the Mw 7.2 VAN-earthquake S. Alcay https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2016.0007
156. Ionospheric anomalies possibly associated with M⩾ 6.0 earthquakes in the Japan area during 1998–2010: Case studies and statistical study S. Kon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.10.005
157. Refined seismic-ionospheric effects: case study of Mw 8.2 Chiapas earthquake on September 7, 2017 K. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-021-01129-8
158. A study of some research work on soil radon concentration and ionospheric total electron content as earthquake precursors S. Chowdhury et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09409-6
159. Lithosphere Ionosphere Coupling Associated with Seismic Swarm in the Balkan Peninsula from ROB-TEC and GPS L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194759
160. Ground Water Chemistry Changes before Major Earthquakes and Possible Effects on Animals R. Grant et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8061936
161. Observations of ionospheric disturbances via U-shaped traces on ionograms O. Laryunin https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2019-10-3-0432
162. DETECTING IONOSPHERIC ANOMALIES ASSOCIATED WITH THREE JAPAN MIYAKO EARTHQUAKES TO SHOW THEIR CORRELATIONS AND ASSOCIATED EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED TSUNAMIS L. Jyh-Woei https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2016.1168017
163. Study of Ionospheric Perturbations during Strong Seismic Activity by Correlation Analysis Method A. Gwal et al. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajes.2011.214.222
164. Ionospheric Ne disturbances before 2007 Pu’er, Yunnan, China, earthquake X. Ouyang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-008-0425-8
165. A review of empirical orthogonal function (EOF) with an emphasis on the co-seismic crustal deformation analysis . Neha & S. Pasari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04967-4
166. Anomalous variation in total electron content (TEC) associated with earthquakes in India during September 2006–November 2007 O. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.07.012
167. Studies of scintillations and TEC variations with GPS satellite links together with soil radon anomalies preceding Nepal earthquakes of April–May 2015 A. Guha Bose et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05221-1
168. Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes S. Pulinets et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2003.07.011
169. Electromagnetic and Radon Earthquake Precursors D. Nikolopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14100271
170. Are the Significant Ionospheric Anomalies Associated with the 2007 Great Deep-Focus Undersea Jakarta–Java Earthquake? D. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092211
171. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ZONING OF LOCAL TERRITORIES OF THE GLOBE BY QUANTITY AND DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY OF TECTONIC EXTREME ORIGIN SITUATIONS V. Tiutiunyk et al. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2020-1-154-272-287
172. Study on the relationship between Global Positioning System Total Electron Content Anomalies and Earthquake Events in Thailand during Solar Cycle 24 C. Pansong & P. Kenpankho https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v29n3.117195
173. Ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2015 M7.8 Nepal earthquake Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.04.004
174. Ionospheric anomalies probably related to the Mw 7.1 northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge earthquake E. Eroglu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.12.010
175. Application of Kalman filter in detecting pre-earthquake ionospheric TEC anomaly Z. Fuying et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2011.00043.1
176. Observations and simulations of seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies before the 12 January 2010M7 Haiti earthquake J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015704
177. Anomaly of the ionospheric electron density close to earthquakes: Case studies of Pu’er and Wenchuan earthquakes Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0816-0
178. A nonlinear background removal method for seismo-ionospheric anomaly analysis under a complex solar activity scenario: A case study of the M9.0 Tohoku earthquake L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.04.001
179. GNSS TEC-Based Earthquake Ionospheric Perturbation Detection Using a Novel Deep Learning Framework P. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3175961
180. Detection and Localization of Terrestrial L-Band RFI With GNSS Receivers T. Roberts et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3109524
181. Decision Tree, Bagging and Random Forest methods detect TEC seismo-ionospheric anomalies around the time of the Chile, (M= 8.8) earthquake of 27 February 2010 M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.035
182. Primary Joint Statistical Seismic Influence on Ionospheric Parameters Recorded by the CSES and DEMETER Satellites M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028116
183. Ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes observed using six GNSS stations data during continuous five years (2011–2015) H. Eshkuvatov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2022.04.002
184. 2016 Yılı 6 Mw ≥ 7.0 Depremin İyonküre Değişimlerinin İncelenmesi E. ŞENTÜRK & M. ÇEPNİ https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.331208
185. Singular Spectrum Analysis of the Total Electron Content Changes Prior to M ≥ 6.0 Earthquakes in the Chinese Mainland During 1998–2013 H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.677163
186. Latitudinal distribution of anomalous ion density as a precursor of a large earthquake K. Oyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015948
187. Ionospheric perturbations in plasma parameters before global strong earthquakes J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.029
188. A Critical Review of Ground Based Observations of Earthquake Precursors L. Conti et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.676766
189. The earthquake-related disturbances in ionosphere and project of the first China seismo-electromagnetic satellite X. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0824-0
190. Response of the ionosphere to the Baltic Sea earthquake of 21 September 2004 A. Krankowski et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-006-0008-9
191. Local changes in the total electron content immediately before the 2009 Abruzzo earthquake P. Nenovski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.09.029
192. A study of the ionospheric disturbances associated with strong earthquakes using the empirical orthogonal function analysis J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.10.007
193. Investigating the preparation phase of volcanic eruptions using Swarm and GPS-TEC satellite data: The case of the 29 May 2024 Iceland-Sundhnúkur volcanic eruption M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2025-0010
194. Statistical evidences of seismo-ionospheric precursors applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve on the GPS total electron content in China Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.05.028
195. Global navigation satellite system detection of preseismic ionospheric total electron content anomalies for strong magnitude (Mw>6) Himalayan earthquakes G. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.046018
196. On the Origin of ULF Magnetic Waves Before the Taiwan Chi-Chi 1999 Earthquake G. Anagnostopoulos https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.730162
197. Characteristics of Anomalous Radio Propagation before and after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake as Seen by Oblique Ionograms K. Igarashi et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.92007
198. Ionospheric precursors to earthquakes: insights from multiple events and global sensitivity analysis over the low–mid latitude region of New Delhi, India Q. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.06.026
199. Variations of multi-parameter observations in atmosphere related to earthquake F. Jing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-27-2013
200. Statistical investigation of the noise added to a model of the effect of solar activities on the plasma of the ionosphere using DEMETER satellite data M. Sharzehei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.05.011
201. Thermal and TEC anomalies detection using an intelligent hybrid system around the time of the Saravan, Iran, (M= 7.7) earthquake of 16 April 2013 M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.017
202. Early warning from seismic ionospheric anomaly of the 24 May 2014, Mw = 6.4 Aegean-Sea earthquake: two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gi.2015.04.015
203. Investigation of atmospheric anomalies associated with Kashmir and Awaran Earthquakes I. Mahmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.12.018
204. Satellite Remote Sensing in Seismology. A Review A. Tronin https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2010124
205. A semi-supervised total electron content anomaly detection method using LSTM-auto-encoder A. Muhammad & F. Külahcı https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105979
206. Ionospheric variations observed by the DEMETER satellite in the mid-latitude region during strong earthquakes S. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.06.006
207. Ionospheric earthquake signatures on GPS TEC B. Muslim et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012070
208. Unusual Change in Critical Frequency of F&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Layer during and Prior to Earthquakes S. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2017.64012
209. Vertical TEC over seismically active region during low solar activity E. Astafyeva & K. Heki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.020
210. Spatial analyses on pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies and magnetic storms observed by China seismo-electromagnetic satellite in August 2018 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-024-00320-2
211. Ionosphere Disturbances Preceding Earthquakes according to the Data of Ground Based Station of the Vertical Ionospheric Sounding Wakkanai S. Pulinets et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218050110
212. Spatio-Temporal Prediction of Ionospheric Total Electron Content Using an Adaptive Data Fusion Technique . Faruk Erken et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321908005X
213. Machine learning-based thermal anomalies detection from MODIS LST associated with the Mw 7.7 Awaran, Pakistan earthquake A. Hafeez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05131-8
214. Statistical Analysis of Ionospheric TEC Anomalies Prior to Ms ≥ 6.0 Earthquakes in Mainland China During 2012–2022 L. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101450
215. Integrated Search for Taiwan Earthquake Precursors (iSTEP) J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.136.214
216. Temporal and spatial analyses on seismo-electric anomalies associated with the 27 February 2010 &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt; = 8.8 Chile earthquake observed by DEMETER satellite Y. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3281-2013
217. Kalman Filter fusion of satellite seismo-LAI precursors for predicting the magnitude of an impending powerful earthquake M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2026.2650388
218. Monitoring of the ionosphere TEC variations during the 17th August 1999 Izmit earthquake using GPS data U. Dogan et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.07.020
219. Precursory and coseismic groundwater temperature perturbation: An example from Taiwan S. Chien et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124457
220. Coarse-graining research of the thermal infrared anomalies before earthquakes in the Sichuan area on Google Earth engine P. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1101165
221. Anomalous Variation in GPS TEC, Land and Ocean Parameters Prior to 3 Earthquakes K. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0057
222. Electron density anomalies associated with M≥5.9 earthquakes in Indonesia during 2005 observed by DEMETER S. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.06.004
223. Physical mechanism and mathematical modeling of earthquake ionospheric precursors registered in total electron content A. Namgaladze et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793209020169
224. Optimal Setting of Earthquake-Related Ionospheric TEC (Total Electron Content) Anomalies Detection Methods: Long-Term Validation over the Italian Region R. Colonna et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13050150
225. Multi-satellite based possible precursory signals detection linked to the 2024 Mw 7.5 Noto Peninsula Japan earthquake R. Shahzad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.015
226. Atmospheric precursors from multiple satellites associated with the 2020 Mw 6.5 Idaho (USA) earthquake M. Qasim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.057
227. Study of the Preparation Phase of Turkey’s Powerful Earthquake (6 February 2023) by a Geophysical Multi-Parametric Fuzzy Inference System M. Akhoondzadeh & D. Marchetti https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092224
228. A multi-experiment approach to ascertain electromagnetic precursors of Nepal earthquakes S. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105163
229. F-region links with the lower atmosphere? H. Rishbeth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.017
230. TEC anomalies observed before and after Sivrice-Elaziğ earthquake (24 January 2020, Mw: 6.8) S. Bulbul & F. Basciftci https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07426-3
231. Monitoring of volcanic precursors using satellite data: the case of Taftan volcano in Iran M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2024-0049
232. Anomalous modification of the ionospheric total electron content prior to the 26 September 2005 Peru earthquake I. Zakharenkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.06.003
233. Ionospheric precursors observed at low latitudes around the time of koyna earthquake K. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.026
234. Ionospheric perturbations observed due to Indonesian Earthquake (Mw = 7.4) using GPS and VLF measurements at multi-stations S. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-021-00345-5
235. Seismo ionospheric anomalies in Turkey associated with M  ≥ 6.0 earthquakes detected by GPS stations and GIM TEC M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.005
236. Seismo ionospheric anomalies before the 2007 M7.7 Chile earthquake from GPS TEC and DEMETER M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2019.05.004
237. Investigation of GPS-TEC measurements using ANN method indicating seismo-ionospheric anomalies around the time of the Chile (M= 8.2) earthquake of 01 April 2014 M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.013
238. Investigating radon and TEC anomalies relative to earthquakes via AI models A. Muhammad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106037
239. The TEC Enhancement Before Seismic Events Is an Artifact J. Eisenbeis & G. Occhipinti https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028733
240. Ionospheric electron content anomalies detected by a FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC empirical model before and after the Wenchuan Earthquake Y. Kakinami et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727788
241. Pattern and evolution of seismo‐ionospheric disturbances following the 2011 Tohoku earthquakes from GPS observations S. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019825
242. Conduction current and extraneous electric current in the global electric circuit A. Namgaladze & M. Karpov https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793115050231
243. Using a Spatial Analysis Method to Study the Seismo-Ionospheric Disturbances of Electron Density Observed by China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.811658
244. Atmospheric blocking anomalies as the synoptic precursors prior to the induced earthquakes: a new climatic conceptual model M. Mansouri Daneshvar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0731-8
245. Earthquake precursors in the light of peroxy defects theory: Critical review of systematic observations F. Freund et al. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000243-x
246. Prediction of the date, magnitude and affected area of impending strong earthquakes using integration of multi precursors earthquake parameters M. Saradjian & M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-1109-2011
247. Assessment and analysis of the global ionosphere maps over China based on CMONOC GNSS data F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1095754
248. The Seismo-Ionospheric Disturbances before the 9 June 2022 Maerkang Ms6.0 Earthquake Swarm J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111745
249. Analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the 2011 M w 9.0 Japan earthquake Y. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4851-y
250. Transient Effects in Atmosphere and Ionosphere Preceding the 2015 M7.8 and M7.3 Gorkha–Nepal Earthquakes D. Ouzounov et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.757358
251. Integrated observations on crustal strain-ionosphere total electron content anomalies before the earthquake G. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01030-7
252. A Machine Learning‐Based Detection of Earthquake Precursors Using Ionospheric Data A. Akyol et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006931
253. Investigation of ionospheric TEC changes related to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake based on statistic analysis and signal detection J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-009-0545-9
254. A fast algorithm for automatic detection of ionospheric disturbances: DROT E. Efendi & F. Arikan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.03.018
255. The 2021 La Palma volcanic eruption and its impact on ionospheric scintillation as measured from GNSS reference stations, GNSS-R and GNSS-RO C. Molina et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3671-2023
256. Investigation of Lushan earthquake ionosphere VTEC anomalies based on GPS data W. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-013-0013-4
257. Modeling of local disturbance formation in the ionosphere electron concentration before strong earthquakes M. Klimenko et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.07.004
258. Ionospheric perturbations associated with two recent major earthquakes (M>5.0) S. Priyadarshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/84/04/045901
259. Deprem ve Troposfer İlişkisi: Şili Örneği G. GÜRBÜZ & K. KOÇYİĞİT https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.823640
260. Three attempts of earthquake prediction with satellite cloud images G. Guangmeng & Y. Jie https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-91-2013
261. Specific features of ionospheric total electron content variations in the periods of preparation of the earthquakes on March 11, 2011 (Japan) and October 23, 2011 (Turkey) O. Zolotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793113050266
262. Preliminary proposal of scientific data verification in CSES mission L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-015-0131-2
263. Intensity Variations of OI 557.7 nm and OI 630.0 nm Lines before M5.0 and Greater Earthquakes in Tokyo Region, Japan, in 1979 to 1990 P. Gole et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856018060210
264. &quot;Real time analysis&quot; of the ion density measured by the satellite DEMETER in relation with the seismic activity M. Li & M. Parrot https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2957-2012
265. AdaBoost-powered multi-class classification of pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies using GNSS network in Türkiye: A comparison with random forest S. Karatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-026-02109-7
266. Atmospheric Anomalies Associated with the 2021 Mw 7.2 Haiti Earthquake Using Machine Learning from Multiple Satellites M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214782
267. Ionospheric anomalies related to strong earthquakes in North America as observed by TEC S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.026
268. Ionospheric Anomalies Due to Nepal Earthquake-2015 as Observed from GPS-TEC Data B. Ghimire & N. Chapagain https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222040041
269. Accurate classification of fresh and charred grape seeds to the varietal level, using machine learning based classification method V. Landa et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92559-4
270. Predicting the Magnitude and Time of an Upcoming Strong Earthquake Using Satellite-Based Seismo-LAI Anomalies . Mehdi Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793225600043
271. TEC anomalies assessment for earthquakes precursors in North-Eastern India and adjoining region using GPS data acquired during 2012–2018 G. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.07.009
272. Seismic Foresight: A Novel Multi-Input 1D Convolutional Mixer Model for Earthquake Prediction Using Ionospheric Signals H. Uyanik et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3583749
273. Spatio-temporal features of seismo-ionospheric influence revealed by the Swarm-B satellite M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.08.025
274. Study of Ionospheric TEC from GPS observations and comparisons with IRI and SPIM model predictions in the low latitude anomaly Indian subcontinental region S. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.09.004
275. A Disturbance Frequency Index in Earthquake Forecast Using Radio Occultation Data T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123089
276. Anomalous changes in ionospheric TEC during an earthquake event of 13–14 April 2010 in the Chinese sector M. Aggarwal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.07.007
277. Use of principal component analysis in the identification of the spatial pattern of an ionospheric total electron content anomalies after China’s May 12, 2008, M= 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake L. Jyh-Woei https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.01.013
278. Assessing seismo-ionospheric disturbances using Vanuatu and Honshu earthquakes of March 25, 2007, employing DEMETER and GPS data A. Akpan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02339-x
279. Pre-Seismic Irregularities during the 2020 Samos (Greece) Earthquake (M = 6.9) as Investigated from Multi-Parameter Approach by Ground and Space-Based Techniques S. Sasmal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12081059
280. Identification of Seismogenic Anomalies Induced by 11 April, 2012 Indonesian Earthquake (M = 8.5) at Indian Latitudes Using GPS-TEC and ULF/VLF Measurements . Devbrat Pundhir et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221030129
281. Verification of the concept of seismoionospheric coupling under quiet heliogeomagnetic conditions, using the Wenchuan (China) earthquake of May 12, 2008, as an example S. Pulinets et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793210020118
282. Simulation of seismo-ionospheric effects initiated by internal gravity waves M. Klimenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793111030109
283. A GNSS-based near real time automatic Earth Crust and Atmosphere Monitoring Service for Turkey G. Gurbuz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.07.026
284. Ionospheric VTEC anomalies before Ms7.1 Yushu earthquake X. Jing et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2011.00048
285. Analysis of ionospheric TEC from GNSS observables over the Turkish region and predictability of IRI and SPIM models K. Ansari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3043-x
286. Application of the T2-Hotelling test for investigating ionospheric anomalies before large earthquakes Z. Sadeghi & M. Mashhadi-Hossainali https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.01.010
287. Revealing Short-Term Precursors of the Strong M > 7 Earthquakes in Southern California From the Simulated Stress–Strain State Patterns Exploiting Geomechanical Model and Seismic Catalog Data V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.571700
288. Design of an Air Conductivity Meter for Earthquake Anomaly Detection via Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling Mechanism With Effective Range of 10–15–10–9 S/m Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.3597009
289. A combined approach using b-value and ionospheric GPS-TEC for large earthquake precursor detection: a case study for the Colima earthquake of 7.7 Mw, Mexico K. Nayak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-023-00430-x
290. ARIMA model simulation for total electron content, earthquake and radon relationship identification S. Keskin & F. Külahcı https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05622-2
291. Ionospheric anomalies associated with the Mw 7.3 Iran–Iraq border earthquake and a moderate magnetic storm E. Şentürk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1031-2020
292. Precursory signature of several major earthquakes studied using 40 kHz low frequency signal A. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.024
293. A Multi-Parametric Investigation of Seismogenic Signals: A Case Study of the 2018 Aomori Earthquake (Mw 6.2) K. Nanda et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2026.152002
294. Genetic algorithm for TEC seismo-ionospheric anomalies detection around the time of the Solomon (M= 8.0) earthquake of 06 February 2013 M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.012
295. Combining Swarm Langmuir probe observations, LEO-POD-based and ground-based GNSS receivers and ionosondes for prompt detection of ionospheric earthquake and tsunami signatures: case study of 2015 Chile-Illapel event W. Jarmołowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021042
296. Resonant mode in the Earth’s thermosphere O. Cheremnykh https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2011.06.074
297. Low-Latitude Atmosphere-Ionosphere Effects Initiated by Strong Earthquakes Preparation Process S. Pulinets https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/131842
298. Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013698
299. Earthquake magnitude prediction using the Dempster–Shafer fusion-based method and remote sensing data M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2025.2557223
300. Support vector machines for TEC seismo-ionospheric anomalies detection M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-173-2013
301. Ionospheric total electron content variations prior to the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727622
302. A statistical analysis of seismo-ionospheric TEC anomalies before 63 Mw ≥ 5.0 earthquakes in Turkey during 2003–2016 E. Şentürk & M. Çepni https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0214-2
303. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies of the GPS-TEC appear before the 12 May 2008 magnitude 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake H. Jhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727796
304. Toward a unified solid state theory for pre-earthquake signals F. Freund https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-009-0066-x
305. Changes in total electron content associated with earthquakes (M > 5) observed from GPS station, Varanasi, India S. Priyadarshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2011.563390
306. A Multi-Network based Hybrid LSTM model for ionospheric anomaly detection: A case study of the Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake E. Şentürk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.057
307. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Pre-Seismic Ionospheric Anomaly Prior to the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw9.0) S. Hirooka et al. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.136.265
308. Temporal and spatial characteristics of VTEC anomalies before Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2010.00023
309. Seismo ionospheric anomalies possibly associated with the 2018 M 8.2 Fiji earthquake detected with GNSS TEC A. Kiyani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2020.101782
310. Strong earthquakes associated with high amplitude daily geomagnetic variations T. Rabeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9449-1
311. Earthquake precursory detection using diurnal GPS-TEC and kriging interpolation maps: 12 May 2008, Mw7.9 Wenchuan case study P. Thammaboribal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101617
312. Change in refractivity of the atmosphere and large variation in TEC associated with some earthquakes, observed from GPS receiver S. Karia & K. Pathak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.019
313. Co-seismic and Post-seismic Changes in ZTD and TEC of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake A. Akilan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02830-y
314. Seismo-Ionospheric Effects Prior to Two Earthquakes in Taiwan Detected by the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite Y. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13091523
315. Nonlinear Frequency Down-Conversion of Acoustic Wave Beams in the Atmosphere and Ionosphere Under Different Types of Modulation V. Grimalsky et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3980603
316. TEC variations analysis concerning Haiti (January 12, 2010) and Samoa (September 29, 2009) earthquakes M. Akhoondzadeh & M. Saradjian https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.024
317. Bayesian fusion of satellite-based precursors for upcoming large earthquake magnitude prediction M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2026.2613390
318. Anomaly Classification for Earthquake Prediction in Radon Time Series Data Using Stacking and Automatic Anomaly Indication Function A. Mir et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02736-9
319. Integrated Analysis of Multi-Parameter Precursors to the Fukushima Offshore Earthquake (Mj = 7.3) on 13 February 2021 and Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling Channels M. Hayakawa & Y. Hobara https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15081015
320. Signature of seismic activities in the F2 region ionospheric electron temperature D. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.01.005
321. Ionospheric electron density anomaly prior to the December 26, 2006 M7.0 Pingtung earthquake doublet observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC C. Hsiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.058
322. Detecting seismic IR anomalies in bi-angular Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer data P. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2065-2013
323. Investigation of total electron content variability due to seismic and geomagnetic disturbances in the ionosphere S. Karatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RS004313
324. Precursory phenomena observed in the total electron content measurements before great Hokkaido earthquake of September 25, 2003 (M = 8.3) I. Zakharenkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-007-0014-7
325. Physical interpretation and mathematical simulation of ionospheric precursors of earthquakes at midlatitudes O. Zolotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212030152
326. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies in total electron content of the GIM and electron density of DEMETER before the 27 February 2010 M8.8 Chile earthquake Y. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.02.006
327. A study for local disturbances of ionospheric TEC prior to strong earthquakes J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2649447
328. On diurnal dependence and spatial scales of seismo-ionospheric effects in the E-layer E. Liperovskaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.01.008
329. Comparisons of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short term memory (LSTM) network models for ionospheric anomalies detection: a study on Haiti (Mw = 7.0) earthquake M. Saqib et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-021-00371-3
330. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Electromagnetic Signals as a Possible Precursory Warning of Incoming Seismic Activity V. Tritakis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040457
331. Total Electron Content Anomalies Before Mw 6.0+ Earthquakes in the Seismic Zone of Southwest China Between 2001 and 2013 J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160032
332. Manifestations of the earthquake preparations in the ionosphere total electron content variations A. Namgaladze et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2012.411113
333. Monitoring of disturbances in a local spatio-temporal region of the ionosphere from data of a network of receiving stations for satellite radio navigation signals V. Dedenok et al. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2011.06.068
334. Anomalous TEC variations associated with the strong Pakistan-Iran border region earthquake of 16 April 2013 at a low latitude station Agra, India D. Pundhir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.012
335. Response of the ionospheric electron density to different types of seismic events Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2173-2011
336. Deprem Kaynaklı Olabilecek İyonosferik Değişimlerin Belirlenmesi üzerine yeni bir yaklaşım geliştirilmesi S. İNYURT et al. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.592477
337. Towards Understanding Earthquake Preparatory Dynamics: A Multi-Parametric Investigation of the 2025 Kamchatka Mw 8.8 Event S. Sasmal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16121328
338. Ionospheric anomalies preceding the low-latitude earthquake that occurred on April 16, 2016 in Ecuador C. Sotomayor-Beltran https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.11.003
339. Challenges in the Detection of Ionospheric Pre-Earthquake Total Electron Content Anomalies (PETA) for Earthquake Forewarning B. Lim & E. Leong https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2083-7
340. Two-stage modeling of ionospheric TEC for earthquake precursors: forecasting with LSTM, GRU, RNN and classification via Random Forest based on the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes C. Budak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.018
341. Analysis of ionospheric vertical total electron content before the 1 April 2014 Mw 8.2 Chile earthquake W. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9684-y
342. Analysis of ionospheric TEC anomalies for global earthquakes during 2000-2019 with respect to earthquake magnitude (Mw≥6.0) M. Ulukavak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2020.101721
343. Pre-earthquake Ionospheric Anomalies and Ionospheric Storms Observed by FORMOSAT-5/AIP and GIM TEC J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-023-09807-7
344. On the significance of requisite criteria in detecting pre-earthquake ionospheric precursors: a case study of the Tohoku earthquake of March 11, 2011 V. Chukwuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00627-0
345. Seismogenic Anomalies in Atmospheric Gravity Waves as Observed from SABER/TIMED Satellite during Large Earthquakes S. Kundu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3201104
346. Observation of Atmospheric and Ionospheric Anomalies before the Nepal Earthquakes on 25th April and 12th May 2015 C. Simha et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852124700158
347. Ionospheric precursors to large earthquakes: A case study of the 2011 Japanese Tohoku Earthquake B. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.006
348. Detection of Effects of Shallow Major Earthquakes (M ≥ 5.0, depth ≤ 30 km) Occurred in India, Nepal, and China on Ionosphere Using Statistical Approaches R. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793224600887
349. Remote Sensing of Atmospheric and Ionospheric Signals Prior to the Mw 8.3 Illapel Earthquake, Chile 2015 M. Mansouri Daneshvar & F. Freund https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1366-0
350. Estimation of the date and magnitude of impending massive earthquakes using the integration of precursors obtainable from remote sensing data M. Khoshgoftar & M. Saradjian https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v28n4.105079
351. Ionospheric and atmospheric perturbations due to two major earthquakes (M >7.0) S. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01650-x
352. Detection of the ionospheric disturbances on GPS-TEC using Differential Rate Of TEC (DROT) algorithm S. Karatay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.042
353. Atmosphere-ionosphere response to the M9 Tohoku earthquake revealed by multi-instrument space-borne and ground observations: Preliminary results D. Ouzounov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0817-z
354. Pre-earthquake signals: Underlying physical processes F. Freund https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.009
355. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies before the 2019 Mirpur earthquake from ionosonde measurements J. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.030
356. Modification in Atmospheric Refractivity and GPS Based TEC as Earthquake Precursors S. P. Karia et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/pos.2014.52006
357. An integrated study of anomalies observed before four major earthquakes: 2004 Sumatra M9.3, 2006 Pingtung M7.0, 2007 Chuetsu Oki M6.8, and 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.012
358. Pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies before three major earthquakes by GPS-TEC and GIM-TEC data during 2015–2017 M. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.12.028
359. Decline of geomagnetic and ionospheric activity at earthquake during spotless Sun T. Gulyaeva https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.10.069
360. Variations of equatorial electrojet as possible seismo-ionospheric precursor at the occurrence of TEC anomalies before strong earthquake M. Klimenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.10.017
361. The ionospheric anomalies prior to the M9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake H. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.034
362. Kalman Filter, ANN-MLP, LSTM and ACO Methods Showing Anomalous GPS-TEC Variations Concerning Turkey’s Powerful Earthquake (6 February 2023) M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123061
363. Monitoring of Ionospheric Anomalies Using GNSS Observations to Detect Earthquake Precursors N. Perfetti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020338
364. High-resolution vertical total electron content maps based on multi-scale B-spline representations A. Goss et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-699-2019
365. Variations of ionospheric profile parameters during solar maximum and comparison with IRI-2007 over Chung-Li, Taiwan Y. Chuo https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1249-2012
366. Ionosphere Sounding for Pre-seismic Anomalies Identification (INSPIRE): Results of the Project and Perspectives for the Short-Term Earthquake Forecast S. Pulinets et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.610193
367. Deep Machine Learning Based Possible Atmospheric and Ionospheric Precursors of the 2021 Mw 7.1 Japan Earthquake M. Draz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071904
368. A study of NOAA particle flux sensitivity to solar activity and strategies to search for correlations among satellite data and earthquake phenomena C. Fidani et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.638337
369. An Investigation of Pre-Seismic Ionospheric TEC and Acoustic–Gravity Wave Coupling Phenomena Using BDS GEO Measurements: A Case Study of the 2023 Jishishan Ms6.2 Earthquake X. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17132296
370. Modulation of total electron content by global Pc5 waves at low latitudes E. Vorontsova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.10.041
371. Ionospheric tomography of small-scale disturbances with a triband beacon: A numerical study H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RS004247
372. Possible seismo-ionospheric anomalies of Mw 6.0 and 6.4 south Iran twin earthquakes on 14 November 2021 from GPS and ionosonde observations J. Pappachen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12005-3
373. Multi-scale GNSS-TEC and GIM investigation of ionospheric perturbations triggered by the 28 March 2025 Myanmar earthquake preceded by geomagnetic storm P. Obasanjo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1791135
374. Anomalous TEC variations associated with the powerful Tohoku earthquake of 11 March 2011 M. Akhoondzadeh https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1453-2012
375. Near real-time estimation of ionosphere vertical total electron content from GNSS satellites using B-splines in a Kalman filter E. Erdogan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-263-2017
376. Robust Satellite Techniques (RST) for monitoring earthquake prone areas by satellite TIR observations: The case of 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (Taiwan) N. Genzano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.010
377. Effect of VLF electric field changes associated with major shallow earthquakes (M = 5.6–5.9) occurred in Indian subcontinent, on the atmosphere A. Yadav & R. Singh https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02688-x
378. Temporal and spatial distribution of GPS-TEC anomalies prior to the strong earthquakes F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1411-8
379. Statistical analysis of seismo-ionospheric anomalies related to Ms > 5.0 earthquakes in China by GPS TEC F. Ke et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9516-x
380. A statistical investigation of preearthquake ionospheric anomaly J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333
381. Anomalous variation in GPS TEC prior to the 11 April 2012 Sumatra earthquake F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1389-2
382. Anomalous Variations of Ionosphere Associated with the Strong Earthquake at Pakistan-Iran Border at a Low Latitude Station Agra, India D. Pundhir et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0020
383. Atmospheric, ionospheric and earth-related variations associated with the 11th August 2012 earthquakes, Ahar, Iran E. Mohamed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105595
384. Analysis of Ionospheric TEC Anomalies Using BDS High-Orbit Satellite Data: A Regional Statistical Study and a Case Study of the 2023 Jishishan Ms6.2 Earthquake X. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17244032
385. Pre-seismic ionospheric anomalies and spatio-temporal analyses of MODIS Land surface temperature and aerosols associated with Sep, 24 2013 Pakistan Earthquake A. Sekertekin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105218
386. Spatio-temporal evaluation of ionospheric disturbances before, during and after earthquakes using differential rate of TEC (DROT) from GPS measurements S. Karatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12216-1