152 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modeling of ionospheric perturbation by 2004 Sumatra tsunami C. Mai & J. Kiang https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004060
2. Possible reason of ionospheric anomaly post the April 20, 2013, Mw = 6.6 China' Lushan earthquake: Applying two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) to two-dimensional total electron content (TEC) J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377813001438
3. Detecting Seismo‐Ionospheric Anomalies Possibly Associated With the 2019 Ridgecrest (California) Earthquakes by GNSS, CSES, and Swarm Observations T. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028761
4. GNSS TEC‐Based Detection and Analysis of Acoustic‐Gravity Waves From the 2012 Sumatra Double Earthquake Sequence S. Srivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028507
5. Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Observed Over South America After Lithospheric Events: 2010–2020 M. Bravo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030060
6. Indications of the Impact of the Influence of Large-Scale Atmospheric Disturbances on Quasiperiodic ELF/VLF Emissions Inside the Plasmasphere P. Bespalov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111310
7. HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY LOCAL TERRITORIES GLOBE V. Tiutiunyk et al. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2019.00937
8. A Method for Determining Parameters of Mid-Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances A. Andreyev et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175377
9. Invariant shock-wave solutions in an equatorial shallow-water model R. Ibragimov & K. Byrd https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ae79ac
10. SPECFEM2D-DG, an open-source software modelling mechanical waves in coupled solid–fluid systems: the linearized Navier–Stokes approach L. Martire et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab308
11. Ionospheric response to Huge Gas Explosion in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, on July 31, 2014 J. Lin https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2018.57.1.1822
12. Haiti Earthquake (Mw 7.2): Magnetospheric–Ionospheric–Lithospheric Coupling during and after the Main Shock on 14 August 2021 G. D’Angelo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215340
13. New aspects of the upper atmospheric disturbances caused by the explosive eruption of the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcano A. Shinbori et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-023-01930-4
14. GNSS-derived TEC signatures of co-seismic ionospheric disturbances triggered by the Mw 7.6 Cayman Islands earthquake of 8 February 2025 S. Naik et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-026-02134-6
15. Two‐mode ionospheric response and Rayleigh wave group velocity distribution reckoned from GPS measurement following Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake on 25 April 2015 C. Reddy & G. Seemala https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021502
16. GPS detection of the coseismic ionospheric disturbances following the 12 May 2008 M7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in China Q. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5000-7
17. Giant ionospheric disturbances excited by the M9.3 Sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023963
18. Upper Atmospheric Responses to Surface Disturbances: An Observational Perspective X. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RS006858
19. Using Atmospheric Waves for the Detection and Early Warning of Natural Hazards: A Review Combining Results from the Neutral Atmosphere and the Ionosphere S. Wüst et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-025-09909-4
20. First ionospheric images of the seismic fault slip on the example of the Tohoku-oki earthquake E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049623
21. The 25 April 2015 Nepal Earthquake: Investigation of precursor in VLF subionospheric signal A. Maurya et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022721
22. Co-seismic ionospheric disturbances characteristics in different azimuths following the 2022 Mexico earthquake from GNSS observations L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01564-9
23. Ionospheric Response to the Seismic Wave Induced by the Kamchatka Earthquake on July 29, 2025 A. Oinats et al. https://doi.org/10.2205/2026es001131
24. Tracking the epicenter and the tsunami origin with GPS ionosphere observation H. Tsai et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.024
25. Threshold magnitude for Ionospheric TEC response to earthquakes N. Perevalova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.014
26. Infrasonic sounds excited by seismic waves of the 2011 Tohoku‐oki earthquake as visualized in ionograms T. Maruyama & H. Shinagawa https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019707
27. Ionospheric and geomagnetic disturbances during the 2005 Sumatran earthquakes A. Hasbi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.09.004
28. The First Near‐Real‐Time Compatible Numerical Method for Co‐Seismic Ionospheric Disturbances Simulation S. Sanchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115208
29. Inferring the Evolution of a Large Earthquake From Its Acoustic Impacts on the Ionosphere P. Inchin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000260
30. Ionospheric Anomalies Related to the (M = 7.3), August 27, 2012, Puerto Earthquake, (M = 6.8), August 30, 2012 Jan Mayen Island Earthquake, and (M = 7.6), August 31, 2012, Philippines Earthquake: Two‐Dimensional Principal Component Analysis J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/271513
31. Vertical TEC over seismically active region during low solar activity E. Astafyeva & K. Heki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.020
32. Ionospheric Anomaly due to the volcanic eruption in Colima, Mexico, 06 January 2013: Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis J. Lin https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134640
33. A case study of the three-dimensional co-seismic ionospheric disturbance evolution R. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26074-1
34. A review of GPS/GLONASS studies of the ionospheric response to natural and anthropogenic processes and phenomena E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013049
35. Detecting ionospheric disturbances using GPS without aliasing caused by non-uniform spatial sampling: Algorithm, validation and illustration K. Shimna & M. Vijayan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105400
36. Co-seismic ionospheric disturbances due to 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake S. Vashisth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2023.100148
37. Ionospheric response to submarine earthquake of March 11, 2011, in Japan according to GPS observations M. Gokhberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433811080020
38. SIMuRG: System for Ionosphere Monitoring and Research from GNSS Y. Yasyukevich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-00983-2
39. Coseismic ionospheric disturbances triggered by the Chi‐Chi earthquake J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014943
40. The impact of the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption on the Peruvian atmosphere: from the sea surface to the ionosphere E. Pacheco et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02022-7
41. Long-distance traveling ionospheric disturbances caused by the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake on 26 December 2004 E. Astafyeva & E. Afraimovich https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352607
42. A multi-instrumental study of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2024 Mw 7.4 Hualien earthquake C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-026-02424-9
43. Simultaneous infrasonic, seismic, magnetic and ionospheric observations in an earthquake epicentre J. Laštovička et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.08.005
44. Evolution of seismo-ionospheric disturbances according to the data of dense network of GPS stations V. Kiryushkin et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952511020043
45. Co-Seismic Ionospheric Disturbance with Alaska Strike-Slip Mw7.9 Earthquake on 23 January 2018 Monitored by GPS Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010083
46. Ionospheric response to the 2020 Samos earthquake and tsunami L. Alfonsi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-023-01940-2
47. Ionospheric disturbances triggered by the 25 April, 2015 M7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal: Constraints from GPS TEC measurements J. Catherine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.014
48. Modeling of atmospheric propagation of acoustic gravity waves generated by different surface sources V. Kunitsyn et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134907020142
49. Temporal and Spatial Ionospheric Variations of 20 April 2013 Earthquake in Yaan, China J. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2015.2463081
50. Pre-seismic ionospheric disturbances (PIDs) associated With 2021 Mw 7.5 Northern Peru earthquake: GNSS and ground uplift observations O. Adebayo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2025.106644
51. Monitoring of the ionosphere TEC variations during the 17th August 1999 Izmit earthquake using GPS data U. Dogan et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.07.020
52. Coseismic ionospheric disturbance of the large strike-slip earthquakes in North Sumatra in 2012: Mw dependence of the disturbance amplitudes M. Cahyadi & K. Heki https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu343
53. The 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquake Sequence as Detected in the Ionosphere B. Maletckii et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031663
54. Effects of Rayleigh-Taylor instability and ionospheric plasma bubbles on the global navigation satellite System signal D. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.11.006
55. Early warning from seismic ionospheric anomaly of the 24 May 2014, Mw = 6.4 Aegean-Sea earthquake: two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gi.2015.04.015
56. Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances Detection With Multi-GNSS Case Study: Turkey Double Earthquakes on 6 February 2023 Q. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3698826
57. Physics‐Based Modeling of Earthquake‐Induced Ionospheric Disturbances X. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025253
58. Traveling ionospheric disturbances triggered by the 2009 North Korean underground nuclear explosion X. Zhang & L. Tang https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-137-2015
59. On the Co‐Seismic Ionospheric Disturbances (CIDs) in the Rapid Run Ionosonde Observations Over Allahabad Following Mw 7.8 Nepal Earthquake on April 25, 2015 S. Sripathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027001
60. Discriminating the tectonic and non‐tectonic contributions in the ionospheric signature of the 2011, Mw7.1, dip‐slip Van earthquake, Eastern Turkey L. Rolland et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50544
61. Assessment of Morelian Meteoroid Impact on Mexican Environment M. Sergeeva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020185
62. Infrasound in the ionosphere from earthquakes and typhoons J. Chum et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.022
63. Possibility of tsunami early-warning from post-seismic ionospheric disturbance for 2 July, 2013, Mw = 6.1 Indonesia’s Bireun earthquake: Two-dimensional principal component analysis J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2014.08.001
64. Near-field co-seismic ionospheric response due to the northern Chile Mw 8.1 Pisagua earthquake on April 1, 2014 from GPS observations C. Reddy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.006
65. Ionospheric disturbances of the 2007 Bengkulu and the 2005 Nias earthquakes, Sumatra, observed with a regional GPS network M. Cahyadi & K. Heki https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50208
66. On the coseismic ionospheric disturbances after the Nepal Mw7.8 earthquake on April 25, 2015 using GNSS observations P. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.09.021
67. Ionospheric Response to the 6 February 2023 Turkey–Syria Earthquake A. Vesnin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092336
68. Acoustic-gravity waves in the Earth’s atmosphere generated by surface sources V. Kunitsyn et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134915060120
69. Нелинейная эволюция атмосферы и ионосферы над эпицентром сейсмического воздействия. Ч. 2. Численное моделирование, "Геомагнетизм и аэрономия" В. Павлов & С. Лебедев https://doi.org/10.7868/S0016794017040149
70. Acoustic resonance and plasma depletion detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake A. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.034
71. Detection of ionospheric response to earthquakes in Mexico: case study of September 8, 2021 and September 19, 2022 A. Melgarejo-Morales et al. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.1.1774
72. Ionospheric anomaly related to M=6.6, 26 August 2012, Tobelo earthquake near Indonesia: two-dimensional principal component analysis J. Lin https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-013-0024-6
73. Dependence of waveform of near-field coseismic ionospheric disturbances on focal mechanisms E. Astafyeva & K. Heki https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353206
74. TEC variations over the Mediterranean before and during the strong earthquake ( M = 6.5) of 12th October 2013 in Crete, Greece M. Contadakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.03.010
75. Analyzing subtle features of natural time series by means of a wavelet-based approach O. Mandrikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661812020083
76. Study of the 2013 Lushan M7.0 earthquake coseismic ionospheric disturbances P. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.014
77. GNSS-based automated detection of the 2025 Kamchatka tsunami 30 minutes before landfall using GUARDIAN C. Martire et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08151-4
78. Seismo‐Ionospheric Observations, Modeling, and Backprojection of the 2016 Kaikōura Earthquake R. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170299
79. Giant ionospheric disturbances observed with the SuperDARN Hokkaido HF radar and GPS network after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake T. Ogawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.08.001
80. Two‐Azimuth Co‐Seismic Ionospheric Disturbances Following the 2020 Jamaica Earthquake From GPS Observations Y. Chai & S. Jin https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028995
81. The Upper Atmospheric Radiation of the Earth in the [OI] 557.7 nm Emission in Connection with the January 11, 2021, Khövsgöl Earthquake (Southwestern Flank of the Baikal Rift Zone) A. Klyuchevskii et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X22060083
82. Anomalous variation in GPS TEC prior to the 11 April 2012 Sumatra earthquake F. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1389-2
83. Seismic and ionospheric disturbances caused by the 3 September 2017 underground nuclear test in North Korea N. Perevalova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.02.005
84. Nonlinear evolution of the atmosphere above a seismic epicenter: 1. Analytical estimates V. Pavlov & S. Lebedev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793213060091
85. Determining the parameters of ionospheric perturbation caused by earthquakes using the quasi-optimum algorithm of spatiotemporal processing of TEC measurements V. Kiryushkin & E. Afraimovich https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353104
86. Ionospheric GNSS Imagery of Seismic Source: Possibilities, Difficulties, and Challenges E. Astafyeva & K. Shults https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026107
87. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ZONING OF LOCAL TERRITORIES OF THE GLOBE BY QUANTITY AND DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY OF TECTONIC EXTREME ORIGIN SITUATIONS V. Tiutiunyk et al. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2020-1-154-272-287
88. Rayleigh wave signature in ionograms induced by strong earthquakes T. Maruyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017952
89. Detection and modeling of Rayleigh wave induced patterns in the ionosphere L. Rolland et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016060
90. The First Evidence for the Detection of CIDs Masked by Equatorial Plasma Bubbles From GPS‐TEC Data R. Rajesh & J. Catherine https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029798
91. Monitoring Seismo-TEC Perturbations Utilizing the Beidou Geostationary Satellites F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102608
92. Multi‐Instrument Observations of Various Ionospheric Disturbances Caused by the 6 February 2023 Turkey Earthquake H. Haralambous et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031691
93. Variations of the total electron content in the ionosphere from GPS data recorded during the Hector Mine earthquake of October 16, 1999, California E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.2205/2004ES000155
94. Co-seismic ionospheric and deformation signals on the 2008 magnitude 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake from GPS observations S. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727739
95. Co-seismic ionospheric GPS-TEC disturbances from different source characteristic earthquakes in the Himalaya and the adjoining regions P. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2018.05.009
96. Unveiling the vertical ionospheric responses following the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake with an ultra-dense GNSS network W. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02211-y
97. Ionospheric effects of the solar flares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999 as deduced from global GPS network data E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00060-8
98. IonoSeis: A Package to Model Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances T. Mikesell et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080443
99. The ionospheric response to the acoustic signal from submarine earthquakes according to the GPS data M. Gokhberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351314010054
100. The use of GPS arrays in detecting shock-acoustic waves generated during rocket launchings E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00071-2
101. Wave Signatures in Total Electron Content Variations: Filtering Problems B. Maletckii et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081340
102. Ionospheric Detection of Natural Hazards E. Astafyeva https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000668
103. Determining spatio-temporal characteristics of coseismic travelling ionospheric disturbances (CTID) in near real-time B. Maletckii & E. Astafyeva https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99906-5
104. Relating Far‐Field Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances to Geological Structures H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029209
105. Ionospheric response to earthquakes of different magnitudes: Larger quakes perturb the ionosphere stronger and longer E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398
106. Nonlinear evolution of the atmosphere and ionosphere above a seismic epicenter. II. Numerical simulation V. Pavlov & S. Lebedev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793217040144
107. A method for detecting ionospheric disturbances and estimating their propagation speed and direction using a large GPS network J. Garrison et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RS003657
108. Global Positioning System detection and energy estimation of the ionospheric wave caused by the 13 July 2003 explosion of the Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat T. Dautermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005722
109. Research of the Wear Rate of Elements of the Flow Part of Centrifugal and Axial Pumping Units B. Uralov et al. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/101/44
110. Strike-slip earthquakes can also be detected in the ionosphere E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.024
111. Method for modeling of the components of ionospheric parameter time variations and detection of anomalies in the ionosphere O. Mandrikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0301-4
112. Possible seismo-ionospheric anomalies of Mw 6.0 and 6.4 south Iran twin earthquakes on 14 November 2021 from GPS and ionosonde observations J. Pappachen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12005-3
113. The 2017 August 21 American total solar eclipse through the eyes of GPS B. Kundu et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy149
114. Detection of ionospheric perturbations using a dense GPS array in Southern California E. Calais et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017708
115. Ground-based GPS imaging of ionospheric post-seismic signal P. Lognonné et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.021
116. Ionospheric GPS total electron content (TEC) disturbances triggered by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011200
117. Method of ionospheric data analysis based on a combination of wavelet transform and neural networks O. Mandrikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.622
118. Localization of the source of ionospheric disturbance generated during an earthquake E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GI000092
119. Nonlinear acoustic waves in the viscous thermosphere and ionosphere above earthquake J. Chum et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023450
120. Multi-dimensional distribution of near-field ionospheric disturbances produced by the 2015 Mw7.8 Nepal earthquake J. Tang & Y. Yuan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.07.039
121. Ionospheric disturbances observed over Japan following the eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai on 15 January 2022 S. Saito https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01619-0
122. From Sumatra 2004 to Tohoku‐Oki 2011: The systematic GPS detection of the ionospheric signature induced by tsunamigenic earthquakes G. Occhipinti et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50322
123. Numerical Solution of the Atmospheric Perturbations Triggered by Persistent Lithospheric Vibrations K. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133336
124. Vertical midscale ionospheric disturbances caused by surface seismic waves based on Irkutsk chirp ionosonde data in 2011–2016 O. Berngardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023511
125. Ionospheric Plasma Response to M w 8.3 Chile Illapel Earthquake on September 16, 2015 C. Reddy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1282-3
126. Geomagnetic Effects of Remote Earthquakes B. Gavrilov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221010047
127. A New Analytical Simulation Code of Acoustic-Gravity Waves of Seismic Origin and Rapid Co-Seismic Thermospheric Disturbance Energetics S. Sanchez & E. Kherani https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15050592
128. Near-field TEC response to the main shock of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2009.07.002
129. Analysis of the dynamics of ionospheric parameters during periods of increased solar activity and magnetic storms O. Mandrikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.019
130. Ionospheric Disturbance in the Near-Field Area of the Epicenter of the September 25, 2003 Hokkaido Earthquake E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-005-0067-9
131. TEC response to the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in comparison with other strong earthquakes E. Afraimovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727747
132. Ionospheric Anomaly associated with Xiaolin Mudslide following Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan: Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (2DPCA) J. Lin https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20154838
133. Spatial manifestation of resonant ionospheric signatures during the 11 March 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake S. Nayak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.01.027
134. Energy partitioning and impulse dispersion in the decorated, tapered, strongly nonlinear granular alignment: A system with many potential applications R. Doney et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3190485
135. Lithosphere���atmosphere���ionosphere coupling after the 2003 explosive eruption of the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat T. Dautermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04390.x
136. Pattern and evolution of seismo‐ionospheric disturbances following the 2011 Tohoku earthquakes from GPS observations S. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019825
137. Dichotomy in mode propagation of coseismic ionospheric disturbance: Observations from 11 April 2012 Indian Ocean earthquake J. Catherine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020621
138. Geomagnetic field fluctuations during Chuysk earthquakes on September – October, 2003 https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2019-31-09
139. Analysis of Ionospheric Disturbances Caused by the 2018 Bering Sea Meteor Explosion Based on GPS Observations Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113201
140. Ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2015 M7.8 Nepal earthquake Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.04.004
141. Study of the ionospheric total electron content response to the great flare on 15 April 2001 using the International GPS Service network for the whole sunlit hemisphere D. Zhang & Z. Xiao https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009822
142. Response of the ionosphere to the seismic trigerred acoustic waves: electron density and electromagnetic fluctuations E. Kherani et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03818.x
143. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies associated with Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake on 2015 April 25 from CMONOC GPS data K. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-019-0038-3
144. Atmospheric Pressure Waves Generated from Large Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Large Volcanic Eruptions T. MIKUMO https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin.64.47
145. Ionospheric response to Kuril undersea earthquakes according to GPS satellite data M. Gokhberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433811090052
146. GPS detection of ionospheric Rayleigh wave and its source following the 2012 Haida Gwaii earthquake S. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023727
147. Resonant signals in the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18887-1
148. Ionospheric detection and localization of volcano eruptions on the example of the April 2015 Calbuco events K. Shults et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023382
149. Characterizing the Complex Two N‐Wave Ionospheric Signature of the 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025376
150. Two‐mode long‐distance propagation of coseismic ionosphere disturbances E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013853
151. Parameters of seismic source as deduced from 1 Hz ionospheric GPS data: Case study of the 2011 Tohoku‐oki event E. Astafyeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50556
152. Ionospheric and geomagnetic disturbances caused by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: A revisit B. Zhao & Y. Hao https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021035